>India was white
>Israel was white
>Egypt was white
>Persia was white
Care to explain?
But it is well known the ruling classes of India and Persia were Aryans. I mean, that's their own history, some fair skinned light blonde people came from far away and took over charge.
Israel? WTF! Never heard that.
Egypt? Never heard that either. They were Asshahadins, so basically Arabs.
>But it is well known the ruling classes of India and Persia were Aryans. I mean, that's their own history, some fair skinned light blonde people came from far away and took over charge.
Source? We talking their high culture time here?
Egyptian depictions of the Israelites showed them with red, blond, or sometimes black hair, and then often blue eyes (Canaan And Canaanite in Ancient Egypt, by Alessandra Nibbi, 1989, UK). They were described as appearing no different from Greeks (Josephus' Antiquities 12.5.1), and King David was described as ruddy (Sam. 16:12). Esau, the grandson of Abraham, and the brother of Jacob, the progenitor of the Israelites had red hair (Genesis 25:25).
(Pictured: Residents of Galilee from the time of Christ from Mosaic found in Sepphoris)
“My beloved is white and ruddy, chosen out of thousands. His head is as the finest gold: his locks as branches of palm trees, black as a raven.” Song of Songs 5:10-11
“Her Nazarites were whiter than snow, purer than milk, more ruddy than the old ivory, fairer than the sapphire.” Lamentations 4:7
Dead sea scrolls apocryphal description of Sarah (Abraham's wife):
"“Her skin was pure white;
'She had long lovely hair;
Her limbs were smooth and rounded (her thighs were shapely)
'She had slender legs and small feet;
'Her hand were slim and long and so were her fingers.”
Adam's name in Hebrew means "to show blood in the face, i.e to flush, to turn rosy."
Jacob's father in law's name, "Laban," means "white."
The Gospels were brought only to Israelites (John 14:15, Matt. 15:14, Matt. 10:5-6, John 20:21). The Galatians, the Phillipians, and the Collosians were all Greek (at that time, White) peoples Paul wrote/preached to.
The Gospels were taken to Europe because that is where the Israelites went. Paul also wrote/preached to the Romans. The Romans were White, and the Romans Paul wrote/preached to were Israelites.
Greece, Italy, and Egypt were all White areas at one point, and now none of them are. Palestine was also once White.
Apocryphal description of Noah, from the book of Enoch, chapter 106:
"2. And his body was white as snow and red as the blooming of a rose, and the hair of his head †and his long locks were white as wool, and his eyes beautiful†. And when he opened his eyes, he lighted up the whole house like the sun, and the whole house was very bright. 3. And thereupon he arose in the hands of the midwife, opened his mouth, and †conversed with† the Lord of righteousness. 4. And his father Lamech was afraid of him and fled, and came to his father Methuselah. 5. And he said unto him: 'I have begotten a strange son, diverse from and unlike man, and resembling the sons of the God of heaven; and his nature is different and he is not like us, and his eyes are as the rays of the sun, and his countenance is glorious."
The Egyptians were not sandniggers either.
Do some research, statistically speaking argentina is more white than your country.
We have a higher % white population, most of our grandfathers came from europe, mostly Italy, German & Spain.
This are facts.
>Greece, Italy, and Egypt were all White areas at one point, and now none of them are.
WIR WAREN KAISER UND SHEISS! DAS RICHTIG!
Well on my father side it was mostly austria with a bit of italy.
On my father side it was all german and polish.
My grandmother was born in danzig (now poland).
And you tell me i'm not white? chances of negro genes are much higher for you bro, i'm sure your grand grandmother fucked some negro slave while her husband watched. you do have cuckold genes anyway.
confirmed wop as fuck
Jeez, I wonder why the god of the sun and light is depicted with light hair and sun-like features...mmmh, must have been gerrmanic, there's no other explaination!!!
