[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
One day, pedophilia and bestiality will be...
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 133
Thread images: 18
File: 1388096406209.png (191 KB, 800x600) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1388096406209.png
191 KB, 800x600
One day, pedophilia and bestiality will be progressive in western society.
>>
Minimum age of consent should be 14
Optimal age of consent should be 15

Anyone under the age of 14, I don't think would be capable of making an informed decisions.
>>
>>40548033
Why is your arbitrary age pulled out of a hat better than the next person's? AoC used to be 7 in America.
>>
>>40548054
>Why is your arbitrary age pulled out of a hat better than the next person's?

Brain development, and life experience. Like I said
>Anyone under the age of 14, I don't think would be capable of making an informed decisions.
>>
peadophilia and bestiality where actually pretty common in the victorian era.
>>
File: 1349323053603.jpg (3 KB, 125x125) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1349323053603.jpg
3 KB, 125x125
>>40548054

WATCH OUT EVERYONE

ARTY IS BACK

HERE TO PROVE ONCE AND FOR ALL

BEING A PEDO IS CHILL

BELIEBE HIM
>>
>>40547946

Bestiality and paedophilia used to be legal so it is fair to say that supporting them is more of a conservative or reactionary argument.
>>
>>40548083
Children were a lot less developed when the age of consent was 7. So why then has the age of consent gone up and not down with development?
>>
>>40548142
I don't know. Soccer moms? You tell me?
>>
>>40548083
I agree that children can't offer informed consent and that strangers or evil parents should be allowed to abuse children.

That said I do not believe all sexual contact with minors is inherently abusive, and its possible for pedos to legitimately love children and want them to grow and develop well.

I think that's pretty reasonable, and i think flatly tossing the possibility out or refusing to even look at it is unreasonable.
>>
>>40548170
Feminists raised the age of consent. It was -not- raised out of a concern for child welfare. It was because they wanted to raise the sexual value of middle aged disgusting women.
>>
>>40548181
Shouldn't be allowed*
>>
>>40548142
>>40548183


Are you SERIOUSLY talking about wanting to fuck 7 year olds man??

The age of consent is widely around 16 because that's the bare minimum of intelligence. Really, anyone under ~20 has no idea what they're doing, so you're lucky it's already so low. Anyone that wants a lower age of consent just wants to be able to manipulate younger children into having sex with them. Jesus man you can already legally go sweet talk an 18 year old, what the fuck is appealing about a 7 year old????
>>
>>40548203
>Why do people like what I don't like? How is such a thing even possible?
>>
>>40548183
You're a pedophile and should be shot. You don't even bother trying to veil your arguments with fake proof, you're just trying to justify your degeneracy to internet people to make yourself feel better.
>>
>>40548203
The law states that any adult with the functional equivalent of an 8 year old, or an IQ of 55, is capable of informed consent.

You literally do not know what you are talking about. Everything you have just said is basically a caricature of the typical mindless anti-pedo retard.
>>
>>40548230
Do you have any little brothers, sons or other cute relatives I can meet? :3
>>
>>40548228
You don't get to use that justification here, cunt. Anyone whose been around a 7 year old child knows they're barely fucking aware of the world around them. It's rape. I'm convinced you're just a troll now, no one is this stupid
>>
You know, I'm not surprised if it is.

Society is sexualizing fucking everything, and the more it's done, the more people will think to include in it.

Yo ho slippery slope, yeah, but it ain't slippery if people are fucking basting it with their jizz. It's fucking freefall then.

Fuck. The decadence will be here.
>>
>>40548228
It's cool bro. You do what you do and we will do what we do. That just happens to be locking peados up alongside murders.

Have fun. We will.
>>
>>40548230
You actually do pedos a service being such a blithering retard.
>>
>>40548183
You're a freak whose sick fetish will never be accepted. You'll always be hiding and pretending to be just like everyone else.

What a sad existence.
>>
>>40548258
OK enjoy your impotent revenge fantasy.
>>
>>40548183
Proof?
>>
>>40548253
They're 7, not 2. They are aware and they can make their own choices.
>>
>>40548267
Sure bro, keep thinking literally anyone will ever allow your bullshit to fly. First time you and your "consenting" child lover are exposed, you're fucked.
>>
>>40548183


Please provide me with proof / research that feminists did this.
>>
>>40548285
No, they can't.
>>
>>40548280
>Peados get locked up with other criminals
That's an important rage fantasy? Ha.
>>
>>40548288
Nah, you're pretty hard in denial of the way the world is spinning.

