>Very harmful [Boards]
>It is generally advised that if you do find yourself on 4chan to not visit these boards.
>/b/, /d/, /e/, /gif/, /h/, /r/, /s/, /t/, /u/, /v/, /i/, /r9k/, /cm/, /y/, /jp/, /mlp/, /pol/, /soc/
>/mlp/ is ranked as harmful as /pol/
/b/, /pol/, /h/, /e/, /jp/, /y/, /u/, /cm/, /mlp/, and /c/are where pedophilia and loli are commonplace. But again, such content is acceptable on almost all of 4chan.
haha they obviously have not been on /tv/
Let's play a game. Roll: http://sjwiki.org/wiki/Something_nice
I got a stuffed dog displayed in a faggotstore.
First greeting upon entering the site.
I think that has something to do with the fact /mlp/ loves to fuck around with SJWs as much as the rest of 4chan does. but yes, it is silly that /mlp/ is put on such as high level. Talk about butthurt.
Already exists. It's shit.
Hahahahaha good one!
Let's be real. Most /pol/acks aren't politically active, have done close to zero research in relevant areas and let themselves be controlled by emotions.
This board is great for funposting. Habbenings, keks and shaming but that's about it. It's an entertainment board, not one for intelligent or serious discussion.
Why does it bother me so much that /lgbt/ is listed as "least harmful"? You'd think "moderately harmful" would be a better designation, since it's not really about hobbies like "writing, arts, food, fashion, etc."
And why is /hm/ listed as "moderately harmful," but /s/ is "very harmful"?
Even I can get a wiki if I really wanted to.
>implying /pol/ focuses only on emotions
make peace with jesus you fucking degenerate because i will personally use your blood to water the tree of liberty on the day of the rope along with the rest of your filthy fucking anti-freedom ilk
Even if it disturbs me to hell, I thought women were into that shit?
If they dislike it I am glad, one more step away from their incessant whining.
Homosexuality feels good.
As someone with actual PTSD, seeing trigger warnings everywhere triggers me.
If we do, let's be smart about it. Add facts and sources, not just scream NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER over and over again.
> /soc/ and /gif/ of all places
>make one then.
Yeah so they can edit and redefine what the words even mean - which is on of their main modes of operation . I don't see any win happening on their own propaganda site .
Wow, their unconscious biases shine through.
>Notwithstanding, some attempts have been made to quantify their identities with respect to gender, age, and race. These results, along with their behaviour and views, lend support to the view that the typical member of their community is an adolescent USAmerican White trans man with little to no experience with the medical establishment, and has been out for a relatively short amount of time.
Any behavior they don't like must be attributed to white American males, no matter what.
(Their source is an online survey.)
I guess teams of SJW trying to re-write Wikipedia to Spout SJW views wasn't effective enough . Even though most their corrupted edits remain unchanged .
probably not .Many Campuses and other independent activists around the western world have made it a thing to change Wiki to fit their political narrative . They may be a small illogical minority but there is an army of these pieces of shit .
>For example, both truscum and radical feminists have been known to claim that trans women are rapists who want to enter women's (i.e., cis women's) spaces by force and not because they are women too.
So if I want to get into the girl's locker room, all I need do to is say I want to be a girl this week?
If they complain about my massive boner, it's because they're transphobic?
Oh, it's imploding.
Check this out, from Arthur Chu on Salon:
>Before the sneering term “SJW” (“Social Justice Warrior”) went viral, the Internet version of putting down elitist out-of-touch liberals was frequently just calling people a “SWPL.”
>Like most effective mudslinging, it’s rooted in truth. Lander was criticizing something genuinely problematic he saw among white anti-racist liberals — or male feminists, or wealthy people who fight against poverty, or straight allies of LGBT people.
>Look, I’ll be blunt. People of color need white allies. Women need male allies. LGBT activists need straight allies. Allies matter. Not in the sense that a movement is only legitimized if a white person joins it or that we need white people to be cool-headed leaders because we’re “too close to the issue” or any of that BS. But in the simple practical sense. Oppressed and marginalized groups already deal with the burden of being oppressed and marginalized. A fight to redress an imbalance of power in society can’t succeed for long if 100 percent of the burden falls on the people who lack power.
>And the SWPL-inspired tactics of mocking “white guilt” and “white knights” that NotYourShield is based on are aimed at eroding what little shield we have. And it’s working, judging by the cowardly silence coming from most of the games industry about the damage Gamergate has done.
