/QA/ Wants /R9K/ To Be SFW

>>25520339
selfbumping, shit

File: reality.jpg (248KB, 988x814px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 988x814px

I like red r9k. I hate blue r9k.

>>25520611
I don't want to put spoilers on my lewd shit

>>25520339
if you're a true robot, you'd want to see this become a blue board
trap threads, BRAAAAP threads, and cuck threads would be gone, forever
go to /gif/ if you want porn, and /s/ if you want rose/katya/etc threads

>>25520339
>r9k
>SFW

how is that even going to work?

>>25520667
don't know what any of that has to do with robothood, seeing as robot just means becoming a shut-in neet and giving up on outside relationships. I don't personally care about trap threads, since they aren't porn mostly just feels, no clue what "braaap" is, and i filter rose threads.

File: 1439907017747.jpg (66KB, 500x349px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 500x349px

DAY OF THE ROPE IS AT HAND, NEET KEKS.

GET THE FUCK OFF MY BOARD

what's wrong with removing porn from /r9k/? it'll get rid of a lot of shit threads and won't harm the quality of the board

>>25520339
Blue boards with tolerant janitors are the best.

i.e. an on-topic nsfw image in a sfw thread is OK, but general porn sharing treads are not.

>>25520800
Yeah I agree, but the issue is /r9k/ janitors are shits.

>>25520757
this

no more cuck threads, no more fembot nudes threads, no more autist posting animal gore

I'm 110% in favor of r9k becoming SFW

>>25520339
Adding the robot was a great decision. Turning this board sfw is a horrible one. The OP of that threat should seriously blow his head off with a shotgun and make the world a better place by doing so.

>>25520830
> no more autist posting animal gore
Absolutely nothing wrong with this though. No more cuck threads would be wonderful. I already report camwhores on sight and they get removed quickly. Camwhores and face picture threads are already against /r9k/ rules.

>>25520830
>>25520874
don't forget no more degenerate trap/fetish threads

>>25520858
>>25520830
>>25520757
>>25520667
>>25520898
Robots, look upon your dumbasses.

sfw r9k = terrible idea.

File: 1449724797662.jpg (1MB, 1796x2181px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1796x2181px

ACHTUNG

http://strawpoll.me/6460013

>>25520703
>no clue what braaaap is

Ok newfag why don't you sit down when people ask about what changes should happen to r9k until you've been here a while

Just make porn dumps a bannable offense. No need to be sfw. Going sfw is a really horrific idea.

i swear, if this happens we're fucked. I've stuck by r9k even through the robot re-enabling, this would be the last straw. I'd have to migrate to wizchan

>>25521028
>this
It's exactly right. Going full sfw would just ruin the place.

I browse this boArd from wOrk and have to disable images so I'm all for turning this bOard sfw

Fight me over iT if that upsets you faggots

Removing unsafe content would just make the board flood with normies. It's be literally reddit.
I dont get the robot hate either, the shitposting drastically decreased. The board is much better now.

>>25521028
Why exactly is SFW a bad idea?

People keep saying so but they won't give reasons. /b/ is already full of porn so what are you worried about losing?

>>25521106
when i was a teen newfag in high school back on /b/ i used to do this crazy thing called private tab, it's pretty hardcore hackerish though, might be difficult for you.

>>25521143
/b/ is the most normie board and has the most porn dumps of any board not dedicated exclusively to pornography.

>>25521170
if you were in high-school when browsers had a private tab feature, you're still a newfag and either underage b& or not far off it.

>>25521208
it's where we all start, where normies are cured. Leave it be.

>>25521230
18 exactly last month today

feels devilish man

>>25521146
>Why exactly is SFW a bad idea?

1. Because you can't post what you want, retard. You have to always be afraid that mods delete stuff. And don't strawman this issue as if only porn is affected. SFW excludes much more than porn, from art to accidents.
2. Because there is already a random SFW board: /int/

>>25521233
>where normies are cured
hahahaha.

>>25521263
>Because you can't post what you want, retard. You have to always be afraid that mods delete stuff. And don't strawman this issue as if only porn is affected. SFW excludes much more than porn, from art to accidents.

SFW does not apply to art. It applies only to porn and gore. It only applies to images. LITERALLY you're fighting for the right to post porn and gore.

Second thing: /int/ is not a random board. It is strictly international cultures discussion and foreign generals. If you post anything else, it gets deleted and you might get banned.

/r9k/ is supposed to be an OC board but now serves as a containment board for >tfw no gf shit. Neither of those require porn or gore. If you want porn and gore, /b/ still exists.

SFW will destroy a good part of the posts that are the epitome of r9k culture
If you don't like it leave

I would rather not give the already trigger happy mods a reason to delete more.

>>25521344
>complaining about /r9k/ being a feels board

Oldfag alert, make sure to pay your respects to gentlemanposter guys!

>>25521400
>this this this

>>25521364
Okay. Explain what that would be.

Cuck posting? "practice for girls"? Craig threads?

Yeah, those are sure an integral part of r9k culture. We can't live without seeing hardcore porn on the front page.

File: gender war.jpg (514KB, 1812x1800px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 1812x1800px

>>25521344
>SFW does not apply to art.

Of course it applies to art, for example pic.

>It applies only to porn and gore.

1. No it doesn't.
2. What porn is, is relative.

>Second thing: /int/ is not a random board.

If you have a topic that doesn't fit to /int/ apply for a new board, don't destroy /r9k/

>/r9k/ is supposed to be an OC board but now serves as a containment board for >tfw no gf shit.

Oh, so you are not interested in SFW, you are interested in different content than tfw. Apply for a SFW random board, I am 100% for that.

