How to find sexism 101; 1.Find an industry with more men than

File: 1443966714195.jpg (88KB, 640x614px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 640x614px

>women can't into computers
>women can't even into websites that guide you along every step of the editing process, have an FAQ and a forum for asking questions
>women can't into research, citations, proper article etiquette and removing personal bias
>most women can't even into wanting to TRY
>IT'S WIKIPEDIA'S FAULT

>>61086440

Or. Or.

Women just don't know shit about what 90% of the entries are about.

Do they know the difference between a 4L60E and a 4L65E?

Or how about the LLR and the L52?

What about the Battle of the Bulge? The History of the United States Navy?

These are things that manly guys know about, and I doubt 10% of /pol/ even knows what the 4L60E is without googling it.

>>61086440
Unbiased means misandry for these people
Not that Wikipedia is unbiased, but these people just shit in the face of imparciality

>>61086440

We made history maybe?

>Why do men control our history
>Wikipedia
>in control of history
>using Wikipedia outside of online arguments
Wew lad

We need to raise the number of male editors to 100%.

>>61086897

> These are things that manly guys know about

There are thing you happen to know, and you've decided they're cool.

> often involves dispute and confrontation, which women are less likely to be willing to deal with than men.

Hmmm this sounds like something else /pol/ is always mentioning

>>61086440
Feels good to be an active editor of wikipedia, a lot of redpilled users on there too.

>>61086440
because 99% of women are incompetent idiots who would not survive not to mention create a civilization (and Wikipedia articles, and its engine computer code, and...)
just shut up and mind your own business instead of spreading this hateful disease of yours

File: feminism-wikistorming.png (71KB, 682x1162px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 682x1162px

>>61086440
Lol retard (((feminists))))
>bergman
>bergman
>bergman
>bergman

File: 1450414578031.gif (392KB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 500x374px

>>61086440
>women dont like wikipedia
>get mad at wikipedia

> wikipedia
> controlling history

The ones that control history are the kikes tbqh

also this is feminism/racism in a nutshell

>NBA dominates by black people
thats just how it is!

>nursing/teaching dominated by women
thats just how it is!

>tech dominated by men
SEXISM

>coal mining dominated by men
who cares????

>>61086897

>4L60E is without googling it.

But the thing is, men have the willingness to google things. We have the curiosity and yearn for learning!

Also what is SRL? See. Now stop insulting your brethren

>In a list of 25 best-selling history books of 2014 only two were written by women.

Women are generally terrible writers way too much exposition and general focus on feelings over fact

File: 2-Women-Laughing.jpg (32KB, 300x269px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x269px

>>61086440
>edited the Gamergate page to reflect events from a feminist perspective (as opposed to justifying and minimising the impact of the online abuse of women in the gaming industry)
WAH WAH WAH waddaya mean i can't just shove in any agenda driven bullshit i like, BUT I FEEL IT'S RIGHT, citations are a tool of the patriarchy
>was that the editing process often involves dispute and confrontation,
literally, i'm a woman you are not allowed to disagree with me
>Simply, tech spaces have a huge sexism problem.
2/3 reasons for women not doing it was their own fault, clearly it's mens fault women wont do it

Why would they blame Wikipedia for the number of editors?

>>61087570

Point taken my hat friend.

>>61086440
>I have a brother who’s 15 years-old. I don’t want him to grow up getting all his information from the same white, stale and male perspective that’s always been prevalent

Poor kid

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/happy-birthday-sexist-wikipedia-why-do-men-still-control-our-his/?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook

>>61086440
fuck it. let's go back to clubbing them and raping them while they're unconscious

File: 34534772352335235234.jpg (436KB, 1692x982px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 1692x982px

Why is this allowed, /pol/?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Feminism

File: feministauthor.png (33KB, 682x431px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 682x431px

>>61086440
>from her linkdin
>Guardian
>Vice
>Feministing
wew all it needed was huffpo and she'd have the set

>Bergman

/pol/ is always right.

>>61088168
This is what Wikipedia's yearly donation drive goes towards.

File: whoops.png (13KB, 292x233px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 292x233px

>>61088210
oh

File: 1450642774122.png (483KB, 434x679px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 434x679px

>Bergman

>>61086897
>Battle of the Bulge
I'm pretty sure they know about that.

>>61088504

Oh ho ho, you cheeky german you.

Written by men or not, the Wikipedia article on Gamergate is 100% horseshit. To learn the truth about it you have to go here: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Gamergate

>>61088322
Bergman,

every fucking time.

>>61086440
its called HIStory for a reason

women for the most part dont change it

>>61088630
Wiki is left everyone knows it.

