Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 1997. page

File: 1501470613220.png (85KB, 410x548px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 410x548px

Shitlibs have been waiting for this since Trump's election. We saw tremors in the beginning with false flags of squiggly swastikas on synagogues, reports of mean words said to muslims and the narrative that racism has finally been energised in America. We can thank leftist news agencies for these conveyances as they were eager to look for any signs that pointed to anything resembling minority oppression

Blacks have beaten, tortured and bloodied whites since the election of Trump solely for their whiteness and because Trump was elected. They tied up a retard and tortured him in front of the whole world, MSNBC anchors laughed about it and dropped the subject after a day of reporting. A day of reporting is how much time was allotted to covering Donald Trump's two scoops of ice cream and his "Nazi salute" (for those who've forgotten, a news cycle back in the primaries on March 8th highlighted Trump's so-called "Nazi salute: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usVFoz41PSg )

We'll be getting much more than a single day's worth of reporting for the death of this domestic terrorist. And that's by design, because as I said, the shitlibs have been waiting for this. They've been provoking us trying to get this to happen. What happened again? A man who was attending a rally against the destruction of a historical American icon was attacked by vicious rioters and in response he plowed through them with his multi-ton vehicle

The right is being blamed for this right now in the MSM. Hundreds of terrorist attacks by Muslims and somehow Islam isn't to blame but rioters provoke a man into committing vehicular manslaughter and somehow it's the president's supporters' fault? The deep state is literally saying they want to kill our president right now but this is seen as more important. It calls to mind the David Duke disavow cycle (also from the primaries). Remember that Trump took heat from not immediately disavowing Duke's support. He'll take heat for this too. So will we, by design

File: seth.jpg (186KB, 1487x805px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1487x805px

But this faggot won't provide a source.

https://twitter.com/TruthinGov2016/status/896653955173945344

File: Labor creates all wealth.png (802KB, 720x749px) Image search: [Google]

802KB, 720x749px

Non arguments:

>If I dig a hole in my backyard and then fill it in I used labor but made no value! Commies BTFO!

Marx clarified (unlike adam smith) that only socially nessary labor (labor used to produce a commodity with use value) creates value. This is also the case if you spend 1000 years making a bed.

>Nature can create value as well. If an apple falls from a tree then value is created without labor

Marx also noted nature could create value.

>if labor determines price why is coca cola cheaper than bottled water?

Labor doesn't determine price. It determines value (not exchange value or use value) and correlates with the equilibrium price. Supply and demand determine price.

Machines cannot create value. If I make a machine that makes diamonds out of thin air then the value of a diamond falls below that of bricks now that they can be aquired with no work what so ever. Price might not fall because you can still manipulate supply and demand but value certainly does.

Some definitions.

Use value = How useful an object is.
Exchange value = Market value of a commidity. Different from use value. You can sell a beanie baby for 200$ but it is almost completely useless.
Value = the amount of congealed labor withing a commodity.


Some evidence of the LTV
http://users.wfu.edu/cottrell/eea97.pdf

File: download.jpg (16KB, 219x230px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 219x230px

https://eclipse2017.nasa.gov/


NASA - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwMDvPCGeE0


(((New York Times))) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-DB5vlYQtg


Fox News - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxDxrNVDTF0


Thread Theme - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04F4xlWSFh0

File: coolguy.jpg (242KB, 566x635px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 566x635px

TFW THE PROTESTS YESTERDAY WERE FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS BUT YOU SECRETLY WISH THAT THEY WEREN'T BECAUSE IT'S FUNNY TO KILL LEFT PROTESTERS BUT RACISM DOESN'T REALLY EXIST ANYMORE BUT YOU STILL HATE NIGGERS AND THAT'S WHAT IT WAS ALL REALLY ABOUT

