[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Why aren't threads about women allowed...
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /qa/ - Question & Answer

Thread replies: 92
Thread images: 10
File: 1342801859432.jpg (549 KB, 782x1052) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1342801859432.jpg
549 KB, 782x1052
Every other board on 4chan is allowed to post related pictures on topic, or even off-topic. Why can't pictures or webm of actresses be posted on /tv/ ?

At this moment, the entire board is overflowing with meme threads, star wars, and e-celeb shit that is left untouched, but any thread about an actress 404's within a few minutes.

Can we finally get an official explanation?
>>
>>404203
No one cares about your cancerous waifu threads, faggot.
>>
>>404213
this is the genius level response i was expecting.

i'm not talking about "waifuists" since most of them were driven away years ago.

why are you so threatened by pictures of women on an IMAGE BOARD about TELEVISION and FILM?
>>
the rule exists because there are legions of autists shitposting eternally about this exact thing and no one else needs it

same with racism, furries, mlp, etc.
>>
>>404214
What does an actresses feet have to do with tv or films
>>
>>404218
you mean, exactly the same as the autists spamming bane, sheev, RLM, etc. etc. etc.?

>>404219
if an actress (or actor) appears in television or film, how is it possible for a discussion about them to even BE "off-topic." ?

i understand your point, but why does it even matter? people should be free to discuss what they like, and if no one is interested it will 404 naturally. this used to be the way of things and still is on nearly every other board.
>>
>>404222
you understand my point but you don't understand my point
just go away my dude
>>
>>404225
your point is "I don't like it so it shouldn't be allowed." I understand it perfectly.
>>
>>404222
>if an actress (or actor) appears in television or film, how is it possible for a discussion about them to even BE "off-topic." ?

You know, I never thought of it that way. You're right; Tina Fey's toenail clippings IS television and film! Oh wait..
>>
>>404222
>you mean, exactly the same as the autists spamming bane, sheev, RLM, etc. etc. etc.?
those are meant to be humor. your cancer is unapologetic and will create something worse every five minutes if it doesn't get cleaned.
>>
>>404233
so far the argument is >>404228

a lot of the actress threads are also hilarious to much of the board, and the threads generally max out if left undisturbed.

why do images of actresses on the television and film board upset you so much?
>>
>>404259
And so far the argument for it is "It's not offtopic because reasons and anyone who disagrees is wrong." If you want to just bitch and not have to actually discuss reasoning further than "I'm right you're wrong LALALA" then why not just write in your diary?
>>
>>404275
every post i've made has had reasoning in it, you fucking contrarian. if whiny pussies like you could just hide threads they didn't like, none of this would have happened in the first place.

>>404222
>people should be free to discuss what they like, and if no one is interested it will 404 naturally. this used to be the way of things and still is on nearly every other board.
>>
>>404278
>I should be able to spam video games on /out/ and fashion on /g/ and card games on /w/, if people aren't interested in it then it will just 404 :^)
Or you could just stop acting like you're the victim when people tell you to fuck off with your shitposting.
>>
I really like the threads that are just pictures of... that one actress. She looks mentally-ill or partially retarded, and the text is either "LEGOS" or "TENDIES."

Those are good threads.
>>
>>404292
>names off-topic threads on unrelated boards
we're talking about ACTORS and ACTRESSES not being allowed on the TELEVISON and FILM image board. fuck off.

>>404298
there is no valid reason why those threads are being deleted.
>>
Just remember, interracial porn is allowed but celebrity threads aren't. This is what happens when you let a faggot like swaglord/invisbro mod your board. Thanks moot
>>
>>404203
The mods hate people who like women. They want to encourage you to be a literal faggot

4chan is a social justice website
>>
Redditors who wanted muh serious film discussion board applied to be janitor and were successful. The rest is history.