>So no thanks to #NotYourShield and the sentiment behind it. I’m a shield for my brothers and sisters who need me to be, and they’re mine in return. That’s the only way progress ever gets made, by people standing together for what’s right.
Basically: "Stop laughing at white SJW's even though they're horrendously hypocritical and self-contradictory because the people we admit are our shields need us because they're too stupid, marginalized, and weak to get anything done on their own!"
Most likely because they're defining "racist" by what the board is for rather than who actually browses it and classing them all racist by default. If they actually knew anything they'd know /lgbt/ is just as racist as /pol/.
Because they never actually read the boards. Go on to /lgbt/ and post something about pansexuals or shit like that, you'll get run out. For all the shit /pol/ gives /lgbt/, they hate SJWs as much as you. There's at least one thread a day calling for the trans threads to be given a containment board.
Fucking truscum shitlords, thinking they're more trans then me just because they've felt this way their entire life and have a medical diagnosis and aren't just doing it so they can perv in the women's bathroom!
This part made me laugh.
"4chan has a fairly unique feature that allows anyone to post anonymously, without even signing up. "
in my head "Can you believe it's a website that isn't mining it's users for their name, birthday, and state to sell for money?! OUTRAGEOUS!"
If you're curious, /gif/ is most is the most harmful section because of the frequent fetishing threads, as well as the rape/forced orgasm threads. But also what you said is true.
I can move it, but I put it in the most harmful just because of the extreme porn. What aspects does it have that are healthy?
Everyone loves to be anonymous here, even me
I think I should actually, it really does deserve it's own
Unchecked institutional-level racism creates a toxic user experience.
Reddit is not only made-up of a bigoted user-base, it is systemically racist and cissexist.
Maybe reddit isn't so bad guys!
> I put it in the most harmful just because of the extreme porn. What aspects does it have that are healthy?
White Knight faggot detected . Calling porn harmful . Harms what your pegged butthurt ?
>A social construct (or social construction) is a product of society. It is a phenomenon that would not occur without a society in which to exist in and be propagated by. Examples include the legal system, religion, race, and gender.
These people actually believe that race and gender would not exist if there was not a society.
I'm an editor of SJWiki, of course I have the aspects of a white knight lmao. But nah porn in general is not harmful, just kinda shocking for someone knew ot stumble upon, you know?
I thought it was supposed to be the Steiner Fist at first.
>New to stumble on
>On the internet
I'm sorry, but porn and sex is like, thing two or three people google when they're on the internet.
The moment they're alone, people wanna see naked people that fuck.
Also why is /k/ moderate? It's literally just about people having hobbies, and the occasional mis-directed /pol/ trying to shill "Muh jews" and those tend to get shouted down.
Why is discussing firearms not a hobby you consider worth putting into the first section?
So is SJWiki . Imagine some ignorant young kid reads that shit . Propaganda is arguably more harmful to kids than seeing "porn" . Is the site 18+? Also are you admitting you take it in the pooper ? You have all the aspects of a white knight don't you ?
Extreme porn doesn't necessarily imply rampant sexism or homophobia. Their BDSM Generals are actually incredibly open and honest about sexuality and all that, both male and female. Safe Sane Consensual and all that
>tfw a young, 6ft, educated, white anglo-French catholic living in my own apartment in a central capital City
I'm reminiscing, I've graduated highschool years ago. Basically I'm comparing anyone that uses the rulez of teh interweb to a 14yo
>porn and sex is like, thing two or three people google when they're on the internet.
Yeah, but you have to admit /d/ gets pretty weird
>Also why is /k/ moderate? It's literally just about people having hobbies
Good point, moved
I think when I made the article I just lumped any porn in the most harmful, but maybe I should make a separate category to specify the porn boards?
Why do you put spaces in between your sentence and question marks? That's really distracting
It would be really funny if this ended up in place of that ridiculous magenta fist posted above.
I am a masculine male who is white, European in origin, heterosexual, able-bodied, highly literate and educated, young, attractive, upper-middle class, English speaking, with a light and pale complexion, Christian, and fertile.
Well look at all this privilege! Next time I feel depressed and in the dumps, I'll just remember that I'm the cherry on the pile of shit we call mankind. Thanks Social Justice!
>Pedobear was an iconic symbol for the pedophile subculture in 2010. But its use as a mascot faded away due to backlash.
Backlash? What backlash? Pedobear was older than 2010 and it was just an old meme laid to rest.
Guns kill millions each year and you put a board that fetishizes violence and right wing politics as "less harmful"?