Nice logic /pol/, his name was James Alex Fields Jr. He was framed by Seth Rich

Prove me wrong /coolguys/

inb4 I'm a paid shill - try and engage with the argument

File: hit.jpg (53KB, 947x532px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 947x532px

a) you will never shake the label of "nazi" because your opponents will always frame you that way
b) leftists have used "nazi" as a descriptor for so many innocuous/centrist beliefs to the point it's lost some of its shaming efficacy
c) the public generally distrust the leftist media so being labelled a nazi by them isn't so bad
d) however in the foreseeable future (say next century or two) you will not change the public's instinctive/trained negative reaction toward REAL nazi sympathies
e) the success of movements you support contend on garnering significant public support (exact percentages don't really matter - whether you think you need 5% or 30%)
f) the benefits of being edgy are outweighed by the cons of people's instinctive negative reaction
g) by invoking nazi symbolism in public you are lowering the chances of white nationalism/identitarianism succeeding
h) this doesn't mean you need to disavow nazism at every opportunity. it just means you probably shouldn't invite a group to a rally that purports to represent "the right" if that group is going to pointlessly invoke nazi symbolism, e.g. carrying nazi flags
I) it's not fair that the public reacts especially negatively and perhaps unfairly toward nazism, but that's not the fight that matters. what matters is making sure the movement you support (a homeland for whites) succeeds.

File: 1493925868000 (2).png (29KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x400px

/pol/, I need help.

A few months back, I would sneak into my little sister's room and do stuff with her... just little things, like kiss her and touch her places, and one time I wiped a tiny bit of cum onto her feet. Nothing that serious, nothing that would hurt her.

I only did it maybe 10-15 times, and then I stopped, but my sister and mum have been acting strangely for the past week or so, and two nights ago, I overheard my mum asking questions to someone over the phone that were pretty obviously related to what I did with my sister.

I immediately packed my bag and prepared to GTFO town as fast as fucking possible, only for my mum to confront me and tell me about what "your father" was doing to my sister, and talked about the possibility of telling the police. Apparently my sister thought it was my dad doing it, and brought it up in casual conversation with my mum, which is how she found out.

My dad has previous sex offenses (none of them actually that serious), so this might just fly.

Is there any chance they could get DNA off of her feet, and if it did, wouldn't it test as a match for my dad since we're both closely related?

I'm also kinda worried that maybe my mum is lying to me or fucking with me and knows that it was me all along.

File: FsDrg0BoZ3ZnJTZbVTKF6JdEovJ-zSva1A3mmYdc9_4.png (413KB, 811x767px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 811x767px

Haven't called anyone a shill in over an hour. I'm sweating.

File: Saitama_OK.jpg (29KB, 375x305px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 375x305px

I hate Commies, Nazis, Snowflakes and Cucks. I want to go to the next happening, wait on the sidelines until antifa starts their faggy bullshit and just start throwing punches at everyone. Anyone interested in starting a "Just here to punch people" Death Squad?

File: maxresdefault-4.jpg (595KB, 3000x1688px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 3000x1688px

Is Québec better than France for Francophones?

File: 1492391936447.jpg (142KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 768x1024px

>Japan is an ethnic nationalist eutop-

File: tf.jpg (92KB, 675x1000px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 675x1000px

I watched it a couple of weeks ago and I thought this should be pol approved.

File: 1481765198505.jpg (87KB, 600x453px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 600x453px

ARRRR HAND OVER YE DEGELATES DONNALD ARRRRR

File: 1490197022622-shutterstock_364331684.jpg (526KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 1920x1080px

>We can make this claim, because we've been studying online communities and subcultures for years; the three of us, Jessica Beyer, Gabriella Coleman, and Whitney Phillips, have each published books on hacking and/or trolling cultures, with a particular focus on 4chan and Anonymous between 2008-2014.

>the 4chan and Anonymous of 2017 is not the same as the 4chan and Anonymous of 2008. On 4chan, this shift is most directly attributable to changes within its userbase.

>That white supremacists from Stormfront decided to recruit on 4chan's /pol/ board, for example, in the process drawing new participants into the 4chan fold, speaks to this variability . So too does the exodus of many users in 2014 to places such as 8 chan, when Chris Poole (aka moot), the site's founder and head administrator, decided to ban all discussion of the GamerGate hate and harassment campaign.

>Even if the individuals using 4chan had remained absolutely invariable, however, those who were 20 in 2008 would be nearly 30 today, precipitating its own kind of change. Building on these shifting demographics, the site has seen a number of shifts in on-site affordances, policies, and ownership; and as Beyer highlights, such structural changes directly impact participant behavior.

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/z4k549/trolling-scholars-debunk-the-idea-that-the-alt-rights-trolls-have-magic-powers

Is it true that the 4chan of 2008 was actually liberal? I haven't been here that long does /pol/ remember what it was like back then?