>open normiebook >feminazis blame "society" for

>>25510454
>>want to argue but I can't because no anonymity

sum4chanup.gif

>>25510454
breasts really arent sexual, though. there's nothing inherently sexual about breasts. you don't reproduce with tits, like you do with a vagina or a dick.

File: 1367186481135.jpg (10KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 251x242px

>its a biology is a social construct episode

File: QxmmvXC.jpg (161KB, 1500x1125px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1500x1125px

>brainwashed by society
seriously look at this picture and tell me you don't find something sexual about it.

>>25510489

I agree with this poster, however, I still believe that women should not be allowed to walk around topless, only because that would probably increase the rate of rape and cause other problems. dumb cunts complain about catcalling enough as it is.

>>25510513
not everyone is into garbage-tier bondage fetishes, anon

>>25510454
Do a large number of women get off on having their nipples pinched etc? Yes
Is it therefore a sexual organ? Yes

Do a large number of men get off on having their nipple pinched? No
Therefore it is not a sexual organ.

Also there's a failure to understand that men sexualise the physical, viable, tangible where women sexualise the emotional and social aspects of people more.

sometimes it's like they think getting a boner is a conscious choice

>>25510522
yeah. there's nothing really sexual in that sense about breasts but i fucking love fat tits. it's the same way for people with foot fetishes.

>>25510524
you're right theres tons of low test beta cucks on /r9k/

>breaststroke aren't sexual
>they experience a significanymt change after sex has successfully occurred from a biological standpoint
Yeah, no. They're sexual.

File: high test 2.jpg (46KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1024x683px

>>25510547
does this turn you on?

I'd support feminism if it meant that breasts stop being a private part and girls stop hiding their tits.
Imagine a world were tits are a normal sight, just like bellies or thighs, and there's you, who have fapped for years to tits. It wont stop turning you on, hell it'll turn us on more.
I don't give a fuck about the patriarchy or rape or whatever, if feminism means free titties then I'm a feminist too.

>>25510489
hypertrophied breasts serve no functional purpose, you dolt, they evolved entirely as beacons of sexual maturation

>>25510513
To be honest she could be wearing a bra and it'd still be sexual. If it was a dude instead, it'd still be sexual.
You can probably find better examples.

>pointless cultural definitions

>>25510563

anon, you need to understand that the only women who would actually run around topless if it were to be allowed would be the overweight ugly cunts you see at slut walks.

Doesn't matter what society thinks -- I find breasts sexual, and will continue to do so for as long as I wish.

What about ass? Is ass sexual?

File: preston_fedora_khaki_0.jpg (41KB, 800x653px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 800x653px

>>25510569
is this you, anon??????????
filter

>>25510595
I'm sure Stacy would sunbathe topless at the beach. If breasts were desexualized, we'd have a better chance of seeing tits on tv and media in general, which is always good.

>>25510597
no, according to the first comment on the screenshot

File: 1447886810798.jpg (58KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 720x540px

>breasts aren't sexual

Bullshit.

Look at this image and tell me which girl makes your dick hardest.

>>25510489
>breasts really arent sexual, though.

Reproductive organ =/ sexual

Besides, female breast grow through puberty and produce milk for their young. It's intended for them to do it.

>hurry guys can produce milk too

I said INTENDED. Plus , guys are drone to like breast.

Compare a humans breasts to ape breasts and tell me they aren't sexual

It's discernibly feminine though, as with the ass, so it's clear that men would be attracted to those parts (as opposed to a shared characteristic such as the neck).

>>25510632
If they were topless it'd take a while to realize there are two girls besides her.

File: 1407951146794.jpg (17KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 500x500px

>>25510454
>having cunts on your facebook
>giving a shit about what they say

Watching women try to discuss ideas rationally is painful. At least my facebook is only full of fucking baby photos and buzzfeed articles.

>>25510632
not the cowtits
not the pink whore

Waiting for some 4chan trolls to shitpost how we want freedom of balls because they're not even a fetish or anything sexual, just something as exclusive as tits and we want to walk with hidden penises and balls showing.

Women should look at shit like that and figure out how retarded they sound.

>>25510454
>Secondary sexual characteristics are wrongly sexualized because of the patriarchy!

I hear that too often at my workplace. Arguing is futile. Let the waves of "feminism" drown you.

File: 346mdg9.jpg (13KB, 449x336px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 449x336px

>>25510632
the one with the healthy skin colour?

File: dc3fd027d91874fbc52bd49e50ad583d.jpg (73KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 500x375px

>>25510581
I agree.

