Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 7408. page

File: ch-lgflag.gif (12KB, 400x268px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 400x268px

Why do liberals see Russia as the biggest baddie when China obviously is the bigger threat?

File: DSC_8121.jpg (390KB, 2048x1356px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 2048x1356px

Are Jews white or are they sandniggers?

File: download (1).jpg (5KB, 305x165px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 305x165px

Why do you still support Trump when he panders to the corporate 1% that screwed over this country (that includes him)?

Sanders wanted the reign in the corporate wall street shills is fucking over this country.
Meanwhile your scottish hombre Drumpf went against his promise to reign them in and instead ENDORSED A BILL to the House to DEREGULATE WALL STREET.

Sanders pushed for a progressive economic and tax system where the jewish corporate assfucks are accountable to the people.
Meanwhile, your "true ally" Drumpf is PUSHING FOR A "TRINKLED DOWN" TAX SYSTEM THAT FUCKS ALL OVER THE MIDDLE CLASS AND PUTS MORE MONEY IN THE CORPORATE SHILLS' POCKETS

Sanders wanted to put these fuckers to jail and fix these loopholes where the corporate shills buy off fraud using money and they get away scot free.
Meanwhile, your good pal Drumpf actually used loopholes to defraud creditors and screw over others, gets away scot free, PROMISED TO REMOVE SAID LOOPHOLES, BUT NOTHING HAS HAPPENED SO FAR

File: IMG_1324.png (801KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

801KB, 750x1334px

>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is in the early stages of launching a debate about climate change that could air on television – challenging scientists to prove the widespread view that global warming is a serious threat, the head of the agency said.

>The move comes as the administration of President Donald Trump seeks to roll back a slew of Obama-era regulations limiting carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels, and begins a withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement - a global pact to stem planetary warming through emissions cuts.

>"There are lots of questions that have not been asked and answered (about climate change)," EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt told Reuters in an interview late on Monday.

>"Who better to do that than a group of scientists... getting together and having a robust discussion for all the world to see," he added without explaining how the scientists would be chosen.

>Asked if he thought the debate should be televised, Pruitt said: "I think so. I think so. I mean, I don’t know yet, but you want this to be open to the world. You want this to be on full display. I think the American people would be very interested in consuming that. I think they deserve it."

>Pruitt, one of the most controversial figures in the Trump administration, has repeatedly expressed doubts about climate change – one of the main points of contention in his narrow confirmation by the Senate.

>While acknowledging the planet is warming, Pruitt says he questions the gravity of the problem and the need for regulations that require companies to take costly measures to reduce their carbon footprint.

TOP Kek
Climate scientist BTFO

File: 1499669587945.jpg (318KB, 969x745px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 969x745px

How does someone make this shit and think it's a good idea?? (See link)

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScxEXxbZF8erF7nhVPAtVQUkKIN9KzgDEHDfs2cJyRKpGmjmQ/viewform?usp=sf_link

File: CVgKxTrUYAAZfLZ.png_orig.png (3MB, 1100x1650px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1100x1650px

Thought's on Azns?

File: adsf.jpg (506KB, 1999x1333px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 1999x1333px

Talking nation state here, rather than Jewnited States.

But should the state be allowed to determine what happens in the wilderness? My feeling is that the wilderness should be left wild and left alone and the state should govern the cities and townships like they used to in the old days.

File: antiwoman.jpg (112KB, 1299x1300px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1299x1300px

The more I think about it, the more women seem responsible for ruining America.

Take for example the fact that women used to not work, and then they started entering the workforce. Imagine what that would do to the workforce having all these new potential employees. It would drive down wages.

Take for example marital rape laws. Women whined and bitched "Waaah husbands shouldn't be able to rape their wives" but the alternative is to have police officers govern what transpires in the bed of a married couple. Do we really need the government policing what transpires between married couples in their beds? Women think so. I don't think most men would.

Fuck women, guys. The more they have power in society the worse things become.

File: serveimage.jpg (288KB, 2400x1300px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 2400x1300px

So what happens if he goes full Napoleon/Hitler?

File: limbo.png (509KB, 715x298px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 715x298px

feel the spirit of resistance.

File: file.png (374KB, 590x613px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 590x613px

If you have another country's monarch as your head of state you are officially cucked as a nation.

File: Russia.png (174KB, 1892x933px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1892x933px

It is a year 2050 and it is a map of Russian Empire.

File: meme compass.png (17KB, 492x522px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 492x522px

post em

https://www.politicalcompass.org

File: 2078px-Alaska_in_United_States_(US50).svg.png (76KB, 749x588px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 749x588px

Bow down to the most free place in the world

File: Screenshot_7.png (153KB, 332x361px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 332x361px

http://www.salon.com/2017/07/11/pepe-the-frogs-creator-raises-20000-to-reclaim-him-from-the-alt-right/
Rip pepe