Hiro, please create a board called /hiki/ - hikikomori
Our idea was formerly named /wiz/ but is now named /hiki/ and we want this board to cater to social outcasts because /r9k/ is being overrun with shitposting.
Current proposed rules (subject to discussion and change):
1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.
2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are non-virgins.
-the use of hookers for sex
-having been raped/molested
3) Do not make porn threads or post porn (clothed and nude) for the sole intent of fawning over for but NSFW posting is allowed.
4)Camwhoring(tinychat/omegle),hookup, "rate me" threads, and posts and threads regarding relationships should go on /soc/.
5) Person worship threads (like Ashley Jones/Rose threads) are not allowed.
Strawpoll that brought this rule: http://strawpoll.me/6764875
>Should /wiz/ (now /hiki/) be created?
>Should gay threads be banned? (posters mentioning being gay is allowed)
>Should /hiki/ be an unlisted board?
>What should the name of the new board be?
Previous /qa/ thread:
Also the correct strawpoll regarding gay threads is here:
The one posted above is an incorrect link
New /r9k/ thread is up
coming from the person who thought that discriminating against female posters on a website is illegal
I am LMAOing @ ur lyfe
provide me with the law regarding online forums banning women being illegal, dumb roastie slut
This board isn't going to happen on 4chan in 2016, it's too mainstream and there would be too much flak. Go to wizchan if you want something like this, /hiki/ will certainly fall victim to the same cancer that it did. Everybody will call each other failed normies and people will posture over who is the least normalfag in lieu of argument. Women shit up any internet community dedicated to loneliness, Doj is a faggot, and the board would probably be better than /r9k/ (low hanging fruit), but it's not feasible.
>can't cite argument
just do it. Completely blow me away. you have the power RIGHT NOW to end this entire thing if it triggers you so badly. Just provide a source saying it's illegal for websites to discriminate based on gender regarding users.
With that one source you will shut me up.
fuck off, this could be a board like /r9k/ that doesn't get co-opted by women and attention whoring limpdick faggots pretending to be women.
/wiz/ was a shit idea and I based it, but /hiki/ is the future and I will fully endorse it.
Look, dumbass. There used to be a loli and guro board. Moot wordfiltered "femanon" to "cumdumpster". How do you think that would be received today, in an age where clickbait monitor the internet to find things for feminists to get mad about? /hiki/ is probably not going to happen, unfortunately.
Wizchan fags will ruin it. The word failed normie is already finding purchase on /r9k/, which is fucking hilarious. It would be better than /r9k/, sure, but it would still be shitty and nowhere near as good as /r9k/'s feel era.
>1. You will not upload, post, discuss, request, or link to anything that violates local or United States law.
Thanks for outing yourself as an obvious, desperate troll, though.
>wikipedia list of a bunch of anti-discrimination laws
ok, so now which one of these laws are you referencing? Just post the exact phrase of the law saying this is illegal.
This went from hilarious to pathetic.
you didn't give a source, you just gave a bunch of acts that you've never gone through and have no idea the content of. Sorry you failed english class in high school and are too stupid to source things.
What you did was the equivalent of citing a news article with the google search of "news"
Please (and I really do mean this) just stop. You're getting embarassed and I know that and I'm cringing at this pretty hard. Do us both a favor and just give it a rest. Ok, champ?
>caring about PR
/r9k/'s feel era was hot garbage imo, best times were the greentext days where threads lasted for days on end and >no croissants today boss reigned supreme.
>wizchan fags will ruin it
this I agree with, but don't see a problem with. those pissbabbys are so sensitive a bit of good 'ol fashioned hostility would drive them off.
nice source you have there tripcunt, admit you were wrong whenever, i'll be waiting.
This is the laziest attempt at something resembling an argument I've seen on 4chan. Not even the reply chain, just this post. Your argument is also retarded; do you think wizchan needs to operate on the darknet or else it will be removed?
Ok, I'm just going to assume you're retarded at this point. As in genuinely mentally disabled because she can't grasp the concept of providing a citation to a claim.
I already had you filtered and am going to stop opening up your replies and just leave them minimized now. Goodbye forever.
And yes I know you're going to reply to me despite me not being able to see it because your ego can't take it. Reply away because I won't ever see it ;)
generically siting anti-descrimination laws doens't prove you right
i'm not even going to go any further with this, I suggest nobody reply to this misinformed tripcuck.
it is in no way illegal to exclude women from online discussion, especially on a site that has a board specifically for the /lgbt/ crowd.
if /lgbt/ can exist so can /hiki/
I don't filter people, I don't want 4chan to be a hugbox and I don't use botnets like 4chanX
uninstall that shit or you will get v& on account of some skiddie dosing someone with your IP
that's what makes you the most disgusting people on the internet or that i've encountered in person.
you know you aren't wanted and yet you force your presence on a community.