I'm so triggered right now
Absolutely tragic UnU but the fact that /k/ has a sticky saying keep politics in /pol/ kinda shows they deserve the less harmful slot
You can yell at me if you want, or make suggestions and I'll work to change them
Why don't you faggots ever come here and actually try to debate something?
Doesn't even have to be here, we'll go to you, provide us the medium where we won't get banned for hurting feelings with facts.
> Trigger warning!
> The following article might be triggering for some people depending on past experiences.
NO!... No, I feel fine... I feel
SJW logic at work.
>WOW ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE COMPLETE SCUM HOLY SHIT
>FUCKING CUM SKIN BETA NECKBEARDS GODDAMN
>Hey why aren't these people listening to us and joining our cause???
>I'm here now friend <: I'm pretty sure you won't get banned on 4chan
Do you seriously still believe Michael Brown didn't do nuffin? Or are you guys just using it as political leverage and don't care either way?
Guys... look what I found...
This is pathetic even for SJW "logic"
Where would you prefer?
We don't actually have an article about the verdict of Darren Wilson yet, but I'll talk with the other editors to see if someone is working on it.
I'll answer this in a separate post, give me a moment
>We don't actually have an article about the verdict of Darren Wilson yet, but I'll talk with the other editors to see if someone is working on it.
I already know what you're going to say about it though, that's why I'm asking, right now, now that the evidence (which was mostly already available albeit ignored) has been fully released and the nignogs are destroying their own neighborhood and looting liquor stores "in protest", do you still uphold that "muh baby didn't do nuffin"?
Have you ever tried thinking rationally or using logic, or is that too triggering for a special snowflake like you? You and your movement are cancer, your arguments are bullshit and you operate purely on emotion. You have no credible points, your movement is a laughing stock.
> least harmful
As a long time fa/tg/uy, I find this quaint.
> tfw its not rape if its an elf
You realize that there's nothing specifically making /pol/ or any other board "hostile" except for the community, right?
There are plenty of people (including myself) who are on the left, or centrist, etc, and we do fine here.
I don't understand why the hostility exists when you have the opportunity to come here and debate as well. Except for a fear of being opinion-raped and having to face other opinions head on.
This will never be your hugbox, faggot.
>You realize that there's nothing specifically making /pol/ or any other board "hostile" except for the community, right?
What sort of shit logic is that? There is no "/pol/" as a board itself. In fact, there is no /board/ as a standalone entity. Take the community out of any board and you'll be left with just a shitty piece of chink software as imageboard.
Jesus fuck your stupidity really rustled my jambos.
They need to be able to control a place with tactics. Like smear campaigns, which was fully absorbed as they typically start with antisemitism. First time around in /new/ not so much, and we kept talking about conservative and liberal politics in the worst way with each side essentially calling the other Hitler.
ayyy I got an idea
if these faggots are gonna come looking through our threads, why don't we just trigger them to death with gore like we did with those other "brave women"
this is kinda related Anon to your picture.
>Had an obvious SJW tell me the other day in lecture that I needed to "remember to check my privileges."
>Simply respond "I don't need to check my privileges because every morning I count my Blessings."
>She just started doing the fish-out-of-water-mouth-thing and stormed off.
I'm not even very religious, but shit, I think it says something when you can troll people by pretending to be Christian.
And that's not good.
Sorry, can't hear you over my freedom.
>words are hard
That's the fucking point you faggot, it's not like RevLeft or Stormfront where a dissenting opinion is going to get you banned, which is what I'm referring to, it's just the community itself is hostile to them, it's not enforced.
SJW's like their speech / but hate free speech
In terms of open discussion or even others having a right to their own voice .
>There are plenty of people (including myself) who are on the left, or centrist, etc, and we do fine here.
If you think being shit on every time you rear your ugly head, then sure.
Though considering most leftist are cucks, you most likely do.
I lol'd hard when I seen this.
Kuma is older than fucking 4chan is.
Pedobear just fell out of common use naturally, unlike when most memetic content becomes hated by the community at large.
I can't count.
>I don't need to check my privileges because every morning I count my Blessings
>/b/, /pol/, /v/, /s/, /hc/, /h/, /u/, /soc/, /mlp/, /r9k/, /tv/, /cgl/, /lgbt/, and /gif/ are where the majority of sexist posts are made. But as with racism, it is found in every board
But aren't they full of women?