Only Bane and Waifus can purge the redditor normalshits.
>>
>>404203
mods and janitors have a hateboner for females

but for some reason the fags who spam the youtube reviewers can do what they wan't.

one of them is constantly breaking global rule #11 with shilling his stupid stream and the mods don't care

http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/eggkara/
>>
4chan's /tv/ board is a worksafe board. Please stop posting women. You're not supposed to masturbate on blue boards.
>>
>>404342
dude i'm barely ever on /tv/ and when i am it's as a user because i like tv shows

i have a busy work and personal life so im not on 4chan as much as you guys would like to believe in order to keep blaming me for stuff :^/
>>
so a whole thread of gossip about a video game reviewer is somehow television/film related, but an actress in a movie isn't. hilarious.

>>>/tv/64606369
>>
>>404203
You actually took the time to make a magazine-esq image about this
>>
>>405220
i saved it from a thread around 2012 or so. the problem has been going on THAT LONG.
>>
File: 1441426626248.jpg (214 KB, 1392x734) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1441426626248.jpg
214 KB, 1392x734
Threadly reminder
>>
File: 2064754ki2x10A.jpg (57 KB, 563x468) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
2064754ki2x10A.jpg
57 KB, 563x468
>>405230
the moderation on /tv/ has always been a fucking joke.
>>
>>405234
>>405230
If you ever needed proof moot was a retard, this is it. There is no reason at all to like him anymore after what he's done to this site.

This is also even more proof that the mods, including moot, hated /tv/. It makes more and more sense now why /tv/ went to shit: moot fucking hated it and his lackeys agreed with him
>>
>>405273
he went on record many times saying that he literally did not watch ANY television or movies whatsoever.

i think that he and some of his cohorts just find "celebrity worship" to be "unseemly" in some way.

invisibro just hates the "waifu" threads because he was soundly rejected by that community when he tried to fit in.
>>
>>405273
Opinions are totally arbitrary and don't matter at all, one bit. On the other hand, they're the only things that matter so I dunno.
>>
>>405283
Not when the entire board fucking hates what's happening to it, swaglord.

>>405282
moot and his "buddies" clearly fucking hated /tv/. Those IRC leaked memos proved that the mods all hated it, including moot. The mods wanted it deleted, but moot decided to keep it because he knew people would be pissed if it was gone. With moot gone now the mods have decided to simply ruin the board beyond repair, and then get hopefully Hiro to delete it
>>
>>405287
I'm not swaglord.
>>
>>405287
>Those IRC leaked memos

any links? i wasn't around to see this.
>>
>>405282
>invisibro just hates the "waifu" threads because he was soundly rejected by that community when he tried to fit in.

tippity top kek
>>
who /givelefuck/ here
>>
>>405369
i banned you myself, faggot.

you are hated by literally everyone.
>>
>>405392
Are you pretending to be a mod?
>>
>>405392

he banned me from his IRC channel that i stopped by a long time ago
>>
>>405395
so you are you guys going to relax the reins a little bit on /tv/ finally or what?

can we at least get some kind of official justification why the rules there are so draconian regarding actresses when every other board is allowed to "waifu" and shitpost at will?
>>
>>405421

i dont speak on behalf of the admin/moderation/janitor team, so i can't really say

what i can say is that 4channers give me an undue amount of blame (and credit) for things other mods/janitors do. i'm not nearly active enough to do every single thing people like/dislike
>>
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>>
>>405427
maybe you should stop making meme stickies on /tv/ and people would stop blaming your for everything
>>
>>405393
i'm doing no such thing i was referring to IRC

>>405427
fair enough, but don't pretend you haven't had a lot to do with the reasons why /tv/ is currently in such a deplorable state
>>
>muh waifus
>>
>>404203
Everyone is sick of you're boring waifus.
>>
is this something that moderation should be doing? babysitting a thread just to delete pictures of women?

http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/64637937/#64637937

Please, someone try to justify this ridiculous behavior.
>>
>>405427
hello can you tell your boyfriend that /tv/ is messed up right now
>20 pages
>new threads cant be posted in as its 404 but still shows up on the catalog
thanks
>>
>>405664

Yeah whats up with that? Open new thread from catalog and it comes up 404.
>>
File: truth.png (56 KB, 869x351) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
truth.png
56 KB, 869x351
>>404203
It's kind of funny. Actresses are only banned on the board where they're most relevant. /v/, /a/, /co/, all are allowed threads on voice actors, /mu/ is allowed threads on female artists.