I genuinely want your lot rounded up and executed publically, you're sick freaks.
Fascinating, you're disgusted by open-mindedness and literally want to kill anyone who doesn't share your opinion. Though judging by your wording, you don't have the balls to do the deed yourself.
Stop being so fucking tryhard. This is a website you shithead. Nobody is going to leave because you say you would execute them because they're from tumblr.
Please stop your /r9k/ shtick, dude. The fembot meme is so cancerous it pains me. People used to have dedicated threads where everybody would come forward and greentext the worst things that ever happened to them, now everybody is treating /r9k/ like a dating site.
Honestly, gay threads create personalities like Noun who derail any thread they post in when five orbiters start s-stuttering to them. They also invite a spammer I really hate. People who want gay threads can have them on /r9k/, they aren't threatened by people claiming to be fembots and they get enough traffic to stay alive unlike greentext threads.
>he thinks tumblr is about open-mindedness
>he thinks it's about my opinion
it's because you're all narcissistic greedy little fucking rodents that think of no one other than yourselves, you're cancerous to a society as a whole and are singlehandedly holding education back.
I have no problem with lefties, which I often see get generalized as 'tumblirites'
the people I want to see rounded up and executed are the oversensitive babies who enforce things like speech codes and tone policing, it's fucking 1984 shit.
yes, I fucking mad.
>Nobody is going to leave because you say you would execute them because they're from tumblr.
I know this, I don't intend to change jack, just voicing my opinion.
absolutely nothing can change 4chan aside from 4chan itself, even trying to with any kind of rhetoric is pointless.
>hurr remove [thing i dislike]
>[thing i dislike intensifies]
OP still thinks he will be given his own board. Seriously, if girls and non-virgins trigger you so much, go to wizchan. That's what it's made for.
There will never be a board on 4chan with rules 1 or 2. How stupid are you that you can't realize that? You will not get your exclusive little club of special snowflakes. Girls and non-virgins have been posting on 4chan from the start, far longer than you. If you can't handle that, you're cancer and should get out.
>If you can't handle that, you're cancer and should get out.
Non-virgins aren't really a problem, but man, people claiming to be women fucking destroyed /r9k/. Self professed women tear communities of lonely people apart.
>poster offhandedly mentions being female
>robots go apeshit, some calling her a whore and slut and gtfo, others saying pls b my gf
>it's the female's fault
I didn't know /r9k/ is full of muslims. It's the woman's fault she was raped, she should have worn a burka.
I just want a hiki lifestyle board, don't give a fuck if women are allowed or not.
hell if there was a real hikki chick out there somewhere(other than gypsy-kun) she'd probably be just as hostile as your average robit.
only rule should be you actually have to fit into the medical definition of hikki - has not left the house for 6 months or more.
I doubt OP even fits this, he's probably just a failed normalfam
OP admitted to having a job. He is simply desperately trying to change the subject so he would get his own board. That's all. He doesn't care about the community. He just wants his own board where he can bask in his own glory.
well, then this is really pathetic.
I still want /hiki/
haven't found a good place to discuss social withdrawal in general, uboachan is SJW/Tulpafag central, and wizchan hates me because i've let women drain my mana and don't adhere to weird newage beliefs.
/r9k/ was fucked from the day they brought it back, shoud've never killed the chon.
I'm well aware, witnessed the last good days and subsequently contributed to its ruination by participating in the 2huspaam. it's still the best place for comfy japan wallpapers though.
You wouldn't be welcome into OP's exclusive country club then, nonvirgins are specifically not allowed.
Ask OP to explain his hypocrisy. He wants a /hiki/ board, but you would be banned from it despite being a true recluse, while he would be allowed on it despite having a job.
>taking le epic rage /v/ dude and puttin g /r9k/ on it
This is why you all need to kill yourself already.
Also protip: Use /trash/
It is the place for people on 4chan that have no other place.
His points about legality are bullshit. But he is right in that 4chan had never discriminated against anyone and has no reason to start now. Why should 4chan suddenly make board restricted only to a few people, when it has never done anything like it, and goes against the open nature of the site?
Oh, man, if only there were a way to hide posts and threads you don't like.
Oh wait, there is such a function. I invite all the newfriends (including OP) to figure out how to use it.
>mention being female knowing it will bait people into begging for your contact information, flaming you, and derailing the thread
Keep your gender to yourself for fuck's sake. I can forgive doing it out of trolling, but just doing it and getting mad at the board for acting like it has always acted is stupid and petulant.
