>>63483642 Guys I think I should share my story with you. My sister only dates white guys. She is now dating some huge guy that thinks he is going to be some champion body builder. The guy is a big dumb blonde guy and he pisses me off because he comes into my room and asks me how I am enjoying my video games. FUCK YOU. I do more then play video games. I wanted to show my sister how I could throw him around using leverage so she would not keep talking about him. I tried to throw him over my shoulder. He laughed and picked me up and kissed me on the cheek and said "you're a good boy".
My sister was laughing as was my mom. It pisses me off. He comes in plants a big kiss on my mom and then sister and tries to be all "I am your friend" with me. FUCK YOU. This pisses me off so much right now. If I could kick his ass I would. It bothers me that my dad likes him too. Why don't they see him like I do?
Always Trump has jewish grandkids And spooky ties Not that any other candidate isnt spooky So uh Is trump controlled opposition Or just an old man.trying.to make up for a lifetime of jewness http://henrymakow.com/2015/12/Donald-Drumpf-Illuminati%20Jew.html
. Also please ignore the tinfoiley nature of this self hating jew website but read about trumps ties
Dont we hate israel for blowing the wtc the fuck up?
I mean really all the candidates have a decent amount of jewish ties
Its just funny because these immigration problems were manufactured by jews
>>63483642 Race matters but culture matters more. You can raise any race baby with abos or niggers and they will be a shitty person due to the culture. The reverse is also true. Adopted black and brown kids raised by white parents are usually high achievers and rarely commit crimes.
>>63485975 >viking culture was great You only say that because they were whites. Objectively speaking they weren't great in any way. I remember reading some 19th century travel guide/encyclopedia/something which described Swedes as brutal and vile criminals, as a country with most people in jail in Europe. In fact, look any older sources, Swedes were seen as butchers and barbarians. German kids were told scary stories about Swedes. Compare that with modern day Sweden.
>>63486608 Exactly. Doesn't mean Swedes were inferior people. >>63486730 ...and what are their accomplishments? Are you aware it's all a fucking myth? Brave vikings got their shit pushed in whenever they faced a real army. Besides, they didn't just raid and butcher civilians, they were traders too. Only impressive aspect of their culture was their seamanship.
>>63484320 No, there plenty of white Brits currently trainng with ISIS to destroy your culture. I'd much rather live among different coloured people who share my values and traditions, than all white, some of whom want to kill me because I play music or watch sports or make art. Wouldn't you rather listen to church bells toled by people of various races than ut up with this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAP14MFoHFM
>>63487228 I'm going from what I see most men doing. Most care largely about the physical features of a woman and not her education, for example. And yes, tall blondes are generally regarded as good looking. But even if you have a Mediterranean preference, my reasoning still stands.
>>63487196 historically speak, but we live in a world with airplanes and immigrtation and shit. I'd rather have neighbours of different colours who share my values and culture, than neighbours who happen to be the same colour but are busy building mosques and stoning women to death and tossing gays from tall buildings, etc.
Depends on what you mean by "more important," but there are many consistencies among racial groups that are not explained by culture, wealth, etc.
For example, if you take black children and put them in white foster homes, you still end up with roughly the same intelligence averages and roughly the same life outcome statistics (similar criminal behavior, similar wealth categories, etc). The same is also true of asians adopted by whites; they outperform their white counterparts in just the same ways that non-adopted asians outperform their white counterparts.
If you look at IQ averages of culturally distinct groups of blacks, e.g., various disparate groups in Africa and across the US, you get similar kinds of patterns; and the same goes for whites. For example, lower income whites do commit crimes at a higher rate than higher income whites, but still at a lower rate than blacks. Moldova is one of the poorest white countries, and its homocide rate is about 6.5 per hundred thousand; Nigeria is the wealthiest black country, and its homocide rate is 17.5..
There is also a fake debate that gets pushed around often. It is said that we cannot separate the influences of culture and race from outcomes, since they both play a role in outcomes. But it is also said that culture is obviously the factor, and not race, since *who knows why* they just say this and it is often not met with resistance. But there is a fundamental question that is not addressed by the culture-explanation, namely, why do certain races have/keep/reinforce certain kinds of cultures? Is there no good reason why black culture hasn't become more prevalent in white populations? Or is it because baseline white intelligence prevents widespread adoption of fundamentally damaging cultural practices? And why do you think white or asian norms/attitudes, particularly concerning education, are often rejected or sidelined in black culture?
