lol wonder if this loser posts here
http://www.courant.com/breaking-news/hc-west-hartford-trump-morely-school-steven-marks-20170705-story.html
>Marks told police on June 19 he vandalized the property "out of 'anger towards liberals and they are breaking major laws everyday and being disrespectful towards our government,'" according to the warrant for his arrest. He told police it was his hope that the vandalism would appear to have been done by the "Left."
why are trumpcucks so fucking stupid?
>>132583605
lol, blacks are about to kick out their last source of food in africa and you guys talk about how dumb white people are. lmfao
is 70k a year income degenerate? What is a nice upper class salary bros?
pic unrelated
>>132583493
70k is ok if you're a rural and suburban retard.
If you want to be part of the ultra high IQ city people master race you need at least 300k
>>132583737
that flag..
Daily reminder that free trade is Communism
http://mailstar.net/classwar.html
http://ipezone.blogspot.com/2008/05/karl-marxs-was-all-for-free-trade.html
Name one necessary difference between simulation theory and Christianity, and explain why one is rational and one isn't, without using a straw man or a rhetorical tautology.
Pro tip: you can't
>who are the enemies of /pol/
>who are the allies of /pol/
pic not ralated but its my fav movie
Question for the jews of /pol/
why do you still suck blood out of baby dicks?
what's up with all the usury/nepotism/pedestary?
Would the ADL consider these questions anti-semetic?
>>132583274
CNN, you, Bloat Thread poster, are the enemy of /pol/.
Sage.
>>132583274
CNN are allies and Reddit are enemies
Man, for people who so wholeheartedly espouse natural selection as the keystone process for their understanding of the natural world, modern day progressives are incredibly reluctant to apply the same concept to their own social and moral philosophies. As with all moral philosophies, progressivism (or postmodern secular humanism, there is quite a bit of overlap between the two.) starts with an assumption; something which is taken for granted. A matter of faith, so to speak. For progressives, the Logos is called Equality, which is certainly a very charismatic word. “We believe that all men are created equal.” Naturally, given the nature of the movement, the words “men”, and “created” have been hastily scribbled out.
The problem that quickly arises from this starting point is how reality fails to reflect noble ideals. Surely if all men (atonal howling of the estrogen addled can be heard in the distance) are inherently equal, then society ought to exist at relative parity? Obviously, this blissful state does not exist. Within the formalized savanna melee which we call an economy, there are very definite winners and losers and many are left out in the cold. At the game of acquiring resources, some are objectively superior. Moreover, there are objective physical differences. One could find oneself very hard pressed to stand between an overweight retiree and a gold medal Olympiad and not find one of them, at least subconsciously, preferable. Even if the brain has been conditioned to dishonesty in these matters, one can always expect the reproductive system to tell the truth. When the question shifts from “Which one is superior?” to “Which would you sleep with?”, the results are a lot less enlightened; though, perhaps, more enlightening.
When faced with these facts, a progressive will turn back to their essential articles of faith and throw an error code. If all men (feminist shrieking) are created (materialist shrieking) equal, but equality does not exist, then something must have gone WRONG. This is as close as a progressive can ever come to espousing an objective moral statement without being hypocritical. Note that this does not stop them from doing so in a plethora of other cases. Here, also, is found the original sin of progressive dogma. If someone is more successful than the mean, he (pronouns multiply silently in the distance) must be guilty of snatching that success from those for whom it was somehow destined. If someone is unsuccessful, then they are being oppressed by whomever managed to siphon off the karma that should have guaranteed their victorious destiny.
This is the point where classical Marxism arose. Since equality was the only objective fundamental good that a materialist could conceive of, then the reapportionment of resources from the more successful to the less successful was the only moral course of action. However, it is with the failure of every Marxist state to ever exist that the Progressive cult hit its first real doctrinal snag. Each Marxist state failed when it tried to compete with their less enlightened economic counterparts. Or, in most cases, when they came into contact with basic human biology, namely the requirement of all living things to consume food. Moreover, they had discovered that some forms of success were too immaterial to be apportioned. Some people were inherently more attractive, some lifestyle choices were inherently healthier, some sexes are inherently better adapted to specific roles. Since it impossible to collectivize gender (they’ve certainly tried), the reformed church of progressivism came up with the idea of reapportioning the concept of success.