Well obviously. He wants a place where he is given mod powers and can ban anyone he doesn't like. He is particularly triggered by girls and non-virgins and that's why he wants them out of his sight. If only there were an actual *chan website purely dedicated to that...
This whole thing is shitty. It was funny at first but it's starting to get stale now. OP will probably give up soon and go to wizchan to lament. /r9k/ will go on as it was before and nobody will give a fuck.
>/r9k/ will go on as it was before
/r9k/ changed a lot in the last couple of years, and for the worse. I can't blame OP for wanting a board dedicated to actual depressive/lonely blogging, and people claiming to be women completely fuck that up.
Listen, one of the promises I made before the r9k election was to get rid of this toxic shit. Why do you people think splitting would change anything? If everyone migrated to your new board, they'd bring all the people you dont like with them.
I have no problem with normies posting on /hiki/. Anyone can post, but they just have to abide by the current proposed rules. As it stands now, they'd be able to do very little normie things there.
This will keep them in check and allow the varied range of robots to enjoy a good board culture.
We just want a social group of like minded people
the rules are meant to keep people that will shit up the group out and the people that won't in.
Do you run up to groups of social outcasts and insult them in public because they don't open up their friend circle to people they don't like?
All the boards are either hobby/interest boards, or boards related to 4chan like /qa/ and /s4s/. Being a "robot" is not an interest, seeing as no one can even agree on a definition of it.
Hiro, disregard OP's faggotry and make /hiki/ - a board for people experiencing social withdrawl.
it should be a blue board and one of the rules should be no discussion of sex and sexuality, this will solve everyone's problem.
but there is a clear definition of hikikomori
"people who refuse to leave their house and, thus, isolate themselves from society in their homes for a period exceeding six months"
/hiki/ should be exclusive to them.
good point, my opinion remains unchanged though.
/hiki/ should be somewhat of an antithesis to /lgbt/
(/lgbt/ is all about sex/sexuality and my ideal /hiki/ would have a rule preventing discussions of sex/sexuality)
>I have no problem
If anyone still thought OP is doing this for robots, get your dose of reality check here. He cares about one thing only: he wants his own board, one where he makes the rules. In his own mind he has already crowned himself as the messiah and emperor of the new board.
To all those reading this:
In cancerous normie threads, link the /qa/ thread in a post.
This will help spread awareness and redirect them here without having to always make a thread all the time.
Stop posting? What? Who? If you want your own board where only people who are like you are allowed, there is plenty of choice.
Why shit up 4chan with your ridiculous demands that will never be met?
>like video games
>there's plenty of choices
>[insert a bunch of seperate websites here]
why are you so triggered that robots want a board dedicated to discussing the robot lifestyle?
Why are you so triggered that you won't be included?
You're not asking for a board discussing the robot lifestyle (whatever that is). You're asking for a board that bans everyone except those you approve. Name one boars that bans people based on who they are, or a board that was given to a special snowflake to moderare as he wants. That's right, there are none, and won't be.
>robot lifestyle (whatever that is)
If you really don't know what robot culture and the hikikomori lifestyle is, we don't have anything further to discuss because you're offering opinion on something you know nothing about.
>But 4chan is not a community of social outcasts...
that's only about half true at this point
You're not even a hikikomori. How can you expect to be able to post on /hiki/, much less given moderator access to it?
Hypocrite. This whole charade has from the beginning been about one thing and one thing only: you want a "no girls allowed" secret club and be given mod powers to it. You're now desperately trying to flip-flop and say anything when you realized it wouldn't happen.
>is a Japanese term to refer to the phenomenon of reclusive adolescents or adults who withdraw from social life, often seeking extreme degrees of isolation and confinement.
And how do you know I'm don't fit this description?
I never said I wanted mod powers and I don't see at all where I'm flip-flopping.
>The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare defines hikikomori as people who refuse to leave their house and, thus, isolate themselves from society in their homes for a period exceeding six months
you admitted you had a job earlier, you are not /hikki/ material.
I was literally just rolling with the definition I got from wikipedia as that fits the description that we want.
I don't see why you're so upset about women not being allowed to attentionwhore their gender and nonvirgins being able to rub it in the face of autists that they lost their v-card
4chan is 4chan. Always has been. It includes everyone, even social outcasts. It has never discriminated. And never has anyone been given special status, especially not wannabes with napoleon complexes like you.
