By popular demand, A dump of the .webms from my muzzie folder! You're all welcome to controob!!
I actually have more, but webms with sound or over the file size won't upload. Fucking hirohito.
.webms also take longer than pics to upload
And now I'm getting an "upload failed" error with no explanation. I hope that doesn't continue.
I probably post this one the most these days
The thread has already fallen to page 6. If anyone cares, we're going to need bumping.
It's street theater where people are comparing refugees to the Islamic State. muslims see the performance and chimp out, but the actors came prepared with bouncers to keep them safe.
The australians really like this one. Watch the guy's eyes track the sword at the end. 2spoopy
The guy behind the tree *might* be a jew.
I had a really good one of an aircraft thermal camera watching muslims fucking donkeys, but sadly it's too big.
this one's a lot of fun to post as well.
Charlie Hebdo Kosher Mart culmination.
Need another bump lads, help me out.
This one isn't a muslim video, but I stuck it in the folder anyway.
Thanks bro! We're still on page 7 tho =(
It's okay, I'm almost out of videos.
I stand corrected. We're back on page 1
Penultimate video. Sorry to disappoint.
Aaaaand this is it. That's all my muzzie .webms that 4chan will load. I hope you all enjoyed the thread! You're of course welcome to add whatever you have. Post 'em if you got 'em!
Oh, cares about this thread I mean. If you want to save the images and get more, the thread needs to be bumped. I'm not under some delusion of grandeur that I'm changing the world over here.
But, as to your specific question, I think there are reasonable, simple things that you (yes YOU) can do. Start by educating yourself about the issues. Next save videos and images like these. Third promulgate them so they get exposure (what the SJWs call signal boosting). Just "having the conversation" is a step in the right direction.
Further, I would say that you don't just "happen to be an American." If you're an American, it's because your parents made you one. Your parents also made our society what it is, if only in their own small ways. Together, all of us in our society make it what it is. If you think our society is valuable (as I think is indisputable) then to contribute to its value with political engagement is also valuable. It's also something that's easy for you to do. Just reposting these videos on 4chan, or other internet media, spreads the message and advances the ball down the field.
Oh look a fellow webm anon!
I too saved all of their GoPro footage!
Despite all the shit ISIS has done they have given us fucktons of ammunition showing people what kebab are really like when they don't have the west looking at them to keep up appearances.
I don't think it's smart to force people to watch anything. I do, however, think that putting the videos out there so that normies *can* watch these videos has tremendous effect. Especially when they're repeated to the point of memetics.
I guess what I meant was if they were put on MSM pages where a normie could easily watch if he so chose but wouldn't accidentally stumble upon it. I think it would finally kill the islamaphobia meme and make them see how serious this is.
So, the problem with that is the curators who make the editorial decisions over what to present in the main stream media will never put them up. It runs counter to their self determined standards, which really come out of Columbia University School of Journalism. Basically, they're not pro-left, so they don't make the air.
But that's part of the beauty of the 21st century. We don't need to rely on those people any more as deciders of our media consumption. The internet is the ultimate equalizer. You can spread those videos through 4chan, twitter, youtube, liveleak, facebook, and other outlets. Although you have to be careful, because those outlets are mimicking the MSM with their censorship tactics. Nevertheless, that's where you can expose normies to the message.
If I might make a recommendation, play hard to get when you do it. Telling someone they're not allowed to see something is probably the best way to motivate them to hunt it down and look at it.
im sure these sandniggras a wetting their hijabs right now
Good catch, anon! I wonder why they're there. Who told them to go there? Since you know they didn't decide to go on their own. For what purpose? What do they hope to learn from this? Why is it two cars instead of one or twenty?
The one with his boot on his head yes I remember 1997 as well. Good times.
I'm talking about muslims invading the west as that was the original point. Would current liberal attitudes towards muslim coming to the west change if these videos were mainstream.
>The one with his boot on his head yes I remember 1997 as well. Good times.
Shit anon, it's like we're brothers. Want to come over and fuck my sister?
