Was /vg/ a mistake?

I don't know

Can you repeat the question?

YOU'RE NOT THE BOSS OF ME NOW

I'd like to buy a vowel

*raises paw*

Who?

>>414450
>3rd most popular board
>a mistake
Not from a revenue point of view, no.

>>414479
But most people admit, I think even moot admitted, that it was a mistake

Sometimes I think yes, but then I remember that it would just be all over /v/ if it didn't exist.

>>414491
No he didn't. /vp/ was a mistake and should have been part of /vp/ as it is what allows /v/ to have less generals clogging up the board.

>>415002
>and should have been part of /vp/
I meant /vg/. The reason /vp/ was created was the same reason they made /vg/ really. The whole pokemon thing covers more media and shit but it was before moot made /vg/ so he didn't realize the right approach on the first try but furries also moved out of /v/ en masse after /vp/ was made so it's pseudo containment board.

>>>/qa/ was a mistake

>>415010
Which sadly needs to go now since janitors don't bother with /vp/ at all and the mods seemingly don't care

>>415330
no, just a and v

>>414458
>>414459
>>414460
>>414461
>>414462
t. Pony Island

>>416313
super gay game 2bh.
ripped off some game the surgeon sim guys made for stuart ashen and everyone thinks it's so original.

Anymore /vg/ is the only place you can discuss video games. You certainly can't on /v/.

Course if the game you want to discuss isn't FOTM then you're just shit out of luck.

>>416778
It could do with more thread slots or more posts a thread or something, small threads constantly get pushed off the board by the big boy threads

>>416817
Delete /vg/, install some forum software modded to allow anonymous posts, all problems solved

>>414450
Yes.