The only argument I need to hear is that /lgbt/ is a board
If /lgbt/ is a board then this is absolutely justified against all arguments of "being a hikki isn't a hobby"
>It includes everyone... It has never discriminated
>2. You will immediately cease and not continue to access the site if you are under the age of 18
i've said this before, and I will say it again, I think /hikki/ should have a rule preventing discussion of sex/sexuality as a whole, as well as being a blue board.
this would both prevent women and "women" from attention whoring, and nonvirgins(like myself) from "rubbing it in"
discussion of sex would be counterproductive to discussion of social withdrawal, and that's the entire point of making this.
a board for discussing social withdrawl would fit with 4chan's ethos.
a wizchan-lite where it's all about hate and general misandry at the end of the day would not.
having rules preventing discussion of sex/sexuality isn't discrimination, nobody is singled out.
if a woman is participating in an anonymous discussion, nobody needs to know she's a woman, same goes for men.
>same goes for men.
That will never work considering how frequently being male is referenced in robot stories and discussions coupled with men getting the worst of it when they're genetically inferior
The stupid thing about OP is that he wants a /hiki/ board that's not a board for hikki's. A hikikomori has a set definition and your board does not cater to this demographic.
You can't call it /hiki/
I think the term 'normie' and any pepe posting should be banned. Keep reddit it reddit.
>I think /hikki/ should have a rule preventing discussion of sex/sexuality as a whole
People need to understand that the primary reason people aren't using wizchan instead of this new proposed board is that wizchan caters to voluntary celibates, they can't discuss sex or relationships in any way. That's why so many users go there and get banned because the absolute vast majority of adult male virgins on /r9k/ are involuntary celibates and still desire relationships or sex.
I think as long as the mods actually do their job and ban all gay hookup threads/steam cuteposting hookup threads and gay circlejerks with avatarfags under the 'no /soc/ posting' rule, then we should be fine.
normie is a reddit term, it started with oversensitive redditors and tumbies getting triggered by the -fag suffux but still wanting to call eachother normalfag.
>wizchan caters to voluntary celibates, they can't discuss sex or relationships in any way.
I personally don't use wizchan because they are mostly hardcore misandrists(this may have changed, last time I went there was over a year ago and after visiting tonight it seems most of them have done some serious reflecting), but I do like that and am essentially advocating for both a /hikki/ board that's actually for hikikomori, and does this as well.
>I think as long as the mods actually do their job and ban all gay hookup threads/steam cuteposting hookup threads and gay circlejerks with avatarfags under the 'no /soc/ posting' rule, then we should be fine.
personally, think the cancer is far too terminal for this to work. /r9k/ has been fucked since the chon died and nothing will drive away the normalfags. the /lgbt/ crowd moved in at some point too, and have been reaching cebruz levels of collective annoyance.
And this board won't ban females or non-virgins because that's unfeasible. It will ban those who state or imply they are these things though
Over the years 4chan has been seen as this hive of recluses and outcasts yet we got a board dedicated to homo discussion before a board dedicated to discussion about hikki/NEET/outcast/recluse/depression things even though there's been overwhelming demand which you can see by what happened to /r9k/. A general discussion board essentially turned into a board to discuss these topics just by itself.
>1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.
>2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are non-virgins.
Fuck off. I want a board for shut-ins, not a board for bitter virgins obsessed with sex like /r9k/.
not that anon, but the /soc/ shut in thread is full of normalfags who are obsessed with social media and attention. they also only really talk about money troubles and all of them whiteknight the shit out of any women.
Yeah... pfft... these guys are almost as bad as /v/
>don't post stuff unless it's related to video games
LIKE HELLO.... nazis! The safe space is on tumblr.... What's next?? banning black people? baka
>cannot reference themselves as women or non-virgins
Good job not knowing what hikikomori means. I will savor watching this board never get created. Especially considering you addressed Hiro directly instead of showing proper respect to the people who actually do the work.
>A/ll the boards are either hobby/interest boards
>Why should anybody cater to you?
>/lgbt/ does not ban straight people
Sure, and there's no reason a board can't create a ban of any mention of being a particular thing.
Pony posting used to be banned site wide, I don't know if it still is but you could just as easily ban female-posting. Nobody is stopping females posting, they're just stopping them referring to themselves as females and it's the same with non-virgins. It's as simple as that.
There's no reason to get so upset about this topic. I think the board should be trialed. If the mods decided that lgbt deserved a community to discuss their own stuff then why not virgin males? I think the rules will work quite well in creating a board that's able to discuss the topics that /r9k/ was home to with much less low quality posts.
There is no forum with any kind of traffic that currently does what the OP is suggesting and I highly recommend you actually read that very carefully to not make the same stupid statement so many others have made.
No board on 4chan has ever banned people based on who they are. No board on 4chan has ever been an exclusive club. You are asking to be given your exclusive board, contrary to 4chan's open nature, because you can't tolerate girls posting. What makes you think you will get such a board?
and to be perfectly clear:
I think the board should be called /dep/ and be a board for discussion about depressing things, shut-in lifestyle, virginity, and those similar topics that used to be able to be discussed on /r9k/ and were part of that little culture. At least this way it has more of a topic.
