Robot Exodus

File: 1453759178910.png (249KB, 768x1280px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 768x1280px

Posts explaining why we want a /hiki/ board

It bothers me that you don't differentiate between 2D and 3D

File: 1454990516388.jpg (28KB, 1624x120px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 1624x120px

Post explaining why wizardchan is not an option

File: important.png (3KB, 446x157px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 446x157px

Also the correct strawpoll regarding gay threads is here:
http://strawpoll.me/6765718

The one posted above is an incorrect link

File: just be yourself bro, always works for me.png (708KB, 1159x321px) Image search: [Google]

708KB, 1159x321px

New /r9k/ thread is up
>>>/r9k/26379549

It's not going to happen, dumb manbaby.

File: 1299346860614.jpg (144KB, 350x501px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 350x501px

>>440095
coming from the person who thought that discriminating against female posters on a website is illegal

I am LMAOing @ ur lyfe

>>440104
It is.

Your board is not going to happen, dumb manbaby.

File: 1403499195345.gif (1MB, 477x350px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 477x350px

>>440107
>it is
provide me with the law regarding online forums banning women being illegal, dumb roastie slut

>>440109
>muh source

Your board is not going to happen, dumb manbaby.

This board isn't going to happen on 4chan in 2016, it's too mainstream and there would be too much flak. Go to wizchan if you want something like this, /hiki/ will certainly fall victim to the same cancer that it did. Everybody will call each other failed normies and people will posture over who is the least normalfag in lieu of argument. Women shit up any internet community dedicated to loneliness, Doj is a faggot, and the board would probably be better than /r9k/ (low hanging fruit), but it's not feasible.

>>440016
Wow you are putting a lot of effort into this.. how often do you contemplate suicide?

>>440118
I mean c'mon, it's 2016

>>440115
>can't cite argument
just do it. Completely blow me away. you have the power RIGHT NOW to end this entire thing if it triggers you so badly. Just provide a source saying it's illegal for websites to discriminate based on gender regarding users.

With that one source you will shut me up.

>>440118
fuck off, this could be a board like /r9k/ that doesn't get co-opted by women and attention whoring limpdick faggots pretending to be women.
/wiz/ was a shit idea and I based it, but /hiki/ is the future and I will fully endorse it.

>>440136
It's not going to happen, dumb manbaby. Even your /r9k/ thread is an absolute trainwreck. You are clearly the only person who wants this board.

Tough luck, bucko. ; )

>>440143
>still hasn't cited his source
guess it isn't illegal to make a board that segregates women. get fucked you triggered tripcunt

File: frogposting.png (505KB, 684x838px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 684x838px

>>440143
>You are clearly the only person who wants this board.

>>440133
Look, dumbass. There used to be a loli and guro board. Moot wordfiltered "femanon" to "cumdumpster". How do you think that would be received today, in an age where clickbait monitor the internet to find things for feminists to get mad about? /hiki/ is probably not going to happen, unfortunately.

>>440139
Wizchan fags will ruin it. The word failed normie is already finding purchase on /r9k/, which is fucking hilarious. It would be better than /r9k/, sure, but it would still be shitty and nowhere near as good as /r9k/'s feel era.

>>440147
>>440150
It's not going to happen.

Nice proxies on that strawpoll, by the way.

>>440154
>the law says you can't do this!
>cite it
>uh uhm uh uh it's not to happen anyway!

>>440156
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discrimination
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anti-discrimination_acts#.C2.A0United_States
http://www.4chan.org/rules
>1. You will not upload, post, discuss, request, or link to anything that violates local or United States law.

Thanks for outing yourself as an obvious, desperate troll, though.

>>440156
I don't think it's ever going to happen because it's a dumb idea and the people that run this site aren't going to do it because it's a dumb idea.

Why should the admins create a new board anytime board culture changes?

>>440159
>merriam-webster
>wikipedia list of a bunch of anti-discrimination laws
ok, so now which one of these laws are you referencing? Just post the exact phrase of the law saying this is illegal.

This went from hilarious to pathetic.

>>440167
>T-THAT SOURCE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH!
Literally a manbaby.

Your board will not happen, sorry manbaby. And if it will, I'd be posting there as frequently as on /r9k/. Tough luck, kiddo.

>>440174
you didn't give a source, you just gave a bunch of acts that you've never gone through and have no idea the content of. Sorry you failed english class in high school and are too stupid to source things.

What you did was the equivalent of citing a news article with the google search of "news"

Please (and I really do mean this) just stop. You're getting embarassed and I know that and I'm cringing at this pretty hard. Do us both a favor and just give it a rest. Ok, champ?

File: 1445771993581.gif (9KB, 210x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 210x250px

>>440179
>grasping this hard

>>440186
Provide the law saying it's illegal for websites to ban female users.

It should look something along the lines of this

"It is illegal for websites to discriminate against female users posting"

File: 1446451406111.png (341KB, 571x862px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 571x862px

>>440191
>he's still grasping

>>440152
first off
>caring about PR
/r9k/'s feel era was hot garbage imo, best times were the greentext days where threads lasted for days on end and >no croissants today boss reigned supreme.
>wizchan fags will ruin it
this I agree with, but don't see a problem with. those pissbabbys are so sensitive a bit of good 'ol fashioned hostility would drive them off.
>>440154
nice source you have there tripcunt, admit you were wrong whenever, i'll be waiting.

>>440186
This is the laziest attempt at something resembling an argument I've seen on 4chan. Not even the reply chain, just this post. Your argument is also retarded; do you think wizchan needs to operate on the darknet or else it will be removed?

>>440198
Ok, I'm just going to assume you're retarded at this point. As in genuinely mentally disabled because she can't grasp the concept of providing a citation to a claim.

I already had you filtered and am going to stop opening up your replies and just leave them minimized now. Goodbye forever.

And yes I know you're going to reply to me despite me not being able to see it because your ego can't take it. Reply away because I won't ever see it ;)

>>440198
generically siting anti-descrimination laws doens't prove you right
>undertale
i'm not even going to go any further with this, I suggest nobody reply to this misinformed tripcuck.

it is in no way illegal to exclude women from online discussion, especially on a site that has a board specifically for the /lgbt/ crowd.
if /lgbt/ can exist so can /hiki/

File: 5.png (18KB, 177x176px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 177x176px

>>440203
>still
>grasping
>this
>hard

>>440207
>undertale
>tripfag
>probably from tumblr
>not even trying to hide it

>>440203
You tell 'em Stevedave.

>>440208
download 4chan X and click the arrow to the left of her tripcode and select filter tripcode

from then on it'll minimize every post she makes and every person that replies to her.

>>440200
He's literally grasping, though.

No, wizchan does not have to exist on the darknet because noone knows about it or cares about it.

>>440205
There are no rules against being non lgbt and posting on /lgbt/.

>>440208
I am not from tumblr.

>>440210
I don't filter people, I don't want 4chan to be a hugbox and I don't use botnets like 4chanX
uninstall that shit or you will get v& on account of some skiddie dosing someone with your IP

>>440208
I'm convinced he's a troll because of some of the things he's posted on /r9k/. He isn't bad at it, but I can't imagine why you wouldn't filter him.

>>440208
Why would any of us try to hide being from tumblr? You seem to think it's something to be embarrassed about, but we aren't that insecure. We refuse to play by your rules.