File: masquerade violation.jpg (212KB, 1096x1056px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1096x1056px

>The Gamergate article is biased AGAINST feminism.

It's one of the more obviously biased articles on the site, Wikipedia talks more neutrally about ISIS and Al Qaeda than it does Gamergate.

Whats the gender balance on Wookiepedia?

Just kill women who think like this

There are women who are doing their part and if they're not,they're just wanting to live their life

File: 1450794888458.gif (826B, 120x160px) Image search: [Google]

826B, 120x160px

>>61088322
> Bergman

>>61086440
Because men came up the term history

And there you have it, folks. These people honestly believe a feminist perspective and an objective perspective are the same thing.

>>61088322
>very fond of food
Oh it shows, kike.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

This was on the local parts counter. Never seen a woman in the HVAC field, but okayyyyyyyyy.

>>61087304
There's nothing stopping women from making wikipedia articles about stuff that they find cool

>>61087566
This post should be framed and on display in every college. I fucking hate this victim culture.

File: windowjump.gif (2MB, 427x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 427x240px

>Wikipedia is an online encyclopaedia which can be edited by ANYONE
>less women than men choose to contribute
>this is somehow sexism

>>61088168
Just prior to GamerGate, their #1 "hot edited" article was the Hitachi Magic Wand page, kek.

>>61087441
Americanized German name, retard.

> often involves dispute and confrontation, which women are less likely to be willing to deal with than men.
Clearly the solution to this is to ban dissent rather than teaching women to defend their points.

>>61086440
The thing is, they could edit Wikipedia if they wanted to, they could sign up en masse and outnumber the men if they so wished, but they don't, because they don't want to, and it's fine and nobody is "oppressing" anyone.

>>61086897
Is it some sort of refrigerant?

>>61086440
>Bergman

/pol/ is always right

>>61086440
>voluntary participation
>somehow sexist
It's sexist to shame women for being homemakers.

File: 1452832888584.jpg (65KB, 441x601px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 441x601px

>>61091780
>Clearly the solution to this is to ban dissent rather than teaching women to defend their points.

That is exactly what they are trying to do.

While this "banning" is practiced through a complex methodology which involves many different practices, I will name one or two.

One way through which this is accomplished is to control the definitions of words. This allows them to exercise cognitive dissonance and to redirect the conversation to silence the opposition. For instance:

>Racism - ...the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races... or .... prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

However, they instead redefine the word by turning it into a math word problem:

>Racism is all that the definition above describes, but it can only be practiced by those who have "power + privilege."

What does this new definition allow them to do? It allows them to exercise cognitive dissonance by issuing statements and supporting laws/policies/procedures that are inherently racist in nature.... but they escape the claim that these things are racist because they lack "power+privilege."

Another means is by simply declaring certain words and terminology to be wrong-think or "discriminatory." The purpose here is to simply deny the other side the ability to make any argument at all. For instance:

>The campus speech police at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee just declared “politically correct” to be taboo.

>http://nypost.com/2015/10/22/campus-speech-cops-ban-politically-correct/

By these actions they can quell dissent by enforcing punitive actions against wrong-think. This creates an atmosphere of fear that prevents debates from even taking place.

These are just two examples out of MANY, but they highlight my point.

File: aacb03e025f851321dd84f61919666001d56d88877bdea48f1fd5ab992c69963.jpg (63KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 400x600px

>>61091262

It is, we even had a meme about it

>>61092508
>>voluntary participation

Anyone not in lockstep with their agenda is declared to be fair game, even when it requires those holding to party doctrine to violate their own beliefs.

>>61086440
mention that it's all kike pls

File: 1435078656247.jpg (37KB, 383x345px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 383x345px

>>61092819

Problem is, feminists are actually proud of their hypocrisy

That's not how you find sexism

If it were, feminists would be complaining about lack of female miners, construction workers, carpenters, glaziers, plumbers, the entire waste disposal industry, etc, etc, etc.

>>61090827
Hvac work isn't easy. I've never seen a woman work in the industrial Hvac side, except as our secretaries or HR. Women tend to not enjoy doing hard work.

BUT MUH EQUAL PAY.

>>61092109
nah, its a transmission

most refrigerants in use today are either legal R-410A, which is what's going in new stuff, or R-22, which is slightly better but kills ozone

at least in HVAC, i think genuine refrigeration uses hot shot

>>61093580
R-717 for industrial.

File: 10983390_10153138025849309_4631237522750770108_n.jpg (25KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x360px

>>61086440
The left eating itself, again? My goodness.

>>61093723
right right

isnt 717 objectively the favorite because its essentially harmless to the environment?