Mostly, nudity isn't inherently erotic.
But I would also say that breasts to have an influence on sexual attractiveness, across all cultures.
So both yes and no. We could easily live in a society without hypersexualized nudity, but it's not a problem that we do. Societies have a lot of arbitrary rules that we have to follow "just because", I don't see why this instance is especially important.

>>25510563
>It wont stop turning you on, hell it'll turn us on more

Not really. The same thing that happened to women finally get to show off their legs , it would lose less of its value. Just because they'll be free to show them off doesn't mean girls will let guys stare and touch them.

>>25510454
was arguing with a fag tonight about how equality should be. even to not come off as racist as i actually am, i said everyone should be equal and no one given special treatment. he dismissed me, essentially calling me a kid and threw in "people like you" to boot. all because i said safe spaces on college campuses are retarded and people need to embrace differences and not get offended so easily.

File: 1426896864478.gif (2MB, 360x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x240px

>>25510607
>i'll try meming, that's a good trick!
breasts are sexual, cry moar faggot

>>25510665
>we want to free the nip!
>we want to stop increased amount of molestation!
>we want to stop the oppression of calling us men because we have tits as good as a guy that's not physically active! (this one would be a hilarious, ironical swift kick to their logic, by themselves as well)

I think it's wrong that women aren't allowed to show their breasts while men are. Sexualization is something men do, and it's wrong to impose your sexuality on others and restrict their freedom because you can't control yourself. That's literally sandnigger tier.

western ppl are backwards and stupid

how is this important
you fucking spoiled twats

>>25510522
if some girl is dressed in a provocative way don't tell me you didn't want to catcall or get her number(which apparently is harassing if you are ugly)

>>25510454
>want to argue but I can't because no anonymity

That's what fake facebooks are for, anon.

>>25510707
why do their breasts look like a man with gyno?

File: naked-african-tribe-man.jpg (151KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 800x534px

>>25510768
Cause that's what a lot of breasts look like. A lot of people look like shit and hide that with photoshop, clothes and make up.
Also african genetics.

>>25510637
I don't fap to animal titties though you idiot

So if i grab a girls tits it shouldn't be considered sexual assault ?

>>25510768

That what happens when you don't wear bras.

>>25510802
nah man ur just being affectionate human being

>>25510793
so the white and asian girls also have same kind of tits?

>>25510454
no way this isn't staged or fake

File: 1.jpg (23KB, 800x331px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 800x331px

If men can walk around topless, so should women. But none should. Seeing a man with a huge belly and mantits is not sexual, it's disgusting. A toned body is sexy and catches the eyes of women, just like decent tits catch the eyes of men. Humans aren't enlightened beings capable of only pure acts, we are animals with instincts that managed to impose on eachother arbitrary rules.

>>25510454
>"society"
>quotation marks
you're just as bad as the feminists and their air-quotes

File: 8960.jpg (53KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1280x720px

The entire purpose of breasts is to show sexual maturity and fertility. Wide hips is in a similar boat but wide hips actually have a purpose for giving birth. Breasts do not, those meat sacks exist entirely to attract a new mate since the female's milk production are not in the breast themselves.

So yes they are the very definition of sexual, socially and biologically.

>>25510802
If you do it sexually or make it sexual, it is sexual assault. But touching a girl's tits isn't inheritly sexual, it's about what you make it.

>>25510802
Femcunts will say "hurr well you generally can't touch anybody " but completely ignores that if a woman sexually assaults a man, it's never taken seriously . Not even to the police

>>25510820
I'm not a tit data statician, but yeah. A decent portion of them.
What? You thought porn actresses and nude models were a good indicator for the average?

>>25510489
It's called "secondary sexual characteristic".

>>25510837
So if i touch a girls nose "sexually" that is sexual assault? You're a retard.

>>25510830
>If men can walk around topless

They're generally not supposed to , la Familia

>>25510837
>May I please put my tongue down your vagina? For science reasons

>>25510830
>If men can walk around topless
How often do you see a man walking around completely topless outside of specific events and areas where that's acceptable? Pretty much fucking never because that's not a socially acceptable thing to do even as a guy. It's seen as rednecky at it's best and vulgar and gross at it's worse.

>>25510860
read the name of the board anon, some of us are legit robots

>>25510489
breasts have been sexualized by cultures since before we could write, they are sexual and it has fuck all to do with modern society just deciding out of nowhere one day that tits would be sexualized

contrary to popular belief people do things for a reason and also contrary to popular belief there isnt an omniscient branch of the illuminati that has spent their entire existence trying to slightly inconvenience liberal women for shits and giggles

>>25510563
>not preferring clothed and supported tits to bare tits
what are you?
a fucking faggot?