To all the normies who are upset with our concept board, please take that to the current /r9k/ thread. I want to preserve the /qa/ thread for discussion. Thanks for the bumps though

>>440211
fuck off tripcuck, your attempts to undermine this thread will not be successful.

>>440218
>I want to preserve the /qa/ thread for discussion.
Yes, please everyone stop shitting up this man's thread. It must be P R I S T I N E

>>440216
that's what makes you the most disgusting people on the internet or that i've encountered in person.
you know you aren't wanted and yet you force your presence on a community.
I genuinely want your lot rounded up and executed publically, you're sick freaks.

>>440216
This is pretty good point, anyway. Tumblr is and will always be an acceptable place to originate from.

>>440219
?

>>440223
You're very tsundere.

So to those in favor and those opposed to gay threads, can you please state your case?

The poll is really close

>>440223
You don't think that's maybe overreacting a bit? Don't you think you could just stop visiting these websites that upset you so much instead?

File: 114.png (29KB, 299x100px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 299x100px

>>440223
Fascinating, you're disgusted by open-mindedness and literally want to kill anyone who doesn't share your opinion. Though judging by your wording, you don't have the balls to do the deed yourself.

>>440226
ur a fag

>>440223
Stop being so fucking tryhard. This is a website you shithead. Nobody is going to leave because you say you would execute them because they're from tumblr.

>>440224
Please stop your /r9k/ shtick, dude. The fembot meme is so cancerous it pains me. People used to have dedicated threads where everybody would come forward and greentext the worst things that ever happened to them, now everybody is treating /r9k/ like a dating site.

>>440226
Honestly, gay threads create personalities like Noun who derail any thread they post in when five orbiters start s-stuttering to them. They also invite a spammer I really hate. People who want gay threads can have them on /r9k/, they aren't threatened by people claiming to be fembots and they get enough traffic to stay alive unlike greentext threads.

>>440231
>he thinks tumblr is about open-mindedness
>he thinks it's about my opinion
it's because you're all narcissistic greedy little fucking rodents that think of no one other than yourselves, you're cancerous to a society as a whole and are singlehandedly holding education back.
I have no problem with lefties, which I often see get generalized as 'tumblirites'
the people I want to see rounded up and executed are the oversensitive babies who enforce things like speech codes and tone policing, it's fucking 1984 shit.
yes, I fucking mad.

>>440233
>Nobody is going to leave because you say you would execute them because they're from tumblr.
I know this, I don't intend to change jack, just voicing my opinion.
absolutely nothing can change 4chan aside from 4chan itself, even trying to with any kind of rhetoric is pointless.
>hurr remove [thing i dislike]
>[thing i dislike intensifies]

OP still thinks he will be given his own board. Seriously, if girls and non-virgins trigger you so much, go to wizchan. That's what it's made for.

There will never be a board on 4chan with rules 1 or 2. How stupid are you that you can't realize that? You will not get your exclusive little club of special snowflakes. Girls and non-virgins have been posting on 4chan from the start, far longer than you. If you can't handle that, you're cancer and should get out.

>>440241
Who is the spammer you really hate?

>>440350
>There will never be a board on 4chan with rules 1 or 2.
You can see the future? Tell me what the next powerball numbers will be.

>>440363
desustorage.org/r9k/thread/24360965/

>>440350
>If you can't handle that, you're cancer and should get out.
Non-virgins aren't really a problem, but man, people claiming to be women fucking destroyed /r9k/. Self professed women tear communities of lonely people apart.

>>440364
Even if I don't know the numbers, I can still tell you that you're not going to win.

>>440365
Huh, I don't really notice that person. Are you sure it's same guy?

>>440388
Yeah it was definitely one person, it looks like he hasn't posted in a while, though. I haven't been to /r9k/ in a while either. Look deeper in the archives if you're skeptical.

>>440380
>poster offhandedly mentions being female
>robots go apeshit, some calling her a whore and slut and gtfo, others saying pls b my gf
>it's the female's fault

I didn't know /r9k/ is full of muslims. It's the woman's fault she was raped, she should have worn a burka.

>>440411
Does it ever get tiring whiteknighting this much?

Hiro please!

I just want a hiki lifestyle board, don't give a fuck if women are allowed or not.
hell if there was a real hikki chick out there somewhere(other than gypsy-kun) she'd probably be just as hostile as your average robit.
only rule should be you actually have to fit into the medical definition of hikki - has not left the house for 6 months or more.
I doubt OP even fits this, he's probably just a failed normalfam

>>440429
OP admitted to having a job. He is simply desperately trying to change the subject so he would get his own board. That's all. He doesn't care about the community. He just wants his own board where he can bask in his own glory.

>>440432
well, then this is really pathetic.
I still want /hiki/
haven't found a good place to discuss social withdrawal in general, uboachan is SJW/Tulpafag central, and wizchan hates me because i've let women drain my mana and don't adhere to weird newage beliefs.
/r9k/ was fucked from the day they brought it back, shoud've never killed the chon.

>>440438
/jp/ used to be a decent place for this, before several dozen independent forces combined to ruin it.

I wish you luck in your quest.

File: 1451101070563.jpg (1MB, 2048x1357px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1357px

>>440443
I'm well aware, witnessed the last good days and subsequently contributed to its ruination by participating in the 2huspaam. it's still the best place for comfy japan wallpapers though.

>>440443
What were those forces?

>>440445
its current userbase. they weren't entirely offsite fagets.

>>440446
I just don't go there ever so I was curious what the forces were specifically.

>>440438
You wouldn't be welcome into OP's exclusive country club then, nonvirgins are specifically not allowed.

Ask OP to explain his hypocrisy. He wants a /hiki/ board, but you would be banned from it despite being a true recluse, while he would be allowed on it despite having a job.

>>440016
>taking le epic rage /v/ dude and puttin g /r9k/ on it
This is why you all need to kill yourself already.

Also protip: Use /trash/
It is the place for people on 4chan that have no other place.

>>440445
People who want to talk about otaku culture instead of shitty circlejerk blogshit 24/7.
Glad /jp/ changed that way.

>>440199
>calling others oversensitive while begging for a safe space board

>>440205
> not filtering tripcunts

Dropped filter to see who you referring to. No surprises there.

>>440205
His points about legality are bullshit. But he is right in that 4chan had never discriminated against anyone and has no reason to start now. Why should 4chan suddenly make board restricted only to a few people, when it has never done anything like it, and goes against the open nature of the site?

I'm game, but only if you add the following:

>Posters can't use the term "normie/s" in any board but /hiki/
>Posters can't reference themselves as having a job or studying

Wow, you millennial shits really can't handle any kind of criticism or comments that may disrupt your fragile worldview. This is pathetic.

>>440563
But that last rule would mean OP would get banned from his own board. Well, surely he is okay with that, right? Otherwise a /hiki/ board would not make sense.

File: 1395007805541.jpg (32KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x375px

Oh, man, if only there were a way to hide posts and threads you don't like.

Oh wait, there is such a function. I invite all the newfriends (including OP) to figure out how to use it.

>>440571
Yes.

As he said, entitled millenial faggot. Now fuck off back to your mammas skirt where its safe.

>>440016
>wants a board for hikikomoris
>bans girls, non-virgins, but not people who have jobs and aren't shut-ins

Explain this.

>>440411
>mention being female knowing it will bait people into begging for your contact information, flaming you, and derailing the thread
Keep your gender to yourself for fuck's sake. I can forgive doing it out of trolling, but just doing it and getting mad at the board for acting like it has always acted is stupid and petulant.

