>>400994 Your non-color coding of the IDs seems foreign and strange.
Love the font choices for your commentary.
Good job. However, people on /qa/, /pol/ (et al.) who routinely post random screenshots of the /pol/ catalog as a reference for why /pol/ is shit are sometimes justified in their complaining by the number of pure shitposting and/or off topic threads at any given time. Mods give a wide berth for the sake of 'free speech' and lack of their own interest in the board topic but that often gets abused.
>>400994 4chan isn't for serious discussion. If it were for serious discussion, there would be more serious discussion taking place.
The emergent behaviour of 4chan is the goal of 4chan. Your own personal idea of what 4chan should be is just your opinion. If the majority of people don't suit you, then you are the one who doesn't fit in, not them. They outnumber you and it's pathetic to think that your individual opinion is any better than the mob's rule. Go make your own chan.
>>400994 Ok I'm gonna make this clear: People don't hate /pol/ for their views,ideology,racism etc...(We all know half of it is ironic don't even try to deny it) People hate /pol/ because you guys are acting like the old bronies/furries and by that i mean that you post your stuff everywhere on the other boards despite being off-topic, you also act like a hugbox, attacking in group whoever criticize you and your beliefs.
In short, /pol/ need to grow the fuck up and understand how this website works or they are no better than reddit.
I'm the first to explain /pol/tards why they are hated, and how obnoxious they are. But how does that apply to this thread? This is by all intent and purposes a meta board, left alive after it served it purpose only to not to stop the meta discussions. All boards, their moderation, their dynamics and content are discussed here, and the other half of the board is rampant shitposting.
I found this reaction of /pol/ very intersting and coutnerintuitive, and I wanted to share this and discuss it with not-/pol/. How is this not the place to have this discussion? Exactly what about my thread fits your idea of an "obnoxious /pol/tard"?
>>402664 You just said discuss, how the fuck do you expect us to know what exactly you wanted to discuss. Also that image is shit, because half the post supporting the black dude were neutral shitposts and some "neutral shitposts" were clearly pro-whites >Exactly what about my thread fits your idea of an "obnoxious /pol/tard"? That image is shit because of the reason mentionned above and there>>402670 You just said "discuss" The image was clearly made with the intent to give us a favorable view on /pol/
The last part isn't bad if taken but combined with the the 2 others, it does make you sound as an "obnoxious /pol/tard"
>>402702 >>402670 there are lots of post saying stuff like "i hate niggers, but this is just an asshole against an old man", or that said that it was the white dude who was acting like a nigger. I marked those as siding with the black because they are bashing "nigger" behaviour, not blacks in general. Not saying they don't hate blacks in general, but they aknowledge the white was in the wrong
If you mean other posts, please point them out. I only saw other two I really regret. And some short posts you need to follow the conversation to see what they mean
Thread replies: 17 Thread images: 1
Thread DB ID: 373207
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.