You can only post in this thread if the Falklands are yours.
Argies stay out
> mfw we really do rule the waves
We showed those argies
>In December 1832 the British reasserted their sovereignty over the Falkland islands. No action was taken by the US
>In 1862, Belize was turned into a crown colony of the British empire and renamed British Honduras. The United States did not take any action against Britain
britain had already destroyed the kreigsmarine and shat on the luftwaffe before america was even in the war, the battle of britain was fought and won with help from only a single american volunteer. saying we would have been invaded is not only historically incorrect but insulting of the free polish, free french, RAF ,Czechs, new Zealanders, Australian, south African,Canadian,Belgian, Irish (etc etc) pilots.
I like america and props for what you did in the war but this is a huge meme that has to stop.
>just prep the bull, john.
You first Hans
Mandatory thread viewing.
You all should be ashamed of yourself and your country you are literally taking pride in being the worst people on earth
werent you the ones being pissed at us having more shekels than you, which ultimatively led to you trying to let the german people perish for good even before hitler came to power ?
dont forget the treaty of versailles.
>The year is 2016
>The British Empire has fallen so low that they can only celebrate their 1 colonial possesion... a group of rocky shit stained islands with more sheep than people
when were you when britannia was kill?
I am genuinely happy you're enjoying your dozen island micro empire, Britannia
Yet you still want the Falklands.
Yes, you are correct, we possess not a dozen tiny islands, but a proper landmass.
No hard feelings though, you can flee shariah by settling on your tiny colonies when the time comes.
Yes, you are still relevant, let no one else tell you otherwise
>enforcing the dumb American stereotype.
Can't handle the fact that you subhuman anglos are race mixtures of Celts, Franks, and Germans?
At least we Americans admit that we're mutts.
When the pirate mocks me, when they say "Falklands"
When I'm feeling sad
I simply remember Britain is full of Muslims
And then I don't feel so bad
Relevant enough for you to be posting here, it seems.
Pretty relevant, not empire relevant though, i'll concede.
Don't fall for the US b8 shit posters
>UK gave Palestine to kikes because "they are the original people"
>Yet the UK still claims the falklands
Why the double think?
I hope you're enjoying our stewardship of the Falkland Islands.
Britain, Brazil supports your cause and is willing to fight against the argie scum down south, we hate Argentinians as much as you hate Frenchmen.
>dont forget the treaty of versailles.
Blame the French, we called for a lighter treaty and they called for one even harsher than Versailles. The Americans refused to sign Versailles as they wanted terms even nicer than the UK's.
Most of us don't hate the French, but that is mainly due to Alizee, once she has died, we'll start warring again.
Yeah o fucking kay matey, all it takes is a gradual ratcheting up of tensions and likelihood of major war between us and another major power and we'll start bringing our heavy industry back online and get back to churning out warships all along the Clyde.
>Not hating Argentina
Get out of my country; commie.
>what on the Luftwaffe
You held them off but didn't destroy them. Churchill was an idiot who instead of even considering peace talks that the Germans extended more than 40 times he wanted to keep the war going. Really all Britain did was help solidify Europe's fucked up future. Thanks britbro.
Try supplying half the allies with tons and tons of war material good god read a book.
Check his name. yknow that green thing that says "Anonymous". It says PK and you can usually see him in different threads with a different rare flag everytime, but with the same name. Unless he travels alot to places no one has ever heard before, he uses a proxy.
Not with that attitude
How about the economist?
See my second point.
I honestly couldn't give a fuck, the people who live there now are British, they have voted overwhelmingly top remain so and as such due to exercising their sovereignty and right to self determination they will remain British until the Falklands drown in the oceans to never be seen again.
I genuinely, unsarcastically and sincerely feel bad for britain's state of affair. You guys used to be great in every sense of the world, now you got nothing but to boast about a small conflict that took place three decades ago.
