Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 6532. page

File: bill-nye-screenshot.png (709KB, 872x869px) Image search: [Google]

709KB, 872x869px

>Bill Nye says race is a "human construct" and race isn't real

Holy fuck lads, has Bill gone off the deep end?

http://www.politicaloutsource.com/2017/07/bill-nye-says-race-is-a-human-construct-gender-isnt-real.html

File: ball.jpg (39KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 640x640px

Ancap has legit become the new neckbeard ideology. Every time I discuss politics with one the argument devolves into them wanting anarchism because they are deluded enough to think that they'll be on top.

These guys put atheists to shame, why do people ever take them seriously?

File: losertrumpkins.jpg (89KB, 600x369px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 600x369px

He's a wearing a boy scout uniform AND a Trump hat. It's like a sign that says "I'll never see a vagina in real life".

File: working-together-as-a-team-PlusOne_Dynamics_Teamwork-Small.jpg (52KB, 550x413px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 550x413px

Can the left and right come together on any issues to actually improve America? Or are we doomed to fight an apocalyptic civil war?

File: IMG_0494.jpg (155KB, 736x973px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 736x973px

What is the final solution? Can anyone offer one better than William Shockleys voluntary sterilization financial incentives program? How long would it take to decimate the undesirables? Also, William Shockley appreciation thread.

File: IMG_7071.jpg (51KB, 368x512px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 368x512px

pic is me

File: file.png (202KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 850x400px

Why is he constantly pushing the "Communism was Fascism" meme, when you KNOW he's smart enough to know they were opposites. He says dumb shit like:
>Nazis were socialist because the word "socialist" was in the name
Its easy to notice, if you try to read anything published by the Nazis, or listen to ANY of their speeches, that they defined socialism as "racial nationalism", not in an economic sense like Marxists did, but in a "social" sense. Its also obvious, from even the most superficial study of the 3rd Reich, what rabid anti-Communists they were. There was no other movement in history as fanatically anti-communist as the Nazis, but Molymeme still insists they were "just another flavor of communism". He also says really dumb shit like:
>the Nazis were socialists because it was a welfare state
"Welfare" in Nazi Germany consisted of "here are a list of jobs we've recommended you for, if you refuse to take one of them we're sending you to a labor camp". There were no gibs in Nazi Germany, except gibs of clothes and food from Churches.
>the Nazi economic "miracle" was fake because they removed jews and women from the workforce, so they cheated on unemployment figures
Anyone can look up the fact that Jews were less than 1% of the population of Germany (500,000) and women's participation in the labor force only dropped by 10% during the entire period of Nazi rule, so that's bullshit.
>The Nazis had so much debt they needed constant war and conquest to steal gold
German GDP grew steadily and steeply right up until the last year of the war, while Germany's debt to GDP ratio constantly shrank, so their debts were nothing to them. They certainly didn't "drive them to war". Its hard to imagine that Molyneux never heard these facts, or couldn't find them if he tried. I understand when retards think this, because its classic kike propaganda, but when someone smarter says it you have to think they're in on the lie. Why is Molymeme lying to us?

File: 7-FB-ER-1.jpg (18KB, 231x308px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 231x308px

I really hate men that are more attractive to women than I am. For example today I saw a cute Asian woman with a big white guy. They were walking and talking. The woman was very happy. Women are never like that with me. I hate both him and her. I hate all hot women and all men that are attractive to women.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-25 at 9.39.23 AM.png (138KB, 1900x646px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1900x646px

For years the prevailing projections put Africa's population at around two billion in 2100. Those models assumed that fertility rates would fall fairly rapidly and consistently. Instead the rates have dropped slowly and only in fits and starts. The United Nations now forecasts three billion to 6.1 billion people—staggering numbers. Even conservative estimates, from places such as the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria, now see Africa at 2.6 billion. The U.N. has in recent years continually raised its midline projection for 2100 world population, from 9.1 billion in a 2004 estimate to 11.2 billion today. Almost all of the unanticipated increase comes from Africa.

Now imagine what Africa might look like with two billion people, much less six billion. History offers little guide. Asia surpassed four billion people in 2007, but it has 50 percent more land and considerably higher levels of economic development on average. Yet even with its assets, large swaths of that continent still face impoverished cropland, falling water tables, food insecurity and crippling air pollution.
One huge change in Africa will be a mushrooming of gigantic cities. The continent is urbanizing rapidly, with most people arriving from failed farmlands and settling into slums, scratching out what shelter and livelihoods they can. Metropolitan areas house nearly half a billion people today; by 2050 they would hold more than 1.3 billion, according to the U.N.'s projections. Demographers Jean-Pierre Guengant of the Research Institute for Development in France and John May of the Population Reference Bureau predict that the continent's biggest cities will explode in size by 2050: Lagos, Nigeria, from 11 million residents in 2010 to 40 million; Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, from 8.4 million to 31 million.

File: 1500888901138.jpg (369KB, 2624x1676px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 2624x1676px

How do you feel about political protesting as done the traditional picket sign way, or congregating towards supporting some sort of agenda.

I personally think its a complete waste and always turns bad (even true peaceful protests can get violent when people oppose each other). I believe in freedom of speech of course and I don't care who does it, but has protesting done any good whatsoever in changing policy in US history? Complete waste of time.,

File: article-2252675-1671A90B000005DC-547_634x357.jpg (78KB, 634x357px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 634x357px

guess the country

File: Capture.png (922KB, 790x595px) Image search: [Google]

922KB, 790x595px

How does this make you feel? -photo from UK.

File: Untitled.png (269KB, 627x433px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 627x433px

As part of their character assassination of any Alt-right or conservative youtubers, leftypol are trying to turn /pol/ against people such as pewdiepie, lauren southern and milo.

If you see anyone call a youtuber an e-celeb and call people posting conservative youtube videos "shills" its leftypol

File: photo.jpg (4KB, 88x88px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 88x88px

/Ourblack/ has named the people who are destroying blacks.