The /tv/ actress ban is not anything practical and is not based on any form of logic or reason. It's simply stemmed from a years old grudge that has become tradition now and nothing more.
>>
>>405291
They're on wiki eat's /tv/ board if you wanna see them.
>>
>>405711
wow those knuckleheads ended up being useful!
first time for everything!

thanks for the tip :)
>>
>>405664
almost 30 pages now
>>
If you don't like it, you can always go back to r/celeb, you piece of shit redditor.
>>
dude double standards lmao
>>>/tv/64646642
>>
File: fucking why.jpg (60 KB, 758x581) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
fucking why.jpg
60 KB, 758x581
>>405853
can't wait until you mouth breathers get bans for throwing that word around like it means something.

>>405873
it has been like that for a while. with no reason or explanation.
>>
Because you don't want to discuss what this actress did, played in, or is going to do, you want to discuss the scene where you can see her nipples.

In short, hive of underages yaping their mouth about tits.
>>
>>406124
and?
why is you trying to censor and sanitize fucking 4chan, of all places? why are you triggered by images of actresses on a television and film image board?
>>
>>406124
Which is utterly fine.
>>
>>404275
>It's not offtopic because reasons

Uh yes, that's correct. There are reasons it is not offtopic and has been stated in this thread. In fact, the board rules say that actresses are not off topic.

And yet,actresses are still deleted as off topic no matter what.
>>
there is obviously a massive inconsistency going on here that needs to be addressed officially.

doesn't matter which side of the fence you are on.
>>
>>406124
and all the threads about the youtube reviewers are just gossip, but for some reason they are allowed
>>
The No Girls Allowed moderation is a meme left over from when moot's e-peen was still determining who and what was going to be allowed on 4chan. He has blatantly stated in old /q/ threads that there's no logic behind the /tv/ ban on women and it comes down to "my website my rules". Well it's not his website anymore, so why are we still enforcing shit he implemented explicitly to antagonize a board?

As if the IRC leaks didn't prove it enough, the problem won't stop until every one of the mods, jannies, and admin crew that were brought on by moot are cleaned out until his little cult is completely gone and a new team can be brought on that has no interest in imposing an agenda on boards.

Basically moot confirmed he hated /tv/ and also saw it as an opportunity to give 4chan a welcoming board to the newfags from 9gag, tumblr, reddit, etc coming in back in the /q/ days who were complaining about how there were people talking about things they didn't like in their new Secret Clubhouse and that threads which have nothing to do with them that they don't have to enter shouldn't be allowed. So moot decided to shit up the board in hopes of making it some sort of safespace for everyone on the internet who wants to post dank memes and talk about the most accessible medium, thus driving up site hits and adbux.

The bottom line is we already know that it's a policy which is based on no rationale or reason, it's pure e-peen horseshit left over from when the King Bitchbaby himself got shitrekt about the issue one too many times on /q/ when all anyone wanted was for him to fix what he broke, then he took it personally. It only still exists because his brigade of shithead mods who have only been around since he ruined /tv/ are still there to enforce his old grudges whether they make any sense whatsoever.
>>
It's been the case for years that you can't even talk about television and film on the television and film board anymore, because if the television and film in question contains an actress the jannies find triggering, they'll delete the thread entirely. You know how ridiculous that is? It just shows how much of a joke the whole board is. It's not and has not been about facilitating any form of discussion for years, because as soon as the genocide of board culture happened it essentially left /tv/ as the blank slate board for nothing but cross-board posting and passing through the "Gateway to the 4chan Experience".

The epitome of autism is seeing someone having fun over there, or talking about something you don't want to talk about, and wanting them to stop when it affects you in no way. The proper response is to simply not participate in things you don't like since you don't have to. Unfortunately moot decided to listen to the autists who couldn't accept that on an entire board full of content there might be things they dislike, and it triggers them that even if they're not looking at it, and not partaking in it, something THEY DON'T LIKE IS STILL HAPPENING EVEN IF IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM REEEEE

It amazes me that adults can not only be this immature, but actually find other similarly immature adults to sympathize with them and cater to their needs.
>>
>>406188
>>406193
OP here. 10/10 analysis and completely correct.

