Pakistani teen cuts off own hand after mistakenly admitting to not praying
What is it about Islam that makes it such a fucked up death cult?
They're metaphors in Islam too, but what can you do when you give retarded sandniggers a religion with complex texts, they take things literally. The religion itself isn't the problem, its the people.
Well, if we look at religious history, we can understand that there has been a lot of criticism of the church and the scriptures for centuries. There have been many versions later written and denominations of faith formed. This includes a growth in secular views that have shaped our cultures during the late renaissance and enlightenment eras then continued to the industrial and progressive eras when a new waves of modern christian groups established (like baptists).
So, we can't use the outdated model of christian religion to excuse their actions. If anything, it just means that the muslims and their societies have some major catching up to do in regards to their religion (its role), their laws, and culture.
>funny how the #religionofpeace uses laws just like ancient military laws
its almost like the Quran was designed to create the perfect army or something
It started a long time ago, brother.
4chan is just a modern spectacle that reveals how almost all humans are.
I'm surprised the fire hasn't risen out of the ground to consume us all with the amount of bodies feeding it.
Yeah, ummmm, about that....
why the fuck would god only write in metaphors, instead of actual, understandable sentences?
surely g-d almighty knew that there would never come any confusion out of it, and it was the best way to deliver the messages to mostly primitive humans.
But, fact is, you don't see any Christians cutting their hands off, do you? They don't believe this kind of thing has a place in modern society.
It's come to an odd state of affairs that I'm siding with a religion, but it truly is a "lesser of two evils"
Anybody who says Often/Sometimes is just terrorist material waiting to happen.
That is all that matters. Someone needs to nuke these cockroaches so that everyone else can live in peace and not pieces.
Religion and culture are what a populace make it. They're savages, so they make their culture and their religion savage.
And yet, I doubt you could name a single Christian group responsible for the killings of hundreds.
>They're metaphors in Islam too
Actually they aren't and thats the problem. Islam is a book of laws. Islam, like Judaism, is focused on the Material World. Christianity is the only Spiritual Religion of the 3.
Yes, but it's also very meaningful if the "majority of moderates" isn't opposed to this in in principle but just thinks it's only justified rarely, i.e. effectively whenever the radicals demand it and are in a position of power.
You live in a country where Jews are cutting off millions of childrens dicks for no reason at all and get mad about the cut off hand of one goat herder child half from way around the world?
>and yet, I doubt you could name a single Christian group responsible for the killings of hundreds.
gr8 b8 m8 now go and read a history book; and before you ask your dad's criminal history does not count you fucking moron.
Bosnians and Persians don't whack off their own hands because religion (or form rape gangs). Retarded, inbred Arabs, Congoids and Subcontinentals do.
Extent of my power to do something against it at this point is vote for SD and redpill everyone I can.
It has taken enormous political capital, brainwashing, blackmail and bribery to get as much third world into Europe, just as it has done so for getting Mestizo Central America into the West US and Somalian into Maine and Minnesota. You bring up an irrelevant point and one that I have no control over save what I mention above.
I pray Trump win (though he might not be the answer).
>lost 34 tanks
How is that even possible? Did muhhmad forget where he parked it or what
And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
how is that literal, you can do the same sins with your left hand
this guy can't even figure out who should be allowed to live in your so called free country
>transparent hands get shot
>showing mercy to ghosts
oh look, one of your other political parties would slaughter a bunch of you fellow citizens for jesus too
thank god the right doesn't do social engineering
Reminded me of this....
I just had a read; here it is
>open desert region
>Pakistan wants to take that Junction to secure their flank/supply; force India troop diversion
>India detects a massive infanry/armour (noise) concentration. India company decides to defend their desert high ground outpost. Pakistan fails to do proper recon; soft desert, single unable road equals troubles. It was also full moon
>India company had 2 choice, retreat or stay - reinforcement will come in 6 hours.
>MIDNIGHT attack launched - started with an mediun artillery - 5 Indian camel died
>India prepares for hasty fixed defense just enough time for barb wire and few AT mines - one Indian died during their obstacles to troops movement manoeuvre
>65 Pakistan tank charge, only to get bogged down. India recoilless rifle wreck the thin Top armour of Pakis. Once within 15-30m Indian engaged with PIAT. Tank had external fuel tanks (God knows why), illumination aplenty once shot/lit; the smoke clouded the Indian high ground for the troops below. It was also full moon that night.
>Pakistan infantry arrived. Saw barb wire, so they immediately presume to be mined (there wasn't)
>2 hrs later, sappers arrive - there wasn't mines, so the troops finally had the balls to surround and engage the base. They dismounted from the road, only to be bogged down and get wreck by Indian arty. They managed to kill another Indian on the recoilless rifle.