>Would current liberal attitudes towards muslim coming to the west change if
To answer that we would need to determine Where current liberal attitudes come from. Where do you think that is?
They're not, though. They're really not. They recruit muslims out of western universities all over the world. Just look at how well produced their newer videos are. That's not done by illiterate amateurs.
hey bro were shooting a video so we can either do this the easy way, or we can slowly burn and torture you for two weeks and then kill you
they got a guy to jump under tank tracks ffs
No reason to believe it's not real. Looking at it objectively the things they are blowing up are just worthless meatbags which cause them problems so why keep them around. Looking at their size now and the way they are expanding they probably won't run out of meat bags to play their saw game either. Unless they all decide to come over here that is.
Only thing you can do is not get caught then. I'm not going out holding out Refugees Welcome signs (and I don't plan to) but seeing these videos can you really tell these people to just fuck off and go back?
Actually you have all the same videos that I do.
I have webms I made of all the old Serbian kebab conflicts as well as a bit of Afghan war(the original one) on my other computer but unfortunately they are all on my other computer.....in Arizona
Going there this summer so if I can remember I will upload all of them in a thread while I am there
This one looks weird. None of them are tied up. You'd think they'd stand up and try to take his gun or something. Even if there are a bunch of other guys behind him they could at least take one out and if they all attacked the same time probably a couple more. Instead of lying there and taking the bullet that is. It's also strange how the body or pocket or whatever is censored of the guy with black pants and black shirt. Either they are really drugged or it's fake because I don't believe anyone would just take the bullet like this.
>Even if there are a bunch of other guys behind him they could at least take one out and if they all attacked the same time probably a couple more.
The muslims really just don't think that way. It doesn't enter their minds to fight back.
Also, it's not just the muslims. The French at the Bataclan reacted the same way. They thought their best chance to survive was to play dead. No restraints. No threats. The shooting started, and they all laid there and waited to be shot.
Of course, the muslims interpret this as allah being on their side.
No doubt the people getting killed in there want to get away from this. Are you saying we should blame them for what those lunatics are doing? It's possible I guess that among them are ISIS militants but the majority probably isn't. From what I hear the majority of refugees aren't even syrian war refugees, most of them are economical refugees from Africa or wherever. The thing is nobody knows where they are from because they just come pouring in here without any documents and where do you send them back to then? We can make refugee estimates all we want, whether it's a million or 2 million in the end nobody actually fucking knows. You can't expect every one of them to make an asylum request. The system is just too god damn inefficient right now. Too much bureaucracy. The real issue though is that we can't control the flow of refugees. We have to make clear that you only get in if you can prove you are from Syria (or whatever asylum accepted country) so all those niggers hoping to make big money in Germany don't even bother coming.
Sorry to make a point by point response, but your post has so many issues that I feel I must.
>No doubt the people getting killed in there want to get away from this. Are you saying we should blame them for what those lunatics are doing?
Evil is not a country. Crime is not a neighborhood. PEOPLE do bad things. When you bring in the people, you bring the bad things they do with them.
>From what I hear the majority of refugees aren't even syrian war refugees
So why are you incentivizing them to come? Why is that an argument for why you should take more?
>where do you send them back to then?
They invaded your nation on their own, they can fuck off back on their own. Dump them all in Syria and let them fend for themselves. Not your problem.
>in the end nobody actually fucking knows.
HOW DOES THAT SUPPORT BRINGING THEM IN
>The real issue though is that we can't control the flow of refugees.
But such advanced nations as Hungary and Romania can?
I see the line of blood from that girl on the right--the one that flows all the way to the left, and it just infuriates me. I read CAIR and Al Jazeera's self-righteous bullshit on FB and it infuriates me.
They do it so the bodies will be carried by the river to downstream settlements in order to threaten and terrorize the people who live there. It's sort of a "you're next" message.
It is a very ancient technique.
>Evil [...] them.
That's some deep shit man. Sorry I'm not in the mood to discuss philosophy.
