>>25736575 Topkek, not knowing the history of gam3r gurlz >Be the release of the last console generation >Gamers of the time had been fapping to bikini clad/naked female game characters since Custers Revenge >They had grown tired of this >At this point, the Chads, growing interested in games more and more since the advent of shovelware fps's and similar games, had integrated into the gamers ranks >Gaming became more and more mainstream as a result >Stacys did not take notice, they could get chads easily by flashing their tits, and did not need to feign interest in a new medium to get tha cock >A few Stacys however, at least, did notice, and started to play games themselves >They were, for all intents and purposes, indistinguishable from their Chad-gamer counterparts >Until the pictures came >Nobody knows why, but pictures of Stacy's holding Xbox controllers were released onto facebook >The world at large didn't give a fuck >The gamers however, did notice >The idea of someone with breasts genuinely enjoying games was shocking and confusing to the gamers >Outrage was seen, some gamers thought they were "fake gam3r gurlz" pretending to like games to get the cock >Others thought they were "Lovely m'ladies," perfect for the sperg-dicking. >The Chads and Stacys mostly went unscathed by this, being of too high social status for the autistic gamers to ever say a word to them >The autistic female gamers however, were not >At that point, it was impossible to have a female name in your IGN without being called a faker and a retarded bitch >Many lulz were had by trolls with fake names, and many tears were had by ingame traps >But now, online games were a place of ridicule for anyone with tits and a vag >All because of a few pictures of someone with a pretty face and fake tits playing shovelware coverbased shooters with her quarterback boyfriend.
tl;dr: Nah, gamers are just too autistic to handle the growth of their own medium.
>>25737006 >Chads, growing interested in games more and more since the advent of shovelware fps's and similar games, Shovelware is the result of Chads, not vice-versa. You think the people who were playing Thief and Deus Ex in the early 00's would be interested in fucking Candy Crush? Before Chads entered the hobby there was no market for those stupid mobile games because the people who played games took the hobby seriously.
Pic related is what you're trying but failing to articulate.
My sister showed me video games when I was growing up. We played Spyro and Starcraft together. She still plays games but it's mostly Elder Scrolls and yearly AAA releases. She has kids now that look up to me because they both like videogames and I help them out from time to time and let them play my 3DS when they're at my house. Also have her boyfriend added on steam and she plays his games alot
in college I fugged a girl who was really into gaming and anime. her dvd shelf looked about like this. I'm not sure what games she played but they were weird rpgs beyond my power level. she was below average looking and a below average lay, but was kind of a whore.
>>25736575 Anyone who plays online games is a faggot anyway.
>inb4 who said anything about online games
If you're not playing online, then what the fuck does it matter who else plays games? You'll never encounter them in-game anyway, so what's the issue?
>inb4 online games aren't shit
Online games are universally shit. Just a platform for faggots to showboat how much money they're willing to steal from their parents to spend on micro-transactions for avatar upgrades and cancerous shit like that. I defy you to name one example of a game that was genuinely improved by online multiplayer, aside from like, maybe l4d.
>>25737633 I disagree, dedicating my resources, time, and energy to manipulating 1s and 0s is a proper way for an adult to spend his or her prime years. I mean come on, it is 2016. Come to the GEEK side! :)))
>>25737852 Because your particular brand of escapism is so much better than theirs? What? Television is okay; fantasy novels are okay; music is okay; opera is okay; exercising is okay; shitposting on /r9k/ is okay?
>>25737852 Really? When is too late, anon? When is YOUR arbitrary date when the jews will fly down on their stealth bombers and nuke everyone who owns an xbox or whatever? What makes your random suspicions for the downfall of society different from every other faggot with a god complex and delusions of persecution?
>>25737006 >I am so mad that I cannot use my privilege as a female (my tits and vagina hole) to garner attention that I have constructed an elaborate and fantastical excuse from an unexpectedly small detail concerning the hobby I do not belong in
>>25737908 I don't read fantasy novels, watch television, or shitpost, you projecting manchild.