I cringe every time you call it a war as if my country was ever your equal. You're only making yourself look bad, as someone who's got nothing relevant to feel proud of.
good bant tho
>mfw Britain loves us so much they threw away their empire to ensure we won WW2
Argentina was a military junta so it was one democracy m9.
I think it's one of the few wars where the same infantry rifle was used by each side (FN-FAL)
> Earliest among these are the numerically small but internationally diverse early 19th century inhabitants of the Falkland Islands, comprising and descended in part from settlers brought by Luis Vernet, and English and American sealers
>that woman will never stomp on my balls and call me a fuccboi
Again they're attempting to extrapolate current fucking conditions to the future, do you seriously think anyone is gonna sit with their thumb firmly planted in their colon if they think there's a war coming along?
I get that because you're an American you don't know shit about world history right, but in the run up to the first world war Britain and Germany got involved in an arms race based around building the largest Navy, specifically Dreadnoughts.
These ships were the Aircraft Carriers of the day and we fucking churned them like it was going out of fashion to the point we had enough to directly blockade Germany after hammering their navy.
Trust me, when push comes to shove we'll build our armies up again, and as we always have we will continue to punch well above our weight.
You do realize you bootlicking cucks were on our side back then, right?
Why is it te only insult everyone on pol can do is fucking about ones nationality? He may not know world history but being American has no fucking correlation to it. Britain has just as many retards as the United States, France, etc.
You realise that your country is significantly worse in every single respect right? Before you start, don't gimme that fucking paki and muslim shite, cause your country is still worse thanks to it being populated by Argentinians.
You're proving the stereotypes right again matey.
Yanks can't banter.
Thatcher actually threatened the French to hand over the disarm codes for the exocet missiles, they didn't beg for them to stop selling them, they told them to disarm the weapons or they were getting fucked as well.
France being a modern nation understood that they weren't gonna take a punch in the nose over some fucking niggers in Argentina.
Also I'm sure Thatcher made strong implications that Beunos Aires would cook under a nuclear flame if they didn't stop the exocets.
>Paying countries to put your soldiers there
You realise cunts rag on yanks for their nationality, cause it's there to be ragged on right? You get all uppity about it so we pick on it.
I mean seriously I don't even care, the US is fine to me just another country but you all get up in arms any time it's mentioned.
>approximately 900,000 are Muslims
Yes, we've had them for a while, we don't get wet over the whole thing, though
Love how you cling to this meme, literally happened once, meanwhile you have shootings on military bases every month.
>Implying we would ever 'beg' to the garlic menace, we strong armed them because we're fucking top.
Good Lord I wish I was. Would piss all over today's sorry excuse for a nation.
Imagine when South America converts to Islam
>Not hating Argentina
For real, nigger?
We're renting out Vengence Class and have increased Astute (a sub that baffles the fucking Americans) to two additional units. Plus not long till with have a lovely new Carriers. Wew
>having the entire world swinging from your nuts because of your massive global reach economically and militarily
>countries have to do whatever you tell them to do or else they get btfo with sanctions and drones
>don't even have to send a single soldier to destroy an entire nation
>control all of the world's trade
>control all of the world's oceans and skies
>being able to wipe an entire civilization off of the earth with a push of a button
>installing puppet governments around the world
>controlling all mass media
>hurrr America doesn't have colonies because they didn't need to fire a single bullet to conquer every single country on earth
Oh wow shootings on a military by sandniggers. It literally is no different from the women in your country being raped by these people. At least in the United States we don't go "its their culture it isn't their fault". Seriously why does Europe accept their behavior?
You Argies are just jealous you'll never have an island. You took a look at Britain and were like "I want a comfy island off the coast of a major continent" and you set your eyes on Falklands.
Unfortunately, you didn't count on one thing.
Arglets are literally brainwashed at school to believe the Falklands are theirs.
>Seriously why does Europe accept their behavior?
What is it with amerifats thinking a few obnoxious left wing media outlets and a couple of facebook photos represent the political opinions of Europe?