>>>440642
He doesn't want a board for hikis, he is wants a place to bitch about normies, roasties and anyone else who differs from him in any way.

>>440657
Yes it does, the generation begins in the early to mid 80s.

>>440658
Well obviously. He wants a place where he is given mod powers and can ban anyone he doesn't like. He is particularly triggered by girls and non-virgins and that's why he wants them out of his sight. If only there were an actual *chan website purely dedicated to that...

>>440642
People need to work to live. /hiki/ is a shitty name, but so is everything else.

>>440675
This whole thing is shitty. It was funny at first but it's starting to get stale now. OP will probably give up soon and go to wizchan to lament. /r9k/ will go on as it was before and nobody will give a fuck.

>>440782
>/r9k/ will go on as it was before
/r9k/ changed a lot in the last couple of years, and for the worse. I can't blame OP for wanting a board dedicated to actual depressive/lonely blogging, and people claiming to be women completely fuck that up.

>>440799
>a board dedicated to actual depressive/lonely blogging
Tumblr?

>>440806
Tumblr is a bunch of blogs with limited capacity for discussion.

Normie women are a major problem with /r9k/. They basically use the board as a place to feel better about themselves, and several of them have flat out admitted it on the board.

Well the results speak for themselves mods and Hiro: We want /hiki/

>>440842
a lot of normies admit doing this

we're a zoo to them

>>440016
Listen, one of the promises I made before the r9k election was to get rid of this toxic shit. Why do you people think splitting would change anything? If everyone migrated to your new board, they'd bring all the people you dont like with them.

>>441100
I have no problem with normies posting on /hiki/. Anyone can post, but they just have to abide by the current proposed rules. As it stands now, they'd be able to do very little normie things there.

This will keep them in check and allow the varied range of robots to enjoy a good board culture.

>>440016
>I want to make 4chan muh censorship safe space
I rememeber when r9k wasn't tumblr

>>441111
we just want a social group. Social groups aren't safe spaces.

>>441112
>we just want a social group
>that censors anything that hurts our feelings :(
>those normie boogeymen are always thwarting us :(

>>441115
We just want a social group of like minded people

the rules are meant to keep people that will shit up the group out and the people that won't in.

Do you run up to groups of social outcasts and insult them in public because they don't open up their friend circle to people they don't like?

>>441115
>baaaaw, we just want to talk about anime :(
>please stop discussing furniture in our anime hugbox, it's triggering me!!!

>>441141
All the boards are either hobby/interest boards, or boards related to 4chan like /qa/ and /s4s/. Being a "robot" is not an interest, seeing as no one can even agree on a definition of it.

>>441142
Feelposting is a very important hobby

>>441148
>tfw no frogposting board
>tfw no shitposting board

>>441151
>tfw no shitposting board
[s4s]

The frogposting board is /r9k/

I scrambled the results with bots because you used a shitty meme poll site.

/thread

Hiro, disregard OP's faggotry and make /hiki/ - a board for people experiencing social withdrawl.
it should be a blue board and one of the rules should be no discussion of sex and sexuality, this will solve everyone's problem.

>>441142
but there is a clear definition of hikikomori
"people who refuse to leave their house and, thus, isolate themselves from society in their homes for a period exceeding six months"
/hiki/ should be exclusive to them.

>>441099
Hence why /hiki/ needs to be made

>>441102
Exactly this. This will make sure the normie can't shitpost constantly, that way they can easily get reported and banned

This thread is full-blown autism

>>441141
>>441115
Wow look at all these normies with their so called "amazing social life".

The results are pretty solid all around mods and Hiro: People want /hiki/ not only created, but want it unlisted as well.

>>441222
It's already up.

>>441222
checked, but I don't want it unlisted.

>>441226
But why? /trash/ is unlisted and its working great for them.

>>441228
good point, my opinion remains unchanged though.
/hiki/ should be somewhat of an antithesis to /lgbt/
(/lgbt/ is all about sex/sexuality and my ideal /hiki/ would have a rule preventing discussions of sex/sexuality)

>>441102
Rule 1: no girls. Rule 2: no non-virgins.

Tell everyone again how this is just another 4chan board where everyone is allowed to discuss the subject at hand.

>>441102
>I have no problem
>I
>I
>I

If anyone still thought OP is doing this for robots, get your dose of reality check here. He cares about one thing only: he wants his own board, one where he makes the rules. In his own mind he has already crowned himself as the messiah and emperor of the new board.

>>441281
well you can't exactly pop out of the computer screen and stop them from posting

File: 1443833665467.jpg (1MB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x2000px

To all those reading this:

In cancerous normie threads, link the /qa/ thread in a post.

This will help spread awareness and redirect them here without having to always make a thread all the time.

>>441289
Stop posting? What? Who? If you want your own board where only people who are like you are allowed, there is plenty of choice.

>tumblr
>reddit
>2*4ch
>wizchan

Why shit up 4chan with your ridiculous demands that will never be met?

>>441292
>like video games
>there's plenty of choices
>[insert a bunch of seperate websites here]

why are you so triggered that robots want a board dedicated to discussing the robot lifestyle?

Why are you so triggered that you won't be included?

>>441291
Why do girls and non-virgins trigger you so much that you go on a whining crusade about it? Go to wizchan if you can't handle other people posting.

>>441295
They don't trigger me. They have no place in a community of social outcasts and are completely out of place.

>>441294
You're not asking for a board discussing the robot lifestyle (whatever that is). You're asking for a board that bans everyone except those you approve. Name one boars that bans people based on who they are, or a board that was given to a special snowflake to moderare as he wants. That's right, there are none, and won't be.

>>441298
>robot lifestyle (whatever that is)
If you really don't know what robot culture and the hikikomori lifestyle is, we don't have anything further to discuss because you're offering opinion on something you know nothing about.

>>441297
But 4chan is not a community of social outcasts...

File: 1408594292301.png (31KB, 448x357px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 448x357px

>>441301
>But 4chan is not a community of social outcasts...
that's only about half true at this point

>>441299
You're not even a hikikomori. How can you expect to be able to post on /hiki/, much less given moderator access to it?

Hypocrite. This whole charade has from the beginning been about one thing and one thing only: you want a "no girls allowed" secret club and be given mod powers to it. You're now desperately trying to flip-flop and say anything when you realized it wouldn't happen.

>>441304
>is a Japanese term to refer to the phenomenon of reclusive adolescents or adults who withdraw from social life, often seeking extreme degrees of isolation and confinement.
And how do you know I'm don't fit this description?

I never said I wanted mod powers and I don't see at all where I'm flip-flopping.

>>441305
>The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare defines hikikomori as people who refuse to leave their house and, thus, isolate themselves from society in their homes for a period exceeding six months
you admitted you had a job earlier, you are not /hikki/ material.

File: 1453404435306.gif (912KB, 240x176px) Image search: [Google]

912KB, 240x176px

>>441306
I was literally just rolling with the definition I got from wikipedia as that fits the description that we want.

I don't see why you're so upset about women not being allowed to attentionwhore their gender and nonvirgins being able to rub it in the face of autists that they lost their v-card

>>441280
Global rules say nobody under 18

All you need is rule 2 since there are no female virgins above 18

>>441303
4chan is 4chan. Always has been. It includes everyone, even social outcasts. It has never discriminated. And never has anyone been given special status, especially not wannabes with napoleon complexes like you.

