>>25690482 Why wouldn't they be? There's a wide range of reasons males are here the same way there's a wide range for the females. Some of them are probably legitimately ugly as fuck and lonely. Others are probably normals here for an ego-boost. It's all the same shit.
Neet. Have nothing to do, basically. Also find it fascinating to observe different kinds of behavior. Think I've gained an understanding of certain types of thinking. Understanding people better generally makes me better able to get along with them (I'm autistic)
Came to see OC and because it was like the /baww/ threads Was caught up and fascinated with a certain generation of robots that have since departed. Keep visiting because I'm a slave to my own habits. Don't like it here any more.
I think I learned most from books and reading various forums and this type of boards. Hearing how some people psychoanalyse, learn what patterns to look for to understand what a person is thinking in the moment. Reading about body language/ facial expressions, learning some basic stuff about how the brain works, reading various themes within psychology (there's a lot of bullshit there though)
>>25690674 This exactly. I started coming here in like 08 when we were all gentlemen, kept coming out of habit, but now refuse to leave because Frog-posting Neets deserve nothing, not even this corner of the internet to call their own.
>>25691094 Always amusing to see this projection when it is females who are not wired for monogamy. In related subjects, men even fall in love faster than women and fall out of love slower than women but of course, a whore is never wrong and a whore's opinion trumps academic scientific findings. >it's a "I'm tired and yell at stupid fucking people for being stupid fucking people" thread!
>>25691156 >you lot There's the problem. Get away from these people for a while. They aren't normal and their sex drives are all fucked up from porn and desperation. I'm in a normal relationship with a normal girl and I only desire sex like once a week.
>>25691185 Biologically speaking, women are most certainly wired for monogamy. They can only have one child at a time. They are attracted to men roughly the same age as them. Men on the other hand are always looking for "the newer model and will always want young meat. >academic studies Testing love is hardly academic. >>25691207 Fair point. >>25691203 "Normie" men gross me out just as much honestly. Although they may not be as openly misogynistic there's still the small hints of it that disgust me.
>>25691269 Of course blatantly making things up is the only retort a whore would have. >you will never meet a smart girl to discuss academic-related interests with because narcissism runs so strong that personal opinion overrules science I sincerely wish people with your level of ignorance were taken behind the shed and given the Old Yeller treatment. Sub-average intelligence guised behind a false sense of knowledge is unsightly.
>>25691334 It's cute, isn't it? I almost would want to share a class with her because she'd probably call scientific facts "misogynistic" and then my female professor would intellectually destroy her.
>>25691293 >nobody cares about you And they shouldn't. Would you rather I get a tripcode and whore myself out? I've posted on this site for only 6 years, but I embrace the anonymous posting philosophy.
>>25691334 Fun fact anon: just because your grandpa discussed the good old days doesn't mean they were actually good. Human beings naturally just weed out unpleasant memories and leaves only the good. Nostalgia is a lie. >>25691366 >blatantly making things up I'm not going to link you to studies that are common knowledge. You have google as a tool. You can fact check me if you so wish. >>25691353 Sorry brah >>25691361 You ever hear about the experiment about how men don't value female platonic friendship?
I've been here since 2008 the day the board opened, I just never left. I've always been here, her before even the majority of users on this board. I am one of the original /arcanines/. Why are you here.
>>25691416 My prof told a story in class once about a 14yo son of one of her colleagues who had went to a pool party and gotten flashed by a girl, along with some other boys. To make a long story short, the kid asked her to put her top back on or something and the girl had replied with something like "what, you don't like a feminist?" I wasn't in this class but my prof told me one of her female students actually said that the story was "anti-feminist" and "offensive", and my prof was a bit upset that she was a professor and couldn't reply with what she truly thought at the time. Can't even make this shit up.
>>25691430 I have a knowledgeable and educated professor as a tool. Since we're playing opinions, I'll take her Ph.D-level knowledge over your contrarian holier-than-thou bullshit. ^_^
>>25691430 Fun fact cuck: my great grandfathers served for glorious united Germany in the Second World War. I'm going to make sure that their cause wasn't in vain, the far right is rising again, can you feel it? Can you feel the power behind thousands of years of evolution and tradition? Might is right anon, and it's only right that the fittest whites are on top.