And before /lgbt/ was made there was no board specifically about lgbt shit
What's your point? 4chan has been continuously changing throughout the years, sometimes in large leaps.
And once again, nobody is stopping female or non-virgin posters to go against this "open nature of 4chan" that you arbitraily pulled out of your ass. Nobody is stopping these people from openly visiting the board or doing whatever they want except making posts that reference themselves as these things.
What could be possibly be the negatives of just trialing this board?
Source for the Australia claim? Rangeband have been done occasionally to prevent spammers and serial shitposters.
What is the logical reason that a board should ban girls and non-virgins?
4chan has always been known as a really open place where new people are welcomed with open arms
>What is the logical reason that a board should ban girls and non-virgins?
Seriously? Banning females is just too fucking obvious.
One of the absolute best general measures for whether or not someone is a normalfag is whether or not they're a virgin. It's a very simple yes/no thing that can separate out people easily. When you don't have these kinds of checks in place you end up with the /soc/ shut-in thread, where the definition of shut-in is up to the individual's opinion which essentially enables absolutely everyone to label themselves a shut-in and it's the same thing for 'robot' or even 'hikikimori'.
It's simple, it's easy, it improves quality.
All the female and non-virgin robots and shut-ins will disagree with you. You don't want a board for shut-ins or robots. You want a board that bans people you don't like. It's that simple. Once you admit it, you will realize why it will not happen on 4chan.
Ive read through the thread as of this post and the above posts deserves special attention/should be properly addressed.
1)Op sounds like he just wants some internet friends that's why hes so persistent on having this board made on 4chan
2)2*4chan, a subreddit, or go to wizchan. Any of these 3 would work for op and theres no stopping him from using all three methods.
3) By principle r9k shouldnt exist, it shouldve been deleted since it failed as an experimental board
4) I'm questioning why op is crusading for a new board if he hasnt been on r9k for months. Why suddenly the desire to have a new community created? Tell us op where have you been.
i dont think the board would be warranted. If the problem is the existing r9k board, then maybe that should be addressed instead.
im not quite understanding of the current theme of 4chan, the introduction of /pol/ was the first board to be inconsistent with said theme of 4chan, but it exists and was able to form a community, perhaps thats the same reason why other new boards such as /aco/ and /his/ was successfully created too, but then why does /i/ still exist despite its lack of community and activity, or is it an image issue of essentially having a /loser/ board?
If its simply comes down to community then the board should be created, but it doesn't simply come down to that, otherwise so many other boards should also be made e.g. Furries
To understand whether or not the board should be created, maybe we should ask 'for whom does 4chan cater for?' On what basis is a board created?
Look OP, I see you have a lot of dedication to waste and I appreciate it, but the board you are proposing is useless.
You can't ask for the replecement of a board because you don't like it anymore (starting off from /r9k/ which shouldn't even be a board for useless neetposting), even more just to add it to the pile of small boards which will be barely used.
Plus, if you really need to, there are many threads on /adv/ to help you fight your unhealthy shut-in habits instead of cultivating them in front of your monitor, or, if I really have to say this, remember yourself that boards are made for and by lovers of a certain hobby or content, not for their research of positivity in their regressive psychological habits. I know 90% of the people who browse this website are introverted, but it's not a problem to me, it should be a problem to you and just to you. Don't make it cluttered.
>All the female and non-virgin robots and shut-in
Anyway, your same, fucking brainless argument has been responded to countless times
You don't say /a/ exists to ban people they don't like
You don't say /lgbt/ exists to ban people they don't like
These boards exist for a particular topic and when people post off that topic they're stopped.
You have obviously have no idea what you're talking about, saying 4chan is some all-inclusive place, talking about all these females posters. You obviously have no experience with any of the forums you're talking about. You're most likely upset about the idea of being excluded from a community when you people have absolutely everywhere else on the internet to go.
What's really going on here is that many older users of 4chan are seeing it devolve into a community they're becoming less and less able to connect to. There was homogeneity in the community to have a functional board that discussed what is now the whole robot culture on /r9k/ just naturally. That grew just from the userbase shifting the tide but that userbase is dying. It's such a shame that boards have really gotten to the point where threads have to be specifically designed to get replies by asking questions or baiting others to just not instantly fall below blatantly low quality or bait threads. Maybe this is just a last desperate attempt to try and bring back what we enjoyed.
I think if the /dep/ board was made with the rules in the OP it could provide a legitimate board for discussion. I have no idea if it will work, the userbase is so shitty it probably won't but I can't see a downside to trying.