So what? It doesn't change the fact England is pretty much the same level of shit as this country. Any European nation who thinks they are better off is delusional just as if any American thinks they are better off. Europe is drowning in Muslims just like the United States is drowning in niggers. Congrats.
No you really didn't. The Luftwaffe continued to operate throughout the war controlling the skies for at least a year longer. The RAF wom the air battle of Britain but didn't destroy the German air power.
Could you Imagine that today?
The stem of complaints flowing into the sun about the war, Jeremy Corbyn no doubt taking a platform and protesting against it. Lefties no doubt would be rioting and vandalising because we'd dare to defend our territory.
Honestly. I would prefer if we just turned the Army on those fuckers, then send them to the Falklands afterwards.
Because that is the main stream viewm Europeans at large may not agree bits happening, your view hasn't changed shit so keep thinking going to your nationalist boards and fagbook to chant your "Europe for Europeans" is actually changing shit. Seriously you talk like you have done anything or can do anything to stop the policies being pushed.
Yup totally delusional
>All throughout history if you controlled the seas you controlled trade. The US is the only one to ever be present in all major oceans
Many of the lefties were anti-war back then too. A lot of them were union members who were very happy to leave the Falklands at the mercy of Argentina just to get rid of Thatcher.
We do, It's called Tierra del Fuego and it's much bigger than your tiny satellites.
There's also that 2,750,000 km2 thing north of it, but mind no attention to that.
Some day, if allah allows it, you might join the caliphate and be part of something relevant once again. Worry not, britbro
You guys are A LOT worse than us.
You guys have things like "Black lives matter" and your colleges are Liberal shitholes, You are 62% white and will soon be a minority. We are also pretty shit but we're 80%
62% as opposed to 80%
We've already established the United States is niggger full, doesn't change the fact you are the same with your Muslim population. I wouldn't like to live there or here they are both going downhill.
Absolutely no surprise, it was probably very low key. Back then if you spoke about the war being all terrible and us being evil you would of got told to shut your whiny pacifist mouth.
But surprisingly enough the Labour leader, renown for being the biggest flop for labour Michael Foot was actually very supportive of the war, despite being pretty far left.
>Because that is the main stream viewm Europeans at large
It really isn't. The disconnect between the electorate and the political establishment has gone so far that we're seeing previously-unelectable nationalist parties gaining significant support all over western europe.
Wow nice rebuttal to my statement and argument. Instead of providing facts and a coherent argument you go straight for a "shut up" statement that ends the conversation since you have nothing to argue against me with. Saying that is the same as saying "you're on the wrong side of history" or "its 2016." Very good job, I bet you're very good at debating since you're very fast at ending it and try to demean the other party. Just like liberals do, shut up the other side because they have no more arguments left.
Mate, we have 4 SNBM subs, in total, around 12 hunter killers, 9 destroyers, 5 frigates (an irrelevant ship now) and those 2 carriers, as well as a fuck ton of merchant support vessels, the most advanced hospital ship to grace brittania's beautiful waves, and Bulwark and Albion, which carry about 700 marines each. I mean...would you fuck with about 1500 Royal marine commandos. I wouldn't.
We cool man. We can still do damage. We aren't a super power...definitely a global power through soft and hard influence.
Don't brag about Tierra del Fuego m8, half of it is ours.
Except you've always been one step below us, every time.
Garlic menace will never win.
There was a kids cartoon about a time-traveling boy in Argentina that explained the "Islas Malvinas" conflict from their perspective.
Then someone changed some of the subtitles to make it hilarious and uploaded it to youtube but I can't remember the name.
Anyone have a link?
The secret war against the Exocet went into overdrive following the loss of Sheffield on May 4. Military attaches and MI6 stations around the world were ordered to track suspect shipments and Israel, South Africa and Libya were all suspected of aiding the junta.
Even Switzerland, whose embassy in Buenos Aires was representing British diplomatic interests, was involved. One report accused Swissair of shipping Israeli equipment to Argentina.
