Live thread, he'll be on in 20 minutes. Let's listen.
Oh god it's that chris cuomo guy who has a job because of his daddy
a total fucking bozo, I'm pretty sure he's special ed from reading his twitter
Cuomo has a low IQ. He's a literal retard, he comes from a famous Democratic family. no talent, no smarts.
>let's talk about gun free zones
>BUT THE USA HAS MORE GUNS THAN PEEPO!!!
What the fuck are you talking about cuomo
Trump: if someone had a gun, there would have been less deaths
CNN anchor: well, we don't really know that for sure
are you kidding me? that's the equivalent of a story of men dying from dehydration in the desert, and if a reasonable or prudent person were to suggest "if they had water, they wouldn't have died from dehydration," this anchor would say "Well, we don't know that for sure"
clinton literally raping women and CNN defending it
What Trump should just say is that Hillary is trying to point herself as a figure for women and calling him sexist while she stood up for a pedophile and her husband is a sex abuse addict who she enables.
He really didn't have to bring up how he had to be friends with everyone as a businessman.
So... Damage report, goys? How much shilling for the Clintons can this guy do?
I fucking hate listening to Trump. He repeats the same thing over and over again as if he thinks other people can't understand him. It's so fucking annoying.
And I'm not talking about the same questions, but when he answers he says the same fucking thing 5 times.
That was literally one of the worst interviews I've ever heard of any kind in my entire life. just speechless.
The jew was strong with that interviewer. He was shilling hard!
Ugh, I hate that Cuomo Guy. Totally shilling for the Dems and Clinton. Similar to the StephaKEKolos guy from abc.
One interview with Trump, that StephaCuckolos guy tried to get in the last word after every question, like he was debating Trump.
To be honest, I block cnn.com in my hosts file. I only watch it through the link.
CNN just can't keep cocks out of their mouth in these interviews.
lets just hope this unemployed single mother in pic related is wrong.
How fucking retarded is CNN?
MORE gun control? Did the forget the sweeping, ass ravaging the liberals received in the voting booths in 2014? Colorado removing their Democrat elected officials? The record number of NRA members and new members after the gun control drums started pounding day after day?
If gun control of any form happens, the Democrats won't hold office in any state besides the usual hell holes, and Trump will rain fire upon them as President of the United States.
Is this one in Lowell, MA? I heard that BLM is wasting thier shekels on valuable tickets that would be for whites, but as usual, nigs gonna nig.
At least the protest in NH was a total bust. pic related.
he leads in double digits with both men and women, he leads MORE with men.
Faggot gauc bowl merchant shill
It's called the Clinton News Network for a reason. they just agree with everything the Democrats say, no exception.
they have a couple token republicans (Jake Tapper is one- at the very least he's a right leaning independent) but for the most part it's all shilling
He hasn't done a Q&A in about 3 months, not counting the Mesa, AZ rally a couple weeks ago. I wish he (hell, every candidate) would do them more but if they did then people would intentionally pick questions the candidate can't answer so it won't happen.
I thought he did a pretty good job fielding questions in the past. If anything, it was a bit cringey at times when people were tossing him softballs.
Considering the amount of time he spends dealing with everybody constantly trying to stump him, I don't think he has much to worry about. He's had no trouble flat out declining to answer silly questions in the past.
Wow guys, do you see this freak they have on now talking about the Donald?
What the fuck is wrong with this bitches eyes?
I know by doing these shows Trump is trying to show everyone his incredible energy / stamina, how unafraid and that he can deal with these bozos.
However, I just start cringing when I see these complete looser nobodies trying to challenge the Trump.
Most of these people wouldn't even qualify on paper to be on The Apprentice, especially these morning show dopes, they're total losers.
don't fucking bother, the interviewer who only has his job due to nepotism just screamed for 5 minutes saying "but you defended Bill a decade ago, and now you're attacking him!! FLIPFLOPPER!!!" and then finally ragequit.
But look at this face?
I would have an easier time kissing an actual hog on its snout than kissing this thing.