The rest of those are either self-improvement or have artistic and enriching value. I don't "escape", I improve, learn, and grow. You're just a drug addict who's too scared to use needles.
>>25737942 Before you end up as permanently gone hermit wild boys. I don't expect society to collapse like in your video games and fantasy universes, but you can break yourself past the point of no return.
>>25736575 yeah but they usually have pleb taste and expect special treatment for playing video games, youre better off just hanging with guys that play games if a gamer gf really appeals to you then you can introduce a none gamer to the hobby and if they like it great, if they dont oh well you still have a gf
>>25737264 mount & blade just cause 2 any number of shooters (or indeed competitive games in general) in which another player will always make for a better opponent than an ai because ai isnt nearly that advanced
>>25738344 You on the other hand sound actually afraid to be wrong. You are so close minded that you can't even see a glimpse of a possibility that there is more merit to things than you already know. >hurr hurr you are a drug addict Did you know that narcissism can be addicted? So you are too a drug addict of a different kind.
>>25738429 >fine art >created to provoke contemplation and deep thought
>video games >created to sell consumer electronics to commoners, create lifetime customers in the form of addicts by targeting children with marketing, and facilitate escapism exactly the way that drugs do
Yeah, exactly the same. Nobody's trying to keep you stupid and eager to consume with an easy drip of dopamine. It's just FUN bros :^)
>>25738466 >projecting your addictions on me >LOL YOU'RE AN ADDICT TOO HAHA SEE IT'S NORMAL
>>25738530 "Fine art" was, for the most part, funded by the rich as a form of entertainment. It was a money sink for them no different then contemporary time sinks. Schubert wrote because it was his passion but died poor and alone with syphalis because nobody wanted to purchase his time sink. Mozart, however, was heavily funded by the rich for entertainment. Fine art is only fine because you have made the arbitrary distinction between "art funded by a monarch" and "art funded by non-monarchical consumers."
>>25738530 I didn't say its normal. Addictions are all around bad and everything should be done in moderation. But you should accept you have a problem before actually attacking other people for a similar issue. Because what you are doing is I do believe called "projecting".
>>25738616 It doesn't matter who funds it if it has no thought-provoking value. Financially well-off people can and do fund and encourage mindless escapism, too. Fine art is as fine as the depth to its meaning and the skill needed to create it.
Video games, by their nature of being mindless dopamine-mines and money sinks, will never be fine art.
>>25738662 >It's you that has the problem >There's nothing wrong with my dependency on video games, it's you that's wrong for trying to tell me about it! >I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM!!!
>>25738891 I agree that this perspective leads to degenerate works of art but that's why I don't go to art galleries that have those pictures. You can accept the fact the all art is meaningless while adding your own synthetic meaning as you have obviously done but you can't take your meaning and make it a real meaning. You view games as degenerate while praising an opera based on your own subjective preferences.
>>25739010 No, it's a recipe for an existentialist interpretation of the inherent meaninglessness of art. We both find high definition photography of anuses degenerate simply because our subjective preferences line up.
The only reasons for wanting to enforce a a definition of fine art versus art are either to stroke your intellectual ego or to attempt to subjugate human emotion and experience thereby enforcing your morality on them. In either case art is still meaningless.
>>25739182 >No, it's a recipe for an existentialist interpretation of the inherent meaninglessness of art. Which invariably leads to degeneracy, a devaluation in art being produced, and reversion back to the jungle.
>either to stroke your intellectual ego or to attempt to subjugate human emotion and experience thereby enforcing your morality on them Or to help guide a healthy society not filled with hedonistic beasts.
"Human emotion and experience" doesn't have to be depraved, nihilistic filth. To "just do whatever feels good" is the way of the beast. Which, of course, you probably consider humans to be no different from whatsoever.
>In either case art is still meaningless. Baby's first rebellion.
