People on /r9k/ unironically think that a woman should have sex with her male friend if he's crushing on her, just to not hurt his feelings.
>women get so much attention and sex from men that they can fully afford to have "male friends" without being attracted to them or falling in love with them
Seriously you women live on easy mode.
Ok but my statement still stands. And to add to it women can be incredibly picky as well unlike people on r9k who just want someone to love them back and isn't obese. You know why this is? It's because men throw themselves at woman every time and they get so much attention and love from men. It's like being a God and being praised and put on a pedestal everywhere you go just because you have a vagina and some breasts. And this would explain the entitlement, egotism and haughtiness of western women.
You missed the mark, roastie.
Woman has a spineless beta male friend who loves her. She is not interested in him but strings him along because free attention and validation while she rides the cock carousel.
Her spineless friend wants to know, does she feel the same or is she just using him.
You're in the minority then. Most posts on /r9k/ can be dumbed down to "WTF SHE HAS SEX WITH HIM BUT NOT ME?!?!?!" and then pretending that Donald Trump cares about fixing this and that democrats caused this.
I agree with you to a certain degree. Women shouldn't string guys along, but ultimately it's the fault of the beta orbiter for sticking around when he knows that she's playing him. I can understand most robots anger on this subject but it's hard for me to sympathize with people who put themselves through this for no good reason.
The problem is that it's hard for some men to realize (or accept) when they've got no chance. I don't blame women for not being attracted betas, but I can't blame betas for not being able to realize when they need to move on. I used to be in that position myself, and the way my mind was wired, moving on simply wasn't an option until the shit hit the fan