Why is no one talking about the new Tarantino movie? Anyone seen it?
Didn't seem to be that successful, tho.
>Budget $44 million
>Box office $29.6 million
Bad luck (with Star Wars and all), bad movie or because of his comments on Cops?
It's pretty meh. 3 Hour movie, 90 minutes is slow as shit, Sam Jackson literally talks about raping a freezing dude for 15 minutes, then its another 60 minute blood bath like every other tarantino movie. Kind of entertaining I guess. But very empty and vapid like every other movie he's ever made.
>Why is no one talking about the new Tarantino movie?
We did. Like 2 weeks ago Hans. And we all agreed that Reservoir Dogs was good and the rest just pander to idiots who like violence and loud noises.
I saw Django Unchained since all my friends were going in the hopes that there'd be some nuance like in Inglourious Basterds, where the Nazis were the only sympathetic characters.
Instead it was total shit and I resolved not to see another Tarantino movie ever again, especially with his BLM cuckshit.
The whole movie was a setup to make a white guy suck a black mans cock
No it fucking wasn't you fucking idiot.
Plus he was probably lying about it.
Plus that scene was to make you dislike the character more. You're supposed to hate almost all of them if you're a rational person.
He only says shit to please minorities just so he can get away with a lot of the non-politically correct shit in his movies. Oh, and he really loves saying nigger.
''Confederate flag is the american swastika!"
''USA has a racism problem!''
Honestly it sucked. Nothing new, nothing fresh. I watched a lot of asian movies and I had a strong feeling I've seen the story somewhere else and it felt like tarantino just ripped another asian movie.
Because no one cares plus a small amount of Star Wars
Tarantino has only ever directed a few "good" films (Kill Bill 1/2 and Jackie Brown)
That's not actually what happens. Jacksons character is a liar and a manipulator who likes to push buttons.
IF you watch the movie the scene right before the 'blowjob story' scene sets it up.
I mean tarantino is still a cuck but there's no reason to lie.
Thats why they call em the hateful 8. you werent supposed to like anybody
-the woman is a gang member that kills a bunch of people. also a bitch
-the nigger is a lying fuck that walks around with a fake lincoln letter
-the cop is a dixie hick punchable faggot
-the hangman is fucking stupid to not kill the bitch woman
-the fed general is fucking stupid because hes fucking demented
-the cow puncher is a lying faggot that killed the best character
-the british guy is a faggot as well
-bob the mexican is the only likable character.
Tarantino, having been shunned by all of us who know all about his disgusting fetishes, turned to niggers and Tumblrinas for companionship, and thus became a race traitor SJW faggot.
He never knew however that conservatives were the biggest customers of his products so now his shitty film is floundering whereas if he didn't anger us, we'd probably see it just because he has made okay movies in the past. Now at least I want nothing to do with it, especially since it's been reviewed mediocrely.
In contrast with the extras
-Jody is a smooth talking criminal that have a high bounty on his head like shanks. also willing to sacrifice anything for his sister
-minnie is a sassy black woman that makes good coffee
-sweet dave is a stock image model
-ob johnson is a pretty cool guy
-six horse judy is best waifu
-gemma is a stock nigger
-the other black guy is also a stock nigger
-the other ob johnson is a stock character
-the guy that sucked the dingus is a stock flashback character
I always thought Quentin was overrated as fuck. His movies are so predictable. Over the top violence to the point of being comical, and some bullshit story of vengeance. I feel like if you see one of his movies, you've seen them all. It's clear that he's an autistic edgelord. Hes basically a basement dwelling autistic neckbeard all grown up who by chance hit it big and now gets to spread his edgelord movies to the public under the guise of it being "angsty" and "artistic". Any meaning in his movies are a hollow shell, the public will fill that shell with whatever the fuck they want.
Tldr his movies are gay and so is he
Pulp Fiction is the only worthy film, after seeing that...well everything related to what you just said.
Good job anglobros.
Most of those themes were in pulp fiction though, it wasn't a bad movie but it's overrated as Shit, Quentin is autistic and his only schtick is unrealistically over the top violence with a faux artistic feel to it. I say faux because there's nothing of artistic substance to them, they are just shot in a way that gives the impression that it's artistic.
Last movie of his I saw was inglorious bastards and that was one of the biggest piles of Shit I've ever seen
>3 hour long movie
>Nothing exciting happens
>Pushing Tarantino's bullshit beliefs
>Watching a guy get sucked off by another guy and calling it entertainment
Na man, Na. Go back to building watches, or jet engines, Hans. Bullshit like this will rot your mind.
Agreed. I was referring that if you've seen Pulp Fiction...you've seen every Quentin movie.
Haven't seen Inglorious Bastards for such fucking reasons.
He's a bad child who never grew out of the "Bad attention is good attention". Judging from the broken home he was raised I can understand why he adopted that mindset but most people with it who become adults either evolve past it or end up in jail or worse because of it.
But literally his schtick is pushing the envelope. Resevoir dogs or kill bill would be tame by today's standards so you had the utterance of nigger every five seconds in Django, gratuitous violence in Inglorious (I'm surprised you didn't get some of that post war nazi-S&M fetish stuff (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_exploitation ) with Jewish concentration camp members), and violence and luridness in hateful eight.