>>25739314 >Or to help guide a healthy society not filled with hedonistic beasts. So what I said: subjugate humanity. That's fine as long as you are open and honest about it. I'd vote National Socialist and burn high fidelity photos of anus' as quick as you would but don't pretend their exists a meaning in any art form beyond entertainment. Sure, make some abstracted difference between base enjoyment and intellectual enjoyment and you may have some grounding to work with but so far you just say "fine art is good video games and anus' are bad."
>>25739477 >So what I said: subjugate humanity. Again, "Human emotion and experience" doesn't have to be depraved, nihilistic filth.
Perhaps if "human emotion and experience" is vile, degenerate, beastly brutality and stupidity, then it does need to be subjugated. Then "subjugation" might even be a virtue. Self-control and planning are what helped bring is to greatness.
>>25739477 >base enjoyment and intellectual enjoyment Isn't that the crucial difference? Enjoyment that helps you build yourself up and grow, rather than the temporary dopamine release that drugs provide. That's a massive difference and all the distinction necessary.
>>25739538 The reasoning faculty. The only definitive element humanity has. >were just apes bro lmao r/atheism might be more your speed.
>>25739538 Well for one we have an intellect that allows us to form abstractions and morality. We are able to think about cause and effect in abstract ways such that we at least appear much above the animal. I'm not even him. I'm the other guy.
>>25737105 >Before Chads entered the hobby there was no market for those stupid mobile games That's because before chads entered the hobby there was no consumer market for advanced cellphones that are commonplace nowadays. Mobile phones happened to "casualize" at the same time as video games, which ended up being very profitable for some.
>>25737306 Sometimes I wonder if autists that obsessed over tabletop games before vidya got big ever get butthurt when they hear that kids that have never touched a proper game outside of computers that do all the counting for them call themselves "gamers"
>>25739619 Base enjoyment is very easily defined: titilation, essentially. Intellectual enjoyment is much more difficult to define. Something Fred finds fascinating may bore Bob to death and vice versa. Not to mention it's very easy to delve into this pseudo-intellectualism and proclaim the a picture of a mans anus on display is representative of the "destruction of the patriarchy by showing the world a mans shame." How do you make the split between your intellectualism and the intellectualism of the feminists proclaiming their vaginas to be art?
If that is you basis of characterization then our opinions are more closely aligned then it at first appeared.
>>25736575 Yeah there's this one on this CS:GO server that's pretty cool. She's genuinely good and has a demeanor similar to the rest of the guys on the server when she talks, which isn't too much. She's also one of the first ones to call out other gamer girls for being annoying attention-whoring cunts. Kind of like a girl gamer uncle Tom.
>>25739822 That's what I'm implying, yea. Let me know when a gorilla can do differentials or when a dolphin can start farming or when a cheetah delelopes an abstracted thought process and proclaims to the others that killing animals is bad and we should be vegans.
>>25737317 I don't disagree with you, but keep in mind you're on a board where the general culture is about being far from what is considered a "normal" adult.
Your post is actually a great example of how much this board's culture has changed over the past year. We have so many normies on here now that people are complaining that too much of the general population is acting too childish.
I have never done this before, but in all seriousness
GET OUT! OUT OUT OUT! OOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUTTTTTTT!!!!
>>25739792 >How do you make the split between your intellectualism and the intellectualism of the feminists proclaiming their vaginas to be art? The key words here are "grow" and "build". A picture of genitals with the supposed message of destruction does not promote growth or building. "Pseudo-intellectualism" does not accomplish any sort of growth, and is easy to spot with its tell-tale self-indulgence and pointlessness.
Of course, you would need to define a criteria for healthy growth, or risk running into the same problem of using "progressive" as a positive descriptor (what defines progress?, etc.).
This would necessarily require a large portion of society, or just the right portions of society, to agree to a similar definition of growth and improvement. Without this, we would stagnate in this "everything's subjective" mindset, and slowly revert to the only "natural" rules, the law of the jungle.