>there's a site called wizardchan that's made for people like you
I called it and you still posted it
There's a site called reddit, tumblr, digg, 9gag, twitter, facebook, youtube, everywhere, etc... that's made for people like you where you can get the same opinions from the same people all thinking the same way
No, the person worship strawpoll had an overwhelming support against person worship so that any threads on person worship were to be banned and it was that way for a couple days.
Now it's gone full 180 in just a day. I think maybe it was linked to an AshleyJ or Rose community since up until this point, most people were really pushing for the rule.
Or maybe (which is most likely from my viewpoint) a couple of individuals want to maintain those threads by any means necessary. Why? Many reasons, I'll imply to one. We are actually quite few.
You should ban us, or you will eventually become us. Good luck.
A long-winded nonsensical rant by a newfag whose only argument is "girls are scary, ban them because I am a special snowflake and deserve it!"
Wizchan is made for people like you. Why not go there?
You clearly haven't been on 4chan for long. The site has always been about having different people with different opinions on the same boards, talking about the same topics, and calling each other faggots.
Seriously, how weak are you that you can't handle a girl posting on the same board as you? Or a guy who has had sex?
It's not about being weak in regards to women. The whole problem is that when women mention they are women in a board of social outcasts and autists, the thread will derail to men trying to get her attention. This prevents attentionwhoring, either on purpose or not.
This is the explicit purpose of the rule, but a little more behind that is that women can't be social outcasts and that them pretending to be robots despite the above (threads derailing as guys clamber over one another to date them) will hurt the community.
Why not go to wizchan and petition them to loosen their rules? It seems like the only problem you have with wizchan is that you're not the one making the rules there. What you want is completely incompatible with what 4chan is about, while it's only small tweaks to wizchan.
Think about it for a minute. Wizchan loosens their rules a bit, you can go there and stay there happily ever after.
>women can't be social outcasts
Yes, we get it, this is only about what you want, and you want to be the one who decide who is a social outcast/robot/hiki. This coming from a guy who isn't even a hikikomori, you have a job ffs. Don't you realize you would be the first one to get banned from the board you're trying to create?
>I don't want to
And you expect to be given your own board to moderate on 4chan, with all the mods and programmers working hard to create and maintain the board, on which they wouldn't even be welcome?
Sorry, but I wouldn't be banned. The rules are listed at the top of this thread.
Also yes, women can't be social outcasts. They will always have legions of beta orbiters who want to have sex with them and she gets the honor of picking. I don't see what you don't get about this. It's quite simple.
>And you expect to be given your own board to moderate on 4chan, with all the mods and programmers working hard to create and maintain the board, on which they wouldn't even be welcome?
so are you saying that mods and programmers are modern day renaissance men who are well versed in fitness, video games, literature, lgbt culture, outdoor hobbies, automobiles, etc.?
Ideally there would be mods that support the board monitoring the board, just as every board on 4chan has. They have mods that support the board monitoring the board.
That's not how it works. There's discussion first among those who want /hiki/ to happen and we agree on the rules, then I post an update to the rules so we don't have randoms like yourself adding and banning whatever they feel like and having the movement falling apart instantly
Let me just clear up the confusion you have
the name is just a name and doesn't represent the rules, and as it stands now, /hiki/ isn't even the most popular choice anymore, but I'll keep it until (if) a board is created, just to avoid confusion and the board can be named whatever the popular choice is.
Again, the name is not indicative of the rules, it's just a name.
>There's a site called reddit, tumblr, digg, 9gag, twitter, facebook, youtube, everywhere, etc... that's made for people like you where you can get the same opinions from the same people all thinking the same way
It's breathtaking how you can say this while insisting on having a board that bans people who don't think like you.
>talk about otaku culture
/jp/ doesn't talk about otaku culture anymore. It does talk about subjects that are associated with otaku culture, but it always had that kind of discussion. Except now it takes place in general threads whose users don't overlap rather than across the board.
>Glad /jp/ changed that way.
I hope that you came to /jp/ in 2012+, or else this is just depressing.
That's why there's only one board about one topic, right?
You fucking idiots
>go to /lgbt/
>make post about fucking bitches and how stupid gays are
>replying to gay people telling them they're stupid for being gay
>mods shouldn't do anything because this is 4chan, not a hugbox
>go to /a/
>talk about football
>call anime stupid
>call anime watchers stupid
>you can't handle the banter brah? Are you a newfag? 4chan is a diverse place full of differing opinions
It's hilarious just how little you understand yet how much you talk
There is one place on the internet that has a fairly decent amount of traffic that kind of does what OP is suggesting but the fact is that it's not what OP is suggesting. They explicitly don't want incels and that's not going to change
But in your tiny little mind, having this one forum that's not actually what OP is proposing is where users who want to discuss this stuff should go but ignore the fact that every single other board has a variety of alternatives
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about yet you'll continue to fight against something new and interesting because it excludes you.