Enjoy your impotent revenge fantasy while you get relegated by society into the reject corner along with the rest of the bigots.
>>
>>40548241

Oh yeah, let's get their SAT score too while we're at it

Fuck you. I can't believe anyone would argue this much in favor of fucking little kids. First of all, an adult has been around longer than a child. They have simply been able to experience more things. It doesn't matter if some arbitrary score like IQ is low and they're a functional retard, they're an adult. You also won't physically harm them just by having sex with them.

>>40548228
>>40548285

Wahh I'm a childfucker and I don wanna be in trubble 4 it
>>
>>40548279
Doesn't need to be accepted. Under 10% of adult-child sex is reported :^)

>>40548282
>>40548293
Sure.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#Reforms_in_the_19th_and_20th_century

Ctrl+F "feminist"
>>
>>40548267
Agreed. Someone make some decent arguments against this guy instead of muh feels.

He kinda makes sense on the feminist part. I'll say that.
>>
>>40548285
There's obviously a huge difference between a 2 year old, and an 8 year old when it comes to intelligence, although I still doubt an 8 year old would be able to make such a choice, intelligently.
>>
>>40548296
Yes actually it is, you laughably clueless mental invalid. Sex offenders get their own wing. Its basically one big autistic circle jerk.

God its sublime watching you rejects fumble around trying to find a way to say something, anything, against pedos.
>>
>Y-you're just regurgitating f-feminist dogma.

Average Artful Dodger response when confronted with the truth that pedophilia is a mental disease. To e to find a new angle faggot, this is getting really old (unlike the unfortunate and unwilling kids you molest).
>>
>>40548325
Why? Young children are incredibly capable at most adult things. We just don't let them try.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sA0WDoTtTT8
>>
>>40548337
World wide? Wow! Oh wait. No. Paedos live short lives once they are caught. That's just our way. Please don't be intolerant.
>>
>>40548315
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#Reforms_in_the_19th_and_20th_century


No need to ctrl f - I am going to read the whole thing.


“Condemnation without investigation is the highest form of ignorance.”
– Albert Einstein
>>
>>40548308
>>40548315

ITT: Pedos vainly try to justify their degeneracy and are shot down by literally everyone and can just say "Y-you're just backwards thinking" or "E-enjoy your r-r-revenge fantasy haha, No one will every condemn my fetish in real life!"
>>
>>40548324
>>40548337


If the fact that the child you want to stick your dick in is 7 years old isn't a decent enough argument, you should be in prison

>>40548352

>kid can operate a front end loader
>means I can fuck him, right?

Christ
>>
>>40548352
Young children are incredibly capable at most adult things.

SOME children are capable of adult things. Some kids develop early, some later. 8 years old isn't when most children are developed enough to make such a choice, intelligently.
>>
>>40547946
>One day, pedophilia and bestiality will be progressive in western society.
and this is a bad thing why?
>>
File: 1419716463415.jpg (49 KB, 500x493) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1419716463415.jpg
49 KB, 500x493
>>40547946
luckily not in my or your lifetime, you walking waste of human resources
>>
>>40547946
God I hope not.
>>
>>40548389
He didn't say it was a bad thing.
>>
>>40548312
Its beautiful watching you seeth with absolutely nothing meaningful to post in the face of actual facts.

>able to experience more things
So what you're saying is anyone who has sex with a virgin is a rapist since virgins do not have life experience to consent to the sex hat they've never experienced before
>it doesn't matter if they have the exact same intelligence as an adult! They're an adult, that makes it OK somehow!
You sound like a molester.
>physically harm them
Yea because your tongue is just going to blow a hole through their cunt.
>>
>>40548389
oh, to add:
>newfags seriously responding to art admirer
please kill yourselves
>>
>>40548381
Why are you acting as if sex is complicated? It's simple, and done billions of times a year.