>>25739871 Well not everyone in humanity can do these things. Some people are more beast like than others(race/genetics/enviorment) so simplistic enjoyment is what these people want to do and will. I know you want to say that we all have the capacity to do great things but this is not true. Humans in their origin, without civilizations progress are very beast like This is why we have mainstream media that is served to the simple folk.
>>25740064 "Censorship" was never the property of a single political affiliation. Everybody censored in the past, and everyone continues to censor now. Sometimes polar opposites will censor the exact same thing.
>>25740082 >Art is pointless That's the beauty of being human and having a reasoning faculty. We can assign value to anything. Everything can be "pointless", can't it? Even food and water if we choose to view it as such. It is what we choose to assign value that makes or breaks us.
>>25740061 The point isn't whether ALL humans can and do do differential equations but we have the mental faculty as a whole to do it. That ability to use our intellect as a tool and to use tools themselves is what set us apart. Anybody who can't do basic calculus or doesn't realize that plants come from seeds in the dirt by 18 needs to be shot.
>>25740161 No, water and food can't be pointless because without it we die. Baring the necessities of maintaining life everything IS pointless. It just so happens that you and I ascribe value to intellectual persuits and stimulation while the degenerates of society persue the baser stimulus.
>>25740212 >No, water and food can't be pointless because without it we die. What if someone views life as pointless, and chooses to die early? The importance of food, water, and life, like the importance of art, can be viewed differently from person to person. Man, unlike beasts, has the power to assign as much value to life and reproduction as he pleases, rather than merely feeling them to be the most important things, as the lesser animals do.
>Baring the necessities of maintaining life You've decided this yourself, and for yourself. Others have decided to forego life as ultimately trivial and useless.
>>25740384 >The point to life is to live. Living is the point to life and that is innate. For how long? If we're calling things pointless, then what's more pointless than to be brought into existence just to die shortly after, like all of those before you and all of those yet to be born?
The point of life for a beast is to live and reproduce as many times as possible before being killed and eaten by something or other. Man, with his capacity for thought, and his will to execute any plan that he formulates, can disregard this as pointless and choose to opt out. Man may do many things beasts cannot, create art, or cast it away, play the game of life, or cast it away.
>>25740448 He may cast away the game of life but that is the only meaning in his life. He may subvert this meaning all he wants but the only way he can rationalize this subversion is through his intellect; an intellect innate to living. He may perceive it as pointless but life can not be pointless because without it he could neither perceive it as pointless. The point of life is living and living as a man gives him the ability to subvert that meaning if he wants.
>>25740531 >He may cast away the game of life but that is the only meaning in his life. Not in his life if he chooses to cast it away.
>He may subvert this meaning all he wants but the only way he can rationalize this subversion is through his intellect
Maybe exercising intellect should be considered the only point to life, then. Life, even human life, does not necessarily come with it, and a man's life is reduced to beastly survival without it. How great can a man be if his will and capacity for reasoning are stripped away from him?
>life can not be pointless because without it he could neither perceive it as pointless. Life does not in and of itself give him intellect or reasoning, as most living things and many humans live without these things.
>The point of life is living and living as a man gives him the ability to subvert that meaning if he wants. His mind gives him that ability.
Put simply, he can choose to disregard life itself, but he can never cast aside his will to think as he pleases. Even in the course of doing away with his life, he still has the reasoning capacity. Therefore, reason must be more precious and meaningful than life alone, as life does not guarantee it, and it cannot be subverted as life can be.
>>25740708 This prized intellect only arises from living. Having intellect surely means you live but living, as you've stated, doesn't necessitate intellect.
>Put simply, he can choose to disregard life itself, but he can never cast aside his will to think as he pleases. Even in the course of doing away with his life, he still has the reasoning capacity. Unless you posit a very immediate life after death wherein we remained unchanged this can not be so. If he disregards life and subsequently dies he may no longer exercise his intellect because he has died. Intellect is linked directly to living.
>Therefore, reason must be more precious and meaningful than life alone, as life does not guarantee it, and it cannot be subverted as life can be. As soon as you subvert life you have destroyed intellect completely.