I don't really care about being part of the cuckshed club, but there hasn't been any strong genetic shift in Italy that could've possibly made the peninsula less white. If anything, the Germanic invasions made Italy a bit whiter than it was, and ironically, Sicily is probably the region which was whitewashed the most, especially around Palermo.
Kill yourself shitskin, all of the statues depict Germans because they were White.
>there hasn't been any strong genetic shift
What are you talking about?
>Goatfucking, cow worshipping, streetshitting shitskin feels able to insult someone else's country
>Kill yourself shitskin, all of the statues depict Germans because they were White.
>lalalala can't hear u lalala we wuz kings n sheit
sure thing Pablo
>What are you talking about?
History 101: The Italic boot has never been invaded by moor peoples, so you would have to explain how the peninsula was white and then magically turned non white when the only invaders were whiter than the average wop.
India has nothing to do with white people other the origin of the word aryan which somehow white
supremacists use a lot
The genetic research say ancestors of the north and south indians were inhibited there since since long time.
Why don't you explain where you came to the conclusion that anybody thinks those areas were once white?
I am still amazed that they are providing you niggers with free wifi over there, Ahmed.
>Jeez, I wonder why the god of the sun and light is depicted with light hair and sun-like features...mmmh, must have been gerrmanic, there's no other explaination!!!
Yeah... No. Anybody could come up with a bullshit excuse like that.
The is how the Romans saw the Germanics.
I could say the same, but while my explanation is sound, yours is baseless and nigger tier 'we wuz shit' shit.
Besides, here is a mind blowing fact: get ready...
There are actually blonde people in Italy and Greece.
Point is that those plebs don't even read Tacitus.
The Germans themselves I should regard as aboriginal, and not mixed at all with other races through immigration or intercourse. For, in former times, it was not by land but on shipboard that those who sought to emigrate would arrive; and the boundless and, so to speak, hostile ocean beyond us, is seldom entered by a sail from our world. And, beside the perils of rough and unknown seas, who would leave Asia, or Africa, or Italy for Germany, with its wild country, its inclement skies, its sullen manners and aspect, unless indeed it were his home?
For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of inter-marriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them.
I never said anything about that. I'm not pretending that Roman Italians somehow dissapeared but you're by NO means pure. You're just heavily mixed to the point of your roman ancestry being insignificant just like the Greeks.
Pic related: An Italian "white" person
>You're just heavily mixed
>to the point of your roman ancestry being insignificant just like the Greeks
Depends what you mean by 'Roman'. If you mean the original Indo-European tribe who founded the city, it's hard to say to what extent they still exist. If you mean the inhabitants of senatorial Italian territories of Rome i.e Italy minus the islands, then we've roughly stayed the same.
Italy has been mixed and heterogeneous since pre-Roman times.
Pic related btw, an Italian shitskin arab.
That should be taken with a grain of salt He only used the Germans as a foil because he abhorred ow the patrician class behaved. Not to mention he never traveled to Germanic lands.
Yet somehow you went from having the greatest empire in the world to being a corrupt little shithole incapible of defeating even niggers at the first try. I'm not really buying it.
Already explained, the statues look like average wops.
I know that for a mongrel subhuman like you it's hard to comprehend that 19th century poor Sicilians aren't a representative of modern Italy as a whole, but give it a try.
And? Take a look at Germany if you want a recent example of people completely changing in less than 100 years.
Also, I could say the same about you, going from manly illiterate rapists and pillagers to the biggest beta moralfags on the planet.
>We have a higher % white population
Yeah, because this is considered white in argentina.
Read franklin, back then in north america only english and saxons were to be considered white.
24. Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth. I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, Scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the Compexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind.