You can probably watch it using go.cnn.com, but as some have pointed out here, it's not really worth watching.
If you're left leaning, he will just make you cringe. If you're right leaning he'll make you cringe. It was just... so bad.
You're not allowed to say anything bad about black people, regardless of their gender. It is not PC.
The only exception to this is if it is a black police officer, or a black christian.
JEB "THE MAN" BUSH IS COMING ON MORNING JOE!!!!! NOW!
ALERT! HE'S GONNA BTFO TRUMP THIS TIME!
>DOES YOUR DICK NOT WORK?
>ARE YOU FAT?
>that women candidate tweeted something about football
>GOT THE BEETUS?
>IS YOUR DICK BROKEN?
I fucking wonder why MSNBC is struggling.
At least they will have JOSE! on tommorow.
>But look at this face?
Seems like someone accused them of hiring only beautiful people.
>If you're left leaning, he will just make you cringe. If you're right leaning he'll make you cringe. It was just... so bad.
That's the only reason i wanna watch it tbqh
Cnn go isn'T working for me, if someone got a youtube link it would be appreciated.
You probably won't see it on YouTube for a few hours if not a day.
The first place to have it posted, if it does get posted, would probably be this site.
>that's why he proposes a ban on muslim immigration until we can figure out whats going on
This sounds moronic, we all know whats going on and trump if being politically correct about it.
>a bunch of muslims don't like us and ISIS claims they are integrating with the refugee population and we can not properly vet these people so lets stop letting them into the country.
>don't allow the democrats to import terror yada yada yada
No comparison, but Bernie gets the second biggest crowds after trump. only other candidate in the race that can pull thousands
Trump's new TV add is pretty fucking boss.
I know its not something any other politician does, but it would be great to hear him voice it himself. There is literally no other voice in the world that is as feared and respected now.
>trying to watch this in Great Britain
The real quote is
>UNTIL WE CAN FIGURE WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON
By which he means he knows full well that the US has played an enormous role in creating the ISIS problem and that this has to stop.
Agree. The ad is underwhelming compared to watching him laying it out at a rally. But I guess the ad people are not trying to target someone like me who actually watches Trump rallies.
>tfw in congestive heart failure awaiting heart transplant
>tfw masturbation could be the end of me
Still alive baby.
>But I guess the ad people are not trying to target someone like me who actually watches Trump rallies.
I have to agree. It's also interesting to hear that "Radio Announcer" voice say "quickly cut the head off ISIS, and take their oil".
"building a wall on our southern border that Mexico WILL pay for".
Its very different hearing it from a voice that could easily be an anchor on CNN or MSNBC.
While I like the fire with which Trump says things, this sort of TV voice saying things could really appeal to old people and people watching TV, or anyone else who might have sensory shock when they have the Donald him self making the announcements.
I don't think any ad he does will meet up his rallies; but think about this: He did spend some money on that ad, but he's never taken ads before like this. MSNBC was playing the ad for free - it's brilliant in a way.
>/pol/ webms in presidential ads
Feels pretty good
I want the fucking Kiwi to give us a good add.
I didn't like the add.
After hearing the Kiwi's complaints i.e. "i couldn't even even understand half of those".
I think the Trump add was way too fast, unless I'm used to fast talkers, its going to be hard to absorb what the add is actually saying and about what.
There is a pacing issue with this add.
>No viruses that can take control and root your system
Not to come off as anti-linux, but that's every bit as factually incorrect as when all the mac people used to go around saying "macs can't get viruses."
It is a over simplification of course, but a properly set-up linux box is wonderful. Complete control. I even banish super cookies to null, they disappear when the browser tries to save it.
Also that Jeb ad is low energy. Trump dominated the ISIS issue this election season.
Why the fuck does the media call Bill Clinton's sleezy sexual abuse as asking "questions about his sexual history" as if it's inappropriate?
>muh sexual history
>why are you asking about his sex life??
Fucking media, I can't stand this. Trump should retort that better, it's too obvious what they're doing.
Its much more difficult for a OSX / Unix / Linux based operating system to "get viruses", you basically have to manually install shady software on your machine to get one.