Also, why is children having sex with other children fine but involve an adult and it's Holocaust-tier outrage?
>>
>>40548412
>actual facts
You've posted literally nothing that could be even remotely argued as a fact in favor of pedophilia. It's all circumstantial bullshit.
>>
>>40548423
Of course it's fine but you must also accept that's it's fine if we lock you up. It's what makes us happy. Please don't judge.
>>
>>40548412

Okay, you're actually talking about molesting children.
>>
>>40548381
And you trust a pedophile to make that distinction?
>>
>>40548423
Hmmm, yeah you're right I guess. We should legalize child rape so a few sick fucks can get their rocks off. I mean it's so beneficial for children to be sexually interfered with.

>Implying kids initiate sexual relations with adults ever.

Nah, just kidding, it's abuse you sick cunt. Grooming a kid then fucking them is appalling. Kids are easily misled, whatever "consent" you manage to ply from them is totally invalid.
>>
Don't let facts get in the way of your feminist delusion :^)

>Ford. C. S.. & Beach. F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper & Row.
"As long as the adult members of a society permit them to do so, immature males and females engage in practically every type of sexual behavior found in grown men and women. After reviewing the cross-species and cross-cultural evidence, we are convinced that tendencies toward sexual behavior before maturity and even before puberty are genetically determined in many primates, including human beings."

>Okami, Paul; Olmstead, Richard; and Abramson, Paul R. (1997). "Sexual experiences in early childhood: 18-year longitudinal data from the UCLA family lifestyles project - University of California, Los Angeles," Journal of Sex Research, 34, 339-347.
"On the other hand, lack of sex play has been indicted for delaying normal development (Gadpaille, 1981), causing sexual pathology in adulthood (Currier, 1981), or indirectly resulting in social violence, as some have concluded from the work of Prescott (1975, 1979)."
>>
>>40548423
>Why are you acting as if sex is complicated?

When I say intelligently, I mean consider the repercussions, possible outcomes, and weigh the current information.

>Also, why is children having sex with other children fine but involve an adult and it's Holocaust-tier outrage?

I doubt 8 year olds are fucking each other, teens, sure. I do think it's stupid if a 18 year old fucks a 16 year old, and everyone freaks out. It's only a 2 year difference.
>>
>>40548381
I agree that children generally can't consent to sex.

What I'm trying to say is that sex is not inherently harmful just because of that.

Its entirely possible to pleasure a child in a respectful and nurturing way. For example, I dont think its ever OK to involve your dick in things.

Not all pedos are like AA.
Just a lot of them.
>>
>>40548481
>P-please read these studies conducted by other pedos
>They're totally non-biased, s-seriously

Is there any level you're not willing to stoop to?
>>
>>40547946
It's like saying mammals are mammals and using you and your family as burgerking meat
>>
>>40548479
>Kids are easily misled
And women are absolutely never misled into sex. That's never once happened.

>>40548484
>When I say intelligently, I mean consider the repercussions, possible outcomes, and weigh the current information.
What are the repercussions of an act we generally consider to be fun, good, healthy and pleasurable?

>I doubt 8 year olds are fucking each other
You would be surprised.
>>
>>40548481
Oh, and none of these links advocate adult initiated sex with kids. Which is what we're talking about. Nice try though.
>>
>>40547946

Kid =/= Adult

One cannot be called or treated as an adult if not responsible.

It is why they are so many people now that are making stupid things, creating problems, or debating on pointless things, because they are not responsible and therefore cannot be treated as adult yet.

With this vision, they are people that will never reach adulthood, even at old age.
>>
>>40548481

Uh you must be completely ignoring the clear distinctions being made between developing children and adults

>>40548519

"we" meaning adults, with other adults. Stop acting like 9/10 people fuck children.

Yeah, I would be surprised to find out that a majority of 8 year olds are fucking, since that's absolute nonsense, at least in the Western world.
>>
Reminder that islam approves of pedophilia. And yet the left defends islam so fervently. They have literally no idea what they are getting into.
>>
File: image.jpg (42 KB, 322x480) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
42 KB, 322x480
Here is a pic of Artful Dodger (left). Notice the erection in his pants as the unsuspecting child victim "consents" to a brutal ass fucking via an innocent hug.
>>
File: 1414377218458.jpg (67 KB, 800x531) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1414377218458.jpg
67 KB, 800x531
Advocating in favor of age of consent is exactly what the feminists want. There is nothing more anti-male than age of consent.