>>63486457 No, not really. The Vikings had a rich culture, created great works of art, pioneered sea faring to another level etc. The "savages" thing is largely from Christian writers who were describing pagans. They really weren't like niggers at all.
It depends on which nation you're talking about. Take Brazilian Nationalism, for an instance. This is a multicultural nation since its inception. A mix of Europeans, indigenous South Americans, and Africans. Our culture came out of a mess, and so did the many mixed races you may find here.
In this instance, in the current year, inside Brazil (for example), a good culture matters more than mere race. In Europe, however, cultures are generally isolated to certain ethnicities, so one might argue that both race and culture are important.
>>63488429 >rich culture So did many other people you see as inferior. Everyone has some culture. However, Scandinavian culture of that age was on the level of Roman culture in 7th century BC. In fact if you studied both you'd see similarities. It's a case of post-tribal society which didn't become civilized yet. >they really weren't like niggers What is a nigger? I call niggers those ghetto blacks from America. Some black people (Ethiopians for example) had very interesting and old cultures.
>>63488516 >Not so many Swedish men into immigrant women Oh really? Plenty of Scandinavians drop their jaw when they come to Balkans. Non-Europeans find blonde hair exotic, that's the thing. It's unique to Europe. Doesn't mean it's some standard of beauty. People can generally agree on what is beautiful but it comes in many variations.
>>63483642 Culture is influenced and fueled by man alive today, race is a social construct indeed but the outside layer of man - the skin color and minor adaptations to climate change over the course of 10k years at max for skin color aka blacks turning white or the other way around and 1000 years or even less for facial structures, details.
>>63487617 >And yes, tall blondes are generally regarded as good looking Onlyy if the tall blondes are good-looking, genius. And I wouldn't say height is important when it comes to females. A LOT of men prefer smaller women. I've dated women from 6'1" to 5'. I find the sweet spot for a woman somewhere between 5' and 5'3", about a foot shorter than I am. here's a morph of three women that height
No it isn't. No more than family is. You can deconstruct anything and call it a "social construct" if your understanding of the world relies on the view of people as disconnected atomised individuals floating in a void. "Culture" is much more of a social construct than blood.
>>63483642 Culture, by far. The biggest problem culture is (was by this point) TV. Television is a god damn brainwashing machine, and even black kids raised in white homes see the dancing monkeys on TV and think that's how they're supposed to act. Black kids raised by responsible white people turn out fine. Fuck black culture.
Blacks have never created a functioning first world civilization even though they are the second most populous race in a resource rich, vast continent. On the other hand, almost every European country with very differing cultures has found great success. It's quite obviously race.
>>63488049 >implying black Americans are representative of all black people
Black children outperform white children in the UK at all socioeconmic levels (there was a economist article on it recently). Your reasoning is completely redundant.
This is the problem with pol. You guys claim to be enlightened yet you're constantly making judgements based n incomplete data. You like to extrapolate your own environment to the entirety of the world. Its like the political equivalent of Hollywood where every momentous event in a movie is set in New York.
I have been to Senegal and I've seen little kids carrying pristine copies of the Bescherelle from 20 years ago, Senegalese kids are taught to learn French and that to be educated means to be French-speaking, there is harsh discipline an Senegalese parents always accuse their kids of being lazy if they don't study enough and tell them they will never achieve anything in this life if they don't learn the white man's language and the white man's way of life.
Conversely, when you go to the big cities, everyone speaks Wolof and the culture has gone to shit, no one can string together a sentence in French and they're lazy, spoiled people.
>>63490302 You're a bumbling idiot, to say the least.
Niggers don't outperform whites in uk, not even close. Take a look at the unemployment rate of uk niggers. Yes, you guessed it, it's among the worst. Wanna take a look at per capita crime rates as well, it's among the worst as well. Comically, this phenomenon is consistent throughout the world with these less evolved creatures.
>>63490302 That's completely fucking wrong and a lie. Niggers do the worst at school here overall, especially Caribbean niggers. Blacks are something like 12 times overrepresented in violent crime here and even commit a majority of violent crime in London, just lmao at trying to make them out as model citizens. Have you ever even met one from London or Birmingham?
>>63490058 The meme is that there is a difference between black people and niggers.
>You do understand that black people can be civilized, right?
At best they can pass as caricatures of civility, and even then only though the tight leash of some entity that's actually civil. They will never become or stay civilized by their own accord just as an animal will never domesticate itself.
