Hey , might as well , call Africans the real indigenous brits , and label europeans as the "colonizers"...
Pretty soon , they'll brainwash what's left of the white race , that Britain was kinda like America. (poor natives , hunted down by evil brits , even though native brits have been there since the Iron Age)
Britain is basically a USSR re-run at this point.
>tfw I was the edgy kid who triggered my teacher by defending muh glorious empire in class
>tfw I wasnt born 6 years later to triggers cucks on this
considering we have Neanderthal dna and Africans don't you could argue its actually since the beginning of the stone age.
That doesn't change anything lol, the people you know as "africans" were the original inhabitants of europe.
> "sectarian language"
is this actually really, and the fuck does this even mean?
> protestant/catholic shit in Northern Ireland?
> scot/english shit about separatism
> no offending the curryniggers in Londonistan?
I really can't fathom living somewhere where spoken opinions can be fucking 5 year felonies.
Fucks sake /pol/, you're better than this. If you define britains as the Germanic tribes then this is obviously true. There were North African Roman troops here long before any Germanic tribes. Does it matter? Fuck no, surely there are bigger things to worry about. We're better than getting butt hurt over a purposeful misunderstanding
It's not, the earliest humanoid/proto human found in the British isles is Homo Heidelbergenesis.
This is revisionist shit and there's a lot of backlash against it which means it most likely won't be taught.
It'll be scrapped due to the sheer amount of people against it and calling it out for the bullshit that it is.
Based on that image, at best 90,000 years they arrived in the Middle East.
They didn't arrive in Western Europe until 40,000 years ago - presumably Britain later (because Island). That's around 50,000 years before they reached Western Europe - and likely 60,000 before they reached Britain.
Those aren't air traffic routes. They're migration patterns over tens of thousands of years.
The people that reached Britain from Europe would have been living in Europe for 50,000+ years. They weren't African anymore. They would have had light skin and hair, different languages, weapons, and social structures and wouldn't have recognised an West African if they saw one.
Daily reminder that if Churchill hadn't sucked kike cock during WWII we wouldn't be in this mess.
Eternal Anglo has been causing the downfall of Europe when they allied with the kikes over the other side of the Atlantic ocean.
Jive azz crachaz always fuckin oppression me during tea time 'n' sheeit. Pass dat crumpet, white bitch boy.
Except Churchill actually did more harm to Jews than the Germans did.
Idiot. Now take off your proxy Eternal Kraut, I know it's you.
Doggerland, first would have been proto European humanoids as I posted.
Such as Boxgrove man, there wasn't many of them that migrated, hence lack of remains and trace of them on these isles.
None in Scotland, Wales or Ireland so far.
Can there be any doubt that this is absolutely deliberate and absolutely definitely being done to incense and rile the already furious, greedy, anti-white, and ungrateful shitskins?
In Africa 100k years ago they would have been dark skinned - like West Africans today.
They would have been slightly lighter by the time they reached the middle east, but they wouldn't have become 'White' (blonde hair, blue eyes, white skin) until they reached West/north Europe and had been there for 10k years or so. Genetic changes like that take many, many generations of interbreeding to become uniform across an entire population.
But by the time they got to Britain, they would have been Caucasian - unrecognizable from Black Africans.
To suggest that that image indicates 'Africans' reached Western Europe first makes no sense with the timescales written in the image. They would have looked nothing like Africans.
For a group of people to become lighter skinned over a long period of time, wouldn't something similar to selective breeding have to occur? Or do they become lighter due to some other force or process?
Even if NIGGERS were the original apes in Britain, they're destruction demonstrates that they're the inferior ones. When will NIGGERS stop laying claim to everything in the world...
HOLD UP MY FINE FELLOW
SO YOU ARE IMPLYING
YOU ARE SUGGESTING THAT
*Kills the irish*
YOU ARE CURRENTLY TELLING ME THAT
THAT WE WERE AN EMPIRE, AND WHATNOT?
would be fascinating to know the real history of humans
we didn't magically get this smart 10k years ago
there's 10s of thousands years of missing history of us on just about this same
So? The first Celts were Iberians and Iberians were proto-berbers, technically Africans
There is less sunlight in Europe throughout the year. People spend more time indoors during winter because it is cold. Over generations this evolves into a common trait. If your body doesn't need do produce melanin to protect you from the sun, it won't.
Eventually everyone becomes like this.
They're right though you fucking retard. Pre-humans and even early modern humans were in Britain, way before Caucasians were around. White american conservative here but you act like a nigger when you ignore the facts.
Seriously /pol/ is acting like a bunch of niggers. This has been well known for a while that niggers were the first in Britain. Who cares though? The white man evolved beyond it. arguing this teaching is futile
so then why are white people white and able to use less sunlight to activate vitamin D in europe but black people according to 1 study are more likely to be autistic because of a inability to activate vitamin D in europe
what of the neantheral dna present in whites but not in africans? humans didnt beat them there. the fosil record doesnt support homo-sapien out running neanderthals to the british isles
Niggers are not the first in Europe because the nigger is an african breed of humanity that spent most of its existence in Saharan Africa and below. The original humans of Bongland were hybrids of non nigger tribes and neanderthals.
Just because something is on wikipedia doesn't make it true. All you have to do to make a claim on wikipedia is cite one book. That doesn't mean anything, anyone can write a book.
>People think ancient Africans are the same as modern ones.
>They think the people that left Africa stayed black.
>They think that the people that left Africa and arrived in Britain weren't (some of) the ancestors of modern Brits (though not majority because Germanic invasion).