The kind of people I have to put up with everyday.
>ISIS, an islamic terrorist organization bombs Paris
>"Islam is not to blame!"
>the islamic state
Yea obviously a bunch of westernised muslims just want to eat burgers and play call of duty but a whole load subscribe to this ideology too.
Its because we're coming off the backs f a war where everyone was told our enemies were like 200 guys living in a cave.
>holy books says "kill the wrong believers"
>followers of this book then go and kill the "wrong believers"
>they're suddenly not *real* followers of the book
Oh yeah, this. I fucking hate this logic. Similar thing happened in Finland just a few days ago when the news told about refugees groping and raping in some new year's event. The police informed that this is a new thing in Finland, or at least the epidemic scale of it, and then far leftists and feminists went full retard by coming up with hashtag campaign #lääppijä to tell stories how they have been non-consensually touched by (white) men.
As if it's somehow going to excuse the actions of the rapefugees. It's called tu quoque fallacy.
>verses in the same book are abrogated and some replace others
>some verses even supersede others
"Look Bob, all I know is that since we've let in Muslims, we've had terrorist attacks. Did we have any attacks when we let in Asians? No. Did we have any attacks when we let in Germans or Greeks post WWII? No. Clearly something is wrong with Islam
It's all virtue signaling senpai. Although to be fair the local Muslim population has done a good job of keeping their reputation clean, and to suggest otherwise could potentially land you in trouble.
That, and our government has been keeping a close watch on them for decades.
The more watertight argument is that, since the precepts of Islam are themselves antithetical to a free and open western society, we should ban or force the secularisation of Islam. ISIS is irrelevant as an example unless Islam itself can be proven to differentiate ISIS from similar groups.
Far far away in a different universe.
>Europe has been going through unending struggle and conflict for centuries over protestants roman christians and other religions.
>Middle east has become the wealthiest and most well developed place on earth were it's muslim religion is declining and equal rights have been made through hardship and experience.
>The United nations of Christianity form in Europe and start to terrorise and do suiciding bombings across the world.
>Middle eastern christians adress this situation by claiming not all christians are bad and that it's in fact the religion of peace and by disagreeing you're a racist.
>Meanwhile in the rest of all the majority christian countries it's legal to behead unbelievers and to practise medieval punishment.
Maybe if you explain it in this way they will actually understand.
Go fix my toilet you box-headed hook-nosed cunt of a Pole.
It is the institution of Islam itself that allows ISIS to grow and prosper. However, you have to actually prove this. You can't just yell "THE I IN ISIS STANDS FOR ISLAM" and consider the argument over, you have to show that the beliefs of Muslims who are not ISIS members are equally condemnable.
A weak argument hurts your cause more than no argument, because you enable the suicidal left to strawman all the right's strong arguments.
>be like Bob
>don't think just do
The left is full of fucking lemmings