Feminism in 2016
>The Femitheist is a 22-year-old criminology student with a three-year-old
>Her argument was that only through the reduction of the male population to between 1 and 10 percent of their current number we can approach "true equality".
>reduction of the male population
How? By bitching about my soggy knees on tumblr?
Sure as hell no strong womyn will do any physical labour necessary to build a conentration camp.
And as soon as any man opposes her with physical force, she would just cave in and develop Stockholm Syndrom.
What she's describing is not equality. That's inequality. Jesus don't these people have any idea how stupid the shit that they're spewing out of their pie holes sound? pic related
Its time for /POL MATH
White man = 1
A nigger = 3/5ths
A woman = 1/10
A niggress equals ???
This would actually solve all problems though.
Less violent crime.
Twists the 80:20 rule so that now it's in the favor of men (every remaining man would have a harem)
I might argue that men would benefit more of this than women, since we're more often victims of violent crime and have more difficulty getting laid in a normal sexual marketplace.
Only problem is that society would probably regress 20 years and remain permanently there because women don't have the brain utilities to use modern technology and science, or competitive drive to innovate and succeed, as much as men do.
But everything else would be so fucking good. I would absolutely sign a bill to kill 90% of men so long as I was in the remaining 10%.
A nigress being worth 1/10 of a nigger makes her 3/50 of a white man. Literally 6% of his value.
What happened to Vice? They used to have some good content, like the documentary on conflict minerals with black on black slavery in Africa, and the African kung-fu movie director. This article just seems like, well, satire. Hell, most lib outlets look like satire at first glance these days, just read some Salon headlines.
fucking archive.is is blocked in fingolia...
fucking finnish border security pissed off the owner who then decided to throw a tantrum and block the site in fingolia
>Deminish male population
>Scientific and technological advancement hindered for decades
>Deminish male population
>Lowers female value
>Deminish male population
>nation ravaged and women are brutally raped for years by foreign invaders
While I do see >>60033735, isn't this exactly the argument that /pol/ Americans use, regarding black people? "Black people drag down all these various statistics, so we should remove them?"
Wut? Are you being racially profiled for setting up border shop? Pls take it to twitter and throw a tantrum. Long enough has the Finno-Uğric tribes suffered opression by the hands of Anglican media!
>Opinions of a 22 year old feminist single mother
Why are you all even discussing this? Its like going into depth about why some Tumblrette is retarded for thinking she's a trans-spider or some shit.
I think maybe the children here really believe that. I understand they have their problems but know we can't remove them rather must work to help them better themselves if we truly want to help everyone out
what a fucking joke
no, there was some problem between the owner and the fingolian border guards about alcohol or something...
Obviously she means men must have a harem of 10 women each.
>That's in theory, what about in practice?
It'll require the re-teaching of everyone—female and male—in classrooms, homes, through literature, media, art, and networks. It is a process that would take decades, generations, and perhaps even a few centuries. Nevertheless, these are things that should be done to forge a new and vastly superior world. My mission is to devise and describe a framework for the carrying out and success of such objectives.
the fuck? she can't even know or see the changes if this shit works.
why even think of it ?
A society run by women would be a lot like a society run by children. Ever seen Lord of the Flies? How did that go again?
i have lots of gbp saved up from mummy son dates and going to bed on time, i think i'll be okay.
Its Marxism for ya. Its a lot like islam really. A list of a few things that you cannot do. In islam it is rather long, and like Marxism, encompasses the articulation of earthly succes-criteria for its form of government. In Marxism this is the only tennet.
Neither can never be held responcible for their actions, as the final judgement is either in the afterlife or a vaguely formulated, Platonian ideal.
Dont bother debating me about it. Im off to the gym. I.e. im drawing the Marxian card and exchanging the debate for shiny muscles (my idea of a free proletariat).
>im really confused about this; ive been following her for a while on twitter and shes obviously not a feminist
The article is a few years old and, now she's realised the impossibility of deliberately fucking up the world for everyone she's settled for fucking up the entire life of one person.