>So why are you incentivizing them to come?
I'm not doing anything. In case you didn't know, in Germany the common man has nothing to say. Mama Merkel said we are taking everyone and that's how it is. If you disagree you are a Neo-Nazi. Considering there is no term-limit for the Chancellor we might as well just assume we will have to deal with the hag for another 20 years as long as the same retards keep voting for the same parties.
>Why is that an argument for why you should take more?
Why? Are we back at philosophy? What I'm saying is that we wouldn't have much of a problem with handling the refugees if we only took those which are actually permitted by the law and not just every single one who comes over here.
>They invaded your nation on their own, they can fuck off back on their own. Dump them all in Syria and let them fend for themselves. Not your problem.
Really smart. I wonder if you know anything about how the world works. Just send them all to Syria? Even though it's pretty obvious most of them aren't from Syria? And what would the rest of the world say? What would the leftist media say? There would be a national and international uproar. The people here also seem to feel guilty about old war crimes so they feel like it's their obligation.
>But such advanced nations as Hungary and Romania can?
EU border states. In a way it is their duty.
Listen man, Germany is OBLIGED to take refugees. It's in the Grundgesetz. What I mean is that we efficiently work out the people that are not fit to receive Asylum status and send them back already and fast. Then we wouldn't have much of a refugee problem because most refugees wouldn't even come here.
As for your pic, I know that the middle guy isn't an ISIS militant but a Syrian rebel. Don't know anything about the other two. I generally don't trust unsourced 4chan images.
What a great amount of time you spent chopping these up. If your goal was to redpill normies though these are all fucking worthless.
Don't have enough of your own identity to stop yourself from using retarded memespeak?
>>Evil [...] them.
>That's some deep shit man. Sorry I'm not in the mood to discuss philosophy.
Sorry, but that is THE most important thing I posted. It's not philosophy, it's reality. You have the muslims. They are going to rape and murder. It sucks that it's an uncomfortable subject for you, but hiding from it won't make it any easier to deal with in the future when they're killing you.
Look, before this, what was the worst crime your people had to face? Herr Fritzl? Compare that to the Rotherham rape case in England, or the Paris attacks in November. That's where you're headed. If you don't face the uncomfortable reality, you'll be wringing your hands later asking "why did this happen?"
>in Germany the common man has nothing to say. Mama Merkel said we are taking everyone and that's how it is.
Oh. So you're ruled by your dictator. Well shit, why even care, then? Just let your nation be destroyed, and your people genocided. After all, you can do nothing, right?
>I'm saying is that we wouldn't have much of a problem with handling the refugees if we only took those which are actually permitted by the law
But you also said that is impossible. So which is it?
>Just send them all to Syria? Even though it's pretty obvious most of them aren't from Syria?
But THEY say they ARE from Syria. So if they are, they shouldn't have a problem. If they're not, their problems are caused by their own lies. How is that your problem? Fuck them.
>what would the rest of the world say?
>What would the leftist media say?
>There would be a national and international uproar.
>The people here also seem to feel guilty
>EU border states. In a way it is their duty.
What's your duty? Paying Greece?
>It's in the Grundgesetz.
Great for you. They want Shariah. I'm pretty sure they care more about their laws than you care about yours. In fifty years which one do you think will prevail?
>we efficiently work out the people that are not fit to receive Asylum status
Noble goal. You have no idea how to do it, though.
>send them back already and fast
YOU ALREADY SAID THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE
FUCK you're arguing against yourself and you CAN'T EVEN SEE IT
>most refugees wouldn't even come here
They will ALWAYS go there when you fucking PAY THEM to go there!
>the middle guy isn't an ISIS militant but a Syrian rebel.
Who gives a fuck? He's a traumatized warfighter with a backwards ideology that tells him rape and murder is good. Do you really care what side he's on when his PTSD is triggered and he blows up a hospital full of Germans? He's not converting to Lutheranism over there!