Please stick around to provide more insight. :)
>>
>https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/64670232/#64670232
Why was it deleted?
It was on topic and not even wayfoo fag shit AND on its way to a natural 404 anyways

Why is this fine >>>/tv/64670401 but not the thread about neon demon

Are we not going to be allowed to discuss it when it's released too?
>>
>>406475
>Are we not going to be allowed to discuss it when it's released
if the OP picture has one of the male stars of the movie AND no one posts any pictures of the actresses in the movie, it MIGHT not get deleted.

yes, things on /tv/ are that ridiculous.
>>
>>>/tv/64683184

gossip thread about some moron that has nothing to do with television or film. this guy and RLM and TGWTG are allowed to use /tv/ to advertise their shitty sites even though advertising is against global rules
>>
File: warned.jpg (285 KB, 846x941) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
warned.jpg
285 KB, 846x941
>>406661
the mods/janitors love them, even if they shitpost they won't get banned
>>
>>404203
3DPD is trash.
You must be confusing 4chan for some other website.
Fuck off.
>>
>>405234
Waifu don't exist in the 3D world, newfag.
m00t may have been a smug cunt and a terrible admin, but he wasn't that stupid.
>>
>>406475
>Are we not going to be allowed to discuss it when it's released too?

Of course not. Any tv show or movies that contain actresses are triggering. Just make sure the shows or movies have no actresses.
>>
>>406939
>Waifu don't exist in the 3D world
the term has evolved beyond your limited understanding.

you fucking troglodyte.
>>
File: 1255938451223.jpg (94 KB, 563x429) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1255938451223.jpg
94 KB, 563x429
>oh no I'm getting called out!!
>I know I'll leave up some garbage actress threads I usually delete within 10 minutes to justify what I do
Fucking lmaoing
>>
>>404203
Regular American censorship.
>>
>>406188
>>406193
Saved for future use.
>>
>>404203
Because an actor or actress's personal life isn't related to television or movies, only the parts they play. start your stalker threads somewhere else.
>>
>>407231
thats a perfect description for the threads about YouTube reviewers
>>
>>406193
>>406188
God if you needed more proof moot was a fucking faggot...

Hiro really needs to clean house now.
>>
>>406188
>my website my rules
exactly

go start your own site
>>
great job right now mods
>actress threads deleted ASAP
>nothing but /b/ tier shit still up and being babysat
>>
>>407418
Roonposting is /tv/

the rest i agree with.

seems as if /tv/ is being abandoned today for some reason...........
>>
File: 1445213930235.png (158 KB, 1690x1686) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1445213930235.png
158 KB, 1690x1686
>>407418
Reminder that this guy is a paedo hiro
>>
File: Thread Archived.jpg (2 MB, 3984x2506) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Thread Archived.jpg
2 MB, 3984x2506
>>
>>407679
Oh look, proper moderation.
>>
File: m-mv7r.jpg (28 KB, 463x260) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
m-mv7r.jpg
28 KB, 463x260
>>407681
>>
>>407685
>memetext image with meme show

Pretty ebin.
>>
>>407679
it's spam
>>
>>407233
anons talk about youtube reviewers?
Holy shit /tv/ really is a sewer
>>
>>409429
threads about this idiot are completely protected even though he has nothing to do with television r film:
>>>/tv/64790793

the threads are solely bad "meme" attempts and personal gossip.
>>
>>407679
good job mods
>>
>>404213
but now the whole board is cancer
The worst scenario is the board becoming /cel/ which would be an improvement.
All I would like is to be able to bring up an actress without the thread getting deleted. The board was way better before actresses were banned.
>>
>>404229
>Tina Fey's toenail clippings IS television and film! Oh wait..
one actress appreciation thread would only improve things you actual activated faggot.
Thread replies: 92
Thread images: 10
Thread DB ID: 404812



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.