File: fuckingwow.jpg (33KB, 248x252px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 248x252px

>>61086440
>According to its own numbers, Wikipedia currently has more than 27 million registered editors, yet studies show that up to 90 per cent of them are men.
Literally anyone can be a wikipedia editor. There is not reason whatsoever that women can't do it themselves. All she's pointing out is that women have no interest in it, because nothing is stopping them. Literally. Nothing.

File: 1452882857398.gif (80KB, 248x203px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 248x203px

>>61093580
>>61093723

All of this will eventually be replaced by sound waves.

Yes, you heard me right. Sound waves.

Thermo-acoustic refrigeration.

>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1343&context=iracc

>http://www.osd.rutgers.edu/gs/06papers/Thermoacoustic.pdf

>http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Publications/ThermoDemo.pdf

>http://www.acs.psu.edu/thermoacoustics/refrigeration/faqs.htm

>http://www.nevis.columbia.edu/~ju/Paper/Paper-thermoacoustic/Construction%20therm%20refrigerator.pdf

The research is ongoing, and the technology is still very young, but working models are already being built. This will eventually replace the need for refrigerant-gas systems.

>>61094027
>Literally anyone can be a wikipedia editor.

Yup. This is exactly why you will get dickpunched insofar as grades go if you base a college paper off of a Wikipedia article.

>>61086440
>Bergman

>>61093376
Bro, even our secretary fucking sucks. Imagine a woman carrying a 3 phase motor up to a package unit? Or a compressor? But yeah; equality. Women are better at their jobs than men. Pffffffft.

File: sampledea492996907ce38ccb1eaf1f9ddb1a3.jpg (177KB, 668x1000px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 668x1000px

>>61093991
High latent heat capacity. Cheap, and easy on the environment.

For everyone else R-717 is ammonia NH3.

Slightly toxic and flammable.

>>61094108
>This will eventually replace the need for refrigerant-gas systems.
Only if they cost less in the long run. Even then it will be a long time till current systems are replaced unless it's massively cheaper.

>>61088504
My sides

>>61093097
REEEEEEEE!!!

File: 1452846171081.jpg (319KB, 1782x1647px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1782x1647px

This is what would happen if women tried to compete with men on wikipedia.

>>61094248
>Yup. This is exactly why you will get dickpunched insofar as grades go if you base a college paper off of a Wikipedia article.

You need to use the references. Nothing wrong with wiki, so long as you do your due diligence.

>>61094027

But this is exactly Feminist logic in a nutshell.

File: 1452806918841.jpg (251KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 800x1000px

>>61086440
>women choose not to edit Wikipedia
>it's wikipedias fault
how do people get this autistic?

File: 1452757567746.png (1MB, 1000x594px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x594px

>>61094727
>>61094027
Can someone put a god dam cock in these fucking stupid whore's mouths? FUCK

File: Save me.gif (112KB, 255x231px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 255x231px

>why do men still control our history
>still
>history is temporary and subject to change

>>61094903
CONDUCTOR

>>61094485
>Only if they cost less in the long run.

Producing sound waves is cheap already. It is just a matter or refining, optimizing and mass-producing units to bring down any costs.

It does not need to even be "massively cheaper" at all. All it needs to be is slightly more cost effective and slightly more efficient and it will replace all current gas-based systems. Combine all of this with the fact that you are not having to deal with toxic gases that can harm the environment and can kill or injure people.... and that do not require expensive haz-mat team to disposed of of when it is time to trash a unit..... and you have a good case for getting rid of gas-based systems entirely.

>>61092701
>>61091780

>Women are worshiped so much in western society that they can't be criticized
>Women are considered "oppressed" when ANY space is male dominated

These sentiments have been around for a while, but the problem is, that beta males that told themselves they were "alpha" let women go too far with this stuff. Why did they let women do that? Well, they thought being a 'male feminist' would get them laid, and it didn't.

>>61088991
Maybe because it's cunts being called out for being cunts.

Women don't like it when you call them out for the underhanded shit that they do. Ya you have a pussy. Get over it.

>>61094913

history is our ongoing interpretation of the past.

so yes, it constantly changes.

>>61095158
history IS the past.

>>61088630
>Encyclopediadramatica is now a legitimate source of information

It's like I woke up in a dimension where everything is the opposite as it should be.

>>61088884
Yes and that reason is because the word comes from fucking French and has nothing to do with gender

God fucking dammit I remember back in high school my english teacher pulled that stupid shit "ohmahgerd language itself is a misogynist conspiracy to oppress women" and it still fucking triggers me whenever I see it

>>61088322
A fat kike whore is complaining about white men? How shocking!

