Tick-tock drumpfkins. it's only a matter of time before the cheeto-in-chief gets impeached.
Drumpf is finished.
>>132846779
You've been saying that since November.
TINA!?
Now looking at it... Check out them fingers.....
today i find out half my relatives were in a terrorist organization. ama ill relay it to them if yall got some questions
>>132846756
One word......why?
>>132846756
OP are they Armenian? Because I dated a braod from Armenia. Hands down wildest shit of my life
One word.....sage
Hypothetical
>ancient good awaken and is a master tier magitek magus of bullshit
>creates 37 million automatic self propelled spheres that float in low orbit and avoid any other incoming object so no death net for NASA
>these spheres can detect nuclear energy and move at speeds that would make Superman blush that can intercept and capture the weapon mid detonation and contain it
>even bombed detonated on site would be contained to a few feet
>threat from nuclear war or weapons is completely negated in a single night with no way to undo it
Is the world a better place or does all out world war III begin when MAD is taken out of the picture completely?
>>132846584
>he fell for the nukes meme
Nukes aren't real retard
>>132848431
If nukes aren't real then 97% of all action movies made during the 90's have a lot of explaining to do.
>>132846584
world war 3 happens, then world war 4.
but afterwards we'd be in a good place. a lot better than we are now. europe would be uncucked, mudslimes would be erased, and slavs would be on suicide watch.
Slide threads are on the rise and I want to remind oldfags and teach newfags how to recognize the difference between worthwhile threads and slide threads in order to optimize the /pol/ experience, avoid demoralization, and get the most out of this place for the least time invested.
Categories of threads and their descriptions:
>Something demoralizing happened.
Could be about minorities moving to white areas. Demographic change. A white woman or white women acting against white culture. The list is practically endless. When you read the thread title, just ask yourself: “Is this topic blatantly demoralizing to white, nationalist interests?” If yes, interact at your own risk. It’s an intentional time sink designed to weaken your resolve and drain you emotionally.
>What do we do about “x” problem / hate threads.
These are almost always a kind of “demoralizing” thread (see above). They get their own category because they are so prevalent, but they should be treated the same. Often worded exactly as the title suggest, they are meant to distract you, waste your time, and cause you to question the efficacy of your own life’s efforts and ideally whether those efforts are even worthwhile.
>Degeneracy threads.
These threads openly promote some form of degeneracy. They might ask “why aren’t you a trap?” or “what’s wrong with sucking dick?” They are generally worded in crass language designed to illicit an emotional response. They are vintage slide threads and should be ignored.
>>132846551
>Examine yourself threads.
These threads generally cause you to look inwards. They often position themselves as anti-degenerate, for example they may ask you if you’re making white babies. Other times they ask you if you’re lifting and /fit/. In those instances they aren’t necessarily bad, although often they are designed to be a kind of demoralization thread. Join only if you have a specific question that another anon with expertise may be able to answer. Generally they should be skipped.
>Biography threads.
Generally a narrative post about something negative. “Just found out my kid’s gay.” “Just found out my white daughter is fucking a black thug.” “My brother just decided he’s going to be my sister.” These are LARP threads designed to demoralize you. Often the OP will decide their “ok” with the negative news. The story is carefully crafted and the post image meticulously selected to get a rise out of as many anons as possible. Certain personality types are drawn to these threads – do not be fooled. They are crafted to drain and demoralize you.
>Divide and conquer threads.
These threads are intended to highlight the differences between various whites, various Christians, or both, rather than outline their common ground, common enemy, common purpose, etc. Often they are in the form of a statement about who is or is not legitimately white, or an all-out attack on Christianity, or a fine point of Christianity designed to provoke Catholic vs Orthodox vs Protestant vs etc. division without resolution. These threads often backfire and have been on the decline, because anons frequently come together and gain a deeper understanding of one another’s beliefs in them. These threads are a coin toss; check only when the board contains no other worthwhile threads.
>>132846643
>Your idea is dumb / ineffectual / backwards threads.
The first thread category that newfags learn to wise up to. These threads will tell you that something you promote – usually a commonsense topic – is pointless or even impeding your ultimate goals. Topics range from protecting your nation’s borders, to promoting your culture, to reforming the monetary system - they can be virtually anything. Always skip.
>”Happening” threads.
These threads can be authentic, although often aren’t. Generally it’s worth your while to at least check to see what “happening” threads are on the board. Often they are obvious clickbait. You’ll know the worthwhile ones when you see them - with a little experience.
>General threads.
Threads such as “President Trump General,” “Syria General,” “National Socialist General,” “Catholic/Orthodox General” and others. Good threads for accessing links to relevant sites and sources, and for asking questions about the topic. Often repetitive in nature, but they are some of the most consistently worthwhile threads on /pol/. Newfags should generally lurk in these before venturing into the wider /pol/ ecosystem.
>Insider threads.