>non digerire le stronzate dei nordicisti = comunisti
>giving anyone shit
my sides are on their way to colonize mars
WE WUZ MONKOLS AND SHAIT
Genghis Khan's Blue Eyes
The Mongol leader Temujin (AD 1167-1227), better known by his title Genghis Khan (Universal Ruler), was a man of strongly Nordish racial ancestry. According to the Persian historian Ab ul Ghasi, the tribal clan to which Temujin belonged, were known as the Bourchikoun (Grey-Eyed Men). [Günther (1934) 185; Lamb (1928) 22.] The ancestral mother and founder of this clan was known as Alan goa (beautiful Alan). According to the Mongol and Chinese legends on the subject, she was said to have been visited in her tent by a divine being, who possessed golden hair, a fair complexion and grey eyes. Shortly after this visitation, she gave birth to the first member of the Bourchikoun clan. [Günther (1934) 184.]
Temujin himself was noted in Chinese descriptions of him, for his tall stature and heavy beard. [Günther (1934) 185.] We should also note the following depiction of Temujin's appearance, as given by Harold Lamb, in his biography of the great Khan:
"He must have been tall, with high shoulders, his skin a whitish tan. His eyes, set far apart under a sloping forehead, did not slant. And his eyes were green, or blue-grey in the iris, with black pupils. Long reddish-brown hair fell in braids to his back." [Lamb (1928) 23.]
Ab ul Ghasi also observed that the family of Yesugai, the father of Temujin, were known for the fact that their children often had fair complexions, and blue or grey eyes. [Günther (1934) 185.] Temujin's wife, Bourtai, bore a name which means "Grey-Eyed". [Lamb (1928) 23.] As both Günther (1934) and Lamb (1928) note, Temujin's relatives and descendants also possessed fair features: Temujin's son and successor Ogadei (1229-41), had gray eyes and red hair; Temujin's grandson Mangu (1251-9), had reddish eyebrows and a red-brown beard; Subatei, who conquered China, had a long, reddish beard.
If you don't like redpilled discussion and trying to understand differences in race then don't come to /pol/. If you're an actual white Italian I don't get why you're so defensive and offended by this. It's the southern filth that's mixed the most.
Am I reading this wrong? Nobody actually thinks this, right?
>3% non-caucasoid = 3% non-white
No way this is a real post.
>whiteness is a fairly arbitrary category
How did you come to that conclusion?
No, not "caucasians," those were all pure, White, Aryans nations.
I don't care about whiteness, I simply shit on people who call us non-white and then want to pretend Romans were white without giving any reasoning for that.
If you don't consider us white, good, who cares, but you can't have Romans white when if anything we've only been enriched by white germanics, who could've only made the peninsula whiter.
Non-caucasoid = negroid, mongoloid, which afaik aren't considered white by any measure. Being caucasoid is the starting point for even beginning to consider a person white, usually.
You're not Aryan shitskin, get over yourself, and use a toilet for once.
HOL UP HOL UP
There appears to have been a blond, racially Nordic element, amongst the leadership of the Arabic peoples, from the very earliest times. Thus, as the distinguished Harvard anthropologist Carleton S. Coon has noted, when referring to the population of the Yemen plateau
The Prophet Muhammad (AD 570-632), the founder of the Islamic religion, was apparently fair-skinned; a freedman, by the name of Umar, described the Prophet thus:
"his face was not fat nor rounded; it was white tinged with red". [Guillaume (1987) 726.]
Most authorities on the issue appear to agree that Muhammad was brunet, but Henric von Schwerin has stated that:
"Red-hair is still honoured amongst Moslems as the Prophet Mohammed himself was reported to have red hair." [von Schwerin (1960) 27.]
During her lifetime Aisha, the Prophet's beloved wife, gained the epithet humayra, a word which has been translated as "light," "reddish," or "fair," but whose meaning can be most accurately rendered as "blonde." [Baltzer (1934) 206; Lewis (1990) 36; Vollers (1910) 91.] Subsequently, she has become known to the Islamic peoples as "Aisha the Blonde." [Günther (1930) 168.]
Abu Bakr, the father of Aisha, and thus, the father-in-law of Muhammad, was the first Caliph of Islam (AD 632-634). He was slenderly built, and white-skinned; also, he dyed his grey beard red, in an attempt to gain a more youthful appearance — possibly in imitation and pursuance of a fair-haired, Nordic ideal. [Günther (1930) 163.]
