Archived threads in /r/ - Adult Request - 5508. page

File: photo2.jpg (78KB, 378x899px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 378x899px

>>15074639

File: n08w1qez.jpg (352KB, 1376x1400px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1376x1400px

>>15074545

I saw her ones in person, she's gorgeous

File: h1.jpg (160KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1080x1080px

same girl

File: scv2.jpg (91KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 720x960px

Friend's mom

File: Untitled-1.jpg (599KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 1080x1349px

>>15073946

Hello Kira.

I use multiple methods. I start with color and contrast filters, rather than the normal level method. If that doesn't work, I will try curves (rather than levels) with color shift to match skintone for light or white clothes and sharpening/blending. I sometimes use an exposure/color shift method for black or dark clothes. I use unsharpen mask and highpass filtering rather than burn to bring out detail, although I do use a light burn/dodge to bring out nipple color as a finishing touch. I also use blurs, both at the start, to even out noise, and at the end as a finisher.

If my ordinary method does not work, I will use other, more advanced methods before giving up, including work with inverts and channels.

My method works better with dark clothes (especially black) then it does with white ones. Also, there are a lot of rayers who do white, and do white exclusively and very well. For that reason, I may skip white clothes just because my time is limited here.

Some rules. Shadows and light gradients are a problem. Dark clothes require brighter light (otherwise no data); and light clothes require more dim light (otherwise they are washed out). Layers and glossy fabric are serious problems. The key here is that light penetrates through clothes, to skin, and then gets reflected back. To get at this color data, first the light has to penetrate (layers and glossiness interfere with that -- and swimsuits are often both layered and glossy).

The picture is manipulated to remove color levels associated with clothes, leaving a very faint and often low quality image of bare skin, which can then be enriched through filters that duplicate and fill in pixel patterns. This is why patterned fabric, stripes, shadows, and color gradients are a problem. In such cases, you can't just remove some color levels to reach a few that show skin and not much else

>>15073631
Very very hot, thanks! More is always appreciated, but there's no pressure ofc - I'm not a greedy bastard :)

File: 2.jpg (483KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1500x1000px

made another one

cum templates etc

File: rt.jpg (81KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 540x720px

>>15075292

Pleaseeee bump

>>>/soc/

there are no women here

And Google translate isn't an option because it's a image, by the way.

>>15075273
>>/wsr/

google translate on mobile phones can translate a picture. Mine show "hits are private, please contact the uploader"

File: IMG_3051.png (2MB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1334x750px

All I have is screenshots because it's saved as a webm and I can't post that from my phone

I'll post info to who does a good job

it has been floating around on /gif/ and /b/ for quite a while.
But I seem to have lost the copy I saved

File: 71b5cc07e4968044f8424437a8e2db50.gif (3MB, 270x180px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 270x180px

And this is the 2nd one.

File: 1.jpg (101KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1280x720px

here you go

>>15075224
thanks so much anon :)

lemonfont - shapeshifter

>>15075182
Thanks.