Of course, the fucking jews would have to be involved somehow.
I highly doubt these parties will actually win any significant power. There are tons of Europeans who think a number of these parties are neonazis or fascist's which don't understand. Of they actually can gain ground then great bit the general attitude I get from European friends and users on here is they think those nationalist parties are too nationalistic.
List of Argentina's achievements:
- The President saved a young boy from becoming a werewolf: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/argentina-president-adopts-boy-stop-werewolf-article-1.2058982
>I highly doubt these parties will actually win any significant power.
They don't need to to influence policy. UKIP forced Cameron to run a referendum on the EU just by the threat of taking the Conservative's core vote.
You're not exactly making it difficult for them. All it takes is for Toshi in his JDF bomber to get drunk to the point of being a bit fighty and you end up with half your warships belly up.
We aren't the only reason. We gave supplies and tons of materials but combat wise the Soviet Union did most of the ground work against the axis military, however the chances of them defeating them without support would have been less but still a close call.
You know which islands are ours too? The ones on the Beagle Channel :^)
Britain was 87% in 2011, the United States was 74% when you adjust for all factors (such as allowing rednecks and niggers to claim to be Indians)
Britain's UKIP leader Farage has already stated that Trump is too radical. Farage has basically backed off of his previous rhetoric which made it clear he wanted to remove most of the immigrants in Britain and their children to make Britain British again.
Meanwhile Donald Trump has a pretty good chance of being president, and at the least isn't afraid of talking about throwing out the immigrants.
Ultimately if things continue their course then children born to immigrants will be 30% of the British total in 2020 up from 12% in 1990. Because of course Indians and Pakistanis who have were born there aren't counted as immigrants this means the total number of white children of predominantly European descent will be around 70% of the total, which is where France is now.
If Donald Trump becomes president then his policies which are directed towards bringing jobs back into the country will necessarily allow lower middle class whites and pussy liberal whites to have children earlier as the economy will be more secure. This, combined with the deportation of illegal immigrants and slashing of yearly legal immigration to a minimum favoring European migrants would result in total white births rising from 49.8% of the total to more than 60% of the total. The total proportion of the population which would be NH white after the deportations would be about 65%, however what is primarily important is that currently 62% of the population has only about 1/2 of the children, meaning that births compared with the total population would be approaching a ratio of 1:1. An immigration policy favoring Europeans, even if immigration was low, would further push demography in favor of white Americans.
>samba, the truth is we are their equals in combat
God Save the Queen.
At first I was puzzled by why you'd think any of it, then i remembered how small your pencil dick country is.
Good for you, texas. No hard feelings over that silly claim over patagonia you guys get flustered over so much, we're cool.
daily reminder that Argentina is so bothered about the Falklands that even today they have another nations sovereign soil printed on their bank notes
I feel sorry for you my white friend :^)
1. You clearly lack any fucking brain power if you think an English political leader would be able to support Trump without committing political suicide
2. You clearly have no fucking understanding of British politics whatsoever, actually.
3. US isn't 74% white. Stop kidding yourself, Tyrone.
4. Trump won't become president. How can you not see this? You're absolutely fucking deluded if you think he's going to win. By all means, vote for him (if you're not the retarded 14 year old you appear to be), but he's unelectable.
You're going to have Shillary. Prepare yourself now. It's inevitable.
>another nations sovereign soil printed on their bank notes
Literally the only time i hear or think about the falklands is when one of you britcucks makes a thread about it.
I get that you're nostalgia clinging so hard to your past since you have no modern achievements, but jesus man, give it a break.
You don't wanna know, meribro
If brave, click the blue arrow
>You are literally pulling numbers out of your arse.
>You're going to have Shillary. Prepare yourself now. It's inevitable.
This asshurt. I will enjoy reading you cry about how Trump can't possibly enact his policies in one year when he is president-elect. When your country is in ruins maybe if you kiss my ass I'll advocate letting in white British refugees.