Caliph Ali (AD 656-661), a first cousin and son-in-law of Muhammad, was also renowned for his blond hair, as were his descendants, who founded the Shi'ite branch of Islam. [Grant (1981) 84-85; Lewis (1990) 36.]
It would also appear that many of the numerous and diverse rulers of Moorish Spain, were racially Nordic; the Spanish historian Enrique Sordo, informs us that:
"Most of the caliphs were fair or ginger-haired with blue eyes, which seems to show a preponderance of Berber or Germanic blood. As they were extremely proud of their origin, some of them dyed their hair black, as if to affirm their Arab descent." [Sordo (1962) 24.]
This trend towards blondism began with the very first independent Muslim ruler of the Iberian Peninsula. Abd al-Rahman I (AD 756-788), the founder of the Cordoban Emirate, was a Syrian from the Damascus region, and belonged to the imperial Umayyad family: he was a grandson of Caliph Hisham (AD 724-743). He is said to have been a "colossal red-haired man". [Grant (1981) 90; Sordo (1962) 23.]
Stanley G. Payne also provides another example of a fair-haired ruler in Muslim Spain:
"An effectively unified state was finally achieved during the long reign of Abd-al-Rahman III (912-961). The son of a Navarrese princess, this greatest of Cordoban rulers was a short, blue-eyed Muslim who dyed his red hair black to match that of most of his subjects. In 929 he took the step of raising his dominion from an emirate, or kingdom, to a caliphate, or empire." [Payne (1973) 23.]
The fourteenth-century historian Ali ibn Abd Allah, in his Roudh el Kartas, described a Moorish Sultan of the time, Muhammed ben Idriss, as "blond".
Muhammad I was known as Ibn al Ahmar (son of the red), because of his red hair; he was the founder of the Nasrid dynasty, and ruled from 1232 to 1273. [Sordo (1962) 120; Vollers (1910) 87.]
Abu 'l-Hadjdjadj Yusuf I, the Nasrid Sultan of Granada from 1333-1354, has been described in the following terms:
"He was of noble bearing and was endowed with extraordinary physical strength and good looks. His skin was too pale however, and, according to Arab historians, he increased his grave and majestic appearance by growing a beard which he dyed very black." [Sordo (1962) 120-121.]
Ultimately, Moorish Spain ended as it had begun: with a fair-haired ruler. Muhammad XII [Boabdil], was the last Sultan of Granada (AD 1482-1483, 1487-1492); Enrique Sordo depicts him thus:
"Among the paintings in the gallery of the Generalife Palace hangs Boabdil's portrait. In it his countenance is kindly, handsome and melancholy, his complexion rubicund and his hair blond." [Sordo (1962) 124.]
Islamic Egypt also possessed several Nordic rulers of significance. Al-Nasir Yusuf Salah al-Din [Saladin] (AD 1171-1193), founded the Ayyubid Dynasty (AD 1171-1254), when he was invested with the governance of Egypt and Syria. He was of Kurdish ancestry, and his contemporaries stated that he was tall, handsome, fair-skinned and light-eyed. [Fossier (1968) 315; Günther (1927) 151; Weyl (1967) 41.] Robert Gayre of Gayre informs us that:
"Salah-ed-din and many of his followers had Kurdish and northern blood which accounted for their lighter colouring..." [Gayre of Gayre (1972) 97.]
Al-Nasir al-Hasan, who was Sultan from 1347-1351, and then from 1354-1361, was one of the last rulers of the Turkic Bahri Mamluk Dynasty, which ruled Egypt from 1250-1390. According to the Medieval chronicalist Ibn Iyas, he had a blond beard and dull-blue eyes. [Baltzer (1934) 210; Vollers (1910) 95.]