>>63491486 > affirmative action means most go to school > still the lowest employment rate because they never finish or learn anything > niggers do shit in school but don't worry so do some whites when you control for income!
Culture because you can teach a bigger culture and make him a civilized black man working in society but if you make race more important we will live in a world of dumb apelike niggers all nig nogging all over the world
>>63491911 Yeah your government not given a fuck about them and handing out gib me dat to all the muslims and darkies while telling them that white men are the devil incarnate does have anything to do with that at all.
>>63483642 Culture. You can have polite, proper black men and nigger-like whites and spics. Culture is the issue: I don't care how black you are as long as you can act like a decent human being and not a fucking ape. Dark skin itself doesn't motivate murder, mugging, and other crime: it's the culture of said person that brings them to do so.
That said, race is very closely (but not fully) intertwined with culture.
>>63492501 Hahaha. You moron, it's white faggots keeping poor white down so you can compete. Brag all you want ,but to claim victory becuase faggot white liberals are literally disadvantaging white so the drakes can compete is hilarious. Good going having to get whites help you compete.
Culture is "cultivated". You can change, you can do improvements. Genes will elevate you or hold you back forever, zero choices. Culture is the way you cure the problems your genetic may had bring to you. If culture and genetics doesn't help, you are in Brazil, enjoy the carnival.
>>63492933 This. If you took a load of niggers and put them in Japan they would still be niggers in 3 generations time. They would still be faster at running, less intelligent, better at dancing, louder, more violent etc than the native population. Same for vice versa.
I honestly don't care about culture at all. Maybe that's the privilege (or disadvantage) of being an Americlap. I have a German surname, a British-born mother, and my paternal grandmother's family were Southerners while my grandpa's traced far back in New England, and I was born in the midwest. I don't have any ethnic culture. Some black dude or Paki liking Shakespeare doesn't make him anything to me. As far as wiggers and white-trash go, I'd go so far as to guess it's genetic and they're some sort of trash sub-race that ought to be banished with the coloreds. If Sweden were 100% white but 50% Muslim, like someone suggested, I still think it'd be a nice place. You know why? It's 100% white. The problem is less Islam, and more sandniggers, and confused white traitors trying to adopt a sandnigger mentality because the religion is mostly made up of subhumans. It's the same way you have tolerable, intelligent/sensible white Christians and Christian niggers still burning witches in the Congo. Blood trumps everything.
Also, it is true, for example, that in the US, Nigerian immigrants do exceptionally well: much better than blacks generally, and better than whites on average. But you should also keep in mind the selection forces at play, and how peculiar that group is: it isn't the average Nigerian that emigrates to the US: they are typically wealthier/smarter than their average Nigerian counterparts, and again, given the statistics (where whites are, on average, smarter than blacks), about 1/3 of blacks should have higher IQs than about 1/2 of all whites. So if you can "pluck" the smartest blacks and compare them with whites generally, they'll do better. Duh.
>>63483642 neither race is only important if you compare people (whites, asians) to animals (niggers, shitskins) one can create civilization, the other cannot even sustain it (pic related) culture is less important than civilization. cultures change, civilization prevails
That's not true at all, there was an American anthropologist who married a girl from the tribe he was studying, the Yanomami, and she had concept of electricity, of how time was read and kept, of how civilized society functioned, yet she moved with him to America and raised a family, learned English, and adapted
Though there is a point to what you say regarding race, she eventually abandoned her husband and children to return to the Amazonian jungle because she said life here was "kept in a box" and her people "never lived in boxes"
It's either shitskin genetics or tribal backwardness, but I agree with you, the shitskin genetics produced the tribal backwardness, but the fact this woman adapted as fast and as well as she did should tell you that there is hope.
>>63494048 You don't even know what an anecdote is. If you can't accept the reality he's telling you to go experience it yourself. Anecdotes are used to give some supposed exception to the rule as an argument against the rules existence.
>>63494602 >Shitskins Middle easterners are actually a perfect example of culture being more important than race. In antiquity, they were the most advanced people in the world (Save for the Romans, who had taken over North Africa and the Levant anyway). Once inbred camel-fuckers from Arabia sarted spreading the will of Allah, they've become almost nigger-tier. Non-practicing Muslims and middle eastern christians are bro-tier.
>>63494605 Nobody has said that other races can't adept to some degree. The point is that there will still be key differences in intelligence, beauty, psychology, etc even if they are raised in white environments. So in the long run, the racial approach is the only correct one.