Many come to /pol/ just for these. Actual anons with insider information. Lurkers come out of the woodwork for these threads. Sadly, many are LARPers (LARP threads being a subcategory of insider threads). You’ll have to develop your own litmus test for deciding who is genuine and who isn’t. The farther down the rabbit hole you get, the easier this will become. They are always worth checking out; usually not worth staying.
>>132846703
>Modern Jews aren’t LARPing threads.
These come in many forms. Any thread that insinuates that modern “Jews” are comparable to biblical Judeans, or promoting Jews as being anything other than anti-Logos nomads, fall under this category. To a newfag this category will seem out of place, but it is probably the most important of all. Any thread insinuating that “Jesus was a Jew,” “Mary was a Jew,” “the apostles were Jews,” all fall under this category - although deprogramming a newfag as to why this is exceeds the purpose and scope of this thread. Most Jews are Khazar descendants and have no identity other than the denial of Logos and (occasionally, although often not) Khazar/Turkic genetic remnants. I could expand on this but only about 3% of /pol/ (by my estimate) is at the level where they are capable of grasping this. Just remember that any thread about Jews – other than those naming the Jew as world parasite in both the spiritual and physical sense – are slide threads, no matter the topic.
>Meta threads.
These threads analyze the meta of 4Chan. You are currently in a meta thread. They are one of the rarer thread categories. Often they are demoralization threads, other times they attack 4Chan as inferior to other Chans or even general pastime activities. Occasionally they are very good. When you see a meta thread, always give it a brief check.
>Mobilization/doxx threads.
Threads such as Draft Our Daughters, HWNDU location, pedogate research, and the recent CNN attack threads all fall under this category. These also include infodump threads designed to mobilize anons to sort through Wikileaks dumps, FBI dumps, etc. These are likely the most important threads on /pol/. Always check these threads without exception.
>In an interview with Poland’s W Sieci weekly, Witold Waszczykowski said “Ukraine will not enter Europe with Bandera,”
WTF is your problem, pooles??? This is our country and our heroes. You can't dictate us who to praise.
Poland was oppressing Ukrainians for centuries, you literally have no right to speak about such matters!
http://thenews.pl/1/10/Artykul/315117,Polish-FM-called-out-by-Ukraine-over-historical-comment
>>132846534
Die you fucking scum shitstain. I wash my eyes and hands everytime I greet a Ukrainian refugee here. Bandera was a murderer and butchered innocent women and children. Find better heroes.
>>132846534
Ukrainians are not human. Russia should cleanse them off already.
>>132846534
>You can't dictate us who to praise.
>you literally have no right to speak about such matters!
But we have a right to veto your membership in the EU.
Idk where else to ask this. But I'm starting EMT school on Monday. What should I expect?
Expect to learn a lot less than you expected.
>>132846280
link
>>132846280
Predictable. CNN will reach and grasp at any small thing if it can suit their needs.
>>132846280
This cannot be real
I wanna fuck the commie out of her
These fucking kikes named us in their article.
>https://archive.is/Jnpwo
>https://archive.is/Jnpwo
>https://archive.is/Jnpwo
>>132846222
>New York Times
>Not, Carlos Slim Daily or
>The Mexican Herald
This is getting kinda weird.
Has CNN ever given an explanation as to why they launched an investigation into that guy?
>Trump tweeted it, that makes it news
No it doesn't. The whole meme phenomenon is the death of the author personified, the only thing that is relevant is the intention of the person using it. I'm sure the people investigating HanAssolio have reposted some le funny cat pictures made by some pretty horrible people on their Facebook, but they'd never dream of applying the same standards to themselves
>b-but he said some racist things, that makes it news
No it doesn't. He's not a public figure, his views on race are not newsworthy. There was nothing at all remotely reflecting his purported racial views in the gif that Trump posted, therefore it's completely irrelevant
We all know that the real reason is
>this peasant dared to insult us, CNN SMASH
but have they even tried to come up with a reason?
JUST
>>132846199
IMPEACH
even melania is taller than little dick putin
>>132846241
ORANGE
https://mobile.twitter.com/AliceCooperNoti/status/882315959582605312
>bite lips
>scratch nose
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH I GOT BEAT UP
https://altright.com/2017/07/07/americans-have-a-winner-mentality-that-destroys-their-society/
>natsoc /pol/ will defend this blatant communism just because it's from the "official" alt-right
can't this manlet duterte not take Marawi City?
Is he all talk no action?
So much for le based chinkspic maymay
http://archive.is/uzrw9
"DEMOCRATS 2018: NEW SLOGAN COULD BE, 'HAVE YOU SEEN THE OTHER GUYS?'"
Can the Democrats come up with a more cucked slogan? Their non-existent platform except 'TRUMP BAD' is summed up perfectly by this.
>>132845856
100% True, we've already won 2018 boys, let's focus on destroying CNN!