With Windows XP, you didn't need admin privileges to install applications i.e. you could write an installer to run in the background and no one would be the wiser.
Vista came along and fixed that, but a lot of people didn't like the password prompt popping up all the time.
Windows is much more secure than it used to be, but not as secure as OSX/Unix/Linux. The inability for Microsoft to develop a way to consolidate its services and processes makes it very easy for malicious software to hide.
It also makes it very easy to kick a DLL file into a directory where you know it will get run by an application that is already authorized.
Where as *NIX systems don't have any of those issues. However you can still run a script with "sudo" and have it basically take over your system, but you got to really be a idiot to do that, and it's a very narrow hole.
So yeah, windows and security, not something you should depend on in my opinion.
I certainly don't trust Windows in the least when it comes to security, especially after all the shady shit they've been pulling with their forced upgrades to Windows 10. I personally use nothing but linux except in those rare cases where I don't have an option.
That being said, rooting is an age-old and popular passtime. I just wouldn't want folks to get the wrong idea about that.
Oh yeah, rooting is real and it happens.
If you haven't hit up the
"Opensource Venerability Database"
I recommend doing so.
Other than the popular ways to get into *NIX systems, like malicious scripts, kernel modules can be a big problem and are often the preferred way of doing a vertical privilege escalation.
I've found a lot of the problems with *NIX security to be "in memory" bugs, where if you're accessing something loaded into RAM, you don't have the same permission checks ( or at least they don't seem to work as well ) as you have on the hard disk with the permission bits.
But it's still not something a script kiddie could do, and Windows is kind of a script kiddie playground.
>Trump is Hitler
I love this maymay
And that's just talking about a single box. Let's say you root a router and now you can trivially watch everything go across the line that isn't encrypted. How much longer until some dude who uses the same password everywhere drops it somewhere in the clear? grep -A1 sudo ~/.bash_history | sort -u >> uh\ oh\ speghettio.lol
One of my favorite factoids is that out of about order 1k social media accounts, not a single one had "nigger" or "n1gger" or anything like that in the username, but over a hundred of them had it in the password. Oh, what people will type into a computer when they think nobody is looking.
The irony is that routers are usually quite a bit easier to hack due to the fact they run some sort of really light weight version of linux.
However, "most" of that traffic is going to be going though via SSH.. really if you are able to get into their bash_history, they're already fucked in a big way.
Can't crack 'em all, but if your mentality is to just have the biggest number of roots among your friend or whatever, then you just worry about cracking what you can get, or maybe watching and waiting until you can own something bragworthy.
What I think is important for people to bear in mind is that if we're operating under a situation where traffic is being recorded en masse (and I would suggest that the fact that there exists specialize equipment to be able to record network traffic wholesale indicates that somebody's doing the recording) that all your public-key encryption is potentially going to be popped open like a $2 whore some day when we have quantum computers do the job for us, or whatever other new marvel of technology comes around.
Hell, even the guys who thought they had encrypted the dead sea scrolls got punked by some information theorists who though it would be fun thing to crack.
I could see that being more of a useful tool to a kid just looking to show off to his friends.
I am actually on the other side of the firewall most of the time trying to test and patch.
I think putting data "on the internet" that you don't want other people to get to.
I've done a lot of work in the medical information security sector, where everything is HIPPA and what not.
So I've sort of turned to having a intranet that is actually closed from the "internet" for data that actually need to be secure.
As someone who regularly roots Linux boxes, I can say that this false, it's an idealized situation that ignores reality.
The reality is that throughout the years all flavours of linux have had severe security vulnerability that allow for privileage escallation, and so has windows, they're both OS's coded by fallible humans and have well documented history of issues.
Windows back in the XP and prior days was less secure for a number of reasons, which have been fixed in modern versions of the OS.
There's a full disk permission system, system RAM is protected, user space is separated and apps are installed to specific user areas and not the entire system, system level components require an admin password.