Now, as a biosphere is capable of producing only a finite amount of resources, a society is capable of producing a finite amount of success. People inherently find themselves unwilling to recognize everyone as a winner. However, while there is only a finite amount of success in the world, society is capable of producing an infinite (or at least arbitrarily large) amount of failure. If that industriously produced failure can be “fairly” apportioned, the shining concept of equality can finally be reached. Namely at the level of the lowest common denominator. Everyone can be a success only once nobody is. The rich can’t take bread from the mouth of the poor once there is no bread. Thus, was born the “white liberal guilt” meme. The moral thing to do, for a conscientious member of the privileged class (read that as white, straight and male.) is to cast off the scarlet S of success as quickly as possible by adopting the habits and behaviors of those less successful. The wealthy must vote for the government which promises to strip them of their money; the free for the one which will strip them of their rights. Citizens of successful countries are expected to import as many of the poor and unemployable as possible to even out the global poverty levels. Even sexually, Men are encouraged to adopt sexual behaviors and identities which ensure they’ll never breed. Cultural Marxism is not about the redistribution of wealth, it is the redistribution of poverty.
The rotten heart of progressivism, the root which nurtures this religion of cultural suicide is the very first assumption “we are all equal.” If there is any doubt that the faith in this statement is religious fanaticism, simply ask someone why they believe it. The innocent question “Why do you believe that?” is met either with shock that you would dare question something so fundamental, or anger as if you had personally attacked their own moral value. It’s much the same reaction you would get if you asked a catholic why they bothered listening to the pope.
When viewed from a materialistic vantage (From which progressivism claims its origin), there is clearly no reason to believe that humans should all be considered equally valuable and valid any more than you would consider the same things of individual sea turtles. An organism is successful if its expressed genetic traits are better adapted to its environment than its competitors. These adaptations are considered better adapted if the creature succeeds at the essential functions of the organism, namely acquiring resources and passing on its genes by breeding. From this point of view, it’s quite clear that humanity consists of multiple distinct populations, each containing genes that have been subject to generations of pruning by the selection pressures of the environments from which these populations spring. If straight white males are more successful in society, then the adaptations of being straight white and male (and the numerous behaviors associated with these demographics) must be better adapted to performing their essential biological functions within the environment of your society. Natural selection does not produce or favor “diversity”, rather it gradually progresses a population towards homogeneity by eliminating the less efficient adaptations. This holds true for as long as the environment remains the same.
Montana Anon here. Just had a 5.8 earthquake near Lincoln, MT. I live in Great Falls and felt it.
Yellowstone supervolcano happening when?
>>132583235
Live in Northern Idaho and barely felt it.
>>132583235
5.8?
it has never been over 5 ... 0.8 increase indicates possible happening
>>132583235
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!!
Why does /pol/ shill hard for Merkel now? Did the (((Trump))) is controlled by (((them))) narrative inspire this unironic Merkelposting?
>>132583194
Nobody is, butthurt krauts and shitskins are.We know our true friends.
>>132583284
OK you had me worried for a second. Because how on Earth do they shill for the queen of multikulti and Western genocide?
>>132583449
Because they are salty that we are giving poland some hospitality, we ARE giving polska some patriot missle defence systems after all.
This is not how the world works. If you think this is how it works, if you think this is success, you have submitted to hundreds of years of conditioning and have utterly failed.
>>132583190
I really wish anime was real
>>132583258
>I really wish anime was real
Me too
ikr, where is the gender balance. lolz
Parents who give their kids a smartphone and then wonder why their kids end up twerking for some pedo Youtuber, should be held responsible. If the gov't had age limits on the internet, then we can start blaming parents for their kids doing stupid shit on the internet because they shouldn't have allowed them on there to begin with.
Think of it this way. Let's say I have kids and decide to show them my entire porn stash, including the more hardcore anal tearing stuff. Is that illegal? Should it be? If it is, then why is it ok to let them on the internet when they have access to worse stuff?
>>132583141
Cool idea, save it for later.
sage for now, focus on CNN war, too many bloat threads.
>>132584305
>too many bloat threads.
Lots of BBC threads trending unfortunately
>>132583141
Alcohol and drugs (in some countries) have an age restriction , does that stop young idiots abusing them ? No.It's not the kids fault it's stupid parents that don't teach morals and basic do and donts to their kids.Tv will educate my kid , I don't have to do anything.
Being catholic is the ultimate kink:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/vatican-police-raid-drug-fueled-gay-orgy-cardinal-apartment-article-1.3302974
>>132583122
Cool.
sage bloat threads, focus on CNN war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEm-1ukIiiY
Well... Is there a reason you all still support allowing the sale of pornography?
>>132583112
>Jew shows his natural aversion to the Aryan instinct to create with perversion.
>>132583619
Exactly.
This video is definitely worth something.
When do we finally kill this fucker?
>>132583081
After the CNN war.
sorry, but this is a bloat thread.
sage.
>>132583081
tomorrow
why dont they just kill veryone
>>132582970
very one what?
>>132582970
You aren't even trying anymore, bloatposter.
Give up, we see right through you.
sage
If they did that, how would they get paid?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFrBYI3Ntro&ab_channel=Kelthuzzar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sxTbfeYdO0
>>132582993
hi comrade Bernie