- Men are assumed pedophiles. Women are not.
- Men cannot sit next to unattended children on some airlines. Women can.
- Men cannot enter Legoland without a child. Women can.
- Men are forced out of primary education and day care for these reasons. Think of how a boy with a single mother will grow up having zero male role models except those he sees in mainstream media. Is that the model for a well-rounded boy?
- Innocent men are killed by vigilantes on the mere accusation they are pedophiles.
>>
>>40548565
>Women are not.
Plenty of women have been into court for fucking teens under the age of consent. Just look it up.
>>
>>40548560
You're getting too close to blowing your cover as a controlled opposition.
>>
File: iceland scum.png (126 KB, 502x531) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
iceland scum.png
126 KB, 502x531
>>40547946
>>
File: 1410512093442.jpg (140 KB, 646x592) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1410512093442.jpg
140 KB, 646x592
>>40548540
>"we" meaning adults, with other adults. Stop acting like 9/10 people fuck children.
Strawman #1

>Yeah, I would be surprised to find out that a majority of 8 year olds are fucking, since that's absolute nonsense, at least in the Western world.
Strawman #2

>>40548560
He's cute. Would cuddle/10.

>>40548582
Women receive lighter sentences for child sex crimes. Pic related.
>>
>>40548371
I didn't say I wanted to fuck any child, you fucking idiot. I'm just not going to start screaming at people based on feels, because I'm not a hypocrite.

The only time /pol/ becomes irrational and throws all logic out the window is when we talk about this stuff. You literally sound like feminists on this topic, everytime, and it sounds hypocritical.
>>
>>40548565

>women are not

Since when? Where?

>some airlines

ooooh u got us

>Legoland

O JESUS FUCK NO

>well rounded boy

O i c, you just want to fuck kids to give them a better life. totally makes sense now.
>>
File: image.jpg (37 KB, 338x507) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
37 KB, 338x507
>"You mean I get to have ice cream if I let you play cave explorer with me?"

This is literally what pedophiles believe counts as consent.
>>
>>40548609
If you're going to continue saying "your cited source is wrong because my feels!" while never citing a single source of your own then I won't keep responding to you. I'm the only one here to cite sources.
>>
>>40548599
> getting laid that young
I cant for the love of god can wrap my head around why would that be a crime. Did they ask the boy if he felt offended ?
>>
>>40548599

>would cuddle young child

>>40548519

>good healthy and pleasurable

O ya totes not implying anything there m8

>>40548352

>just don't let them try


Ya u totally don't want to fuck little kids

>>40548644

I don't need a fucking source to tell you that grown men fucking children is wrong.
>>
>>40548519
>What are the repercussions of an act we generally consider to be fun, good, healthy and pleasurable?

Puberty in girls starts at ages 8 - 13
SO
>What are the repercussions
Being a pregnant 8 year old, mostly.

and again, I doubt most children younger than 11 want to have sex. They probably don't even know what sex is before that age.

>Guy walks up to child
>"Ey u wunt sex bby"
"What's sex?"
>"It's where I stick my peepee into ur peepee, and you feel good"
"Oh, okay, sure!"
>>
>>40548634
Yeah, that's fucking sick.... and gay.
>>
>>40548684
I refer you to the bottom of this post
>>40548669
>>
>>40548669
>They probably don't even know what sex is before that age.
So? That's not a prerequisite for sex. You'd let a sheltered 18 year old with no knowledge of sex consent. You're a hypocrite.
>>
Reminder that anti lolicon is pro child abuse.
>>
>>40548634
>This is literally what pedophiles believe counts as consent.
>Prostitution is rape

Really?
>>
File: 1388322712776.jpg (344 KB, 720x960) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1388322712776.jpg
344 KB, 720x960
How can you call yourself pro-freedom while supporting state-enforced age of consent? That is the opposite of freedom. It's literally the state saying "people below this arbitrary measurement of development can't have freedom".
>>
>>40548706
I doubt even a HIGHLY sheltered 18 year old wouldn't know about sex. Even if he didn't, he'd know not to agree to something he knows nothing about, but a child wouldn't know not to not consent to something he/she doesn't know.
>>
>>40548706

>You'd let a sheltered 18 year old

Who would? And who are they having sex with? And an 18 year old without any knowledge of sex probably wouldn't fucking consent to it because they don't know anything about it.