>>441309
literally nothing you say matters because until we hear from Hiroshima, you can blather away about it not being allowed all you want but until then it's just conjecture.

>>440016
The only argument I need to hear is that /lgbt/ is a board

If /lgbt/ is a board then this is absolutely justified against all arguments of "being a hikki isn't a hobby"

>>441309
>It includes everyone... It has never discriminated
>2. You will immediately cease and not continue to access the site if you are under the age of 18

>>441307
i've said this before, and I will say it again, I think /hikki/ should have a rule preventing discussion of sex/sexuality as a whole, as well as being a blue board.
this would both prevent women and "women" from attention whoring, and nonvirgins(like myself) from "rubbing it in"
discussion of sex would be counterproductive to discussion of social withdrawal, and that's the entire point of making this.
>>441309
a board for discussing social withdrawl would fit with 4chan's ethos.
a wizchan-lite where it's all about hate and general misandry at the end of the day would not.
having rules preventing discussion of sex/sexuality isn't discrimination, nobody is singled out.
if a woman is participating in an anonymous discussion, nobody needs to know she's a woman, same goes for men.

>>441312
>same goes for men.
That will never work considering how frequently being male is referenced in robot stories and discussions coupled with men getting the worst of it when they're genetically inferior

The stupid thing about OP is that he wants a /hiki/ board that's not a board for hikki's. A hikikomori has a set definition and your board does not cater to this demographic.

You can't call it /hiki/

>>440563
I think the term 'normie' and any pepe posting should be banned. Keep reddit it reddit.

>>441312
>I think /hikki/ should have a rule preventing discussion of sex/sexuality as a whole
People need to understand that the primary reason people aren't using wizchan instead of this new proposed board is that wizchan caters to voluntary celibates, they can't discuss sex or relationships in any way. That's why so many users go there and get banned because the absolute vast majority of adult male virgins on /r9k/ are involuntary celibates and still desire relationships or sex.

I think as long as the mods actually do their job and ban all gay hookup threads/steam cuteposting hookup threads and gay circlejerks with avatarfags under the 'no /soc/ posting' rule, then we should be fine.

>>441316
normie isn't a reddit term and has been here for quite some time

>>441317
Just like the troll face right?
le rage face?

Such hilarious memes

>>441319
pepe is a meme that is now pretty popularized by reddit, but unless you can find a replacement for normie, it's going to be on /r9k/ for a long time

>>441320
You really are autistic and stupid aren't you?

Are you thinking up other names for your board that would actually make sense since /hiki/ doesn't?

>>441322
there is a strawpoll up regarding names

surprisingly /hiki/ is no longer in the lead

>>441317
normie is a reddit term, it started with oversensitive redditors and tumbies getting triggered by the -fag suffux but still wanting to call eachother normalfag.
>>441316
>wizchan caters to voluntary celibates, they can't discuss sex or relationships in any way.
I personally don't use wizchan because they are mostly hardcore misandrists(this may have changed, last time I went there was over a year ago and after visiting tonight it seems most of them have done some serious reflecting), but I do like that and am essentially advocating for both a /hikki/ board that's actually for hikikomori, and does this as well.
>I think as long as the mods actually do their job and ban all gay hookup threads/steam cuteposting hookup threads and gay circlejerks with avatarfags under the 'no /soc/ posting' rule, then we should be fine.
personally, think the cancer is far too terminal for this to work. /r9k/ has been fucked since the chon died and nothing will drive away the normalfags. the /lgbt/ crowd moved in at some point too, and have been reaching cebruz levels of collective annoyance.

>>441319
coolface was from bodybuilding forums and rage comics came from /b/ you supreme faggot.

>>441311
/lgbt/ does not ban straight people.

>>441310
You won't hear from him, ever. He has more important things to worry about than a whining petulant manchild who wanta his own board to moderate because he's a special snowflake.

>>441327
Thank you for the cup of your tears when people don't want to include you in something

>>441326
And this board won't ban females or non-virgins because that's unfeasible. It will ban those who state or imply they are these things though

Over the years 4chan has been seen as this hive of recluses and outcasts yet we got a board dedicated to homo discussion before a board dedicated to discussion about hikki/NEET/outcast/recluse/depression things even though there's been overwhelming demand which you can see by what happened to /r9k/. A general discussion board essentially turned into a board to discuss these topics just by itself.

>>441334
>this board won't ban females
>but it will ban anyone who mentions being female

The level of cognitive dissonance is amazing.

>>441334
>4chan has been seen as this hive of recluses and outcasts

Lolwut. No it hasn't.

>1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.

>2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are non-virgins.

Fuck off. I want a board for shut-ins, not a board for bitter virgins obsessed with sex like /r9k/.

>>441342
Go to the /soc/ shut-in thread

When you come back maybe you'll see why these rules exist

>>441344
Why the fuck would I ever go to /soc/ you fucking degenerate.

>>441345
not that anon, but the /soc/ shut in thread is full of normalfags who are obsessed with social media and attention. they also only really talk about money troubles and all of them whiteknight the shit out of any women.

>>441346
A better rule would be one banning discussion of social media such as Facebook and Twitter.

>>441349
ban discussion of sex and sexuality and that will follow, nobody uses that shit other than to get laid or keep up appearances.

>>441350
Discussion of masturbating and 2D should be allowed. Whining about how you can't get laid shouldn't be allowed or it will just be /r9k/.

>>441349
>>441350
>ban everything I don't like

That's all this whole discussion will ever amount to, and why a new board for this will never be created.

>>441354
Unless the whining is curbed the board will absolutely be an /r9k/ clone.

>>441352
>Discussion of masturbating and 2D should be allowed
why? nobody needs to know what you jack off to, degenerate.
>>441356
it's already looking like one.

>>441356
With the only exception being that OP is the and can ban everyone he doesn't like. That's the one and only thing he has wanted since the beginning.

>>441359
>OP sets out some rules for a new board
>WOW Y NOT JUST BAN EVERYTHING U DONT LIKE?
I guess a lot of people don't handle rejection very well...

>>441368
>I-i-i-it's not banning everyone I don't like! It's just the rules!
>The rules just ban everyone I don't like!

>>441373
Yeah... pfft... these guys are almost as bad as /v/

>don't post stuff unless it's related to video games
LIKE HELLO.... nazis! The safe space is on tumblr.... What's next?? banning black people? baka

>>440016
>hiki
>cannot reference themselves as women or non-virgins

Good job not knowing what hikikomori means. I will savor watching this board never get created. Especially considering you addressed Hiro directly instead of showing proper respect to the people who actually do the work.

File: 1454468112324.gif (25KB, 703x800px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 703x800px

>>441376

>Wanting a board that encourages your mental disorders
Up next: an autism board that bans neurotypicals?

>>441380
OP wants to ban female and non-virgin hikikomoris. While not banning himself when he is not even a hikikomori.

>>441391
Or a board for pedophiles that bans anyone who does not have a CP collection.

>>441391
How many times does this need to be said?

/lgbt/ exists

>>441398
How many times does this need to be said?

/lgbt/ does not ban straight people

>>441400
It does if i post guys on girl

>>441400
How is that relevant at all?

>>441403
You mean porn? Nsfw will get you banned on a blue board.

>>441405
You use /lgbt/ as an example of why you want your own board. It's not comparable at all.

>>441429
>A/ll the boards are either hobby/interest boards
/lgbt/
>Why should anybody cater to you?
/lgbt/
>/lgbt/ does not ban straight people
Sure, and there's no reason a board can't create a ban of any mention of being a particular thing.