>morning comes, India airforce glassed everything (Pakistan airforce was busy in other missions)
I don't get it either, personally I would just arty the base; seeing India chose fix defense tactic. Even so, once that outpost is captured, then what? Sit in the base and wait for decisive battle against the reinforced Indian? Problem with a lot of Muslim commander is that they like pretty map; whilst making everyone below them scare shitless to disobey the order even when the attack is suicidal.
haha remember this?
any republican supporters here?
that maps looks a lot like this map. i wonder why, hmmmm =/
>the country has been going down hill since the religious right got involved in politics
Nice try. The US has been gradually going to shit since the 1970's, when the indoctrinated University graduates got let out into the world and discovered that not everyone agreed with them.
If you're familiar with history, the effects we're seeing today parallel the last few centuries of the Western Roman Empire, only greatly speeded up.
hes a canacuck. should be worried about le current year +1 man and his economy crashing more than shit posting.
the righteous right just can't see that their presidential front runners look like sociopathic hustlers to normal ppl
hell they might have to kill hundreds of thousands of your fellow citizens for freedom
Your just jelly Muhammad's not raping my women.
After the wall is built in the south we will build a wall on the north so you don't come here as a refugee.
responding to your own post instead of others...
Truly taking Australians shitposting title
Epic kek my friend
all abrahamic religions are a death cult.
christianity is pseudo islam, and muslims who live in 3rd world countries like pakistan follow their shit extremely just like how christians in africa are burning "witches" and gays to death
the real question is what is it about religion that gets good people to do horrendous things, blaming "islam" for evil is ignorant and not even remotely looking at the root of the problem. in fact you are literally no better than the muslims you hate so much when you dehumanize them like that for being just as into the same made up abrahamic god as you are
no shit. its plagarized christianity because muhammad was a creative hack. the entire old testament is completely canon in islam.
why the fuck do you think muslims and christians live with each other in the middle east and called each other brothers during the ba'athist and arab nationalism days while jews were kicked out.
its so goofy seeing christians hating on muslims when ever since post crusades you guys have been allies and realized you believe in the exact same bullshit (jesus is the holiest , there is only 1 god, and the jews suck)
hell christians are the chosen people of the quran, the term infidel/kuffar means people who don't believe in the abrahamic god/pray to multiple gods/shiaa. christians aren't infidels in islam
Is a myth, and she's not even talking about trickle-down economics, she's just using it as a buzzword.
The top 10% are getting richer, but it's a changing group of people - the poor can become rich and vice versa. Most people start poor and become wealthier over time, so what it really represents is that there's a higher ceiling on economic potential, even though people are starting from the same place.
That's still an issue, arguably, but it isn't caused by muh bankers muh bonuses. It's caused by supply and demand. When you have 7 billion people to choose from to staff your gas station, you can afford to pay minimum wage. Giving companies a global pool to hire people from is the main reason why wages haven't been increasing - there's no leverage to increase them on the part of employees. There are all kinds of incentives which the US could be using to encourage domestic employment rather than just letting them pass out infinite visas, but we're not implementing them because presumably some company somewhere wouldn't be able to stay competitive if they had to negotiate wages on a remotely even playing field.
Who mentioned them? Oh, you did, as a shitty strawman to deflect from the fact that you have no argument. You also brought up gay people. 10/10 for populism. Nice avoiding the topic when I said the global situation parallels the Western Roman Empire. I guess you were never into history. Should not have expected any better from a Canuck on /pol/.
So, you have no idea what the koran actually says re: Judaism and Christianity, yet want to preach to everyone. Got it - you're an idiot.
"Trickle-down economics" is a librul hysteria term given to some guy's idea to reduce taxes on millionaires. He noticed that most rich people stored their money overseas, so even though the tax rates on the rich were very high, the tax revenues were very low. He supposed that reducing the rate would lead to higher tax revenues from people moving their bank accounts back on-shore. He was right.
The actual idea of taxing the rich less in the hope that they'll spend more money, stimulating the economy (i.e. "trickle-down economics") has never been seriously advocated by anyone.
When was the last time Christians were responsible for mass deaths? When was the last time a thief had their hand chopped off by christians? When was the last time christians beheaded someone? All religions at one point in time did barbaric things and yet, all but one has repented for them and vowed to save lives, not destroy them. Only one religion in modern times remains that commits barbaric acts and refuses to change their ways and continues to live in the stone age. Islam is the lone religion in modern times that continues to commit these horrible acts.
Thanks for illustrating my point. It's a buzzword punching bag because nobody knows what it's supposed to mean, they just know that they're supposed to dislike it because muh bankers muh bonuses.