>Radical feminists get their way
>Male population is magically reduced by 90%
>Majority of women still want nothing to do with traditionally male positions and roles
>Men become even more important than they were before
>Female population winds up entirely subservient to the small male population
Bring it on.
>"Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death."
Is she retarded, who does she thinks improves the quality of life for anyone? Women don't improve anyones general quality of life.
Men work the oil fields, men work sanitation, men farm, men manufacture everything.
Without men the human race would revert back to the stone age.
>90% of active military soldiers are men
>men on average have 6 inches height advantage in the US
>male athletes have their own league so as to not shit fuck women
Let's go. I'm ready.
Getting rid of 90% of the male population won't solve anything. However, I believe that if we target specific groups of males, it would be for the better.
For example, starting with the losers who watch anime or other cartoons past the age of 10 - that gets rid of the majority of people who contribute nothing to society and just suck up money from the government and healthcare sectors.
I really just want to know what the fuck these retards would do once they actually reached gender equality.
What happens? What do they do with their "gender politics" degrees? They flounder, looking desperately for inequity somewhere on earth. Eventually coming to the point of amputating their own limbs in order to make themselves more "oppressed."
There is no pleasing these retards.
If you do that, why not also cull the hambeast, and draw out the landwhale with hooks?
The worst men I ever worked with were still categorically superior to the less than very best women. When men are deficient it's because they are holding back understood abilities, whereas women normally lack those abilities altogether, and their problems are often totally artificial, creating trouble out of boredom like a sentient cat. I'll take a substandard human who can be managed to better petformance over an inferior performer who starts trouble for the sake of starting trouble any day of the week.
>This would actually solve all problems though.
No it wouldn't, it would create a shit ton of problems
Unless we kill all of african, asian and south american, we'll be losing a lot of men that produce a lot of goods and services.
Society would come to a standstill as women realize they're fucking shit at creating anything and making everything work
>that gets rid of the majority of people who contribute nothing to society and just suck up money from the government and healthcare sectors
do you have any studies that support this?
She's half correct.
90% of women also need to go.
Basically, get rid of anyone with brown skin and everyone who is retarded, insane, or psychopathic, or Chinese and you're left with about 10% of the current population.
>women dominate and genetically neuter men into harmless trappy fucktoys
>treated like slaves and petsfor the next few centuries
>eventually cultural shift gives men rights
>they fight to get the ability to vote
>reach the status of second-class citizens
>affirmative action and political favourability
>men take women's place and get to send all the female "rapists" and sexist scumbags to jail
It's a cycle. We'll get our revenge.
>starting with the losers who watch anime or other cartoons past the age of 10
I watch anime and I work full time, own a sports car and pay my bills on time, what do I win?
If you all killed all the red and all the non-whites in America you're left with 10%.
>its ok you men will become a minority and a protected class your life will be infinitely better
>minorities have it shit and are opressed in every way
Last I checked, Femitheist declared her site "satire".
However, this is old news - the first to suggest that was Sally Gearhart, and this cunt wasn't some obscure blogger but a figurehead of feminism and the first to teach "Women's Studies" at universities. These are the people who shaped and poisoned the minds of millions of women since then, largely unchallenged on their genocidal beliefs.
>implying it would take that long
Most grocery stores need to restock two time a week minimum, with many items three or four times. Most women would be on starvation watch in 5 days when their primary food source starts drying up.
Lol I was curious about Islam and today I was reading a book that said that one of the signs of the coming of good and the end of times was precisely a decline on the number of males, 50 to 1 ratio
Damnit anon, your forgetting the most powerful tool in a woman's disposal. Deceit
And that's not just my inner /pol/ memester talking. Turn your back to a crying woman and you're going to get a knife to the spine. In a gender war, men all over will succumb to their inner drive and crumble before a tearful beauty.
ironically, the best soldiers in this situation would probably be the wizards of r9k.
>girl I know in high school
>think she's dumb at first, but progressively she shows potential
>taking a lot of legit hard classes, going into genetics in college
>now 15 weeks pregnant, no indication who the father is
It's sad when people fall back into their trashy first impressions.
Should 99% of children, born from now on, be girls? You only hear about boys going crazy and shooting up things.