Pony posting used to be banned site wide, I don't know if it still is but you could just as easily ban female-posting. Nobody is stopping females posting, they're just stopping them referring to themselves as females and it's the same with non-virgins. It's as simple as that.

There's no reason to get so upset about this topic. I think the board should be trialed. If the mods decided that lgbt deserved a community to discuss their own stuff then why not virgin males? I think the rules will work quite well in creating a board that's able to discuss the topics that /r9k/ was home to with much less low quality posts.

There is no forum with any kind of traffic that currently does what the OP is suggesting and I highly recommend you actually read that very carefully to not make the same stupid statement so many others have made.

>>441444
No board on 4chan has ever banned people based on who they are. No board on 4chan has ever been an exclusive club. You are asking to be given your exclusive board, contrary to 4chan's open nature, because you can't tolerate girls posting. What makes you think you will get such a board?

>>441444
and to be perfectly clear:

I think the board should be called /dep/ and be a board for discussion about depressing things, shut-in lifestyle, virginity, and those similar topics that used to be able to be discussed on /r9k/ and were part of that little culture. At least this way it has more of a topic.

>>441445
And before /lgbt/ was made there was no board specifically about lgbt shit
What's your point? 4chan has been continuously changing throughout the years, sometimes in large leaps.

And once again, nobody is stopping female or non-virgin posters to go against this "open nature of 4chan" that you arbitraily pulled out of your ass. Nobody is stopping these people from openly visiting the board or doing whatever they want except making posts that reference themselves as these things.

What could be possibly be the negatives of just trialing this board?

>>441446
>females and non-virgins can post!
>rules 1 and 2: females and non-virgins are banned on sight

Why aren't you also banning gays, blacks, or non-neets?

>>440380
Create a rule stating no user can directly or indirectly communicate with female posters, this will put responsibility on the community

>>440454
I have to agree, i would like op to explain this

>>441450
Australians were banned from making threads on /mu/

The mods obviously see the value in regulating certain demographics

Your argument is moot

>>441446
>What could be possibly be the negatives of just trialing this board?

How about the objective fact that it's a stupid idea?

>>441446
It creates an exclusive club for a few undesirables and sets a precedent where 4chan is no longer an open community where everyone can post?

>>441461
Source for the Australia claim? Rangeband have been done occasionally to prevent spammers and serial shitposters.

What is the logical reason that a board should ban girls and non-virgins?

>>441480
4chan has always been known as a really open place where new people are welcomed with open arms

>>441482
>What is the logical reason that a board should ban girls and non-virgins?
Seriously? Banning females is just too fucking obvious.

One of the absolute best general measures for whether or not someone is a normalfag is whether or not they're a virgin. It's a very simple yes/no thing that can separate out people easily. When you don't have these kinds of checks in place you end up with the /soc/ shut-in thread, where the definition of shut-in is up to the individual's opinion which essentially enables absolutely everyone to label themselves a shut-in and it's the same thing for 'robot' or even 'hikikimori'.

It's simple, it's easy, it improves quality.

>>441486
All the female and non-virgin robots and shut-ins will disagree with you. You don't want a board for shut-ins or robots. You want a board that bans people you don't like. It's that simple. Once you admit it, you will realize why it will not happen on 4chan.

>>441486
Anyone can jump in and post on 4chan. It has always been that way. If you have a problem with girls, there is a site called wizardchan that'a made for people like you.

>>440569
>>441304
>>441309
>>441342
>>441392
Ive read through the thread as of this post and the above posts deserves special attention/should be properly addressed.

1)Op sounds like he just wants some internet friends that's why hes so persistent on having this board made on 4chan
2)2*4chan, a subreddit, or go to wizchan. Any of these 3 would work for op and theres no stopping him from using all three methods.
3) By principle r9k shouldnt exist, it shouldve been deleted since it failed as an experimental board
4) I'm questioning why op is crusading for a new board if he hasnt been on r9k for months. Why suddenly the desire to have a new community created? Tell us op where have you been.

i dont think the board would be warranted. If the problem is the existing r9k board, then maybe that should be addressed instead.

im not quite understanding of the current theme of 4chan, the introduction of /pol/ was the first board to be inconsistent with said theme of 4chan, but it exists and was able to form a community, perhaps thats the same reason why other new boards such as /aco/ and /his/ was successfully created too, but then why does /i/ still exist despite its lack of community and activity, or is it an image issue of essentially having a /loser/ board?

If its simply comes down to community then the board should be created, but it doesn't simply come down to that, otherwise so many other boards should also be made e.g. Furries

To understand whether or not the board should be created, maybe we should ask 'for whom does 4chan cater for?' On what basis is a board created?

>>440016
Look OP, I see you have a lot of dedication to waste and I appreciate it, but the board you are proposing is useless.

You can't ask for the replecement of a board because you don't like it anymore (starting off from /r9k/ which shouldn't even be a board for useless neetposting), even more just to add it to the pile of small boards which will be barely used.

Plus, if you really need to, there are many threads on /adv/ to help you fight your unhealthy shut-in habits instead of cultivating them in front of your monitor, or, if I really have to say this, remember yourself that boards are made for and by lovers of a certain hobby or content, not for their research of positivity in their regressive psychological habits. I know 90% of the people who browse this website are introverted, but it's not a problem to me, it should be a problem to you and just to you. Don't make it cluttered.

>>441490
>All the female and non-virgin robots and shut-in
heh

Anyway, your same, fucking brainless argument has been responded to countless times

You don't say /a/ exists to ban people they don't like
You don't say /lgbt/ exists to ban people they don't like
These boards exist for a particular topic and when people post off that topic they're stopped.

You have obviously have no idea what you're talking about, saying 4chan is some all-inclusive place, talking about all these females posters. You obviously have no experience with any of the forums you're talking about. You're most likely upset about the idea of being excluded from a community when you people have absolutely everywhere else on the internet to go.

What's really going on here is that many older users of 4chan are seeing it devolve into a community they're becoming less and less able to connect to. There was homogeneity in the community to have a functional board that discussed what is now the whole robot culture on /r9k/ just naturally. That grew just from the userbase shifting the tide but that userbase is dying. It's such a shame that boards have really gotten to the point where threads have to be specifically designed to get replies by asking questions or baiting others to just not instantly fall below blatantly low quality or bait threads. Maybe this is just a last desperate attempt to try and bring back what we enjoyed.

I think if the /dep/ board was made with the rules in the OP it could provide a legitimate board for discussion. I have no idea if it will work, the userbase is so shitty it probably won't but I can't see a downside to trying.

>>441492
>there's a site called wizardchan that's made for people like you
I called it and you still posted it

There's a site called reddit, tumblr, digg, 9gag, twitter, facebook, youtube, everywhere, etc... that's made for people like you where you can get the same opinions from the same people all thinking the same way

Can anyone explain how the strawpolls regarding being an unlisted board as well as banning person worship pulled a complete 180 overnight?

>>441527
Are you upset that banning person worship would result in you being instantly permabanned, tripfag?

>>441531
No, the person worship strawpoll had an overwhelming support against person worship so that any threads on person worship were to be banned and it was that way for a couple days.

Now it's gone full 180 in just a day. I think maybe it was linked to an AshleyJ or Rose community since up until this point, most people were really pushing for the rule.

>>441532
Maybe.

