Is this map correct?

File: heh.png (3KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 480x400px

>>37814107
It's pretty accurate I'd say, there are many different maps explaining different aspects of your political compass.

>>37814107
No

File: 1386382832916.png (52KB, 361x361px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 361x361px

>>37814107
It's pretty accurate, but it will always be up for debate since group identification is inherently a moving goal post.

>>37814107
How can one determine whether it's correct or not? What is it supposed to represent? All I see are political ideologies seemingly randomly scattered across a chart.

>>37814230
X axis is social policies, ranging from Liberal to conservative
Y axis is Centralized axis, ranging from Anarcho to Totalitarian.

>>37814287
Those ranges make no sense. Why from liberal to conservative when those aren't even directly related to each other? Centralized axis, what's that supposed to mean?

There are many ideologies I would disagree with according to those parameters but instead of writing several pedantic posts, I will only point out that liberalism placed in the middle makes absolutely no sense.

>>37814287
That makes the chart even more retarded

I'd say its overall pretty accurate.

Especially with putting natsoc on the left as opossed to the right to put natsoc fags in their place and differentiate them from real fascist

File: tumblr_mt1zfxhEFP1s6h1wgo1_500.jpg (82KB, 500x362px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 500x362px

>>37814107
Can someone inform me of how Anarcho-socialism would work?

Why should I share my resources and allow for that?
I can see how Ancap is intuitive, but I've always been a fuzzy on the mechanics of ansoc or ancomm

>>37814945

Simple, it's not really a thing. That's why it's only a popular choice in high schools.

>>37814107
Except progressives never mean that, most "progressives" are within the socialist/social democrat range.

>>37815528
This, we would literally have to become a species not compatible with our capitalist bio-evolutionary system.

Free market will fix it = evolution will fix it

File: COMPASSGUIDE.jpg (128KB, 1375x729px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1375x729px

>>37814107
This is a better one, but it's still flawed.

>>37814945
Keep in mind those all all ideologies and therefore not realistic.

Anarchism (crudely translated as without sovereignty) basically means that noone has the power to rule over you, the abolition of hierarchy and rule.
Socialism (comradeship) means that everything is owned by everyone and not individuals.

They are in conflict with each other. Socialism is democratic / ochlocratic by nature, therefore anarcho-socialism can't exist.

I suppose what is meant when talking about social anarchism is that everyone voluntarily shares everything and helps eachother so that in the end everything is not theoretically but at least practically owned by everyone because everyone is willing to give away everything on a voluntary basis. This system requires a single person to disagree and it would collapse.

But yes, in the end ideologies often overlap in highly unrealistic and often extremely fragile scenarios, for example socialism, communism, conservatism and liberalism could all exist at the same time.

>>37816221
>Socialism (comradeship) means that everything is owned by everyone and not individuals.
I want to mention that I could be wrong with social ownership because the word itself does not imply this. However, I have no clue what else should be meant with socialism. That everyone befriends everyone else? Maximized altruism? How exactly is this supposed to look like?

>>37815628
>Free market will fix it = evolution will fix it
Gonna steal this comparison.

>>37815701
This is best one.

>>37814225
I like this picture

File: Political tests on 25.8.2014.png (29KB, 1212x509px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1212x509px

>>37814107
No.
I`m not even communist, but only authoritarian socialist.

File: Polcom new 2.png (352KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 800x800px

Is there any way I could get an even 'better' result?
I quite like this.

File: 1336004633355.jpg (53KB, 600x383px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 600x383px

>>37817851

>Authoritarian Socialist

How's middle-school going?

>>37817851
>Authoritarian socialist
>I know what's best for every one, you people are too stupid

>>37814225
decadent socialist master race

>>37817851

God, I hope you are still young and have a chance of getting less stupid in time.

>>37818525
idealistic children master-race!

>>37814225
nice

File: 85b28d1f821b286a8eb3b56cbd0a3649.png (6KB, 482x503px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 482x503px

>>37814107
pretty close

>>37814225
>group identification is inherently a moving goal post.
which doesn't matter since, for example, libertarianism is never going to be to the left of syndicalism

File: labels.jpg (122KB, 791x901px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 791x901px

More like this.

File: large-Che-Guevara.jpg (22KB, 360x330px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 360x330px

>>37814107
so where does "che" merchandising fall in this plot graph? is it about the message or making money?

>>37820415
>no anarchism
trash

>>37817851
where to take test on right

File: 1412898992800.png (126KB, 795x718px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 795x718px

>>37814107

>>37820739

It's there on the top m8

File: 1413517209317.jpg (95KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 700x700px

>>37820739
it's actually from an Anarcist website.

I guess it's there to show actual real life comparisons next to Anarchism? Who can truly be the voice of Anarchism anyway? It doesn't have "the one voice", that's kinda contrary to pan-anarchism and pan-secessionism.

>>37821145
>there is only one kind of anarchism
>economic liberty

>>37820415
Hitler was rightist conservative

>>37820804
putin is in the center of the triangle. does that make him the most balanced, moderate political leader in the world?

>>37814107
>National Socialism
>left wing

No, it's not. It's trash.

>>37821235

Are you implying anarchism isn't an extreme form of libertarian capitalism?

>>37821368
Im implying property does not exist in any form of anarchism.

>>37821321
Hitler was a traitor to the ideals of Social Nationalism. He wasn't a real National Socialist, he was a capitalist enabler.

>>37814107

Wtf is "ultra capitalism"?

>>37821478

But it's the ultimate expression of personal liberty. It doesn't need to respect property as a right, because everyone can decide anything themselves and protect it as they want.

>>37821368
It isn't an extreme form of any kind of capitalism. Anarchism is by definition entire anti-capitalist. So called AnCaps are simply small government capitalists in practice, or Ron Paul Liberterians generally. AnCap is a false Anarchism.

>>37821615
Yeah, but it's like that in amy society. You van go and do anything, butthegovernment can too.

>>37818152
Noice

>>37814107
no, how the fuck can middle ground be liberalism

>>37821556
Coincidentally, I've written an article on this particular ideal. It can be yours for a mere 19.99!

>Basically all parties are left-authoritarian.

Why god why.
I guess it's the ''easiest''. Father Government makes sure your useless ass can't do anything to hurt yourself and it ''feeeels goooodddd''

File: right wing.jpg (57KB, 491x485px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 491x485px

>>37814225
In Mexico i'm considered right wing, and they wonder why we can't get out of our shithole

File: Compass2014.png (68KB, 1324x1044px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1324x1044px

Good/Bad?

File: notsure.jpg (95KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 480x480px

>>37821321

>Conservatives want to overthrow the government and bring about a new age of human existence