1% of males could easily impregnate 99% of females.
The need for male's physical labor is going away. Most or all physical tasks, carried out by males, will eventually be replaced by machines. For example, there is no reason farming, mining, fishing, construction could not be accomplished by robotics. Even robot soldiers are the wave of the future.
Even seeing or knowing someone from the top 1% in America is already difficult. Now imagine the top 1% of the world. And now you can only breed with this top 1%.
This would create such a filter for women, only the most absolutely beautiful females would even get a chance to have sperm inside them. Men can only fuck so many females a day without giving up his work, and since there are so few of them they can't exactly slack off. With so many beautiful females at disposition for each one of them, this eliminates competition and makes cooperating with other males a lot easier.
I imagine each male living the life of a king, only getting out to work for scientific progress, and spending his entire free picking only the most beautiful girls and fucking non-stop.
This, of course, if females don't capture the 1% and force them to have sex with everyone, including the ugly ones, instead of working. Effectively killing the human race.
>You know Children used to rule Kingdoms right? Albeit some relied on advisers more than others.
Name me one child ruler that wasn't just a figurehead with an older relative or adviser actually performing the king/emperor's duties until they were an adult.
Yeah guys I just checked, Femitheist was just a satire character some Libertarian chick made up.
Vice got rused hard, but I guess that's modern journalism for you.
HOLY FUCK CHARGE YOUR PHONE
we can achieve what this bitch wants simply by cloning 10 white cuties per white male and giving each a harem of women to live in a 'utopian reservation' for each man. seeing as she believes she has ethical grounds to move forwards she gives us ethical grounds to move forwards as well
really this woman is high af. There's something about women that they can never directly have an original thought and carry it through to it's objective conclusion, there's something about this that is almost like she's trying to mimic a mirror reflection of what SHE thinks men plan to do in the future... and is trying to beat them to the punch, but she thinks its ethical, because she's retarded. she's also extrapolating on a lot of what she's 'learnt' by living in a western state driven society where the state has drilled into her the ideas of them owning children rather than you. really she's high as fuck on propaganda and paranoid tantrumming
>The schoolmaster had a tame sparrow and had warned the students not to harm it, threatening death. One of the boys stepped on the bird and killed it; he was afraid to return to school but did so. After lessons, the master took the boy into a private room and strangled him to death. The boy's father went to the school and shot the schoolmaster dead.
I like sparrows but damn.
>oxygen causes the most breathing used by warmongers to then commit war
>advocate for scrubbing all but a tiny portion of oxygen from the earth
besides we are on the cusp of, through technology, destroying the very meaning of crime - war - murder even, if we play it correctly. freedoms will approach a maximal value for all creeds and genders if we allow white males to continue working on technology and carry the torch of power
that's only because we fuck over young white boys in the west so much, in school and beyond
if we did the same to white girls half of them would have hung themselves by now
In a perfect world, this would probably work.
But most of the technical and medical progress was made exactly in war-time.
Naw, you need to leave some - to have some variety. It will be boring having 3-4 archetypes of men.
wtf, site blocked for legal reasons?
Yeah, I thought about the same.
It might be because of anglo privilege.
>tfw blames the jews
>tfw doesnt know about the international mongolian brotherhood that controls everything
>mfw most of the people will never realise this
correction, women are more likely to attempt to cash in the sympathy that 'suicide attempts' afford
think about it, there are a huge bulk of attention whores out there that do what they know won't kill them to get attention. it takes attention away from male actual suicide cases too, think about that
We are responsible for most crimes and wars. We are also responsible for an incredible majority of everything that has ever been invented, built, or learned.
It is a trade off, we are more violent than women because we are more competitive, and competition is what drives evolution. Woman are more passive since their biological role is to birth and raise children while the men defend and provide for them.
The main difference between all men and niggers is that all men are collectively responsible for nearly every advancement the human race has made, whereas niggers are responsible for less of them than white women who they outnumber more than 5 to one.
This is how you use logic you dumb nigger.
A quick test to determine if you're qualified to provide solutions for world peace. Answer accordingly.