Or maybe (which is most likely from my viewpoint) a couple of individuals want to maintain those threads by any means necessary. Why? Many reasons, I'll imply to one. We are actually quite few.

You should ban us, or you will eventually become us. Good luck.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRo-GarMaIg

>>441531
I'm upset cuz you fag, fag.

>>440025
So you are not "normal", but you want to be on a popular forum.

You are contradicting yourselves.

>>441512
A long-winded nonsensical rant by a newfag whose only argument is "girls are scary, ban them because I am a special snowflake and deserve it!"

Wizchan is made for people like you. Why not go there?

>>441540
OP will ban you from his subreddit all right. He will stop at nothing to get his own board.

>>441547
I don't care if I get banned. I belong to the worshippers, but within us there are many divisions. Ban me, or you will become me.

>>441545
Lonely people have but one desire.

>>441512
You clearly haven't been on 4chan for long. The site has always been about having different people with different opinions on the same boards, talking about the same topics, and calling each other faggots.

Seriously, how weak are you that you can't handle a girl posting on the same board as you? Or a guy who has had sex?

>>441540
Why not just take your rose threads to /b/ or leave them on /r9k/ if we get /hiki/?

>>441577
It's not about being weak in regards to women. The whole problem is that when women mention they are women in a board of social outcasts and autists, the thread will derail to men trying to get her attention. This prevents attentionwhoring, either on purpose or not.

This is the explicit purpose of the rule, but a little more behind that is that women can't be social outcasts and that them pretending to be robots despite the above (threads derailing as guys clamber over one another to date them) will hurt the community.

>>441582
Why not go to wizchan and petition them to loosen their rules? It seems like the only problem you have with wizchan is that you're not the one making the rules there. What you want is completely incompatible with what 4chan is about, while it's only small tweaks to wizchan.

Think about it for a minute. Wizchan loosens their rules a bit, you can go there and stay there happily ever after.

>>441585
>Why not go to wizchan and petition them to loosen their rules?
Because I don't have to and I don't want to and also because of this >>440025


It'd be much easier for Hiro to just create a board and sticky on the front page our rules.

>>441584
>women can't be social outcasts
Yes, we get it, this is only about what you want, and you want to be the one who decide who is a social outcast/robot/hiki. This coming from a guy who isn't even a hikikomori, you have a job ffs. Don't you realize you would be the first one to get banned from the board you're trying to create?

>>441587
>I don't want to

And you expect to be given your own board to moderate on 4chan, with all the mods and programmers working hard to create and maintain the board, on which they wouldn't even be welcome?

>>441588
Sorry, but I wouldn't be banned. The rules are listed at the top of this thread.

Also yes, women can't be social outcasts. They will always have legions of beta orbiters who want to have sex with them and she gets the honor of picking. I don't see what you don't get about this. It's quite simple.

>>441589
>And you expect to be given your own board to moderate on 4chan, with all the mods and programmers working hard to create and maintain the board, on which they wouldn't even be welcome?
so are you saying that mods and programmers are modern day renaissance men who are well versed in fitness, video games, literature, lgbt culture, outdoor hobbies, automobiles, etc.?

Ideally there would be mods that support the board monitoring the board, just as every board on 4chan has. They have mods that support the board monitoring the board.

OFFICIAL UPDATE TO THE RULES OF PROPOSED BOARD /hiki/

2b) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply having a job

>>441590
>Sorry, but I wouldn't be banned.
Now you would be.

>>441594
That's not how it works. There's discussion first among those who want /hiki/ to happen and we agree on the rules, then I post an update to the rules so we don't have randoms like yourself adding and banning whatever they feel like and having the movement falling apart instantly

>>441594
Let me just clear up the confusion you have

the name is just a name and doesn't represent the rules, and as it stands now, /hiki/ isn't even the most popular choice anymore, but I'll keep it until (if) a board is created, just to avoid confusion and the board can be named whatever the popular choice is.

Again, the name is not indicative of the rules, it's just a name.

>>441595
>randoms like yourself adding and banning whatever they feel like
But that's what you're doing.

>>441595
>There's discussion first among those who want /hiki/ to happen and I decide the rules, then I post an update to the rules

Fixed that for you.

>>440026
>Also the correct strawpoll regarding gay threads is here:
>http://strawpoll.me/6765718

kek, I was wondering wtf was the joke.

>>441512
>There's a site called reddit, tumblr, digg, 9gag, twitter, facebook, youtube, everywhere, etc... that's made for people like you where you can get the same opinions from the same people all thinking the same way
It's breathtaking how you can say this while insisting on having a board that bans people who don't think like you.

>>440491
>talk about otaku culture
/jp/ doesn't talk about otaku culture anymore. It does talk about subjects that are associated with otaku culture, but it always had that kind of discussion. Except now it takes place in general threads whose users don't overlap rather than across the board.

>Glad /jp/ changed that way.
I hope that you came to /jp/ in 2012+, or else this is just depressing.

>>441577
That's why there's only one board about one topic, right?

You fucking idiots

>go to /lgbt/
>make post about fucking bitches and how stupid gays are
>replying to gay people telling them they're stupid for being gay
>mods shouldn't do anything because this is 4chan, not a hugbox

>go to /a/
>talk about football
>call anime stupid
>call anime watchers stupid
>you can't handle the banter brah? Are you a newfag? 4chan is a diverse place full of differing opinions

>>441585
It's hilarious just how little you understand yet how much you talk

There is one place on the internet that has a fairly decent amount of traffic that kind of does what OP is suggesting but the fact is that it's not what OP is suggesting. They explicitly don't want incels and that's not going to change

But in your tiny little mind, having this one forum that's not actually what OP is proposing is where users who want to discuss this stuff should go but ignore the fact that every single other board has a variety of alternatives

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about yet you'll continue to fight against something new and interesting because it excludes you.

>>441603
Actually no, that's not true. I originally created more lengthy and restrictive rules. From there tiny details were added and removed based on consensus and someone a number of threads ago suggested reducing the rules and I agreed so I did and put up a poll to vote on the original rules vs the reduced rules.

Changing the name wasn't even my idea.

The only thing that I would actually consider putting my foot down on would be banning person worship threads. Past that, the only thing I'm doing is trying to keep the appeal more broad than wizchan, but allowing everyone to make suggestions and discuss.

>>441654
A fair amount of people have proposed scrapping your "no girls allowed" and "no non-virgins allowed" rules, simply for the sake of being realist. Then some discussion board actually might be feasible.

But since you don't want a discussion board but your own exclusive club, it's not going to happen.

>>441662
that rule has been around since the inception and the poll showing those in support of creating the board far outnumbers those who oppose

>>441639
>go to /lgbt/
>mention being straight
>don't get banned

>go to /specialsnowflake/
>mention having had sex
>get banned

Amazing how simple it works.

>>441666
yeah and?

Do you run up to groups of autistic people and brag about how you slayed some pussy at chad's party last weekend and then get furious when they would rather not associate with you?

>>441662
>scrap the primary rules of the board to defeat all purpose so nobody gets offended
Only intelligent people like you have been arguing this

>>441582
Look, man. You're speaking to someone who doesn't anymore of those threads. Those other people want you to become them.

Why? Various reasons and I do not share this ambition. I don't need a community as much as they do.

>>441670
*want

Sorry, bit tired from hotline 2.

>>441668
If the board's entire existence is based on those two rules, then it might as well not exist at all.