>>25691416 Nice strawman you just destroyed there, buddy. I have never met a single person who argued women were physically as strong as men. Besides someone arguing from a misandrist view point is not going to argue that men and women are equal.
>>25690674 Wait, what generation are you talking about? The gentlemen, the post gent /baww/ era, the Derrida extreme mysogeny era? We're in the meme/shitposting/cuck era now. Shitposting has always been around, but because of the whole SJW vs 4chan war and all that shit it's really hard to tell if people are legitimately SJW's getting offended by things, or if they're trolling and pretending to be SJW's to piss off robots.
I wasn't around /r9k/ for the gentlemen era, but I do remember Derrida. Holy shit that guy was either insane or the greatest shitposter of all time. Possibly both.
>>25691430 Haven't heard of an experiment, but I'm familiar with the concept. Men and women supposedly can never have a platonic friendship because of underlying sexual tension/desires. Just from my experience, this tends to decrease as people age and have more experience in relationships. I will say that it does kinda suck that there is always a low level of sexual desire between hetero men and women though. These desires can be controlled, but it would be nice to just have friendship and not have that there.
I think we should make it a point that we will not tolerate women on this board, like specifically "on this board". we should track down one of the so called "fembots" and make her an example to all "fembots". who is with me?
>be azn >spend k-12 being bullied and hated on by obese white girls >find a community on the internet where I can bash obese white girls 24/7 and receive full support and comradery for doing such >that community is /r9k/
>>25691506 Slow down there, /pol/ >>25691505 >M-Muh professor said it so ha! She had a vagina too! Congrats, dipshit. You're in college. So are the rest of us. If you want to pretend as though you're intellectually superior than I suggest you come up with a better argument than "this one female professor agrees with me". >>25691553 Actually in the study, a majority of women believed platonic friendship is possibly while hardly any men agreed. It was rather depressing. >>25691574 That's pretty sad.
>>25691543 >tfw Mecha-Hitler will never lead the Fourth Reich ;_;
>>25691590 That was around the last year of old9k, and lo and behold, we've come full circle yet on par with current /soc/ quality. Fuck moot for interfering with old9k so much, inevitably turning it into shit, and acting as if he had no involvement.
>>25691598 Brother, you can save yourself from this degeneracy. Pull yourself out of misery and into the light. Create the best version of yourself, and then you will attain the respect you know you so desperately want from your peers (women included) just join the glorious far right, we know how to save you from this hell.
>>25691645 >>25691648 I know you are baiting. please just stop it. this board is gone downhill so much recently people might take you seriously. come on anon think about it. this isn't what you really want for r9k is it?
>>25691683 I found it. http://bleske-rechek.com/April%20Website%20Files/Bleske-Rechek%20et%20al.%202012%20Benefit%20or%20Burden.pdf interesting results and conclusions, particularly pic related. It supports my opinion that attractiveness to the opposite gender decreases with age. Interestingly enough, it never quite goes away but it does drop considerably.
I hate most people here. I only have 2 friends from here, one male and one female. The female seems a bit nervous of me because she thinks I'm a true bot and the male is crazy himself but in a more tolerable, less disgusting way.
>>25691590 >>25691622 Oh shit, I forgot about the whole /soc/ controversy. I was mainly a lurker back then but yeah, I remember now. Attention whoring/rate me threads were becoming so prevalent, that pretty much 1/3 of the threads were /soc/ shit, 1/3 were threads complaining about those threads, and 1/3 were other shit. Shit was so bad /soc/ got created.
I wouldn't say it's nearly as bad as it was then though. As I said, probably around 1/3 of the threads were attention whoring, maybe even more, I'm feeling pretty generous with that estimate. I guess "robots only post pics" threads are still posted. Dick threads are attention whoring in a way too, in fact, pretty much any thread about appearance (weak jaw/chin, cut vs uncut, height) is attention whoring, even if people aren't posting pics. However, I believe most of these threads are started due to feelings of insecurity, just like the original rate me threads; posters hoped that people would tell them they're "good enough" or how they can improve whatever aspect of their appearance. I'd say rate me threads on /r9k/ and /soc/ are different in that the former are based on feelings of insecurity while the latter are based on feelings of confidence. Of course, there are exceptions. 4chan's a dynamic place.