Why even make these situations up? So you can imagine having sex with underage kids?
>>
File: 1420866889844.jpg (176 KB, 830x827) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1420866889844.jpg
176 KB, 830x827
>>
>>40548742
Excellent question dodge. You're a hypocrite.
>>
>>40548669
Anyone with unmonitored internet access knows what sex is, and while kids don't want cocks shoved in them it is a fact that children masturbate and are interested in physical pleasure.

And once again your argument relies on a predatory stranger to have any relevence.
>>
>>40548769

A predatory stranger instead of what, a polite adult family member? What are you getting at?
>>
>>40548758
Question dodge, how? I explained to you how even a sheltered 18 year old, would have more common sense than an 8 year old.
>>
>>40548750
Well what do you know, AnCaps aren't total retards.
>>
File: 1374173865145.png (85 KB, 1604x865) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1374173865145.png
85 KB, 1604x865
>>40548782
See picture. The general populace is misinformed about the facts of adult-child sex.
>>
>>40548742
Everything you're saying is an argument against predators taking advantage of children, and not an argument against sex itself.

Obviously we shouldn't let evil people use anyone let alone children.
It doesn't always have to be like that.
>>
>>40548706
Imagine you're 10 years old again.

The parents who are meant to be your guardians, who provide for you, give you a secure home to live in, give you peace of mind knowing that despite whatever happens, your family will be their for your, your mother and your father, are the kind of people they're meant to be.

You're in your room, almost asleep as you hear those footsteps coming up the stairs. You know what's coming, what's going to happen, and you know you are powerless to avoid it. The people you're meant to be able to rely on the most are the ones who are ruining you, turning you into a shadow of who you could be.

The door swings open, and the man who's meant to protect you from all your nightmares, the one who's the foundation of the family, the breadwinner, the protective bear of a figure who's always their to guard you, drags you by your panama sleeve onto the ground, pawing at you, licking your neck.

And then he forces you to do disgusting, vile, horrid things, and you're sick to you stomach, and you know that it will happen again, and you have no power to stop him.

Your mother knows what's going on, and she doesn't do anything to stop it. She's angry at you, angry that you somehow made this happen, and she's screaming at you, telling you how worthless you are.

But it was all "just a joke" right? It's not as if this kind of thing happens every day to real people, so it's alright to anonymously joke about this kind of shit online isn't it?
>>
File: 1374434772075.jpg (716 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1374434772075.jpg
716 KB, 1024x768
>>40548796
The law allows an 18 year old with zero knowledge of sex to consent, while disallowing a 10 year old with knowledge of sex to consent. This proves it has zero to do with knowledge. Sex education begins lower than 10 in some cases.
>>
File: 1401342780666.jpg (257 KB, 720x720) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1401342780666.jpg
257 KB, 720x720
>>40547946
People who have sex with children are worse than murderers.

This guy down the street was 24 and had sex with a 17 year old neighbor of mine destroying her life. We informed the police and he is on the registry for life for his crimes. he thought he was going to college now he is homeless and cant even get a job thanks to us calling any place that hires him and harrassing them until hes fired, he squats down by the creek now in an abandoned house, its only a matter of time until he kills himself we all hope.
>>
>>40548819
>I have to use strawmen arguments because I know I have nothing else I can say
>>
>>40548807

lol nice choice of paper

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy

Goddamn pedos are retarded
>>
>>40548285
#guaranteedreplies

Do you think a 7 year old can't be manipulated and even the most mature of them is not highly susceptible to predators for a myriad of reasons? Have a conversation with one. I'm confident 7 year old boys don't want to get raped by Catholic priests but clearly there is not the resistance to coercion of a developed adult. You're a 6/10 troll and if you are by the off chance serious - I suggest therapy and meditation to re-evaluate your life and why your ethos and mental concept of interpersonal relations of intimacy are deeply flawed.
>>
>>40548819
I have never advocated for the rape of children, and that's exactly what you described.