There are a lot of extremely annoying echo chambers on the internet that annoy me, both left and right wing. On reddit, the SRS people are horrible, I wish their user names came with pictures so I could see just what this special brand of idiot looks like. Then there is freerepublic.com - equally horrible right wing morons. They all operate as an echo chamber with no ability to debate. Ah well, fuck 'em both.
If you don't consider this harmful there is something deeply wrong with you.
>Using fascist as a pejorative.
Plz. Use North Korea if you must find an example of a repressive state. Hitler and Mussolini were great men.
Actually that's not that bad of a chart, at least partially. Notice where females lie on it, and contrast that to reality. You have to consider that it's very likely SJWs were once an honest altruistic group that has since been subverted and used as a tool to fight with other groups deemed politically unfavorable.
Nice derail attempt . Those guys are dead the SJW Socialists who say fuck my basic rights are changing our fucking legal system to deny constitutional rights like a fair trial equal status and on and on ...
> who say fuck my basic rights
Hitler never denied any basic rights, but in fact removed much restrictive legislation that existed during the Weimar Republic.
For instance, did you know that Hitler made firearms more publicly available, and even legalized pistol duelling for the first time since the monarchy?
The things he believed in like control of the press, can be quite justified when you realize that jewish Marxists controlled the papers and were trying to rally a communist uprising.
My sides are already in orbit.
Reminder that countless wrongs are done out of a sense of altruism . Adolf Hitler , Osama Bin Laden,Tim Mcviegh , George Bush , Martin Luther . Joe Stalin , Christians , Islamicists , SJW's , Klansmen etc .etc. all believe they ere righteous and what they do is right , maybe even blessed by the creator . Any time anyones on a moral crusade they need to step back and evaluate it critically .
/k/ here. I am very Impressed that you DARE NOT SPEAK OUR NAME.
You can't 'blocked :)" on chan boards as a user.
Plus anonymity denies them interweb fame.
I just wonder how many people would volunteer to do it for free in order to keep place clean.
>they list what boards are racist, sexist, etc.
>mfw they tested every board and gauged reaction
>mfw /tv/ passed
>Boards here generally focus on hobbies and interests that have a lot to do with the real world. Things like: Writing, art, food, fashion, etc. Most of the time, the content on these boards could even be considered family friendly.
/lit/- Literature, /an/- Animals, /fa/- Fashion, /x/- Paranormal, /sci/- Science & Math, /ck/- Food & Cooking, /vp/- Pokemon, /out/- Outdoors, /o/- Auto, /diy/- Do-It-Yourself, /wg/- Wallpapers/General, /g/- Technology, /m/- Mecha, /p/- Photo, /vr/- Retro Games, /3/- 3DCG, /cgl/- Cosplay & EGL, /gd/- Graphic Design, /n/- Transportation, /po/- Papercraft & Origami, /toy/- Toys, /tg/- Traditional Games
lol Faggot boards detected
You literally cannot make this shit up.
>The image boards called /b/, /pol/, /lgbt/, /v/, /s4s/, /gif/, /soc/, /r9k/, /tv/, and /jp/
I find it funny that they think it is racist that some people are not attracted to black people.
Also, /s4s/? Seriously?
>/e/ is highly harmful
gonna go fap to some cute right now I guess
>yfw the saying "/pol/ is always right" has always referred to /pol/ being right wing
Wait... How is saying "you look great" different from saying "you look great?"
Is it just that it is a woman saying it, even if it isn't? It's just a guy that sounds like a girl?
Isn't that incredibly offensive to people with irregular voices? Isn't that a type of ableism or whatever? Also, are these people literally crazy or what?
>/a/, /b/, /pol/, /h/, /e/, /jp/, /y/, /u/, /cm/, /mlp/, /tv/, and /c/are where pedophilia and loli are commonplace. But again, such content is acceptable on almost all of 4chan.
>The following article might be triggering for some people depending on past experiences.
>Please read with caution, go back to the home page, or look at something nice.
>Thunderf00t was suspended from twitter
>He used the free speech argument to defend himself from criticism for his tweets
>free speech argument
Yup. /k/ here. I periodically come to this board to remind them that we hate them whenever they take time out of there "Jews did 9/11 with micro nukes and holograms" bullshit to think that we're buddy buddy.
Oh, and we hate you too. But everyone who isn't you hates you. Hardcore anarcho-syndicalists hate you guys for fuck's sake.
>/g/ is not listed
Fuck. The SJW probably never come to /g/ anyway. The feminist threads on /g/ are the most interesting IMO. Especially how the are royaly fucking the FOSS community atm.