>>25510454
>open r9k
>robots blame "society" for nogf and their inability to get casual sex
>they have shitty arguments
>they keep arguing because anonymity
>enjoy funposting and cool pictures of frogs

>>25510928
Doesn't mean you can't use a little common sense. Obviously people who have to look good for their profession look better than people who don't share their profession. Or do I have to explain that the average IQ of college professors is a bit above national norms too?

>>25510873
Depends on how you define "sexual assault", really. If you define it as "rape against people who can't be raped (men)" then it's not, and sexually touching tits would not be either. But I don't think that's the right definition. Let's say that it IS sexual harassment. Sexual assault sounds more violent, so a quick touch of breasts may not be either.

The girl may not realize it's sexual harassment, if she doesn't realize the toucher is sexualizing it, but we can't define crimes according to what the victim feels, that would mean ugly people should go to jail for saying hi and things would be very unpredictable. (But I DO think that all flirting is sexual harassment, including asking a pretty girl for her phone number. It's forcing sexuality and sexual attention on someone. However, some sexual harassment may be more acceptable.)

>>25510897
Technically that wouldn't have to be sexual, but a non-sexual context would be rare. But possible.

>>25510873
if you put your finger up a girls nose sexually, is it rape?

>>25510986
>flirting is sexual harassment
do you also think animal courtship is sexual harassment? Flirting is human courtship you fucking SJW trash.

>>25510986
>men cant be raped
you realise that this gives away your bait everytime you do it right?

>>25510986
>we can't define crimes according to what the victim feels
And its pretty damn near impossible to prove what the offender has going on in their heads unless they state what they're thinking. So in practice if i go up to a girl and grab her tits real quick nothing should happen to me

>>25510934
breasts aren't sexualized by us, they are desexualized in places where women walk around with them hanging out all the time

I distinctly remember when I was 11 visiting a museum and seeing a bbw's cleavage wearing a renaissance blouse thing, I couldn't stop staring. Never seen it before, my mom was catholic, always flipped the channel whenever something remotely sexual was about to come on.

>>25510454
>open normiebook

why the fuck do you have "normiebook"?

>>25510986
>Sexual assault should only depend on the toucher

Ummmm no. If some guy was touching me in a way I don't like, it doesn't matter what the fuck they were doing it for.

>>25510454
Kek, breasts are sensitive and cause sexual arousal so how are the not supposed to be sexual?

>>25511090
But thats bullshit. If someone pats you on the back you dont get to decided that its sexual assault just because youre a crazy person.

Men are programmed to be sexually aroused by tits because in the caveman days they were one of the most obvious signs of a female. In that regard they're the very definition of a sexual organ.

What I don't understand is why women are convinced it's "The Patriarchy" stopping them from going topless in public. Surely every straight male in the world would be totally fine with that?

>>25511032
Like I said, some forms of sexual harassment may be acceptable, because unless we only want planned marriages, there is no way around it. We have to accept it if we want to be able to pick our own mates. We need to make some rules for it, and limit suffering over sexual harassment as much as possible, but it will always have to exist in our current model for finding romantic partners. A suggestion for a couple of rules that would make things much better would be to stop doing it to total strangers, and stop if the other person doesn't like it. But when you give a person sexual attention they may not want, it can't be anything but sexual harassment, technically speaking.

>>25511040
That was more tounge in cheek against the feminists who do think that, those who want the laws to differ between rape against men and women.

>>25511067
This is a good point, perhaps we could have a "guilty until proven innocent" law for this, like we already have for discrimmination against disabled. Explain why you grabbed her tits, and unless you have a good excuse, you are guilty.

>>25511090
It could be a misunderstanding, it isn't always sexual assault just because you don't like it. If a guy says hi to you, and you think he's doing it to sexually harass you, but it really just is to greet you, then that's your fault. You are the person sexualizing it. Same goes for touching.

>>25511185
If you're going to get upset over someone asking for your number or asking you out for a drink the problem is with you, not them. Just politely decline and go about your day. It's really not hard.

>>25511185
>If a guy says hi to you, and you think he's doing it to sexually harass you, but it really just is to greet you, then that's your fault.

>guy punches me in the face

>Hey man, what the fuck?

>NO NO NO I'm my culture, we punch people as greetings

>>25511234
>Crazy feminists think saying hi to someone is sexual assault and comparable to being punched in the face
This is why the west will fall.

>>25510970
I like clothed tits but they don't come even close to naked tits. All the appeal to clothed tits is imagining how the look behind the clothes.