A- does it advocate for mass murder?
B- are you under the age of 60?
C- Are you having an affair with Eva Braun
If you answered "Yes" to all of these questions, congratulations, you got it.
If you answered "Yes" to the first two and "No" to the last, I'm afraid you've come up short.
they think everything they've achieved is because they're "strong" or some delusional shit like that
they don't realize that the only reason they're even allowed to vote is because the alpha males died in the world wars and the lo test beta providers spilled spaghetti when they realized the gender imbalance
instead of fucking multiple women, they turned them gay and gave them rights
now that women can pretty much marry the government you have a shitton of fatherless males that will also grow up to be beta, and females that will grow up scared/resentful of males because they lack a father figure
This is an excellent idea. Also, men should lose their right to vote and be prevented from any position of power.
There will be developed nanotech that makes it impossible for men to orgasm without being inside of a woman, basically making fapping more of a torture. This will make men more "obedient" to women, as horny men will worship women and do whatever they say in the tiny hope of getting between her legs to bust a nut.
I agree with her but not for the reasons she believes. It would be nice having a harem. Imagine a girl sees you and you're the first male she's run across in months. You wouldn't even have to try.
They're basically admitting that men, by birthright of being men, are inherently superior and the only way to counteract this is to reduce their numbers.
Fucking wow. Doublethink is real.
>I know I'll never look like the ideal woman to a man
>I know! Let me preach on a literal anime message board about eradicating them!
Irony at it's finest.
Up to a point, she might be right
Feminism, and other bullshit, happened because the ""price"" of pussy skyrocketed. Or, if you kill a shitton of male, the demand for pussy will go down extremely fast, making lots of women desperate so hard that they will become 50's tier women.
It's litterally as simple as offer and demand
I pray that by some unholy twist of nature this becomes a reality. 10 women for every man, sounds great. Might drive me mad after awhile, so I'd just escape to the wilderness where you need to work to survive, no women would be found there.
>someone points out that if there were less men there would be less crime and war
Wars wouldn't even be needed for direct nigger-tier enslavement, so, yes, wars wouldn't happen, but enslavement/brutality/massacre still would anyway.
As I said here
What we need to do is lower the figurative price of pussy and let women go 50's tier themselves.
I think some way to do it is either VR waifus, sex/waifubots and exogestation.
Then, things will change
>remove 90 percent of males
Who would run the power plants? Who would do the machining? Who would engineer their new iPhone each year?
I would ask who will make their anxiety medicine but pharmacy is the one stem field that women manage to do well in.
Technically it's a win-win situation for us.
I mean, if they get rid of all the violent, war-mongering, raping, sexist "alpha" males we empathetic, sensible and kinder "beta" males will be surrounded by a majority of women. it's a dream come true.
>Her argument was that only through the reduction of the male population to between 1 and 10 percent of their current number we can approach "true equality".
What a fucking retard. If anything it would give men more status.
Here's what I predict would happen if you took out ALL men
>majority of STEM jobs are men
>majority of hard labor jobs like oil rigging, electric plant, water management, etc are by far men
>men disappear, suddenly all the tech jobs, and jobs like that disappear
>electricity vanishes as women can't figure out how to get those jobs
>oil runs out once they use it all up and have no one left to drain it
>water plants die
>no more internet of course
>the few women who do know how to do stuff can't get along, since everyone knows women can't lead or stand eachother
>archaic mad max like place where cars are all broken down, oil and electricity doesn't exist, etc
>back to having to survive the old fashion way
>can't even do that, we've all seen the Dutch survivor men vs women
>majority of women die out over time due to lack of resources and too much dead weight, the ones who can figure out how to survive do
>the ones who actually took stem jobs are deemed invaluable, the ones who knew how to survive are now leaders
here's the kicker
>those women are all the conservative women who went out with their dads to hunt or listened when they said "don't get a gender studies degree, get a valueable one"
>world is repopulated without the women who WANTED men disappeared, cunts like the one in OP are all dead
I guess in the end the world would be technically a better place without them
This. If this happened pussy would be so hugely devalued nobody would give a shit about her opinions anymore. The remaining men would rule even harder and women would be forced to bow and scrape at every turn for a moment of their attention.