Violence in a movie isn't bad, it's just clear he does it for the shock factor.
His movies to his fanboys are like "The Tale of Scrotie McBooger Balls" in south park. People read into things that aren't there. There is no substance to any of his movies except garbage, but that's not acceptable to them. They'll invent reasons as to why his movies are good. After all, we've all been told he's a good director, it's conditioning, but I challenge anyone to actually break apart his movies, they're all the same basic storyline. The guy probably got picked on in high school, so he makes movies about someone who was wronged who comes back to get revenge on the ones who wronged him/her.
Bam, saved you $15 dollars on all future QT films.
Lol. And now he's re-tooling his own movies. I wanted to reach through the dvdscr and choke him for blatantly redoing Tim Roth's belly shot/scream spiel from 'Dogs'.
I saw part of it myself. It was unwatchable, I don't think it was a true dvdrip, the resolution was pretty low. That's why I just went to see the movie instead.
I'm sure it's the case for lots of people.
A couple reasons it's bombing:
> Tarantino is an obnoxious public personality
> His political stances are obviously pandering
> His movies have nothing interesting to say about race or anything else
> He pidgeon-holed himself into crap b-movie pop genres, and his shtick isn't surprising anymore
> His racial themes have morphed from seeming anti-PC, like in Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction, to seeming pro-PC and SJW.
> He seems to worship black people, and the only people who get off on that are a minority of elite, bourgie, rich liberals
> it's not resonating with people of lower classes who have to live with the criminality and hypocrisy of black folks and SJWs
> all these richfags think they're the 99%, but they're the living characatures of the 1%, and they don't understand why the only people who think they're cool are hipster trustfund kids
tl;dr he's a cuck
It's not yet mastered for DVD. I am going to see it in 70mm here in two weeks. I watched the screener so I could get the story, and I am excited to see some of the visuals in 70mm.
I have read a few books about cinema history, and I've seen a lot of the classics. It gets to be really tiresome to watch his movies sometimes because you are constantly thinking, "That shot is from X, that picture in the background is from Y, that character is from Z." I wish he would just do his own shit instead of trying to jerk off his filmcock for the audience.
>Samuel L. Jackson's character is a former Union Major in the Civil War who committed atrocities during the war, tortured a man years after, and is meant to be hated by the entire audience but has some characteristics appealing to black people
>The former Confederate Captain is depicted as a racist good ol' boy who committed atrocities during and after the war, is meant to be hated by the entire audience, but has some characteristics that are appealing to white people
>Both of them team up at the end to kill the real bad guys
Honestly if you get offended by this movie you're no better than emotional SJWs. Plus Samuel L. Jackson's character gets his cock and balls shot off which completely makes up for the fact that he made some dude suck his dick.
I was gonna leave this thread be, but...
Imagine if a true visionary writer/director had QTs sweet ride. The films would truly be modern day masterpieces.
I once fancied myself a filmmaker, and it buttpains me to see the resources get wasted.
As much as I love cinema and good movies I could never be a film maker. I wish QT would break his mold and make something different. The dude has the fucking talent.
I really wish we got to see more Korean directors directing Western films.
The only reason I'm going to watch it, is because the legendary Ennio Morricone did the score. First original score he's done in like 40 years or some shit. He is the sound of Spaghetti Western.
Meh. 6/10 movie for me.
It starts off decent. The actual cinematography and sets are amazing. It looks beautiful. But the story is full of stupid shit. At first they set it up to be kind of a mystery, and it builds some decent tension, but then it just turns fucking stupid really quickly. Like they reveal who the "bad guy" is, and it's just dumb. Then everyone basically dies in the most over the top retarded B movie shit I have ever seen. Just as a movie it seems like it's constantly bouncing between wanting to be taken seriously and being absolutely stupid. It's weirdly excellent in parts and simultaneously grade A garbage in others, so you're left with this really uneven experience.
Of course, there's the dumb racist scene that everyone always talks about. Samuel L Jackson makes some confederate general's son crawl naked through the snow so that he can mouth rape him and it's supposed to be some kind of poetic justice since confederates are racist devils or whatever but it's just pointless antagonizing filth that is meant to be porn for leftists. It's just out of place, distracting, and unnecessary to anything in the film. It just made me think that Tarantino is a closet homosexual that wants to be roughly fucked by blacks or something because the scene just feels so out of place.
But tl;dr is that the film is a mess that is nonetheless impressive at parts.
He wasn't lying. There is literally a scene where the nigger makes the white man crawl thru the snow to suck his "long black dick" for warmth. The entire movie is a fiction so whether that particularize clip was "lie" is a moot point.
Yeah QT is gay faggot who probably was abused by his mother's boyfriends when he was younger
There are more gay interracial sex scenes in his movies than straight sex scenes
The dude has problems desu
Dick sucking scene didn't bother me.
It could have just been made up, like the Lincoln letter, just to provoke the old general.
Also, he gets shot in the nuts by a white guy so that kind of rounds it out in terms of karma.