>>63495030 >In antiquity in antiquity Romans were heroes while Italians are cowards, and Greeks were great instead of lazy idiots. In antiquity there was no islam in the middle east. >Non-practicing Muslims like 5%?
>>63495030 Islamic civilisation used to be fine, at times more developed than Europe. They aren't an inferior race, just different. You're also an idiot if you think a middle Eastern Christian has more in common with you "culturally" than a middle eastern Muslim.
>>63495030 Yeah equating Middle Eastern people with advanced tech. HAHahah. They took slaves and pressured conquered people in to working for them. They literally gained a gold mien form the slowly dying Byzantine empire. Their race has always been shit tier. Muslim isn't a race also ,so they have through subterfuge and fanaticism over centuries conquered more capable racially groups .
>>63494048 Statistics actually. Look up crime and race in Britain. Look up anywhere with a high black population - guarantee it will be among the shittiest/most dangerous. British niggers are better on average than American niggers but that really isn't saying much at all.
>>63485150 Nice theory, Alberto Barbosa, see how it goes in your Brazilian lab. What about a mixing culture in which 50% is robbery, people make moviments and noise without any sense, just like animals in a forest, hyperbolic dance, violence, sexism, drop away your own childrens to improve sexual life and goes like this. Culture never will be inscripted in a tabula rasa, always depends on genes to germinate.
>>63495501 Keep telling yourself that. The only time Blacks have been white washed has been underneath white rule. The few that pass the test in the states just have European DNA in them that makes a small percentage of them them more capable.
culture if you ask me, niggers wouldn't be niggers if they just acted like fucking people, and me I have no problem with mudskins but I do have a problem with Islam and most mudskins tend to be muslim, race isn't as big an thing with me then culture
>>63495644 Jesus, look what the "son" is doing with the gorgeous movie star. Two pics and in both "son"... Is really enjoying his hot "mother". Yes, OP, faith in "culture" is just a way to procrastinate.
Let's look at Britain, if a Bengali or Pakistani or Indian wanted to immigrate to Britain in the 60s, he had to assimilate into the wider, broader British culture, simply because there was no one else like himself, whether by ethnicity, caste, religion, or occupation.
Fast forward after mass immigration, now he's had seven children, they've produced 20 grandchildren, and there's something very odd happening: He never spoke Hindi or Urdu to them outside of the home, yet now, Hindi or Urdu is all you ever hear being spoken outside of the home.
I agree with the Swede, the racial approach is the most objective determining factor in a person's development, but also we're completely losing sight of proportion. If a small proportion of blacks, asians, indians, pakistanis, bengalis, what have you, exists in a majority white population, they assimilate and integrate.
It's when an entire community develops to support the use of their backwards culture, useless language, and awful child-rearing practices that problems develop.
>>63496756 http://ose.utsc.utoronto.ca/ose/story.php?id=2135 "Previous research shows people are less likely to feel connected to people outside their own ethnic groups, and we wanted to know why," says Gutsell. "What we found is that there is a basic difference in the way peoples' brains react to those from other ethnic backgrounds."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Salter#Diversity_research "More ethnically homogeneous nations are better able to build public goods, are more democratic, less corrupt, have higher productivity and less inequality, are more trusting and care more for the disadvantaged, develop social and economic capital faster, have lower crime rates, are more resistant to external shocks, and are better global citizens, for example by giving more foreign aid. Moreover, they are less prone to civil war, the greatest source of violent death in the twentieth century."
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095660 "Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistance, but rather on well defined topographical and political boundaries separating groups"
http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/study-asks-is-a-better-world-possible/ "Policymakers have attempted to create communities where a diverse group of residents not only live close to one other but also interact freely - in other words, neighborhoods that are both integrated and socially cohesive." "The most integrated a neighborhood is, the less socially cohesive it becomes, and vice versa." "It's not that local leaders and policymakers aren't trying hard enough. Rather, we now think it's because the goals of integration and cohesion are just not compatible with each other."
>>63495030 The only good to come out of that shithouse is due to what higher racial elements existed there for a while.