Actually no, that's not true. I originally created more lengthy and restrictive rules. From there tiny details were added and removed based on consensus and someone a number of threads ago suggested reducing the rules and I agreed so I did and put up a poll to vote on the original rules vs the reduced rules.
Changing the name wasn't even my idea.
The only thing that I would actually consider putting my foot down on would be banning person worship threads. Past that, the only thing I'm doing is trying to keep the appeal more broad than wizchan, but allowing everyone to make suggestions and discuss.
A fair amount of people have proposed scrapping your "no girls allowed" and "no non-virgins allowed" rules, simply for the sake of being realist. Then some discussion board actually might be feasible.
But since you don't want a discussion board but your own exclusive club, it's not going to happen.
Look, man. You're speaking to someone who doesn't anymore of those threads. Those other people want you to become them.
Why? Various reasons and I do not share this ambition. I don't need a community as much as they do.
You have a very obvious flaw in logic. The purpose of rules are to try and make a better quality board
You have different topics to try and create a discussion board for different subjects. It's not a hugbox, it's an attempt to improve quality of discussion.
You've completely arbitrarily determined what rules can be made. You can ban females from referring to themselves. There's no reason this rule can't be made.
The primary problem here is that you have no idea what you're talking about yet you're the leading authority of what would make the best community. People are seriously asking how banning people referring to themselves as females is a benefit.
The latter is almost impossible to control unless they are bragging. The first one can be easily spotted, but then who wants a sausage feast.
Are there only non-virgins and women on the internet?
>people who have had sex are automatically normalfags
you guys have no clue how the real world works, which in that case shouldn't have any input on how a board should actually cater to the real world
The thing is that these 'tfw no gf' fags were the ones who changed the boards culture, now they feel entitled to having their own board because the original residents post trying to restore it. It went from creating content and misadventures in the real world and sharing similar feels to "WHO /PATHETICSHUTIN/ HERE?" measuring who has the smallest dick just to gloat in front of other losers.
I don't think they realize /r9k/ literally has no purpose, and never did. It was /b/ with a robot, but mental illness flooded the board and now that people are starting to take their meds and post normal stuff, the NEETs are screaming at the top of their lungs
/r9k/ is a race to the bottom. People who call themselves "robots" compete with each other on trying to out-loser each other, and everyone is trying to convince themselves and others that they are indeed the most pathetic failure in life that ever existed.
Just so we're clear, your polls went full 180 because I messed with them yesterday.
Strawpoll is hideous, poorly-made reddit cancer. It's full of ads and tracker scripts. Please use a different poll site in the future or I'll continue taking subversive action to protect my fellow anons from being exposed to potentially faulty data and malicious scripts.
>No? Then don't speak for them.
The mods have never officially instituted anything remotely like it in the history of the website. hiro has never done anything like it on any of the sites he has run or had a voice in.
If you think it's a possibility, you are, frankly, completely retarded.
>The mods have never officially instituted anything remotely like it in the history of the website. hiro has never done anything like it on any of the sites he has run or had a voice in.
ok, point being? Show me where there was demand for this beforehand and Hiro or the mods said no, then we'll talk.
Otherwise you're just grasping at straws
>Show me where there was demand for this
Pretty much every time any board has demanded a special rule and not got it.
>and Hiro or the mods said no
99% of suggestions aren't implemented or even dignified with responses.
/a/ asking to ban anime that "isn't /a/," /v/ asking to ban video games that "aren't /v/", /mu/ asking to ban music that "isn't /mu/", repeat ad infinitum. (With more specific criteria, obviously).
>and saying no
99% of suggestions aren't implemented or even dignified with responses.
Every suggestion to moot demanding that he ban a certain kind of poster has been shot down, though, since he has traditionally supported anybody being able to post anywhere.
>then why argue at all?
I'm pointing out to you and any observers incredibly, extraordinarily fucking stupid you are in thinking that you can arbitrarily demand rules and get them.
If all /r9k/ posters are as entitled and retarded as you are the whole board should just be canned. Something that, mind you, actually has precedent.
And /pol/ is just a den of jealous yucky bigots who.... blah blah blah... let me tell you all about boards I don't lurk based on what I hear from other people who don't lurk
This isn't proposing a change to a board, this is a proposal for a new board
Some countries are banned from posting
Australians could not and may still not be able to post threads on /mu/ which is something people demanded and got which outright disproves the lie the person I replied to above is stating
>This isn't proposing a change to a board, this is a proposal for a new board
I confused it for the previous ten or fifteen threads.