Sultan Al-Nasir Faraj (AD 1399-1412), was the son of Al-Zahir Barquq [Burji] (AD 1382-1389, 1390-1399), the first of the Burji Mamluk rulers; the Dynasty reigned from 1390 to 1517, and was mostly of Circassian descent. Ibn Iyas stated that he was blond-bearded; he also noted that both Al-Nasir al-Hasan and Al-Nasir Faraj, possessed what he described as "Arab faces," which meant that they had long, noble countenances. [Baltzer (1934) 210; Vollers (1910) 95.]
Ibn Iyas also observed that Sultan Al-Mansur Qalaun (AD 1279-1290), of the Bahri Mamluk Dynasty, had fair hair and a fair complexion. [Vollers (1910) 91.]
During the period of Ottoman rule, Nordic racial elements once again achieved a position of ascendency in the Islamic world. Orhan (AD 1324-1362), the son of Osman I (AD 1280-1324), who was the founder of Ottoman rule in Anatolia, was the first of that dynasty to use the title "Sultan." He is described as being very tall, broad-shouldered, fair-skinned, light-eyed and blond-haired. The German physical anthropologist Professor Hans F. K. Günther, considers him to have been predominantly Nordic in type. [Günther (1934) 189-190.]
Mehmed II (AD 1451-1481), known as the Conqueror, was the Ottoman Sultan that ended the Byzantine Empire, and who occupied the city of Constantinople, converting it into Istanbul. A contemporary miniature of Mehmed, painted by the artist Sinan Bey, depicts him as a light-skinned, light-haired and light-eyed man. [Reader's Digest Association (1974) 127.]
Ottoman rule over North Africa — Algiers, Tripoli, Tunis — was extended and consolidated by the brothers Aruj and Kheir-ed-Din Barbarossa. The name Barbarossa stems from the Italian word for "Redbeard," and the brothers acquired this surname because of their ginger hair. [Baltzer (1934) 211.] Kheir-ed-Din (d. 1546), was appointed Regent of Algiers in 1530, and his reign was largely a success. [Mitchell (1976) 137.] Hans F. K. Günther refers to him as:
"the Viking-like Khair-ed-din Barbarossa, the founder of Osman [Ottoman] rule in North Africa, the red-bearded son of a Greek from Lesbos." [Günther (1927) 173.]
We may also note that the Algerian national hero Emir Abd al-Qadir al-Jaza'iri (AD 1807-1883), who fought the French attempts to occupy his country in the 1830s and 1840s, appears to have been blue-eyed. [von Schwerin (1960) 28; von Schwerin (1964) 129-130.]
>i am talking to a mongrel who thinks indians are 100% pure "white"
Explain the descriptions of him having distinctly Aryan, and not chink features.
Source? As far as I'm concerned, this is a myth. White people are White people.
Is that a fact? If you're going to look at famous figures, I would not be surprised if they did have White features. See: Indian caste system
Are you insinuating that these are all fabrications?
As for the present leadership of the Arab world, Henric von Schwerin has pointed out the extent to which it tends towards blondness and the Nordic type.
The Nordic element in the Islamic world continues to play an important role — this is demonstrated by the fact that many of the leading statesmen in the recent history of the Middle East (particularly those who have organised the causes for national liberation and independence), have been predominantly Nordic in type: for instance, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (1881-1938), the founder of modern Turkey. Henric von Schwerin has stated that Atatürk:
"must be characterised as predominantly Nordic..." [von Schwerin (1960) 27; von Schwerin (1964) 128.]
Haj Amin al-Husseini (d. 1974), the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, during his lifetime he was renowned not only for his political activities, but also because his beard was reddish-blond and his eyes were blue. The Swedish authoress Karin Johnsson compared the Grand Mufti to Saladin, and Henric von Schwerin considered him to be:
"one of the most pronounced Nordic types among renowned Muslims of today." [von Schwerin (1960) 27; von Schwerin (1964) 129.]
