Why do so many people on /qa/ complain about boards that they

>>410513
Why won't the moderators address the userbase?

Is that so difficult?

>Why do so many people on /qa/ complain about boards that they clearly do not browse?
that's what this board is for. you don't take any of these threads seriously, do you?

>>410513
I'll chill out as soon as the threads on /v that are relevant to my interests are cleared of fecal matter.
And we all know that won't be happening any time soon.

>>410521
Because you're a bunch of insolent children and responding to you seriously would not be in anyone's best interest

>>410513
Because this board is for shitters and other ban evaders to pretend to be the "userbase"

>>410529
It might do something to halt the multiple threads calling mods out on their incompetence, and their determination to destroy certain boards.

But then the mods would be reminded that they aren't particularly good at their job, wouldn't they :^)

>>410521
>It might do something to halt the multiple threads calling mods out on their incompetence
Capcode posts in /qa/ have not once resulted in less complaining.

>>410513
>Why do so many people on /qa/ complain about boards that they clearly do not browse?
They hate that those boards even exist on the same site as their home board.

>Why can't /qa/ chill out like we used to?
Because everybody here thinks they know best.

>Isn't that what moot wanted?
It's partly his fault. He was a decent admin from a technical standpoint but his total lack of will to stay in touch with his userbase came off like neglect and apathy. This emboldens trolls and makes conspiracy theories flourish.

It's further compounded by the mods hardly ever posting under their trips anymore, being incommunicado unless they're on IRC, and bans being on the ban page now instead of being threadly exhibitions of mod power (and humor).

I don't know if this was a directive moot gave them long ago or if they did it on their own but whatever the original intent was has backfired and caused unintended negative consequences.

>>410540
I think that at some point moot decided to make 4chan moderation into a great faceless wall which enforces rules as written, to prevent mod personality cults and stave off lynch mobs.

It's pretty boring, though.

>>410521
The mods don't address the userbase because it doesn't achieve the effect that they desire.

>>410627
This pretty much

>>410627
If we knew what they were doing and why they were doing it, /qa/ wouldn't be full of threads complaining about the mods.

>>411400
Anon, the mods could be the literal meaning of perfect and transparent and /qa/ would still be mostly people bitching about the mods. That's the sort of people a meta boards attracts when its big. There is a reason people say /qa/ needs to go and stop being treated like /q/. It's because most of the people posting are fucking idiots

>>411400
That's only true if everyone were like you. If everyone were like you then there'd be nothing to complain about to the mods as they wouldn't be enforcing or endorsing any bad behaviour. Humans have disagreements and neither side is correct. You happen to be in opposition to the mods. If the mods did something that you liked then somebody else would be in opposition to the mods. We're snowflakes.

>>410521
You whiny kiddos and your /q/ blogs don't deserve to be taken seriously.

>>411561
>Humans have disagreements and neither side is correct.
I understand what you are getting at but some sides are simply not defendable (like mod abuse for example.) Some things simply should not be but yeah complaining won't do much of anything at this point.

how do you know they don't go to those boards?