That said, the OP is then utterly and completely fucking retarded, since not only does it have nothing to do with hikikomori, it's stealing the term from people who actually are.
>Australians could not and may still not be able to post threads on /mu/ which is something people demanded
They banned an ISP (Telstra, I think) after issuing what is probably thousands of bans against the same person.
>4chan is a simple image-based bulletin board where anyone can post comments and share images.
This is why those two rules won't work. Only people who get banned for mentioning who they are are underage, and that's for legal reasons. There's no legal reason to ban a female or a non-virgin, so they will not be banned for mentioning this.
So in other words, you've had no idea what you were arguing for multiple threads
And yes, OP is an idiot but that's besides the the point.
And banning an ISP is discriminatory. Why do mods make 4Chan hugbox by banning a group of people for no good reason? How very offensive. You can't just ban a group of people because you don't like them
>So in other words, you've had no idea what you were arguing for multiple threads
The original threads wanted rules modifications.
>You can't just ban a group of people because you don't like them.
They banned a group of people because they didn't want to assign someone to the full-time job of keeping one persistently advertising shitter off 4chan.
This is not fair to Australians, but is still an exceptional case.
>not having sex makes someone a social outcast
Really embarrassing, desu.
There are social outcasts who aren't virgins, and virgins who are well adjusted and don't care about sex. Please tell me you have the mental capacity to realize this.
t. An attractive normie who doesn't give a shit about sex.
Just imagine the devastation caused to 4chan if we were to lose people directly implying or stating that they're female
It would be awful. It's definitely not worth the benefits. Absolutely not. Females have always been an important part of the 4chan community
Shieeet. Im glad to see this. I stopped shit posting on r9k because a lot of my posts would be met by
>x can't be a robot
Which I assumed was shit posting back. Now that I know that there are people this asablasted, I will start shit posting again. I'm going to spam r9k all over normiebook and omegle.
Btw, you're not an outcast because you're a virgin, you're an outcast because you're pathetic, desperate, and deluded.
Also, btw I'm a grill. Also, btw why won't Chad talk to me :(. Also, btw guys under 6'3" are disgusting. Also, btw I fucked my gf last night.
>4chan has always been known as a really open place where new people are welcomed with open arms
good god, how new are you? Seriously? Second year? Third year on 4chan?
>it's too mainstream and there would be too much flak.
No one would get any flak for creating a lonely faggot bored. More likely no mod wants to bother enforcing such retarded rules for a board, and without the support of any of the mods it won't happen.
Outcasts get laid by other outcasts. It just so happens that you are in the top 1% of outcasts that not even other outcasts enjoy being around. Wizchan is much better suited to you since 4chan isn't made around user requests.
Typical robot defense mechanism. When you point out to a bitter virgin he is being retarded, you get called whiteknight cuck beta sjw female and whatever. Can't expect anything else from manchildren.
How am I white knighting? I'm just pointing out how delusional this guy is. It's frankly embarrasssing and it's tumblr- tier mentality. He just wants 4chan to be his echo chamber because he hasn't had sex.
What's delusional is getting so offended at completely factual statements
It's no wonder why you're so opposed to opposing arguments when you refuse to believe anything true that's offends you.
No bias here
Yes, it certainly is delusional. I said something factual, and you proceeded to be offended.
Because you'll try and tell me these aren't facts, go to us government health website or the cdc website. You will find that there is only a couple percent difference in male and female virgins.
I won't be surprised if you or OP tells me there's some big conspiracy where people are lying to you about sex statistics. It's a typical tumblr tactic: something is not true if it hurts your feelings. The boogeymen are out to deceive you.
As someone who does view /r9k/ that way, I for one am still against this idea. It's certainly good for entertainment, but the point of a zoo is to keep all the animals in one place. OP is proposing the creation of a second zoo while leaving the first zoo alone. They have no right to two zoos. This is not something they get to control. And that's all there is to it.
OP and his followers display the textbook example of No True Scotsman fallacy.
>hurr durr girls or non-virgins can't be social outcasts
>okay, here's some girls and non-virgins who are social outcasts
>hurr durr but those don't count
I remember a time when this kind of obvious teen angst faggotry was derided.
Sadly the inmates have taken control of the asylum.
Oh, don't worry OP. If in the rare chance that Hiro becomes an idiot and decides to listen to the userbase again, I'll just shit up your special snowflake board since a board like that deserves it.
That's because there can be a gay board without banning straight people because there won't be a bunch of faggots spamming the gay threads with "i have a gf and am just attracted to girls but i'm still a gay man".
/hiki/ would have been full of normalfags without banning them.