Less than 10% of children involved in sexual relations with adults described their experience as traumatic or forceful. Stop lying please.
>>
>>40548819
>She's angry at you, angry that you somehow made this happen, and she's screaming at you, telling you how worthless you are.
Isn't this the bigger problem here?
>>
>>40548782
Yes, exactly that.

Your ignorance relies entirely upon a straw man groomed into you by society.

You can't possibly perceive any other possibility beyond what society wants you to believe exists.
>>
>>40548863

Oh yeah, sorry. You don't want to rape kids. You just want them to agree to have sex with you. Totally different.
>>
>>40548858
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Rind#Sex_research
>Author Thomas D. Oellerich called the study "politically incorrect" but "scientifically correct".

Rekt.

>>40548860
>Do you think a 7 year old can't be manipulated
Strawman. Never said that.

> I'm confident 7 year old boys don't want to get raped by Catholic priests
Why do you strawman in this way. I've never advocated for rape, ever.
>>
>>40548831
>Even if he didn't, he'd know not to agree to something he knows nothing about, but a child wouldn't know not to not consent to something he/she doesn't know.
>>
File: 1419358640994.jpg (24 KB, 320x374) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1419358640994.jpg
24 KB, 320x374
>>40548840
fuck yea thanks to Adam Walsh a brave american who was murdered by a pedo and went from victim to national hero the Megans Law is now in EVERY country.

Im in Anonymous I know the law, any image of a child real or drawn is now illegal under US law. We in Anonymous pressured japan under Bill 156 to ban anything that could corrupt a child. Working with the US government we in Anonymous are lobbying the UN to impose a global ban on ALL images of children under 18 since aan image reaal or ffake contributes ot he same crimes that occur everyday which is a fact.
>Join the official facebook group of Anonymous today and become an online hacktivist.
>>
>>40548883

SERIOUSLY?

You're advocating family members having sex with children???

Weak troll or one of the worst people alive.
>>
>>40548735
Of course it's arbitrary. But we don't have a standard means of gauging maturity yet, so people just chose an age when the human body is fully equipped to handle sex and childbirth. If I have to explain why that's dangerous, then you don't deserve to be considered as someone who can give propee consent either.

>>40548769
>children masturbate
True. But there are lots of ways to abuse a kid without using cock. Is using something other than cock not rape?
>>
>>40548893
Oh yea, sorry. Toy don't want to rape women. You just want them to agree to have sex with you. Totally different.
>>
>>40548840
>17 years old girl
>child

Only in Clapistan.
>>
>>40548142
uhhh you know Mohammad had sex with his 9 year old wife it says in the quran, all muslims are pedos that is why Anonymous is out to shut down the islamic faith since the religion trains muslims to prey on children in our homes.
>>
>>40548863
But you agree children are unable to consent. You might not say it but that's just you trolling, anyone with a functional brain realizes that's the reality of it.

So how can a non-consenting child not be raped? They can't, it's always rape. You're a rapist.
>>
>>40548900

One person

Oh and Congress condemned it, that must not mean much

>>40548900

see

>>40548893

>>40548914

That argument would make more sense if we weren't talking about raping children, which is something so far a few people in this thread are supporting
>>
>>40548909
Notice this poster doesn't have an actual rebuttal.
>>
File: 1420869132893.jpg (17 KB, 289x174) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1420869132893.jpg
17 KB, 289x174
>>40548915
We in Legion Doxed this guy
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/04/26/cops-radnor-teen-arrested-for-graphically-defacing-girls-facebook-photos/

This man looked at childrens facebook photos and masturbated to them. Now hes in jail facing 400 years for the 4 children all of whom were only 17 with their facebook pictures violated, most of the victims had no idea they were being victimized.
>WE NEVER FORGET WE NEVER FORGIVE!
We will hunt ANYONE who violates US federal law. We are legion!!!
>>
>>40548940

I don't need a fucking rebuttal. You're advocating sex with children. Most everyone else knows you're a horrible person for that.
>>
>>40548901
Take your presumptive notion elsewhere. Not everyone doesn't do something because they have no knowledge of it. Humans are naturally inquisitive.

>>40548913
The human body can handle both sex and childbirth well, well before 18.