I cut that out to save on space, blame the 2000 limit. I don't know about attaching a Rapist and Murderer sign to an entire ethnic group. What you are suggesting is just too out of this world anyway. Nobody is gonna change the GG so Germany doesn't have to take refugees.
>So you're ruled by your dictator.
>After all, you can do nothing, right?
As long as the majority silently agrees with the dictator and the rest is branded as equals with the most hated group in this countries history? Yes.
Politicians. The ones in power to be exact. The people too probably (but who cares about that).
>What's your duty? Paying Greece?
Looks like it.
>Great for you. They want Shariah. I'm pretty sure they care more about their laws than you care about yours. In fifty years which one do you think will prevail?
Do you want to hear a /pol/ answer or the realistic one?
>Noble goal. You have no idea how to do it, though.
Tell them they won't get money and won't be accepted?
>They will ALWAYS go there when you fucking PAY THEM to go there!
Don't pay them then? We are paying them to come here? Haven't heard about that.
>He's a traumatized warfighter with a backwards ideology that tells him rape and murder is good.
How do you know what he is? Last time I checked those guys were allied with the west.
Listen don't try to smartass me. You shouldn't spend so much time on /pol/ and actually check on how the world works. You are delusional. Your ideology might just be as dangerous as theirs. Clearly you are incapable of discussing realistically so I'll drop it here.
So, you're defeatist. But you think I'm delusional.
Suppose that one out of a hundred muslim was a rapist or murderer. But one out of a thousand Germans was. Would you still say you should import so many muslims? Would you still say that one ought not to tarnish the entire group by the actions of a few?
How many new rapists and murderers should you import?
But you don't care. You don't think you can have any impact. Just let the politicians destroy your people. The real problem is me not being "realistic."
What it that projectile that goes fling through the crowd chopping people up? Was this some kind of IED with a shaped charge? The only thing that could generate such kinetic energy that it keeps cutting through people like they're made of tissue paper...
> CAIR and al jazeera self-righteous
The thing most westerners aren't prepared for is how DEEP the semantics game is with Muslims. They LITERALLY and fully define words like "terrorism" or "human rights" completely and utterly within the framework of Islam and sharia law. These terms have no universal meaning, only a specific meaning with respect to Muslim rights; non-Muslims are denied rights by the Quran. Even the word "peace" is completely defined with respect to Islam.
The problem I have if that Western leaders aren't complete idiots. Western media isn't staffed by people who were incapable of graduating college. They're not illiterates. At some point, critical views of Islam HAVE to bleed into their little bubbles, and they have to have HEARD some of these more troubling truths. The entire diplomatic corps of the US state department can't be all blind and dumb indoctrinated fools. There are people in there who speak the lanugages of the foreign broadcasts they translate, and know what the meanings are in the minds of the people where these "extremist" views are being promoted.
These people learned arabic by READING THE QURAN, at least in part. It's impossible there are not exposed to these contradictions with what our elected leaders are preaching to the public.
I can excuse the average person for having misinformation they got from the liberal media, but it strikes me as pure evil that our leaders and journalists push such extreme lies about an ideology that wants to destroy us for being non-believers.
I think you overestimate the value of college education with regard to learning truth. It was the greatest success of Soviet KGB to infiltrate and subvert American Universities. Now we have had many generations of Americans going through that system to the point that they are incapable of resisting the ideology they were indoctrinated to believe.
Or, how about, you enforce your borders and keep them all the fuck out, by force if necessary.
I hear the exact same attitude as yours in the US.
Why are people like you so against enforcing borders?
I think you oversimplify my point. I'm talking about the probability that NO ONE ever realizes that these are falsehoods. I say this because, like Col. Stephen Coughlin, or the agent from DHS who knew about the Islamist cell in San Bernardino, when they are ACTIVELY REMOVING PEOPLE who expose these truths about Islam, there is no way they ahve never heard of these dissenting views.