File: image.jpg (84KB, 960x686px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 960x686px

>fuck gf
>cum
>too lazy to finish her off
>she starts fingering herself
>she's not getting off
>start vigorously sucking and squeezing her nipples
>she cums right away with her body shaking to the rhythm of my sucking

Nipples are a sexual organ imo for this reason alone

>>25510489
You do realize touching the breasts are sexually stimulating and Thats why right.

>>25511385
Neanderthal women with an IQ of like 10 breastfed their children - why? Because it felt good. Same reason fucking feels good, early humans wouldn't even bother to breed unless it did.

>>25510454
>going on kikebook
>arguing with people on kikebook

you're just as bad

>>25511810
Neanderthals weren't nearly that dumb, they were pretty much human in most aspects

>>25511810
>breastfeeding
>feels good

oh no it dont

>>25510454
Rape is wrong because society has made it wrong.

Pedophilia is wrong because society has made it wrong.

Down with society.

>>25512004
You aren't a grill though

File: biggerguyneeded.jpg (134KB, 500x307px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 500x307px

>>25510454
>>want to argue but I can't because no anonymity
kek, what a fucking pussy.
Kill yourself, you are shame to man kind.
Fuck this world, feminazis can spit their shit whenever they want, and wont be challenged becouse fucking muh anonymity
re

>>25510454
Female breasts are a secondary sex trait. They are considered sexy because they identify the owner as a sexually healthy female. Men need sexually healthy females for reproduction, so evolution would have it that breasts are considered sexy so we pursue humans with these positive sex traits.

>>25510454
As someone with tits, yeah they're p much right. The whole reason women can't be topless is because breasts are considered sexual and being publicly sexual is a problem for people.

Feminazis just take it one step further and blame men for this, which I guess historically, is probably accurate. The ownership of women probably lead to "women's parts" having a necessity to be covered up - because you own a woman, her assets shouldn't be shown to anyone else.

But that was the past and we all live in the world the past created, we call it, the present. In the present, women are still proliferating the sexualisation of boobs, as much as men are, by wearing bras, push up bras, low cut tops, anything that makes cleavage look good. So you can't really blame men for this situation, or the patriarchy, since the men you're blaming are long gone and probably dust by now. We can blame the status quo of the world, but its unlikely to change because women see their own breasts as somewhat sexual too. Otherwise they wouldn't go to such lengths to make them look good for other people.

Also, the whole idea of boobs being ALWAYS SEXUAL is ridiculous, when you consider that other things can be sometimes sexual. Most of the times, tongues, backs, hands, necks, and eyes aren't sexual - thus allowed to be publicly displayed to some extent - but there are times when they are, I love a back arch as much as the next bisexual woman, I love it when my neck gets stroked by dainty pretty hands, while i stare into some eyes - all of that gets me aroused as fuck. Yet we're allowed to display those things, because they're not always sexual - but netiher are boobs.

tldr, nobody would give a shit if you got your tits out inpublic desu, people would stare for all of about 20 minutes before it stopped being a problem for anyone - in my country at least.

I argued with a girl posting about free the breast shit and she had nothing to say but just omg what can I talk about and I'm cringing for you

>>25510989
No but if you put your dick in her nose..

>>25511810
It doesn't feel good you fucking retard it hurts when whatever is sucking is doing it out of survival.

>>25512049
Rape is not compatible to pedophilia. Pedophilia is the attraction aka harmless. Rape is a violation of someone's body, personal space, privacy, rights as a human being, and respect. Men can be raped too anon.

>>25510873
>>25510989
its only rape if its penis in vagoo/anus/mouth - thats the literal definition of rape.

Sexual assault is any assault which is carried out sexually. So if you're a foot fetishist and you bite someone's foot, that's a sexual assault - the issue is proving it. Whereas it is almost objectively a sexual assault or not, you have to prove this in a court of law and have it agreed upon by other people. If you can't prove it was a sexual assault, you'll end up with a regular ol' assault charge.

EASY.

>>25513154
>i argued with one idiot which means the whole of this argument is idiotic

You're and idiot.

>>25513468
Men can be raped, only by other men though. If a woman inserts an object forcefully into your anus or mouth, that counts as a sexual assault, because its not a penis.

The more you know.

>>25513495
they change the law though
anal rape is now considered full rape.

>>25513517
Only if its a real penis that is in the anus. If its a plastic dick, that's sexual assault.

I heard somewhere that breasts remind us of comfort because we were breastfed when we were young 'uns

>the penis doesn't turn into a baby
Oh I'm laffin