>>25740814 Intellect always comes with life, but life certainly does not always come with intellect.
>As soon as you subvert life you have destroyed intellect completely. If destroying your physical life was the intent that you formulated, then you have acted in accordance with your reason. At the same time, you have prematurely ended your life, and failed as a beast for not reproducing as many times as possible and living for as long as possible.
Even in destroying your physical form and subverting life, the reasoning faculty is followed.
>>25740916 I never posited the meaning of life as beastly reproduction rather I said living.
>Even in destroying your physical form and subverting life, the reasoning faculty is followed. In order to the intellect to subvert life you must be alive in the first place. Intellect must exist in a living mind in order for intellect to subvert anything.
If you wish to say that intellect is the ultimate meaning how do you keep intellect? Invariably by staying alive. Only those who do not prize intellect subvert their own life because without it they have no intellect.
>>25741022 >If you wish to say that intellect is the ultimate meaning how do you keep intellect? Invariably by staying alive. The aim is not so much to cling to intellect and be terrified to lose it, but to use it as you see good and fit. You may choose to subvert your own life, destroy your own brain, and be in violation of life, yet still be in accordance with your own will and reasoning.
>Only those who do not prize intellect subvert their own life because without it they have no intellect. But your intellect is what gives you the power to make such a decision. Executing your will, especially in such a way, is utilizing your intellect in a way you deem good.
Your reasoning faculty allows you to give life whatever value you choose and make the choice to keep it or cast it away. It gives you the power to cease using your intellect and body.
>>25741122 >Your reasoning faculty allows you to give life whatever value you choose and make the choice to keep it or cast it away. It gives you the power to cease using your intellect and body. Again I only have this reasoning faculty because I am alive. A desire to see life as meaningless or meaningful proceeds after life. Before we can reject life we have to live it, or at least, mature into our mental faculties. The meaning of life is to live and it precedes our ability to think otherwise because life is what gave us that ability.
>>25736575 I want to take the "actual girl who plays games" and tie her hands behind her back with the controller cable and fuck her silly and then blow my load all over her back and turn off the game she's playing
She'd be terrified traumatized and in a strange state of bliss
>>25741252 >Again I only have this reasoning faculty because I am alive. A life without a reasoning faculty would be decidedly inferior to a life with one. Once again, because reason does not necessarily come with life, and primitive instances of life lacking in reason exist, I will value my intellect above simple life which demands only to be lived. With intellect, I can choose to always exercise my will, even when this may bring about the end of my life. Without it, I am limited to instincts and chained to a basic existence.
>>25741398 >A life without a reasoning faculty would be decidedly inferior to a life with one. I agree completely
> Without it, I am limited to instincts and chained to a basic existence. Without life you may not have your intellect either.
You can not prize your intellect without prizing the life that gave rise to it. You wouldn't be able to prize your intellect without life because without life you would have neither life nor intellect. Intellect proceeds after life.
>>25736575 i tried getting my little sis into gaming, but she refuses to play anything other than CoD. even worse, she always trying to use the mic so she can "communicate with the team", but she never even talks to them directly. she'll just talk to whoever's in the room. so she just wants them to know she's a gurl. shit's embarrassing. so i don't let her use it anymore
>>25741635 >To kill intellect is to not prize it. >And to kill the intellect is to not value it. Again, you may choose to subvert your own life, destroy your own brain, and be in violation of life, yet still be in accordance with your own will and reasoning.
Executing your own will and acting in accordance with that you consider to be right is utilizing your intellect.
>>25741825 So, basically, art is meaningless and the only value it has is what people give it. Video games have just as much value as "fine art" and that value is nothing. What I said quite awhile ago, in fact. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
>>25741882 >What I said quite awhile ago, in fact. Thanks for clearing that up for me. Everything can be considered "pointless", if you haven't gotten that quite yet. I've wasted all this time if you haven't.
Calling something "pointless" is foolish and short-sighted.
