The liberals are at it again; as soon as anonymous goes outside of what their morality pushes for, were fucking vilified, and thrown to the wayside. Ungrateful vermin, after everything we've done for them, they're so quick to take the side of hollywood idols, who only perpetuate everything that's wrong about this fucking country.
>looking at these pics is non-consensual
>Ana on a hacker leaking nudes: I agree with a ten year sentence of a guy who committed a non-violent crime.
>Ana when it comes to drug sentences: IT'S A NON-VIOLENT CRIME, 10 YEARS IS OUTRAGEOUS.
but y tho
The difference is one harms the user, the other harms someone who doesnt wish to be part of the action in place.
>it fucks ME up
>steal pictures and post them
>ruins THAT persons image
The NSA had all these.
This isn't news to us that someone could get them.
This story takes focus off the NSA and gives excuse to take away internet freedom.
tl;dr Just watchin goyim like usual
I took weed once. It made me void my bowels like there was no tomorrow.
>ruins THAT persons image
Why should we care about a celeb getting nudes leaked? If anything, it would draw more attention to her like
>"Hey you want to go see the Hunger Games movie?"
>"Isn't Jennifer Lawrence in that?"
>"Yeah, the bimbo who took nudes of herself!"
>"FUCK YEAH, LETS GO"
celebrities want a life under the spotlight and these are the risks they take and considering they live luxurious lives I would call it pretty fair
the common man does not want a life under the spot light, and it isn't justified when his life is already shit
also one guy posted them here how is this anything to do with 4chan, imagine if he mailed them to a friend and we blamed the postal service for it
What's the matter? Got something to hide? Hmm? HMM!?
Someone should make a video showing how they treat the two differently.
Remember the NSA like to leave things vulnerable to hacking so they can get into them easier.
No NSA = No n00dz
but she feels bad because all those people are violating her rights and other unimportant bullshit. Bitch could afford to have 100 neets beheaded by isis if she wanted why should anyone care about her feelings.
Let's say the NSA is monitoring you, why the fuck do you care, they don't give a shit what porn you view and it would take them ten times longer to filter out all the garbage to find things worth noting, makes more sense to just collect everything
when the NSA starts black mailing people with the information, or it gets leaked, then we'll talk
>leave 4chan for an hour
>roll for dubs
I personally get turned on thinking about how some NSA agent has to flipbook through my pictures of cheeseburgers and guns just to find my porn which also features cheeseburgers and guns.
>when the hacker starts black mailing people with the nudes, or it gets leaked, then we'll talk
>celebrities want a life under the spotlight and these are the risks they take and considering they live luxurious lives I would call it pretty fair
Blaming the victim, and that too, based on your assumptions about their lives.
THEY'RE UNDER OBLIGATION NOT TO FUCKING HAVE IT IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!
Why would they follow the obligation that allows them to break obligations?
the government is obligated to keep you safe
this is the most efficient way of doing it and it's clearly working since the number of terrorist attacks pale in comparison to the amount of people who hate the USA
>when the NSA starts black mailing people with the information, or it gets leaked, then we'll talk
Why would the NSA directly release the information? That's retarded, even for an alphabet soup bureaucracy. All they'd have to do is get on 4chan and release them, instant exposure, none of the blame.
>Lector is 4Chan
>Clarice is SJW
>Buffalo Bill is /b/
>Jack Crawford is FBI
>Whoever did this is a a shit-bead drenched in diarrhea. They violated the privacy of these women and helped to fuel the exploitation of women.
That was an actual comment
>the population would be chimping out if they didn't at least try
What would the population chimp out about? You mean the niggers on welfare?
>also what is this 'information' you call speak of, no one has ever specified it
You're the one who mentioned it in the first place, you tell me.
Okay totally not NSA agent
>Spy on own country, not who wants to attack you
Good use of resources, I feel safe.
There's plenty of places where they don't try, and the population doesn't do anything. The people who rely on the government rely on the government, and therefore can't chimp out without the government's help.
>What would the population chimp out about? You mean the niggers on welfare?
about the government not attempting to keep them safe from terrorism
>You're the one who mentioned it in the first place, you tell me.
the burden of proof isn't on me as I do not believe there is any information worth leaking for the common man
>Spy on own country, not who wants to attack you
because no American has ever committed a terrorist attack right?
Why are you here?
Can I get paid to do what you do?
>about the government not attempting to keep them safe from terrorism
Yeah, I'm sure the majority of Americans just love the NSA.