There's so much racism back and forth you can't really hate it.
"Thats Major West to you"
My intent was to say that the entire movie is a peice of cuck shit. If you had a brain you would see his cuck argument that the scene didn't matter, you fucking braindead nigger.
see dude this is the logical and rational response.
There is always a lot of talk of celebrities being cucks and all that shit. Guarantee most people that are talking about this film on 4chan didn't see it. There is nothing PC or SJW about it.
>Niggers gets his balls shot off by a white man.
>White man that shoots the balls off is a literal prize being worth 50 grand and is the head of a criminal gang.
>The female leads gets beaten the fuck up by men.
>A shit ton of Mexican stereotypes, jokes, and quips.
>They call niggers "Niggers" probably 100+ times.
If you look at it this way then Tarantino actually sounds like a gigantic racist and very anti-pc.
But no... people see one scene, or read one line from a script and they judge. /pol/ is no different from the SJWs they hate in terms of judgement and people that disagree with the hivemind.
>over the top violence to the point of being comical
That's exactly the point, dipshit.
None of his films have "meaning." They're pure entertainment. Some of them have themes, but none of them deliver a message. He doesn't argue otherwise either.
You sound like a YouTube commenting teenager.
His dad was patterned off of Confederate irregulars like Bloody Bill Anderson and Nathan Bedford Forrest. It's assumed that he is a clansman since he would be growing in the reconstruction South the son of a raider that refused to surrender.
>paying for movies
>not knowing about glorious Greek cinema
>when are the debns coming back?
We loaned some money that we were gonna pay back by 2020 but then the market crashed in 2008 and we couldn't afford to anymore, so we fixed that by paying back denbts by loaning money that we are gonna pay back by 2050.
What don't you understand?
Most people aren't going to spend money, and time on two movies in less than a month. Star Wars is cucking everything.
The Revenant will be best picture because it is made by Mexicans, and pro-immigration anti-Trump. The Oscars are a liberal political award show, same as the Nobel Prize.
Bad movie because his glorification of nigger rape and obvious hateful sentiment against white people.
Anti white hollywood propaganda, nothing more. Propaganda is rarely ultra-blatant and obvious, if you recall Goebbels words about the Russian propaganda not being subtle enough, and about less is more style thinking.. youd know the jews today are being more subtle than ever most of the time.
Just look at all the cuck shit.
it's a dirt cheap indie leftist attempt at the deconstruction of the archetypal middle class family. evident of the towering inferiority complex of my people. the fact that it draw attention is a complete fluke.
"a touch of spice" is the only somewhat respectable greek movie in half a century. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0378897/?ref_=nm_knf_i1
Personally I liked it better than Django Unchained and Inglorious Bastards, just something fun about a racist white man and a racist black man banding together to hang a cunt by her neck until death.
Really though everything that could go wrong did go wrong with this release
>lotta people protesting seeing the movie because the cop shit
>its opening up after SW but still having to compete with that hype machine which was going to wreck anything competition for weeks and weeks
>the movie leaking out online in decent quality before its even out in theaters
>decent amount of ongoing hurtburt about the cock sucking scene from both some whites and blacks when it leaked so long ago even though it amounted to nothing compared to everything else
Also the first movie I've ever seen where Walton Goggins actually was still alive when the movie ended so theres that too
Incredibly boring movie. Worst I've seen for ages.
Django was like x1000 times better and that says a lot.
I can't believe that some people actually like this movie. It's like a fucking theatre play with the crappiest "twist" in movie history - the movie is way too predictable.
If it didn't have Tarantinos name on it - it would be considered a B movie (which it still is).
The entire movie revolves just around the blowjob scene. The movie is called 'Hateful Eight' = Hate fellat (-io) ffs.
There is a 100% chance that Tarantino made this movie because his homosexual black power fuckbuddy Obongo told him to do so after mouthfucking Tarantinocuck at some sex party in Washington.
Tarantino made 3 of the best crime films ever back in the 90s. Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction and to a lesser extent Jackie Brown are three fantastic films.
Ever since, he's only produced mainstream garbage. I'm sure his new fans wouldn't even appreciate his first films.
You haven't seen the movie and you're just riled up because you take anything you hear on pol seriously
He lied and makes it clear in the scene he's lying and simply uses it to kill the Confederate general who had ordered some black prisoners to die or some shit
Basically check out his interview about Star Wars and Disney. He was meant to have 2 weeks showing at this great theatre then Disney 2 weeks before that. Anyway Disney got greedy and said they wanted 4 weeks showing or they'd refuse to show the film to the entire state. Disney are cunts end of.
Plus Renegade Rebels, Dignity in Defeate, Mannix Mauraders... sounds a whole lot like Klux Klux Klan to me.
My favorite character & movie of the decade.
I love how he was able to spot the lies and liars immediately, its probably an ability most overlooked but during the entire money he's the only one who could call peoples bluffs
Also Hollywood has been going down for years. Almost all their movies are repulsive to normal people.
Also Netflix stole their thunder some by releasing the comedy Rediculous Six a few days before the premier.