Political Cringe Thread
that thing in the green is fucking disgusting
I'll just bump the thread with more of the stupid shit he's said...
We were talking about islamic terrorists and how they commit acts of terrorism in the name of their god when he said
> The Irish have done the same thing though with the civil unrest they have due to religion.
He even implied that they commit worser acts
Kek. I'm talking communism and socialism, not modern SJW leftism.
Marxism and anything derived from it has an anti-Liberal-Feminist-Intersectional-SJW streak in it a mile wide.
Down with bourgeois reformism! No war but the class war, no divide but the class divide.
Look at what you just wrote, Comrade.
Read it aloud. Tell me it does not sound silly.
If you are serious I can engage in your some actual theoretical conversation, but I do not think so.
Sorry but your white supremacy means nothing in the proletarian struggle. You should find another political movement to cash that in on.
>Solidarity with all trans communists and POC.
>mfw all the communists I meet on this damn board are fucking trots who can't argue for shit
Just stop tovarish. It'll be a cold day in hell before /pol/ even think of communism as a respectable ideology. There's no point in preaching to people who won't learn.
Most we can do is send them to the wall when we take power if they keep acting out.
Also, the girls in the video are trots. They aren't worth our time trying to defend.
What's a "trot?" Something to do with Trotsky?
Also, someone should make a Fascist/NatSoc version.
Toppest of keks
All of the Marxist-Leninists who didn't think Stalin was a super nice guy, and thought Trotsky had a better set of ideas.
It's kind of used in two ways, to mean 'actual follower of Trotsky's beliefs' and to mean 'believer in Social Democracy/Council Communism', like, big deliberative democracy setups one jump removed from Anarcho-Syndicalism and IWW.
Trots actually believe in shit like
Orwell was pretty much a Trot.
Authoritarianism gets shit done. There's no denying that. Democracy is a fated system the stagnates legislation and opens the nations power to the average everyday idiot.
I'd like to see that.
I hate it how its these types of people that everyone relates marxism with. Its like how NatSoc's hate it how they associated with Skinheads.
Pretty much in the respect that libertarians are just shills for corporations. Sure, they'll say they hate corporations and think that the genuinely "free" market will cause more competition, thus better prices. But in practice, all they do is seem to shill.
I've taken two years of economics and what libertarian amounts to is very good, but only if your a consumer, once you go to the other side, its complete balancing act of walking on pins and needles trying to stay afloat financially.
Don't get me wrong. A communist society with industries like electronics, firearms, entertainment, etc given free market status it seems is the way to go. However, that being said, unionization, and primary government stock ownership of corporation is a need be.
But as for "free market" side, most if it would be small business, as you see the best service come from them.
They are in many ways correct, just misguided.
Rape Culture as they use it really does mean 'Bourgeois Culture'.
In a post-revolutionary society, if women take part in the struggles - and we saw in Russia and in Spain in '36 that women can make fine revolutionaries - then it will quite quickly follow that rape culture, and I mean bourgeois culture, will be abolished.
>But in practice, all they do is seem to shill.
That's because all initiatives from the left to limit the power of corporations involve expanding government.
When libertarians, like myself, propose loosening business licensing, or abolishing both income and capital gains tax, or measures which would make it impossible for government to pass favourable regulations to particular corporations, it's OPPOSED by the very people who claim to be against corporatism.
It's fuckwits on the left, who seem to believe the government is the answer to limiting a legal fiction, that screw it up for everyone else.
Libertarians be all like
> let's all abolish government and let the free market sort it out
> muh property rights
who will enforce property rights?
> muh police
Who are the police?
Who will enforce the contract?
You can't be an anarchist if you believe in property rights, because property rights necessitate force and government on one end and shitty gangs on the other.
>You can't be an anarchist if you believe in property rights
This is a patently false claim, and the sooner you stop making it, the sooner everyone will begin listening to what you have to say.
>because property rights necessitate force
They necessitate reactionary force, they don't necessitate the initiation of force.
The one on the left has great tits. Would smash.
But he was a painter until going into politics.
He spent 6 years (ages 19-25) supporting himself by painting (and with some of his father's money). Then WW1 happened and he returned from it mad as hell, spent two more years in the army, THEN went into politics.
The "lel hitler got rejected by the academy so he abandoned painting to kill all the jews" is a silly meme.
I hated seeing this shit at my university.
A friend and I once put up a sign next to one of these, explaining how men already understand consent, and that the constant affirmation that we don't was a veiled insult to the intelligence, and morals, of men in general. It got torn down twice.
So then we printed the sign onto a fabric banner and used spray adhesive to attach it to the wall above the sign post board, sealed the edges with a two-part compound. It's still there years later, apparently no feminists on campus own a ladder, or the required knowledge of how to remove it
BLACK PEOPLE ENSLAVED OTHER BLACK PEOPLE
ARABS ENSLAVED BLACK PEOPLE
CAMBODIANS ENSLAVED CAMBODIANS
AZTECS ENSLAVED OTHER SOUTH AMERICANS
PRETTY MUCH EVERY FUCKING CIVILIZATION IN HISTORY HAD SLAVES
WHAT IS YOUR FUCKING POINT WOMAN
What are you trying to say, that Hitler wasn't a monster? He was a horrible human being. He wasn't THAT much worse than most other 19th-20th century statesmen, but he was the last to be as brutal as he was. He did some good stuff, but that doesn't excuse genocide and war
>The holocaust didn't happen
Stop. Please just stop.
I'm gonna say it again, I don't know how these two got into university without knowing basic math.
If he makes 100 dollars and she makes 10% less, she would make $90.
If she makes $90 and he makes 10% more, he would make $99.
Neither of them are fucking smart. They don't understand numbers.
The song of modern day Leftists and neo-cons. Their ideology has corrupted the world.
>if they say yes and change their mind it's not consent
Qui tacet, non utique fatetur: sed tamen verum est eum non negare.
there's nothing inherently wrong with doing this shit, but the cringe comes from putting it on youtube
put it this way: if you saw them doing this in public, would you not think it was embarrassing?
the clitoris is separate to the female urethra who the fuck wrote this shit?