Would men be kept in isolation like stud horses?
I believe we must remove men from the community and place them in their own specific sections of society, akin to subsidised or state-funded reservations, so they can be redefined. We can make not only men safer, but women as well. By subsidising said reservations through the state we can provide men with activities, healthcare, entertainment, shelter, protection, and everything that one could ever require in life. This will remove conventional inequality from society. By reducing the number of men to 10 percent of the total population, their socio-biovalue will be raised. They will live out their lives happily and safely, and male disposability will be a thing of the past.
>What do you propose as alternatives?
Children should be raised communally and by the state. The nuclear family model is a breeding ground of deceptions, mediocrities, treacheries, hypocrisy, and violence. It needs to be abolished. Bigotry, prejudice, and antiquated convictions are passed down through each generation. The conventional family unit indoctrinates our youth and drains them of their potential. My solution would be to assign children caretakers whose task would simply be to provide shelter, food, clothing, and protection for each child—all of which would be yielded by the state. Perfect girls will be conceived, developed, and engineered in state-owned breeding centers. They will be bound together in a communal venue under the instruction and control of female savants.
>the revolution begins
>women manage to exterminate 99% of the male population
>they round up the top 1% in terms of looks, intelligence, health, and height
>these few males are kept in house arrest, where their sole purpose is to mate with the entire female population
>you are well fed, have your own gym, doctor, dentist, movie theatre, swimming pool, vidya etc
>live there with a few other top 1%'s
>you enjoy all these goods, but you are also forced to inseminate hundreds of women per day
>you will never be one these sex slaves
Dude you're forgetting what war is. People talk of cyber war, cold war, 'social evolution' over 'physical evolution' but in the end it all comes down to who kills who and when all out war occurs there isn't a chance in hell women take power even with a 40% male cuck percentage because they are as weak as the women they worship. Just like when it does finally come down to the race war we will annihilate muslim scum from the face of the earth, we just have to hope it comes sooner rather than later to minimise pure white casualties.
When the bombs drop white males will win not because of privilege but because of literal, quantifiable superiority. Nigers might run fast, and women might deceive men into being on their side (especially migrants) but when they're still holding swords and we have nuclear bunkers and bombs it really won't be an issue.
>pussy would be so hugely devalued
>I wish leftists were smart enough to realize
Should we both posts tits with timestamp
>used to have some good content
Stop posting smug animu girls you're going to trigger the poor thing.
The only reason women aren't currently declaring war on each other is that men are busy declaring war on each other. And of the two wars, women's war takes a backseat.
Without men to wage war, women would wage war in the power gap.
You know, men being outnumbered wouldn't be unprecedented.
Ever wonder why Europeans can have blonde, flaxen, red, or black hair, while virtually everyone else on Earth only has brown eyes and black hair? It's because men died off in vast numbers during the Ice Age and basically got their pick of the litter. For women, the rarer the color, the more likely they were breed. The few remaining men didn't just knock up every woman because they could hardly afford to keep multiple mates or many children in those kinds of harsh conditions - there just wasn't enough of anything to go around. It was basically natural genocide via catastrophe + sexual selection.
Where's the biological imperative to strive and improve civilization once most of the men are eradicated?
All the order would be used to maintain order and the harems with the surplus of women who are available. Men would either become warlords or like the mice in Calhoun's experiment - solely living for hedonistic pleasures because why not? How would they keep this population below 10%? Would they have to commit infanticide or some sort of sterilization? If men are reduced to just tools of reproduction where would society go? Less rape and killings maybe - but that's a bloody dystopia regardless.
Men need men and women need men, lest you want to fall back to tribalism.
I agree with the principles of eugenics but not just applied to men and not in the edgy way she puts it. In her world, only top females would be allowed to breed with the top males which wouldn't include her anyway.
>we are the majority
>b-but we don't have enough majority
>lower male population where they are even bigger minority group.
>can't into logic
The mental gymnastics with these cunts is amazing.