And the government did a good job keeping the people safe in the Boston Marathon, right?
>the burden of proof isn't on me as I do not believe there is any information worth leaking for the common man
Are you retarded? Do you know how the burden of proof works?
You can't come up to me and say "unicorns are real" with no opposing statement from me at all and then tell me that the burden of proof is on me to say they aren't. God damn you're an idiot.
>Spy on own country, not who wants to attack you
Who are you quoting?
Why the fuck would I care if she takes nude pictures or not, if I never get to see them anyway?
Also, lmao she approves of vigilantism, but not when it happens to celebs.
Nice double standard you got there
>I sit here and talk against government agencies that invade our privacy blah blah blah
She's right, though. Nobody should have the right to look at your private pictures/videos/conversations etc. I'm not saying I'm not glad those nude photos got leaked though. They're hawt.
I'm pretty sure the fact that EVERY SINGLE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IN THE WORLD reported this entire thing did more damage to those actresses careers than the nude leaks on the internet.
The leaks can be subpoenad right quick, the pictures contained to torrent sites. The reputation damage done by the nonstop media coverage however: BILLIONS of people now know about it.
The fact that the zionist media are all over it proves that the leak was orchestrated by three letter agencies imo. They wanted to damage JLaw's career because of her punky, anti-establishment attitude, and because unlike media approved degenerates like Miley Cyrus, she refuses to adhere to the official liberal narrative of white-girl self-destruction.
They want JLaw gone because the Hunger Games movies, her rebellious anti-establishment pranks on the red carpet, she was becoming a subversive role model for young white girls so they try to character assassinate her.
We should start a petition that every celeb should post at least 3 nude pictures before being allowed to become a celebrity.
1 full frontal nude shot.
1 closeup of pussy and ass
1 closeup of tits.
The hunger Games is happening in real life fucker.
Jlaw didn't play her part.
But she'll get them before they get her.
>act outraged at the leaks
>plaster on the pics on the screen
No shit hunger games is happening irl. It's an analogy about the Wall Street 1% and the rest of the now mostly completely impoverished USA.
And how do you think Hollywood likes the fact that JLaw isnt just unexpectedly popular and turned some shitty movies into huge blockbusters, but takes the rebellious, subversive attitude of her movie character onto the red carpet?
This was bound to piss off the right people sooner or later. They are trying to dismantle her as a role model, trying to kill her popularity.
i never gave two single fucks for them. i really don't know half of these fuckers. besides they all look like 5/10 and below. i only like this, since it shows how idiotic people are on their privacy.
>need to go to hospital because I dun goofed on how much to take
>now costed lots of time and money to society.
>smoke too much
>get lung cancer
>giant cost in time and resources to society.
>get fucked up
>go commit crimes and do other stupid shit because I think it's a great idea to my drug altered mind
>waste societies time and resources.
Drugs do not just stay in a little vacuum all the time.
That's why I don't think it's much of an issue with putting people away for certain types of drug use, because you are just as likely to put stress on the community, not just yourself.
So, no you're wrong, it doesn't just fuck you up.
>throws a hissy fit when the NSA monitors citizens?
Because most of /pol/ is children that goes 'fuck the man' at the first sign and has no foresight.
I personally thought the NSA spying thing was way, way overblown.
I'd be embarrassed for the country if they weren't doing these things, mass data processing and looking at meta data and everything.
And handing said data to Israel. How much of a fuck do you think israeli intelligence gives about the civil rights of american goyim?
It empowers them to control americans even more thoroughly than they already do. They control the mass media, and now they have enough dirt to character anyone who publically opposes them.
>I'd be embarrassed for the country if they weren't doing these things, mass data processing and looking at meta data and everything.
>The liberals are at it again; as soon as anonymous goes outside of what their morality pushes for, were fucking vilified, and thrown to the wayside. Ungrateful vermin, after everything we've done for them
Pretty sure Anonymous stopped being exclusively 4chan a very long time ago. About 6 years, give or take
>not realizing hard drug overdoses occur because they aren't able to regulate and control purity consistently because they aren't able to set up labs good enough for standardized strengths
You realize the door swings both ways right?
The machines collect everything, everything is recorded.
If you can get dirt on someone, they can get dirt on you, you just have to go get it.
>implying even if you were setting some standards people wouldn't get impaired and commit crimes, or keep taking more until they reached dangerous levels, and then become a huge cost to society.
Why would any rational person feel bad about exploiting a propaganda shiller in Hollywood?
The great pretenders lie and cheat, and expect us to respect them. It is complete Hollywood bullshit.