>>25521440
>Cuck posting? "practice girls"? Craig threads?

and why would those be at all relevant to sfw vs nsfw content

>The quality of the board has improved slightly since the robot filter was brought back
Does this person even browse this board? 99% of posts involving the robot are either complaining about it directly, or adding extra words at the end of their post to avoid it.
Everyone still posts the same shit, they just word it slightly differently. There's also no good reason for every single post to be original - you still need 'functional' connecting posts between original content.

I really get the feeling that changes are being made to /r9k/ without paying attention to the opinions of the posters here. When Hiroshima asked us whether we wanted the robot back, opinion was quite clearly divided between having it back or not having it, and it seemed to me like more were against. We still got it, and it's turned out to be shit. Is it ever going to go?

>>25521484
Because those are the only threads where porn regularly is posted. That's what this is all about.

On a sfw board you literally only get banned for posting porn.

>>25521483
That shows people having sex. Whether or not you want to call it art, it is quite literally pornographic.

>Robots immediately take it as an attack against them
>Start shouting SJW and shit as if being worksafe suddenly meant being politically correct

Fuck, you cry babies, it might be good for the board is not every thread was some sissy bullshit. Maybe we could actually start having conversations here that aren't just tear-soaked rants about women.

>>25521486
I miss it being off. I came when it was disabled the FIRST time and all the gentlefucks left. It was like a party in here those first few days.

/qa/ needs to be fucking deleted because that gook faggot actually listens to them

The only ones who want to make /r9k/ worksafe are women and SJWs who hate anti-women threads.

>>25521509
>That shows people having sex. Whether or not you want to call it art, it is quite literally pornographic.

EXACTLY, it's art and it's NSFW.

>>25521509
>cuck posting
the word cuck being used in threads is pornographic to you? do you get a hard on?

>practise girls
yes, those are annoying but never have porn. just generic CLOTHED pictures of fat chicks

>craig threads
What? like craigslist requests or something? haven't seen that in years anon

>>25521511
let me drive this out one more time

MAKING /r9k/ WORKSAFE DOES NOT AFFECT THE CONTENT OF YOUR TEXT POSTS

sfw boards literally only make PORN against the rules

THE QUALITY OF TEXT POSTS WOULD NOT BE BETTER

NOR WOULD THERE BE ANY MORE SJW

File: 1443951859128.jpg (85KB, 654x720px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 654x720px

>>25520339
The board is beyond saving anyway. Cheap bait threads will always get the most attention and there's not a whole lot you can really do about that.

>>25521518
the funny part is he doesnt. he listened to them at the q&a and then never came back. he's never been seen there again except for some brief bullshit posts

>>25521077
>I'd have to migrate to wizchan

good, fuck off.

>>25520830
>no more autist posting animal gore
he already gets banned

>>25521560
>tfw everyone always talking about how r9k is dying and horrible
>tfw I feel like the only one who still loves my home

>>25521542
>practice for girls

the practice girl meme is like a week old, newfag

practice for girls is faggotposting

And yes, all of those types of threads are always full of porn.

>What? like craigslist requests or something?

You're so new. There used to be a guy named craig who had a bot post threads like "how can you possibly date a woman who has had another man's cum on her face" with graphic photos. It still happens every day.

>>25520339

Thanks for showing me this thread, I posted my support for making it a blue board.

File: image.jpg (57KB, 340x565px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 340x565px

>work safe /r9k/
>encourages OC
>Restrsicts Content
That concept is contradicting

File: fembot.jpg (318KB, 1032x960px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1032x960px

>>25521557
>MAKING /r9k/ WORKSAFE DOES NOT AFFECT THE CONTENT OF YOUR TEXT POSTS

But it expands mod powers and limits the choice of images. For example one could not discuss fembots anymore.

>>25521560
This is pretty much right. People just want to post in generals or have comfortable flame wars. Unique or interesting threads rarely make it to 50 posts.

A SFW /r9k/ would be marginally better than this one, but it still wouldn't be worth browsing.

>>25521618
It's a fucking virgin board. When was the last time you saw OC porn on here?

Jesus Christ

File: 1447491253212.jpg (98KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 640x640px

>tfw I'd be willing to tolerate the robot just so this board won't turn blue

what has this world come to

>>25521656
When was the last time your mum didn't fucking suck me off bro?

>>25521595
It's not dying or horrible, there are definitely still some enjoyable posts every now and then, which is why I keep coming back (that and I'm a worthless shitstain with nowhere else to waste my time), but the amount of cheap bait "I am le female/strawman give attention" posts gets annoying. Especially when you see real threads die at the same time as these threads get showered in comments.
Like I said though, not a whole lot you can really do about that. People will respond to what they want and if they don't care then I guess they don't. But it's got to feel shitty to post a real thread only to have it just die like that.

File: Hitlersama.png (144KB, 953x904px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 953x904px

>>25520898
you'll take my traps from my cold dead hands you fucking normal

They just need to make a /cuck/ board or move everything cuck related to /trash/ site wide, except maybe /b/.

>>25521678
Why don't you just fuck off to /b/ where posting shit like that is normal?

>>25521604
>the practice girl meme is like a week old, newfag
The Norwegian that's been spamming it has been around for over a year now. Look up boiginity in the archive.

>>25521230
apple has had private browsing for 11 years

I like this thread and don't want it to die.

File: 1447944768427.png (141KB, 672x808px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 672x808px

>>25520339
If that happens, i'm moving to /trash/ for sure.

You're right, there literally is no upside.

>>25520339
I approve of that. Too many trannies and gay shit and also general porn dumps, shit belongs on /b/ or some other board.

>>25523214
Nevermind. That board is definitely different than the last time I visited it. Too much furshit, ponies, and shitty games/cartoons.
Fuck.