IFF they have heard of these dissents, then at least a FEW of these "useful idiots" have gone to debunk them, even just for their own piece of mind. Obviously, some have discovered it is truth. When they discover it is truth, they naturally remain silent, but sometimes they break the silence. If they meet someone else with doubt, they break the silence. In the soviet time, this was called "whispering", meaning people are speaking in a way that is illegal in private. The state was terrified of whisperers, which is why you have things like Stasi in East Germany, not just to police the average public, but to find mid-level party, military, and police who are disturbed by the truth and are not silent.
The war on terror has been going on a long time. Many, many people are leaking to the press, some of them former high ranking US officer.
TO keep supressing this is not just innocent mistake, it is willful. This makes it evil. They know, but they allow the enemy to make progress anyway. You must ask why.
It doesn't matter if they have heard of dissent about islam.
These people are ideologically demoralized. You could lay out irrefutable facts before them, and they would reject those facts all the way to the execution chamber. They believe to their toenails that communism/multiculturalism/cultural Marxism is good, and anyone who says otherwise is a bigot (which is tantamount to the worst thing anyone could ever be). We have had sixty years or more of hiring practices that purged the "silence breakers" and put the apparatchiks in positions of power.
I don't really know what a "whisperer" is. I do know what happened to edward snowden, though. Did that traitor go to Oklahoma, or to Moscow?
Your situation is quite differently from ours. Our refugees aren't coming from next doors. It's not as simple as building a wall. What do you propose we do? You do know that the EU has open borders right? Schengen Agreement ring a bell? Are we gonna patrol the whole border and when someone looks like a refugee we tell them they can't go past this point? Who is gonna pay for it? Who is actually gonna do it? Germany's pathetic excuse for an army? Forget it. As law dictates refugees need to make an asylum request in the country they entered the EU in and wait there until their request is processed. The borders that need to be watched are the EU borders and I'm all for that. However instead of doing things by force, building walls, having armed patrols why not remove the reason these people are coming in the first place? I'm not talking about the war refugees, I guess eliminating war in that region wouldn't be so simple. I'm talking about the economical migrants. Without the economical migrants (seems like most of them are African) which clog the whole system we'd have much less of a problem. Do you really think it's better to do things forcefully when it can be done otherwise? Just make it so they have to prove they are from Syria and you are done. The rest you can send back the day they arrived on. And you can bet your ass more will stop coming if all that happens is they get sent back because that journey sure as hell isn't fun or cheap for them either. If they all made requests in the countries they arrived in as the Dublin Regulation dictates we wouldn't even have to worry about economic migrants because those would be sent right back where they came from they way the came and we'd only get actual refugees which would no doubt be a manageable amount.
Somebody else making an entirely different point. Sorry man but you say we shouldn't take a single refugee, send them all to Syria and think of them all as rapists and murderers. Your statements are just so out of this world there is nothing to discuss. You can talk about what you think is right all you want but someday you have to look at reality, at something called law. We aren't taking refugees for fun you dingu.
Oh, that's easy to explain. Just wonder why people still whine about the bombing of Dresden, then multiply it by about a million.
But we're really not talking about America, are we?
Come on it's all just rapists and murderers isn't it? I don't see the problem. Let's just waste the entire middle east and have some white people move in after it stops being a radioactive wasteland.
And people whine about the bombing of Dresden? Sorry all I hear is death camps, 6 million and collective guilt. I find it kind of funny how no one ever mentions 25 million soviet casualties but always go crazy about the 6 million.
>I don't really know what a "whisperer" is.
He literally described it for you. It's the chatter among the aparatchiks as you called them; they know the official party line bullshit, so they can't openly say its wrong. When too many people know, and they start talking, it increases the risk of instability within a command structure or government. This is what precedes a coup.
Why do you think your NSA spies on your congress, or how Obama was able to purge the military of so many who weren't willing to be yes-men on his middle east policy?
It's amazing that Nixon was impeached just for breaking into a rival party's hotel room, but a president spies on another branch of government, and all his senior military, and no one blinks.
I believe Germanbros point here >>59846159
is: to learn who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. One might say, "to learn who matters, find out whose defamation, losses, pain, or humiliation matter above all others.