You'll never find a politician advocating it, or anyone implementing it, because it's always been a negative bogeyman without anyone defending it, making it safe to beat up.
>So Old Testament religions have savage justice? Fancy that.
"And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell." (Matt 5:30)
while this is Jesus' words from our own Holy book, the New Testament, there's a monumental difference in meaning:
Jesus was speaking hyperbolically, reminding us of how it is impossible for mankind to NOT sin, and to live a perfect life. He was emphasizing the very need for His Own perfect sacrifice on behalf of fallen Man. He lived a perfect life - one that we could never live ourselves - and then died on the cross, subjecting Himself to the penalty that was due US for our sins. this way, God remains both perfectly Forgiving and perfectly Just - just, because all sins are punished, and all accounts are balanced. and perfectly Gracious, or forgiving, because that penalty is not carried out on those who rightfully merited it by their own sins.
Islam doesn't have any such concept. each man is accountable, ultimately, for their own sins. when a Muslim says, "in the Name of Allah, most merciful," he is LYING, because i can think of a much more Merciful God than Allah - namely, the Christian God.
but - oddly enough - i respect this kid for making good on his self-punishment. ..
but he's REALLY going to regret it when he finds out that he couldn't possibly atone for ALL of his sins by himself.
p.s. - Islam is indeed a barbaric faith
You have lost the right to call yourself persian the very moment you start praying to a goatfucker.
Low IQ, low time preference, low impulse control, inbred brown people. Mass-convert them to Christianity or atheism and Whites Islam or atheism and you will still have them gang raping Whites and not the other way round.
Shia Islam is almost as old and legitimate as Sunni Islam. It has to do with the succession struggle rising out pf Muhammad's death
Patently untrue. Persia was one of the first areas to embrace Islam, and blend it with their own local culture
>Shia Islam is almost as old and legitimate as Sunni Islam.
Sunni = islam
Shia = some islamic shit, with Persian culture still. changed to be compatible with current times.
false, islam was spread to them by force. learn history
>Patently untrue. Persia was one of the first areas to embrace Islam, and blend it with their own local culture
Blend it, sure. It was a rather tolerant society as far as societies go. The same can be said about Judaism. The only ones with early troubles were the christians, but they were integrated too eventually.
Ancient Persia was a trade hub and a cultural center in it's own right. Accepting and assimilating other cultures makes sense when you are in the middle of such varied cultures and religions geographically.
Is this explicitly stated?
Also the bible never asks that you follow it to the word. You have the commandments and the deadly sins, everything else is fair game.
At some point the west recognized that it's just a book written by men, thud open to interpretation. Muslims still haven't fathomed that with the Qur'an in a thousand years.
You clearly are the one who needs to learn their history. Shia literally means "the party of Ali". After Muhammad kicked the bucket, he left no male heirs and so there was confusion over who would succeed him. First was Abu-Bakr, a companion of Muhammad who generally embodied his teachings. when he died, Umar I was elected and made a series of pacts not to enforce Islam on the "People of the Book" i.e. Christians and Jews. Then Uthman seized the throne after his death, and was generally a bad Caliph so he was assassinated in his home.
Ali was the nephew and son-in-law of Muhammad, married to the Prophet's daughter Fatima. He had long turned down the Caliphate, but after the death of Uthman he laid claim to it and struggled with rebels for most of his life. The Shia held that Ali was God's rightful Caliph, and that only those descended from his bloodline could rule the Caliphate. Ali eventually tried to negotiate with one of his opponents, Malawi, but was killed by a radical sect of his followers who believed he was offending divine sensibility by negotiating.
After that, the Umayyads came to power for quite a time. Shia were originally just partisans of Ali's house, but over time they developed specific traditions and branches, like that of the Twelver Shia. Shia was actually more prominent in Egypt before Persia, under the Fatimids.
Also, Islam wasn't spread to the populace by force. It was a conquering force but only the provincial governors were mandated to be Muslim. The conversion of the populace was rather slow - there were very few Muslims compared to those they ruled over. It wasn't until the piety-minded Abbasid dynasty that a concentrated effort at conversion really took place.
Open up a book sometime, instead of just learning everything from /pol/.
This is true. When you have such a vast empire, deviations in the faith and culture are likely to occur.
Yup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naseerullah_Babar#Army_career_and_Indo-Pakistani_Wars this guy in the picture alone captured whole Sikh company of 55 soldiers
you could say he was on a....
Sikh and destroy mission!
>Immoral Journalistic Integrity
You're not Australia, why are you shit posting?
The New testament is about gods son coming to earth to tell us that following the rules of the old testament is impossible and even if you do never sin you still have original sin so following religious rules are pointless. Christianity is an anti-religion religion