The Young Jerks have always defended the wrong side.
i sometimes wonder if nsa agents are looking at us and laughing that we haven't even hit the jackpot in nudes and never will, and that they are the ones giving out nudes because they feel bad.
I actually used to watch TYT on a regular basis, back then they were just a underground news, not super liberal.
Then they "got big" and sold out to Al Gore's news network and became complete shit.
Best question of all, where is link for compilation of all the photos? now im curious, were not for media and its attention towards it i wouldnt even give a crap, now i want to see it
First of all, they have a 20 year headstart over everyone else. They were the only ones who knew that the entire internet was one gigantic honeypot. If not for Snowden, they'd STILL be the only ones who are aware. Do you really think that they were stupid enough to incriminate themself in this time, when they knew all along that everything posted on the web sticks around forever?
Sure you can turn the tables now, you could take the surveillance infrastructure away from them and then use it against them.
But do you REALLY think they are stupid enough to give you incriminating material?
People like Netanjahu dont use the internet to communicate or 'express' themself, they dont use cell phones, and they even have special accomodations where they communicate with each other using written notes, only that they instantly destroy.
The worst you can do these people is to take everything they built over the last 20 years and burn it the fuck down. The entire surveillance apparatus. Then you pass laws that make character assassinations using material that was possibly obtained by three letter agencies impossible.
Destroy their intelligence, reign in the jew press via laws, problem solved.
Yeah, she is right...
And it is disgusting that someone hacked and stole private photos, im agains fucking NSA and im against this sort of things.
However, jesus fucking christ, this are people with millions in their names, one would expect them to be slightly smarter than to upload their faces full of cum to the internet, or better yet, to take those fucking photos in the first place.
They arent to blame, but they sure as shit are partially responsible for it, dislike it but at the same time cant help but sigh and be curious about the photos now that they are out
perhaps, still curious about it, unless its some sort of criminal offence to even look at them >_>
Which then, is honestly rather hypocritical as when this happened to male celebs or normal people, no one gives a flying shit
It didn't start there. The Anon who got the pics probably got them from an onion trading ring. But the leak itself was Anonymous.
Anonymous originally was just a joke. It still is, except people laugh AT Anonymous, not with it. Anonymous was a joke that everyone posting on 4chan, and then 7chan, 99chan, 420chan, etc, was all the same person.
It was just a meme.
One year at a New Jersey state prison: $44,000
10=440,000.00 USD, that your tax dollars to house a 18yr hacker for distributing celebrity pics.
that sounds far to both the hacker and the people right?
Ana says she won't look at the pictures.
1. Unless she's a dike why would she be interested in female nudes
2. If the leaked nudes were of famous male celebrities, you know that bitch would look at them
What an insufferable hypocritical cunt.
That's exactly what happens, you kike. /pol/ warned about this ages ago
You think you data isn't going to be used? >False, the NSA's data collection is being used for character assassinations and blackmail:
Think all this is for catching terrorists? >No, the NSA haven't stopped any terrorists:
Think you're not high profile enough? >72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered Potential Terrorists In Official Government Documents:
Think you can hide? >Jacob Applebaum explains how they are spying on you in ways you can't even conceive of:
Huh, back in this thread and wanted to elaborate further here. How do they even know this guy has been selling pictures and obtaining bitcoins for celeb nude photos? Doesn't that strike anyone as odd, they're tracking him so much they know who he supposedly selling them to and for and to what websites. Shit, this whole thing absolutely reeks of NSA or an government affiliated agency.
>tfw Anonymous used to mean something
>tfw nobody does it for the lulz anymore
>tfw we don't even get shit like Brave Agent Pubeit anymore
If that's case, she has been penetrated in every hole by goodness knows how many people.
Daily reminder this was posted by a TYT intern and it's clickbate
They have no one to blame but themselves really, so I don't feel sorry for them at all. The only reason people take naked photos of themselves is with intention to share it with someone else. Sharing it on the cloud was just plain retarded in the first place.
>For all the hackers out their skill in doing good things
>these people should stand up and absolutely denounce this individual
>this is the kind of person who will group all of the hackers into a really really terrible thing
>a very dangerous, non moral, immoral, group of people that just hack for their own self interest and for their own enjoyment of pleasure
stupid camwhore do something stupid
blame everyone but herself
consequence be the same
she just dun goofed
>talk about not using the hacked photos
>uses one of the hacked photos
>defends personal privacy
>says it's ok to hack "if it's for a good reason"