>>61094767
That's not how genetics work. One of the benefits of having lots of "unnecessary" genetic code is to increase the chance of mutations occurring in code that won't be expressed as proteins.

>>61095158
If I punch you in the mouth, whatever amount of time passes makes it history.

The motives and objectives are open to interpretation but the fact still stands that you got block end in the gabber m8. What these women are on about is the fact that men are writing it and that somehow muddies the water with what historical facts are presented. But if they had it their way ava braun would be the mastermind of the holocaust and that we can do it bitch would still be considered not a fraud.

Men are the only creatures on the planet more capable than any other for completely removing any and all emotion in situations that require precise calculation and extensive research.

>>61086440
The wiki article is pretty anti-GamerGate, I can't imagine it with Feminist bias. I've realized that SJWs have become our idea of "the man". They are literally communists.

>>61090704
>Feminist
>Female
>Objective
>Object
But they are the same.

File: AmericaCuntification.jpg (475KB, 800x1915px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 800x1915px

Has Femen found a new Soros yet?

>>61086440
>>According to its own numbers, Wikipedia currently has more than 27 million registered editors, yet studies show that up to 90 per cent of them are men.
All they prove is that men are willing to contribute towards the world without compensation while women aren't. People do it for free for fuck sake.

>>61094569
>hurr durr

Women already edit wiki jackass.

>>61086440
I stopped going to wikipedia AGES ago, it has a very clear bias already, NPOV is a fucking joke. You don't even have to pick especially controversial topics to see it, just pick someone relatively not-famous who has a wikipedia page and it becomes a popularity-contest-by-proxy between randoms and self-appointed wiki editors.

Everything, EVERYTHING, associated with social media + identity is absolute fucking cancer garbage.

>>61097682
It's nice for general things that can't really be biased. Like if I find a new country here on /pol/, I'll Wikipedia it and see just where the fuck it is, and a few other little factoids about it.

Generally objective things like what the article's author is bitching about. Even still, always wear your bullshit filter glasses just to be safe.

File: mr_rage.jpg (20KB, 306x410px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 306x410px

>>61092701
>Campus speech police
I'm pretty sure they're just the secret police.

>>61093097
>this is what feminists believe

>this
>is
>literally
>reality

now let that sink in...

>>61086440
>women not willing to become boilermakers
>women not willing to become linemen
Ok that's fine. Thank god I worked with a woman groundman and she was literally trash tier. All you fucking do is attach shit to the winch. I dont make their lives miserable or anything. That bitch didn't even pick up the damn insulators I drop. Nor remind the water idiot that I need to drink shit. But whatever.

>>61086440
>Wikipedia currently has more than 27 million registered editors, yet studies show that up to 90 per cent of them are men.

Holy shit. Delete that sexist piece of shit netzone.

>>61100339
I take it back. Just delete the 90% that men are responsible for.

File: 1426491504683.gif (848KB, 665x662px) Image search: [Google]

848KB, 665x662px

Leave history alone!!!!!!!
God fucking damn!

>>61086440
it's funny because there are no sexes online.
you have to declare your sex.
as everyone else has already pointed out, she doesn't like that women are stupider on average and can't deal with more capable people. so they say "be nice to me i'm just a girl'

it's a big shit test and these threads are infuriating

File: 1429997318815.jpg (24KB, 246x216px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 246x216px

>tfw anxiously checking to see if anyone has deleted your wikipedia page edit

File: 1420369951000.jpg (473KB, 1316x1080px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 1316x1080px

>>61091503

So, a jewish name?

File: Muslim General Mathmatitian.jpg (13KB, 209x241px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 209x241px

>>61086440

>inb4 Aafreen Aalia was a brave lesbian Seljuq general that defeated the crusaders and was the mother of modern mathematics.

>>61095716
The whole shebang is such a spectacle that it doesn't need any additional ED spice.

> 90% Are Male

Okay, but how is that a problem caused by men? What if women are just not interested in hovering around a computer typing into Wikipedia all day?

Do feminists actually believe that being a woman equals all women agree to follow feminist ideology?

I don't care too much about this. I'm a science major, so while feminists might edit articles on Gamer Gate and campus sex assaults and abortion to have feminist bias, they won't touch any of the articles that I care about. There's really no way to put a feminist spin on physics.

>>61101645
I wouldn't know bro. But feminism to me sounds like women just trying to copy/match/outmatched men in anhthing;without inventing anything original for themselves

>>61103138
hey now- women invented the shower poof. its way nicer than a bar of soap
unless you can link me to the shower poof wiki that says a man intvented it