Is there a ranking for which boards are heavily moderated and which aren't?
For instance I know /a/ is heavily moderated, but from what I heard /m/ isn't despite being an off-shoot of /a/.
it depends on what you mean by "heavily moderated". a lot of boards have certain things that will be quickly deleted, but other kinds of rule violations will not be deleted at all. i don't think there are any boards where all the rules are strictly enforced in a timely manner.
/vp/ moderation is utter shit, as in it pretty much doesn't exist. Porn threads and frog threads stay up for hours, generals there get daily raids by career shitposters, and the report function is more or less useless.
Yeah /vp/ is a containment board, but it's turning into a full-blown shitpost board. If you're going to make a damn board and keep a damn board for this many years, you need to actually moderate the damn board. There are all sorts of /vp/ users who have said on /qa/ that they want to be jannies and they applied to be one because they love their board, only to have their applications ignored.
/vp/ is one of the worst
- shitposters who spend 8+ hours a day shitposting in threads
- porn dumps
- feces/gore dumps
- furry dumps
- thread spamming to flood the catalogue
- thread dumping to kill threads
All of which takes hours to be cleaned up. The only time the mods actually react fast is if something illegal gets posted like doxx info or cheese pizza
/tv/ is so heavily moderated that posting a relevant picture of an actress while talking about her role in a movie results in a 3 day ban.
why this is has never been explained or justified.
meanwhile youtube "reviewer" threads that are nothing but gossip about their personal lives are protected by moderation.
Its simple: The mods fucking hate /tv/ with a passion. In fact moot hated it as well and always did. The mods have been trying to nuke /tv/ for a while now, and I guess they really, really want to get Hiro to nuke it.