>>441666
You have a very obvious flaw in logic. The purpose of rules are to try and make a better quality board

You have different topics to try and create a discussion board for different subjects. It's not a hugbox, it's an attempt to improve quality of discussion.

You've completely arbitrarily determined what rules can be made. You can ban females from referring to themselves. There's no reason this rule can't be made.

The primary problem here is that you have no idea what you're talking about yet you're the leading authority of what would make the best community. People are seriously asking how banning people referring to themselves as females is a benefit.

>>441673
The latter is almost impossible to control unless they are bragging. The first one can be easily spotted, but then who wants a sausage feast.

Are there only non-virgins and women on the internet?

>>441676
>There's no reason this rule can't be made.
Except for the fact that nobody anywhere on staff would ever support it.

I hate to break it to all the people complaining about OP's idea, but the fact remains that a majority of people want this board

>board culture changes

>WEEE NEEDDDD A NEWWW BOOOAAAARRRDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>441676
>You can ban females from referring to themselves.

Doesn't mean you should. There are girls who happen to be NEETs.

>>441696
Girls can't be robots or hikis or social outcasts. OP has repeatedly said so, and he is the ultimate authority on this. Nobody can question him.

>>441697
Well then OP is a fag and his board is dumb.

>>441699
You don't say.

File: dr_evil_wut.jpg (20KB, 320x245px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 320x245px

>>441689
>a majority of people want this board

>people who have had sex are automatically normalfags

you guys have no clue how the real world works, which in that case shouldn't have any input on how a board should actually cater to the real world

>>441697
Yeah, but this is cuckchan. Don't you remember? Nobody likes (I*m indifferent) you and therefore they do not care.

File: 1455156065166.jpg (19KB, 192x220px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 192x220px

>>441693
The thing is that these 'tfw no gf' fags were the ones who changed the boards culture, now they feel entitled to having their own board because the original residents post trying to restore it. It went from creating content and misadventures in the real world and sharing similar feels to "WHO /PATHETICSHUTIN/ HERE?" measuring who has the smallest dick just to gloat in front of other losers.

>>441709
>BRAIN PROBLEMS
The best summary of everyone itt.

>>441709

I don't think they realize /r9k/ literally has no purpose, and never did. It was /b/ with a robot, but mental illness flooded the board and now that people are starting to take their meds and post normal stuff, the NEETs are screaming at the top of their lungs

>>441709
/r9k/ is a race to the bottom. People who call themselves "robots" compete with each other on trying to out-loser each other, and everyone is trying to convince themselves and others that they are indeed the most pathetic failure in life that ever existed.

>>441673
Newsflash: You aren't the intended demographic!

it's so funny that something that won't affect you in the slightest is something you concern yourself so much over

>>441681
you're a staff member?

You're friends with all the available mods? You're personal friends with Hiro himself?

No? Then don't speak for them.

File: dont-use-strawpoll.jpg (144KB, 268x338px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 268x338px

>>441527
>>441532

Just so we're clear, your polls went full 180 because I messed with them yesterday.

Strawpoll is hideous, poorly-made reddit cancer. It's full of ads and tracker scripts. Please use a different poll site in the future or I'll continue taking subversive action to protect my fellow anons from being exposed to potentially faulty data and malicious scripts.

>>441723
Didn't know this, I'll never use that site again. Thanks mate, no sarcasm intended.

>>441723
what poll do you recommend?

>>441722
>No? Then don't speak for them.
The mods have never officially instituted anything remotely like it in the history of the website. hiro has never done anything like it on any of the sites he has run or had a voice in.

If you think it's a possibility, you are, frankly, completely retarded.

>>441747
>The mods have never officially instituted anything remotely like it in the history of the website. hiro has never done anything like it on any of the sites he has run or had a voice in.
ok, point being? Show me where there was demand for this beforehand and Hiro or the mods said no, then we'll talk.

Otherwise you're just grasping at straws

>>441748
>Show me where there was demand for this
Pretty much every time any board has demanded a special rule and not got it.

>and Hiro or the mods said no
99% of suggestions aren't implemented or even dignified with responses.

>>441749
>Pretty much every time any board has demanded a special rule and not got it.
show me an example of the mods or Hiro being asked to have a board with rules similar to ours and saying no

>>441750
/a/ asking to ban anime that "isn't /a/," /v/ asking to ban video games that "aren't /v/", /mu/ asking to ban music that "isn't /mu/", repeat ad infinitum. (With more specific criteria, obviously).

>and saying no
99% of suggestions aren't implemented or even dignified with responses.

Every suggestion to moot demanding that he ban a certain kind of poster has been shot down, though, since he has traditionally supported anybody being able to post anywhere.

>>441751
I asked for an example

>>441752
Lurk more, you stupid faggot.

>>441753
>can't provide a specific example
then why argue at all?

>>441752
>I asked for an example
Naruto, Call of Duty, meme rap. If you're looking for individual threads you can look them up in the archive yourself.

>>441755
>then why argue at all?
I'm pointing out to you and any observers incredibly, extraordinarily fucking stupid you are in thinking that you can arbitrarily demand rules and get them.

If all /r9k/ posters are as entitled and retarded as you are the whole board should just be canned. Something that, mind you, actually has precedent.

>>441742
different person, but i have sometimes seen people use poal.me

>>441719
And /pol/ is just a den of jealous yucky bigots who.... blah blah blah... let me tell you all about boards I don't lurk based on what I hear from other people who don't lurk

>>441749
This isn't proposing a change to a board, this is a proposal for a new board

>>441747
Some countries are banned from posting
Australians could not and may still not be able to post threads on /mu/ which is something people demanded and got which outright disproves the lie the person I replied to above is stating

>>441759
>hey, mods, can we get a board solely for the posting of western drawn porn?
>STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE RULES
This is you.

>>441768
>This isn't proposing a change to a board, this is a proposal for a new board
I confused it for the previous ten or fifteen threads.

That said, the OP is then utterly and completely fucking retarded, since not only does it have nothing to do with hikikomori, it's stealing the term from people who actually are.

>Australians could not and may still not be able to post threads on /mu/ which is something people demanded
They banned an ISP (Telstra, I think) after issuing what is probably thousands of bans against the same person.

>4chan is a simple image-based bulletin board where anyone can post comments and share images.

This is why those two rules won't work. Only people who get banned for mentioning who they are are underage, and that's for legal reasons. There's no legal reason to ban a female or a non-virgin, so they will not be banned for mentioning this.

>>441771
So in other words, you've had no idea what you were arguing for multiple threads

And yes, OP is an idiot but that's besides the the point.

And banning an ISP is discriminatory. Why do mods make 4Chan hugbox by banning a group of people for no good reason? How very offensive. You can't just ban a group of people because you don't like them

>>441775
>people under 18 must cease using this site immediately
You're just pretending to be retarded now

>>441777
>So in other words, you've had no idea what you were arguing for multiple threads
The original threads wanted rules modifications.

>You can't just ban a group of people because you don't like them.
They banned a group of people because they didn't want to assign someone to the full-time job of keeping one persistently advertising shitter off 4chan.

This is not fair to Australians, but is still an exceptional case.

>>441486
>unirionically that there can't be female virgins
>unironically believing that someone can be not a virgin and a hiki
I like how it's evolved from shiposting to this.

>>441590
>not having sex makes someone a social outcast
Really embarrassing, desu.

There are social outcasts who aren't virgins, and virgins who are well adjusted and don't care about sex. Please tell me you have the mental capacity to realize this.

t. An attractive normie who doesn't give a shit about sex.