You had white/Nordic/Indo-European/whatever you want to call it, racial elements in the early Middle East that disappeared slowly. Hittites, Persians, Hellenes, etc. I have a friend from college, a white dude, kind of a silly head-in-the-clouds intellectual type, who converted to Sufism because he thought it was "philosophically right." Anyway, he's non-racist and all that, "culture over race," etc. but I remember in passing him mentioning some Hadith about Mohammad having a Persian grandmother or something along the lines of that. Even he acknowledges he finds most Saudis and Iraqis loud and ignorant, and most of the Muslims he seems friendliest with are Iranian (not white, in my opinion generally, but whiter than a lot of that region), so these people attributing Middle Eastern/Islamic civilization to some quadroon savages like so many of the people living there now are fooling themselves.
>>63496756 How Ethnocentrists Rule - https://egtheory.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/how-ethnocentrics-rule/
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full "...the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogeneous settings... virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings."
We don't want them to assimilate. Not to mention, they are less intelligent and will never rise to the top. Leave them in their shitty countries where they can commit crime and rape there.
https://ose.utsc.utoronto.ca/ose/story.php?id=2135 >Previous research shows people are less likely to feel connected to people outside their own ethnic groups, and we wanted to know why,says Gutsell. What we found is that there is a basic difference in the way people's brains react to those from other ethnic backgrounds. Observing someone of a different race produced significantly less motor-cortex activity than observing a person of one's own race.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Salter#Diversity_research >More ethnically homogeneous nations are better able to build public goods, are more democratic, less corrupt, have higher productivity and less inequality, are more trusting and care more for the disadvantaged, develop social and economic capital faster, have lower crime rates...
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0095660 >Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistence, but rather on well defined topographical and political boundaries separating groups
http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/study-asks-is-a-better-world-possible/ >policymakers have attempted to create communities where a diverse group of residents not only live close to one other but also interact freely -in other words, neighborhoods that are both integrated and socially cohesive. >The more integrated a neighborhood is, the less socially cohesive it becomes, and vice versa.
http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon2007-06-25jl.html https://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/ >Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam, author of Bowling Alone, is very nervous about releasing his new research, and understandably so. >His five-year study shows that immigration and ethnic diversity have a devastating short- and medium-term influence on the social capital, fabric of associations, trust, and neighborliness that create and sustain communities.
>>63498367 What race are you? The vast majority of white men prefer white women to blacks just based on looks. Full equality will never be possible. You will still have a problem with a shortage of white women and wage differences because of different IQs.
>>63493083 Yeah, I'm kind of suprised to see how many people here have chosen culture. Like everything would be OK if those immigrants were christians instead of muslims or if blacks in America behaved better. Society is racial construction (instead of vice versa) and nothing can change that.
>>63498970 I'm white pretty much a mix of all northern Europeans you can name, I never said full equality could be achieved, I'm not that naive, not disagreeing with those facts, more just saying I think culture has more to do with how we act, and I personally don't find myself hating others for racial reasons bit more for cultural differences, I fucking hate Islam and I'm not a religions sort, and the extreme left that the 1st world seems to be taken by and I'm not really right wing but more centrist, but I hate them for their culture and ideologies not because of their races, sure I probably do find white women more attractive more often, but I certainly find plenty of black women hot too, its all in culture and how you act for me personally
Do you concede that Asians are more intelligent than whites? If so, then you have to explain why Asians excel and surpass whites in every area of social significance: Lower crime rate, better academic performance, more prone to employ rather than be employed, more stable within the family with divorce being rare, ect.
>>63483642 If there's any takeaway from the Scots Irish Americans prior to industrialization (during which they were forced to conform to Anglo Saxon standards - liberals prevented the same from happening to blacks), it's that you can be Germanic and still culturally degenerate.
>>63495030 Middle eastern christians are not "bro-tier". They live in the same kind of culture as the middle eastern muslims, more or less. We have a city in Sweden thats majority or soon to be majority assyrian (christian arabs). Do I need to tell you its a mess with shootings, huge corruption, crime families?
>>63499921 Respectfully disagree. I don't consider even the best looking black woman on par with an average white woman. You cannot have a working society like that. The people have to be equal in ability and beauty because otherwise there will be too many economic and sexual tensions. One race -> one country.
>>63500857 But nothing he said (with my pasta, sweet) was related to ranking the races. It's about racially homogenous societies functioning the best by far breeding successful, stable societies and you countered with a bunch of talk about a homogenous successful society. You're attempt to deflect by saying it's ranking races when it mentioned nothing of the sort. I.E you're a piece of shit that would do well in politics. I'll answer you anyway: >lower crime rate See his earlier links. Ethnic nepotism, anon. >better academic performance Cultures obsessed with testing to the point that it is damaging to their effectiveness on the job. There's cheating too but that's less important. >more prone to employ than be employed What does this imply? They have ethnic enclaves where they do everything and their nepotism even outside of said enclaves is infamous and puts jews to shame. > more stable within the family with divorce being rare Shame based culture as opposed to our guilt-based culture. It's an interesting thing to read about, really.