Amongst the leadership of the Algerian rebellion against France was fair, tall and well-built. It was said that his features were almost like those of a Frenchman. [von Schwerin (1964) 130.] Colonel Houari Boumédienne [Muhammad Boukharouba] was known as "the Swede," because of his fair hair; he is described as having:
"wispy, sandy hair, a straggly, reddish mustache, and small grey-blue eyes." [von Schwerin (1964) 130.]
Habib Bourguiba (b. 1902), he was blue-eyed. [von Schwerin (1960) 28; von Schwerin (1964) 129.] In Syria, Sultan Atrash, had a very fair skin and clear blue eyes. [Günther (1930) 152; von Schwerin (1960) 27; von Schwerin (1964) 128-129.] Emir Adil Arslan, another important figure of the rebellion, had bluish-green eyes and strongly Nordic features. [von Schwerin (1960) 27; von Schwerin (1964) 129.]
Muhammad Idris al-Sanusi [Idris I] (1889-1983), Emir of Cyrenaica, and King of Libya (1951-1969), was said to have "calm blue eyes". [von Schwerin (1960) 30; von Schwerin (1964) 129.] General Nuri-es-Said (1888-1958), the Iraqi premier for many years, was equally blue-eyed. [von Schwerin (1964) 128.] Finally, we should note that Muhammad Ayub Khan (1907-1974), the President of Pakistan (1958-1969), was tall, fair-complexioned and grey-eyed. It was said by certain French journalists that:
"to judge from his appearance and manners, he could well be taken for a senior British officer..." [von Schwerin (1960) 28; von Schwerin (1964) 128.]
Bibliography in the foot notes.
>i am talking to a mongrel who thinks indians are 100% pure "white"
nope, I see you are literally unable to understand basic propositional logic.
P => Q doesn't imply Q => P.
So when I say white => caucasoid(necessary condition) I don't imply caucasoid => white(sufficient condition).
Hope that helps you Tyrese.
>red, blond hair, blue eyes
>appearing no different from aryans
>white and ruddy
>whiter than snow, purer than milk, more ruddy than the old ivory, fairer than the sapphire
>literally unable to understand basic logic
>uses "caucasoid" as proof modern italians are white
Your picture might as well have said Indians are pure White.
k, at this point you must be trolling or a nigger, no eurasian person is that dumb
YO HOL UP
The works of the German scholars Paudler and Kern demonstrated at great length, the northern origins of the Megalithic culture, and its essentially Nordish racial background. It would therefore appear, that given the evidence, the Megalith builders were probably Brünn/Nordic in racial type.
 F. Paudler, Die hellfarbigen Rassen (Heidelberg, 1924).
 F. Kern, Stammbaum und Artbild der Deutschen (Munich, 1927).
clean your mouth, sit down, take a deep breath and read it again, and maybe you will actually understand the picture
assuming you can read of course, which by now I'm not really sure you can
Pro-tip: nowhere in that pic the implication is what you say.
>Many nineteenth century Americans saw irish people as a group that simply could not be made "American,"...They saw them as violent, as non-white, as doomed to poverty and ignorance.
DUDE RACE WITHIN A RACE LMAO
ITS CALLED A TRIBE
DUDE WEED LMAO
We may note that Angel (1944), calculated that during the Classical period of Greek history (650—150 BC), 27% of the Greek population had been predominantly Nordic in type.
The study of Greek literature which Sieglin (1935) performed, has demonstrated that many individuals in the elites of ancient Greece, had blond or red hair.
In his Argonautica, the Greek poet Apollonius Rhodius, describes the hero Jason, and all fifty of the Argonauts, as blond-haired. [Sieglin (1935).]
For the Greeks, the most beautiful woman who ever lived, Helen, was a blonde, as were those mythical men such as Adonis, who were famed for their handsomeness. [Sieglin (1935).]
For more literary descriptions of pigmentation in ancient Greek poetry and prose, as well as craniological evidence, the following works: De Lapouge (1899), Jax (1933), Myres (1930), Reche (1936) and Ridgeway (1901).