The major difference is that Linux is a harder to use operating system, especially from the command line and is overwhelmingly used in server environments, a significantly larger portion of the Linux user base are IT professionals in some way and so know not to run things as root and what binaries are generally safe and what aren't. If the same level of user runs something like Vista onwards the OS is approximately as safe.
The vast majority of windoze memes from the old school linux crowd are now out of date, the security is just fine with windows, and stupid users are always going to do stupid things, no OS can protect against that.
I don't see why completely isolated networks aren't the norm, of course now with thumbdrives (*cough* STUXNET *cough*) not even physical separation works anymore. RFID is just total insanity. Barnaby Jack wound up dead pretty quick after he demonstrated the ability to hack implanted medical devices in that Las Vegas conference the other year. Are the security people even trying?
And as far as HIPPA goes, it just so happens I was in the hospital the other month getting an IV put in, and this nobody IV tech starts asking me about whether or not I had fun visiting XYZ country years ago based on the fact that this computer terminal had given him a list of the vaccinations I'd gotten back then. I have enough old people in the family to understand that compromises sometimes have to be made in the interests of getting people taken care of properly, but how many other people, HIPPA or not, have my medical records? They even made FDR shit in a special outhouse so that the enemy couldn't literally reverse-engineer his poop to discover his medical condition. I'm no FDR, but what are people thinking?
>As someone who regularly roots Linux boxes
>Linux is a harder to use operating system
>the security is just fine with windows
You realize you sound like a fucking retard?
You regularly root linux boxes but you find it harder to use than Window's million windows of bull shit to click though for server admin work?
Do you even know, or can you even articulate security concerns in modern Windows versions that have to do with the ambiguity with how processes and services interact with each-other?
What is the point of this full retard post?
Idiots with thumb drives will always be a thing, you've just got to anticipate that and make sure fucktards can't mount these devices at all, which is what I do.
As far as the actual security of your medical data. I can tell you pretty much without a doubt that it is really fucking out there.
You have "laws" made up by congress and enforced by bureaucrats running windows xp.
So, while people make a big stink about it on paper, and I had to really step up my game to build my little security consulting company. In reality most doctors use budget software and badly implemented "bulk" HIPPA compliant CRMs.
Oh, just a side story of a system I ran across personally...
Someone had a SMS "appointment reminder system", they had piggy backed onto the whole medical records database to get access to appointments and "suggest" appointments to patients based on their medical history.
Basically it ended up shitting out people's medical history ( and some times even SS numbers ) over SMS to wrong phone numbers, never mind phone numbers that have been changed.
>You regularly root linux boxes but you find it harder to use than Window's million windows of bull shit to click though for server admin work?
No I never said that, re-read what I said. I said it's a harder OS to use, not that I find it harder to use, I'm Head of ICT as my day job and have been a sys ad using linux and windows boxes for a bit over a decade.
Linux isn't targeted at end users and doesn't have any real decent GUIs to speak of, it requires more knowledge to do basic tasks, and is especially unfriendly to novices with regards to troubleshooting, the average novice user cannot use a CLI and 99% of the time when you have an issue in linux you're stuck in the CLI to tweak some file or other by hand.
>Window's million windows of bull shit to click though for server admin work?
Most server admins create scripts for both linux and windows to automate tasks which is why for power users linux is not any harder to use, the type of approach to your work in both environments is nearly identical.
>Do you even know, or can you even articulate security concerns in modern Windows versions that have to do with the ambiguity with how processes and services interact with each-other?
I know I can root both linux and windows machines with ease because both have a long laundry list of privilege escalation issues, the fact that I can do this without having deep knowledge of how processes and services interact with each other is a testament to how they're both insecure and go through exploitation/fix cycles.
As >>60028711 correctly said, just simply visit any good vulnerability database, put in your linux/windows version and you'll find a nice long list of scripts you can copy/paste and run to literally root the box in 2 seconds
I've been doing penetration testing for years now so I've done both red team and blue team work and regularly pop both windows and Linux boxes of all flavours.
Of course not goy, only Bernie "Free Stuff" Sanders can make free as in freedom software work. Trump is big business and big business wants unfree software.