>>40548919
Children are able to consent. Children are not able give lawful consent. The definition of consent is permission to do something.
>>
>>40548934
>State condemns paper proving State wrong.
STOP THE PRESSES
>>
You can safely ignore LfjB21S8.

Sources cited as of this post: Zero.
>>
>>40548960
>>40548967

Keep it up m8, either you'll get murdered by some family member of a kid you diddle or you'll end up in prison getting raped yourself.

That or you're trolling, which is extremely retarded.
>>
>>40548960
>The human body can handle both sex and childbirth well, well before 18.
What age is more appropriate then? Oh, and please cite.
>>
>>40548960
So if you agree they can't consent how do you reconcile it not being rape? Obviously a child cannot give permission for a carnal adult act when they don't have the capacity to understand it.

And no, childhood sexual exploration is not the same type of knowledge. If you think that, then you have some intellectual issues you need to get sorted out (as well as your emotional ones).
>>
>>40548960
> Not everyone doesn't do something because they have no knowledge of it

These are what we call "Retards". If you fucking go into something not knowing shit about it. You're an idiot, and deserve anything bad coming to you.
Aside from kids, because they don't have this common sense.
>>
File: 1419359567046.jpg (123 KB, 766x464) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1419359567046.jpg
123 KB, 766x464
>>40548863
Learn the law you sick pedo fuck:
US law under the Adam Walsh Act states any image or discussion sexualizing a child which is under 18 is a federal offense. Anyone under 18 is a child you dumb fuck.

Japanese Law 156 makes half that site illegal for promoting non consensual drawn sex destroying the lives of millions of children.

All will be prosecuted, all will be judged, there is no escape from Anonymous.
WE ARE LEGION!!!!!!!
>>
>>40548981

The one source you've cited is a crackpot study that was reviewed and condemned. No one needs to cite a fucking study to tell you that raping kids isn't chill.
>>
>>40548934
Congress also passed sopa 2 and a a shit ton of other things that we both know you scream tour lungs out over. But they agree with you on a subject and suddenly the are the leading authority in child psychology.
>>
>>40549004
Let the courts decide. Abolish AoC. All allegations of rape of a person incapable of consenting can be dealt with in the court system.

>>40549009
>So if you agree they can't consent how do you reconcile it not being rape?
It's only "rape" if your definition of "rape" is the feminized "RAAAAPE!" version in which everything is rape.

>Obviously my opinion is correct despite posting no sources because my feels
Try again.
>>
>>40549047
Creep shots are illegal under US law violating our right to privacy. We in Anonymous fight for the rights of victims of sexual assault. Join us in Legion in the revolution for the safety of women online and offline.
Send screenshots of this thread to the following government agencies, Dept of Homeland Security, Interpol, and FBI, to end online violence against women. All those who violate the law harming the rights of survivors of this sexual violence will be imprisoned by us in Anonymous.
We never forgive!
We never forget!
WE ARE LEGION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Every 5 secs a woman is raped in the city of New York, stare rape accounts for over 90% of unreported rapes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYl68KipxeM
>>
>>40549023
>Still hasn't cited a single source
>I'M RIGHT BECAUSE MY FEELS!
>>
File: image.jpg (311 KB, 1600x1496) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
311 KB, 1600x1496
>>40548981
This boy just wanted to play cricket at the beach. Why did you rape him? Why did you ruin his life by touching his dick? Why are you a soulless monster?

>status: told
>>
>>40548958
Actually yes you do need a rebuttal.
Of course you'll never be able to formulate one, which is why you rely entirely upon acting indignant.

You're pathetic.
>>
>>40549059
TY BASED ANONYMOUS
>>
>>40549047

Congress is made up of Boomers with no concept of the Internet so you shouldn't be surprised that they passed a stupid law pertaining to it. People have known raping children is bad much longer than the Internet has been around.

>>40549053

>don't let the state decide
>let the courts decide

retarded

Actually, it's rape if you fuck a child. Because they're too young.

>>40549060

>still wants people to believe his shitty study

You're like a moon landing hoaxer

>>40549073

Here it is: Having sex with children is wrong. Everyone knows it except you and Art Faggot.
Thread replies: 133
Thread images: 18
Thread DB ID: 31438



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.