>>25742142 I am not positing the existence of something you are. You have to make a reasonable case as to why meaning exists rather than taking it for granted. If you can not provide a reason for the abstract thing to exist then it may as well not exist. For someone who prizes intellect more than life you'd think you would have a grasp on what "burdon of proof" means and were it lies. And you've provided no such argument that games "serve exclusively as a driv and business opportunity." In fact, all you've done is state it as fact without backing it up with any evidence.
>>25737264 What about games that are built for multiplayer from the ground up? Stuff like CS (admittedly has microtransaction visual customization cancer) or Battlefield? Or even MOBAs, if that's your thing?
I enjoy single player and multiplayer games, and both are enjoyable in different ways. I feel much more of a sense of accomplishment when I win in an online game, and even more of one when I work with a team and lead them to victory.
>>25736575 Met quite a few girls on Runescape (yes, actual girls) and half of them were actually got with one being a 9/10. She was hardcore and had like 3bil exp and only really talked during afk skills.
Also met quite a few of CS:Source but they were like 14. One was 26 but batshit ugly. She's lost heaps of weight in 3 years since I last talked to her and would be a 6/10
So they do exist but not in mainstream games as those ones are mainly attention whores.
>>25742198 You said art is pointless. You never gave any proof. Where is the demand for proof there? I offered ideas as to how anything could be considered "pointless", rendering it a useless way to describe something. You didn't seem to be able to grasp this, so I thought something productive could come of a discussion. You still haven't presented these ideas in a plausible manner, and you're wandering around in circles. Video games were developed as a way to sell electronics to customers and create an industry from the simple dopamine releases produced by playing these games. Not deeper thought, simple base enjoyment.
>>25742299 Alright, I'll remember that when confronted with an Athiest all I have to say is "Prove God doesn't exist!" Meaning is a teapot circling the Earth. Not too mention that fine art was paid for by rich bastards for entertainment and the rich bastards enjoyed opera for the "quick dopamine" they got sitting through an entertaining show.
Also, gamer girl girlfriend NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT NORMIES GET OUT
>>25736575 I notice gamer girls pride themselves on looking haggard and swearing alot, as if that increases skill. Maybe it wouldn't be so bad if they lived and let live, but they act very cruelly to girls who don't fit this mold. In short, I don't fuck with these raggedy bitches because I'm not going to prostate myself to bunch of bitches who want to feel like special grimy snowflake. Skyrim is a shit game, bitch, Dragon's Dogma 4 lyfe.
Sincerely, the real life moe blob gamer who your sempai always notices
My cousin plays video games. The whole does it for attention doesn't make sense because she never uses a microphone as she's almost a mute. She Plays GTA online with me and is the only person I know to actually complete a level one playthough on Demon's, Dark, and Dark souls 2. She also is the local street fighter/ pretty much any fighting game local champ for like the last 4 years now.
I haven't met anyone IRL from the opposite sex that could talk about Games or Nipshit as much as me yet. And my power level isn't that high, mind you. (At least when it comes to nipshit).
I've even met faggot normies that 420 blaze it all day erryday and post on r/pcmasterrace but they at least know the bare minimum for me to not constanza internaly every 3 minutes.
They might've not played some of the greatest games out there, and they might be incapable to go too far back if a game looks dated, but even they know that most releases for the past four years have been absolute gutter trash and we can complain about videogames during study sessions.
On the other hand, I've met three types of "gamer girls".
The first, was in my class in highschool. I was never a very social person, and still am not, but I can go through most motions without dropping spaghetti and generally people like me even if I don't reciprocate.
I was trying to gitgud at Blazblue and since I had a homebrewed PSP I was playing Continuum Shift Extend during my classroom breaks to practice combos. Back when I did this I was pretty absorbed because Hazama is a bitch to play especially if you want to get good juggles going and combo either from supers or into supers.
One of her friends asked me what I was playing, and this was a person who did not know anything about games. I think to myself that there's really no way to explain it since it's a fucking anime fighter that normal people have no idea even exists, so I tell them that they wouldn't know it even if I told them. I just said it was a fighting game.
