Why are girls such plebs? No interests, no inquisitive mind.

>>25512546
I think you might disregarding their interests because from your perspective they don't seem like "real" pursuits. But in that I don't think women in general are any worse than most robots.
>food, travel, and Netflix
is just the Stacy equivalent of
>vidya, anime, and history
Just because to us other people's interests are boring doesn't make them any less valid as wastes of time.

File: 7ZZdO13UgZQ.jpg (56KB, 477x650px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 477x650px

>>25512649
Baseless assumptions, anon.

Try and argue or call me a misogynist to dismiss me, don't bring something irrelevant to it when you have no basis.

>>25512649
> Netflix is on par with history

Can't bait me fagit

>>25512546
Plaina and simple, it is because they do not have male minds.

The women who begins to think like a man begins to have objective interests. The woman who individuates her mind from the female thought-web becomes male.

>>25512676
You already started with the assumption that no women value intellectual pursuits when that's simply not true, at least relative to guys with shallow interests. I would've agreed with your point if you had said "normies" instead. But even then are we really any better? We spend much of our free time on this board, after all. I don't think the air of superiority is justified.

>>25512687
Wouldn't Netflix be the equivalent to anime and travel to history in those two sets?