>>441778
Did you even read my post?

As I said that's for legal reasons, it's not the same as banning someone for saying they're female or non-virgin

>>441775
This desu. 4chan is very inclusive in its own way, and "girls are mean to me" isn't a powerful enough reason to undo that.

>>441102
>implying they'll even follow said rules
>implying there's even a remote possibility this dumbass board will EVERY be created

>>441786
Just imagine the devastation caused to 4chan if we were to lose people directly implying or stating that they're female

It would be awful. It's definitely not worth the benefits. Absolutely not. Females have always been an important part of the 4chan community

>>441810
>legal reasons
How does every other website do it?

There's absolutely no reason 4chan can't have under 18 sfw boards. It's all just discrimination.

>>441486
Shieeet. Im glad to see this. I stopped shit posting on r9k because a lot of my posts would be met by
>x can't be a robot
Which I assumed was shit posting back. Now that I know that there are people this asablasted, I will start shit posting again. I'm going to spam r9k all over normiebook and omegle.
Btw, you're not an outcast because you're a virgin, you're an outcast because you're pathetic, desperate, and deluded.
Also, btw I'm a grill. Also, btw why won't Chad talk to me :(. Also, btw guys under 6'3" are disgusting. Also, btw I fucked my gf last night.

>>441809
well then as a normie it's obvious you have no idea the demographic you're talking about

generally speaking, outcasts don't get laid. That's it.

File: 1446231469722.jpg (10KB, 240x210px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 240x210px

>>441486
>4chan has always been known as a really open place where new people are welcomed with open arms
>mfw

good god, how new are you? Seriously? Second year? Third year on 4chan?

>>440118
>it's too mainstream and there would be too much flak.
No one would get any flak for creating a lonely faggot bored. More likely no mod wants to bother enforcing such retarded rules for a board, and without the support of any of the mods it won't happen.

please do this. i'm so sick and tired of these fucking feelfags ruining the board that was intended for original content only

>>441946
There are outcasts that get laid. There are also non-outcasts that don't. No one gives a shit about sex

>>441946
Outcasts get laid by other outcasts. It just so happens that you are in the top 1% of outcasts that not even other outcasts enjoy being around. Wizchan is much better suited to you since 4chan isn't made around user requests.

>>441956
>le how new are you argument

Request discarded.

>>441963
>outcasts get laid by other outcasts

Too bad female outcasts are next to nonexistent so there is always a line to date them.

confirmed for normie know-nothing

>>441987
Shut the fuck up, idiot.

>>441987
Confirmed for delusional know-nothing.

>>442000
Was there any doubt ever that OP is anything but a retard?

>>441997
>>442000
The only thing more pathetic than OP is you whiteknights

>you can't make a board excluded females

>>442019
>getting "whiteknights" out of those posts

You're even more retarded.

>>442021
>make completely factual statement
>"ur a retard, how dare you say mean things about females"

>>442019
Of course you can make a board that excludes females. Nothing is preventing you. 4chan won't make one for you, though.

>>442021
Typical robot defense mechanism. When you point out to a bitter virgin he is being retarded, you get called whiteknight cuck beta sjw female and whatever. Can't expect anything else from manchildren.

>>442028
Or maybe it will and I think it should

>>442032
>make completely factual statement
>"ur an angry bitter manchild, how dare you criticize females"

>>442019
How am I white knighting? I'm just pointing out how delusional this guy is. It's frankly embarrasssing and it's tumblr- tier mentality. He just wants 4chan to be his echo chamber because he hasn't had sex.

>>442035
>make completely factual statement
>ur a whiteknight how dare you go against my hugbox

>>442038
What's delusional is getting so offended at completely factual statements

It's no wonder why you're so opposed to opposing arguments when you refuse to believe anything true that's offends you.

No bias here

What an absolute shitshow.

I'm not even sure what the poll is for. Surely the people who view /r9k/ as a "zoo" to gawk at would be the first in line to support the creation of this board?

>>442042
Yes, it certainly is delusional. I said something factual, and you proceeded to be offended.
Because you'll try and tell me these aren't facts, go to us government health website or the cdc website. You will find that there is only a couple percent difference in male and female virgins.

I won't be surprised if you or OP tells me there's some big conspiracy where people are lying to you about sex statistics. It's a typical tumblr tactic: something is not true if it hurts your feelings. The boogeymen are out to deceive you.

>>442026
>completely factual statement

Oh, so you're delusional.

>>442041
>make completely retarded statement
>hurr durr it's factual because muh feels

So if you were shown just one female social outcast virgin robot, you would admit having been wrong?

>>442055
Of course he wouldn't.

Fatties and skinnies

Being really upset

>>442044
>Surely the people who view /r9k/ as a "zoo" to gawk at

This is so much fursecution, it's great

Although who knows whether cunts are serious about this stuff

>>442044
As someone who does view /r9k/ that way, I for one am still against this idea. It's certainly good for entertainment, but the point of a zoo is to keep all the animals in one place. OP is proposing the creation of a second zoo while leaving the first zoo alone. They have no right to two zoos. This is not something they get to control. And that's all there is to it.

>>442061
I'm one of those people, that's why I brought it up.

I mean, I hardly ever post on /r9k/ but it's interesting to observe. This new board would be the same.

>>442057
OP and his followers display the textbook example of No True Scotsman fallacy.

>hurr durr girls or non-virgins can't be social outcasts
>okay, here's some girls and non-virgins who are social outcasts
>hurr durr but those don't count

File: anakin5uj.jpg (101KB, 478x669px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 478x669px

I remember a time when this kind of obvious teen angst faggotry was derided.

Sadly the inmates have taken control of the asylum.

>>441116
>make a social group of like-minded people

You have one, it's called /r9k/

>>441987
>says there's no female outcasts
>fembot threads on r9k daily

They like you people, faggot. Treat them a bit better for fucks sake.

>>442361
OP isn't on this plane of reality. He wants to continue being a bitter virgin and die as one.

just go to wizardchan you stupid faggot

i bet you are crying because you followed some reddit or 4chan hotlink to there and got auto permabanned

fuck off neet

>>442365
WizardChan sucks

>>442361
Fembots threads are troll threads

They get filled with either men wanting to date them (so lonely ;_;) or guys telling them they cant be robots.

>>442363
Hold on, let me just get pull a number and get in line with the hundreds of men wanting to date the few women on /r9k/

I'll lose that v card in no time after she's done with the chads

Oh, don't worry OP. If in the rare chance that Hiro becomes an idiot and decides to listen to the userbase again, I'll just shit up your special snowflake board since a board like that deserves it.

>>442365
wizchan is not at all like what OP wants this new board to be

File: notruescotsman.png (18KB, 1012x814px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 1012x814px

>>442075

>>441666
That's because there can be a gay board without banning straight people because there won't be a bunch of faggots spamming the gay threads with "i have a gf and am just attracted to girls but i'm still a gay man".

/hiki/ would have been full of normalfags without banning them.

>>442361
Those threads are mostly filled with girls with social lifes and bfs.

>>441963
>>441961
>social life
>social skills
>well liked

>outcast

>>442065
Since there would be no good reason for robots to go to /r9k/ for feels /hiki/ would be the "zoo"

>>442055
Even if there is one banning them all would be much better for the board since the rest of all girls are normalfags who just shit everything up.

>>442768
/zoo/ would be a good name for the new board