Now let's have a thought experiment: Say we whites had a shame-based culture, had ethnic enclaves in Shanghai and Beijing, only supported each other through nepotism and put an insane emphasis on education.
Would we fare better or worse than the native Han Chinese?
He accused me of "ranking the races", whereas I put forth the idea that we would dominate the native Han population were our culture and circumstances similar to their's in the Western world. They would be complaining about too many whites in their universities much as we do about too many Asians in our's.
>>63505498 I'm not your guy you're talking to, but we (whites) did dominate Asians for a while didn't we? They may have a higher IQ on average, but we cucked them on their own turf in Hong Kong, and made Japan our bitch the 1860's. The class I had to take on modern Japan last semester, the professor said it was at the point that some Japanese intellectual idealists got to the point they wanted to abolish the Japanese language in favor of English or French, and some said the Japanese should breed themselves out into being white. Obviously those were fringe opinions, but the professor said they were common enough some respected public figures, including I think it was their first minister of education, mentioned them.
>>63506627 >they wanted to abolish the Japanese language in favor of English or French I want to live in the parallel universe where that happened. All those games and anime no longer needing to be subbed or dubbed at all. I bet those fuckers don't even appreciate what they have.
>>63507025 Yeah, found the dude I was looking for. I wouldn't have minded that. I'm not very keen on Asians desu, but the Japanese are the one set of them I have a degree of respect for. A lot of them look kind of white-ish too, maybe thanks to Ainu mixture, so if their population was small enough at the time that white imperialists could have bred them white I wouldn't care.
Another interesting alternate history idea from a letter by H.P. Lovecraft. Not sure where the Aryans came from, I know now people are suggesting Anatolia, or the Caucuses, or Central Asia. He thought the Hindu Kush, but that's beside the point, the idea he talks about is kind of interesting.
"The cardinal virtue of Asia is its sane and philosophic timelessness. Whenever I contemplate that side of the Oriental nature, with its easy handling of centuries and millennia and its patrician disregard of momentary stirs and bustling, I am tempted to weep at the futile tail-chasing and clock-grovelling of the hectick West; and to wish that the virile Nordic had never left his homeland in the Hindoo-Koosh to merge his fortunes with the restless, fever’d, machine-driven European chasers after mutable nothingness. Had we stuck to Asia, we might have founded a permanent world-empire of unrivalled splendour and irresistible strength—as mighty and puissant as Rome, and as stable and enduring as antique Aegyptus or deathless Sinae. We might have kill’d off all the slant-eyed yellow folk, and have had long camel-trains of slaves and gold and ivory and strange crystals sent us as tribute by the dark-eyed vassals and cringers of Ind, of Persia, of Africk, of Europa, and of the empires Cuzco and Uxmal beyond the monstrous River Ocean. Glory to the Aesir! A bullock to golden-bearded Odin, and a fat buck Negro to hammer-wielding Thor! Long life to Astahahn, our capital on the Yann—for here we have fetter’d and manacled Time, who wou’d otherwise slay the gods. Eheu—the things that might have been!" ––from a letter written April, 1932
>>63493674 I'm mixed. Life is whatever, I'd say go for it. I have an edge in political debates because I can challenge liberal black lives matter bullshit without people immediately accusing me of being a racist.
>>63509520 Oh yeah, Lovecraft was a really interesting guy. I like a lot of his stories, and even reading his personal letters are cool to just hear him vent. He was pretty uber-racist. I do like his separation between Nordic and European because it doesn't leave any ambiguous room for cultural-nationalism. He admitted in a letter that he didn't see himself as totally "Nordic" because of his dark hair and eyes, but believed it was sort of a racial standard/ideal to strive for. He was a pretty rabid Anglophile too though. Like despite his clear racial rather than cultural views, in his stories he lets every non-Anglo have it, even going so far as to shit-talk the Dutch. It's almost kind of funny to read, like an antidote to the feelings being pushed by modern "equality" culture is to hear a guy rant about how no one but white Anglo-Saxons should even be allowed.
Thread replies: 247 Thread images: 37
Thread DB ID: 492725
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.