Günther’s works on the subject of Greek racial history (1927; 1928; 1929a, b; ), are particularly valuable. Günther performed a detailed analysis of Greek history, from a biological perspective. Utilising craniological, literary, and pictorial evidence, he reconstructed the racial structure of ancient Greece. He concluded that the Nordic subrace formed something of an ideal for the Greeks, and that the Nordic element was more influential than any other. At the summit of its achievements, Greece possessed a large Nordic element.
EVERYBODY WAS WHYTE EXCEPT NIGGERS IN HISTORY XDDD!!!!
WE WUZ ERRBODY
THE AFRICAN KINGDOMS HAD NORDIC ELITES AS WELL!
THEY WUZ NIGGERS N STUFF AS WELL LAD!
Everyone of any relevance in the past was either nordic white aryan, bantu western african or turkmongol depending if you ask to a nordicist, an afrocentrist or a radical turanist/panturkist.
It's kinda sad to see but whatever.
Have a cutie.
>He was of Kurdish ancestry
kurd was the term for iranians nomads or iranian groups that migrated to assyria when arabs invaded
any iranian migrant group was called kurd
some were prone to mix and some stayed pure
that is why you see many brown ugly kurds and lighter with light eyes kurds
litghers kurd are the less mixed or pure iranians
I never really understood the white version of afrocentrism. We whites actually have vast amounts of different history that we can look up to without having to revise history. Also I've never heard of this turanist shit.
Haven't you knot brained gherkins ever heard of the term "Indo-European"? There's a fucking reason the Indo-bit is there.
That reason is jew propaganda; Indians as a whole have nothing to do with Europeans, but the "Aryans" who invaded the shit out of India and became the ruling class (and then got mixed out) came from the same stock as caucasoids; they just migrated to a different direction.
Ok found it.
An African tribe in the extreme north of South Africa, the Lembas, has a tradition14 that its male ancestry originally comprised "white people from over the sea who came to southeast Africa to obtain gold".
Some individuals possess aquiline noses and narrow, non-negroid lips. Implying that traces of the original Zimbabwean genetic material survive in these other (nearby) communities too.
Unusual amongst African Bantu is their ability for mining and metallurgy21. In fact, they still provide neighbouring tribes with metal tools - using copper obtained from deposits in their area - even as early as the 18th century
14. van Warmelo, N.J. , contributing to Hammond Tooke, W.D. - 'The Bantu-speaking peoples of southern Africa'; Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1974 (originally 1937), p.83; also see van Warmelo's publication in German referenced in my note 18, pp. 281 and 282 (which adds that there were large cities in their original homeland).
--- Confirmed by Junod, H.A. - 'The life of a South African tribe', volume I: 'Social life'; MacMillan, London, 1927, p.73.
ACCORDING TO DNA TESTING ALL PATERNAL LINEAGES OF OTTOMAN SULTANS BELONGED TO INDO-EUROPEAN R1A AND EAST MEDITERRANEAN J2 HAPLOGROUPS
I looked up the video and now thoroughly regret it
who gives a flying fuck?
I know who I am, my virtues and my values!
>You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion [Islam] too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?
I can imagine people being enthusiastic about the paradise of Mohammed, but as for the insipid paradise of the Christians! In your lifetime, you used to hear the music of Richard Wagner. After your death, it will be nothing but hallelujahs, the waving of palms, children of an age for the feeding bottle, and hoary old men. The man of the isles pays homage to the forces of nature. But Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery. A n***** with his taboos is crushingly superior to the human being who seriously believes in transubstantiation.
Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers -already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity! -then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism [Islam], that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.
pretty sure that no reasonable white person on here has said those places were white at any point, but whites have conquered most of those places at one point in time and freely chose to leave instead of losing in battle.
STUPID GOYIM HELLENICS AND JUDAENS ARE NON-WHITE THAT HAVE ALWAYS RULED AND ENLIGHTENED THE INFERIOR WHITES