She keeps insisting because, and here she pulls her friend over, her friend is a pretty big gamer because she's always playing games on her cellphone. Angry Birds
I try not to have an anneurism, and since they won't drop the subject, eventually I name the game, and just as I said it would happen, they had no idea what the fuck it was. (1/2)
The second one I met was the girlfriend of one of my actual friends in Highschool. I got along with him because his nipshit powerlevel was as high as mine, and he played just as many videogames as I did. That said I haven't talked to him since we finished highschool four years ago
Now this one was your typical "not like the other girls xDD" type of girl. She dressed all in black and dyed her hair. Nowadays she'd be the kind of person you'd immediately finger out as a tumblr hipster idealogue, and maybe nowadays she is, I haven't really kept in touch. She was studying to go to art school too.
Me and him used to play fighting games on our PSPs since it was easier to just homebrew it and bring it to school to play than go to eachother's place. We both valued our space, I'd not want him at my place and I'm pretty sure he shared the same feeling.
For a while we were getting into Dissidia because we both were huge Final Fantasy fans and apparently his girlfriend had the game too. So he decided to ask her to play with both of us.
We both had at least 5 characters fully leveled with the best equipment and all our abilities unlocked, she had one character at level 20. Even by level syncing it'd never be fair since we'd keep our abilities and it was pretty obvious we were way above her skill ceiling.
The third, and last girl gamur I met was not IRL but instead this britbong that I played with on FF14. She was actually not that bad and mained a DPS role rather than healer which was rather surprising. It was the only half-decent gamer girl I actually met that was legitimately there only to play the game, too. Our guild had a teamspeak that only 6 of us ever used, so all six of us ended up becoming good friends and her gender was never really an issue either. She didn't flaunt it and as far as we were concerned she was just one of us.
>>25745231 That's true. I played Wow with a guy who was a DK tank and placed in the top 10% of logs everytime with minimal gear. Pulling as much dps as our geared dps, and being rather easy to heal (I healed). He wanted to dps so we found anot her DK tank decked out in gear and she pulled less dps than the paladin tank on single target and was always dying, and very rarely used CDs. It's not like we couldn't get shit done with her, but she was significantly worse than her undergeared counterpart (s)
You know something. It's one thing to hold these beliefs and shitpost about them on an imageboard. It's something else entirely to be obnoxious IRL when someone talks about it. You can thinkg CoD and Mobile Games are cancer and not be obnoxious about it outside of an actual discussion with someone else who knows what they're talking about.
>>25745296 I got something for you to internally Constanza at mate...
>at work >night shift with some guuurl gamer who constantly shares shitty vidya memes over kikebook >bitingthebullet.jpg >ask her about vidya she plays >call of duty, halo and forza on xbone >warningbells.gif >brings up that she liked Alien Isolation and the "stealth" but hasn't really delved too deep into the genre >bring up MGS >doesn't even know about it yet used to have a PS2 >the cherry on top was that she actually like DMC
Got triggered pretty hard that night.
I thought it was just a shitty meme until I came to this website.
Is it really that hard to find some non-degenerate qt3.14 gf in which I can talk shit about Hotel Dusk?
The problem is that there aren't too many good stealth games out there that normies would be interested in. MGS is great but it's too crazy for normies to actually play. You either got into it young and you know what to expect from Kojima or you're going to pass on the ruse cruise.
You'd probably have been better off getting her into stuff like Dishonored first before you threw Rex's big throbbing railgun on her face.
>>25746609 >experimental board >people come here to get away from shitty /b/ >feels culture develops >more and more people come from reddit >girls from /soc/ and /cgl/ come here to try to grab a cute shy guy hiding among the rest of the autists >guys from other boards and reddit hear about the fembots and come here to try to get a shot at the pussy r9k has almost as successful of a hookup culture as /soc/ beneath the surface it's just that it only exists for known tripfags and people who are decent looking and go to vocaroo, omegle, and faces threads
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.