>>25691905 Rate Me threads occur sporadically nowadays. Sometimes we'll have several a day for several days in a row then nothing for a notable amount of time. And robots aren't the ones posting in them. Sure there are some but a bare handful and everyone else is a fucking normalfag. There's even some camwhore who posts threads about herself and posts a picture of herself with nearly every reply. Her photo was posted earlier ITT.
>>25691906 Because /r9k/ is a newfag containment board. This isn't 2010 arcanine anymore. 4chan isn't a secret club sadly
>>25691976 moot actively interfered with /r9k/ several times, drawing much unwanted attention and users here, which added to the shitheap of its eventual pre-/soc/ incubation. /r9k/ wasn't a trial board by twenty fucking ten. moot didn't care for the board because it didn't pump out OC like he expected it to.
>>25692031 The fact that "the friend zone" as an idea even exists makes me laugh. You too. I was pleasantly surprised someone responded with genuine interest as opposed to the other garbage people respond with.
>>25692020 I believe in empirical evidence. Unfortunately, many people (usually women, as a given) define misogyny as "thing(s) I disagree with". Humans are shitty overall but women make it plainer and obvious with FAR more frequency.
>>25692050 I don't even know how OC would be taken anywhere nowadays. I don't believe 4chan has even had a natural meme spark up since at least 2012/2013. Everything is so painfully forced and cringeworthy.
>>25692106 Y-you too. I honestly don't post to be liked or disliked; I merely report factual observable evidence which is the foundation of my beliefs and viewpoints but thanks. I don't know how to take compliments.
>>25692090 I don't mean OC for memes. I write porn stories by request. I did on on /co/ back in the day and I wrote a few here pre-deletion and more recently for /tg/ but not anymore. People have told me they have masturbated to them so if nothing else I accomplished that.
>>25691976 Ah, you're right, I got the boards mixed up. That was about the time I started migrating away from /b/ and coming here more so I got them confused. What I said applies to old /b/ then. I remember /baww/ threads being pretty popular on /b/ at the time too.
I still think most attention whoring threads on /r9k/ are primarily insecure people rather than people trying to show off though.
Hey you I believe you can post your picture here once in awhile, but when you ask for a pointless rating or start flat out dumping pic after pic of you then it hits attention whore levels. And I think those baww threads still happen I believe, haven't checked lately
>>25692211 /co/ and /tg/ usually have a detailed story in mind and are ready to get off to the plot and characters, but /r9k/ usually had no idea where to begin with a story or what they wanted characters to be like. The result was a lot of stories that felt like they had little context.
Here are a few of them that I remember. I don't have a lot of the old ones saved, I'm afraid. I'm on a new computer since then. >Young woman in an abandoned city encounters a man in a face-obscuring helmet and SWAT armor. He fucks her and locks her in a corner office in an office building >A sentient, abstract image of a face stalks a librarian. It possesses someone's body and they had sex >Two girls get drunk and take turns tying each other up to see if they like it. They do. >An alien and a human try to figure out each others languages to communicate how they feel about each other and confess their affections. Weird alien sex follows.
I passed up most requests that could be fulfilled by generic porn.
>>25692341 >A sentient, abstract image of a face stalks a librarian. It possesses someone's body and they had sex >An alien and a human try to figure out each others languages to communicate how they feel about each other and confess their affections. Weird alien sex follows.
Well, at least we're not lacking for some creativity I guess. Do you jack off to this stuff yourself or just find amusement in writing it?
Same reason as the rest of us, chad don't want my beefhole. Also I notice the perspective you guys give me about things helps me open up and give myself hope and even empathise more, you guys are like friends only you're real. I feel like I'm finally starting to advance in my life and with much help from you guys, y'all are awesome. Thanks robots. love you
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.