First Past the Post.
Divide the country in 650 constituencies based roughly on population. Each constituency has a mini election on who represents them. Each representative (MP) belongs to a party. If enough constituencies vote for one party's MP's and they get a majority (anything over 325 MPs) then they get in power.
It's a fucking awful system.
>literally the only time i hear or think about the falklands is when one of you britcucks makes a thread about it.
Or whenever you use a 50 pesos note.
How much is 50 pesos worth again?
>Absolutely no surprise, it was probably very low key. Back then if you spoke about the war being all terrible and us being evil you would of got told to shut your whiny pacifist mouth.
The Shadow Foreign Secretary Denis Healey actually had to apologise when he accused Thatcher of "glorying in slaughter" when the Belgrano got sunk.
Our system fucked over the greens and ukip for sure im not sure on the numbers but ukip got one seat with 10-20% of votes if we had a proportional representation ukip wouldve got 60-120 seats
But with our system who ever wins the area gets the MP lets say 51% labour49% tory labour wins that area
All you need is 30-40% votes to get all the seats
Gotta love Murdoch's bantz when the Belgrano got BTFO
I mean the man must have sculpted them or something. That's not natural.
1 British Pound equals19.38 Argentine Peso
What? sorry, it went over my head because that's a bank note, not actual money we use
This is the actual 50 pesos bill
Nice try, though
>only twelve people have ever even been there
Most useless fucking space colony ever. China will probably steal it because they claim Chinese astronomers were the first people to see the moon 10,000 years ago. Then they'll blow it up and shoot the fragments at countries who don't recognize China's eternal claim to the entire Eurasian landmass.
Can he actually do that? Wouldnt he need the falklands to do a referendum? Surely its their right and surely we would vote aswell besides hed get killed before this happens just like diana
>bank notes are not actual money
Also, pic related. That's the old bank note you've got there. This is the shiny new one you got as a parting gift from Kirchner.
England should do another referendum just to show how much they don't want to be Argentinian. I think the last vote was like 99% against leaving their status of a British colony. They have a very high GDP per capita and HDI so why would they want to be reverted to the 3rd world with shitty fucking Argentina?
FYI a bank note and paper currency are one and the same. That's the old 50 pesos bill from 1999, the new cuck notes went into circulation march 2015
>nice try, though :^)
The 1% who voted in favour probably did it for the bantz hehe
Whether he can or not is irrelevant, I doubt even if he held a vote his party would back him on it.
You shouldn't be supporting a politician who even gives these wacky ideas credit.
>not sure if stupid, poor, secretly Australian or all three
I'm in denial of nothing. Your politics are fucked because they ensure that a further-right party must get a majority or else get cucked out of its seats
America only has two majority parties and a system which ensures no one tries to make third parties, hence why Reagan changed the entire course of the Republicans in 1980 and Trump will do it in 2016
You saying "Hillary will clearly win" goes against even the most basic understanding of politics especially when a recession is imminent- which would ensure "any Republican" will win in 2016. This of course ignores a deeper understanding of American politics, since electors are won on a state-by-state basis rather than a national basis.
Illinois has an 80% white voting population, Michigan has an 85% white voting population, Pennsylvania and Ohio 90%, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Iowa 95%+. All of those states are located in our "rust belt" which is the former industrial belt. Union workers and blue collar workers in the North are traditionally Democrats, however the previous president told them he wouldn't do anything about deindustrialization and that those jobs were gone for good and he had no solutions for them. Trump says he will bring the jobs back. This is ignoring that the black workers were also dependent on those jobs.
Come 2016 all of those blue Great Lakes states will go Republican because Bill Clinton is the reason factories got sent to China and Mexico and Trump is promising to bring them back. If you can't understand what I'm telling you here then you're an idiot, and if you still claim I'm wrong then you're the one in denial.
If england could somehow weaponize bants we could be great again, reforming our empire starting with the best shitposters of all, Straya.