Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 13633. page

File: ivtaibtjdt.jpg (60KB, 1280x830px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1280x830px

I bet the Jews did this!

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/29/politics/ivanka-trump-champagne-popsicle-twitter-memorial-day/index.html

File: the bad image.png (75KB, 1417x987px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1417x987px

Is this a "fact" in your country? In mine it is becoming "opinion".

File: Fight-for-15.jpg (38KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x399px

It really cant be that hard to convince large parts of the fight for $15 movement to crank it up to fight for $25. If that passed in just one major US city the fast food chains there wouldn't have a choice but to automate.
What're some good fight for $25/hr ideas?

File: IMG_0378.jpg (33KB, 707x471px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 707x471px

My name was Seth Rich. I was murdered.

File: Women can fight.jpg (69KB, 954x486px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 954x486px

At 2:25 in this video you see a woman thats fighting with a Special Forces Unit, So /pol/ if women aren't in Special Forces why is she there?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlDtsKi54SM

File: summer23.png (615KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

615KB, 680x680px

What about eugenics?

http://www.seventeen.com/health/a40854/there-are-8-types-of-nipples-in-the-world/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3146192/What-nationality-BREASTS-Plastic-surgeons-preferences-vary-depending-live-opting-big-nipples-French-favouring-smaller-bust-Indians-choosing-buxom-chest.html

>Plastic surgeons' preferences vary depending on where they live.

>US opting for big nipples, the French favouring a smaller bust and Indians choosing a buxom chest

Why are (((they))) trying to control nipple perception???

File: neanderthal-1.jpg (83KB, 835x835px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 835x835px

Why is /pol/ so against whites racemixing with other races if their ancestors already mixed with Neanderthals?

File: Screenshot_2017-05-29-23-00-03_1.jpg (69KB, 1038x976px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1038x976px

>11 Years Old, a Mom, and Pushed to Marry Her Rapist in Florida

>When she was a scrawny 11-year-old, Sherry Johnson found out one day that she was about to be married to a 20-year-old member of her church who had raped her.

>“It was forced on me,” she recalls. She had become pregnant, she says, and child welfare authorities were investigating — so her family and church officials decided the simplest way to avoid a messy criminal case was to organize a wedding.

>“My mom asked me if I wanted to get married, and I said, ‘I don’t know, what is marriage, how do I act like a wife?’” Johnson remembers today, many years later. “She said, ‘Well, I guess you’re just going to get married.’”

File: SGBMC_Diagram.jpg (24KB, 526x325px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 526x325px

Why is this so hard for /pol/ to understand?

File: Morrissey_crop_tie.jpg (252KB, 695x940px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 695x940px

Is he, dare I say it, /ourguy/?

From his facebook page:
>Celebrating my birthday in Manchester as news of the Manchester Arena bomb broke. The anger is monumental.
For what reason will this ever stop?

Theresa May says such attacks "will not break us", but her own life is lived in a bullet-proof bubble, and she evidently does not need to identify any young people today in Manchester morgues. Also, "will not break us" means that the tragedy will not break her, or her policies on immigration. The young people of Manchester are already broken - thanks all the same, Theresa. Sadiq Khan says "London is united with Manchester", but he does not condemn Islamic State - who have claimed responsibility for the bomb. The Queen receives absurd praise for her 'strong words' against the attack, yet she does not cancel today's garden party at Buckingham Palace - for which no criticism is allowed in the Britain of free press. Manchester mayor Andy Burnham says the attack is the work of an "extremist". An extreme what? An extreme rabbit?
In modern Britain everyone seems petrified to officially say what we all say in private. Politicians tell us they are unafraid, but they are never the victims. How easy to be unafraid when one is protected from the line of fire. The people have no such protections.

Morrissey
23 May 2017.

File: tw9aw8wmyg0z.jpg (55KB, 584x703px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 584x703px

What ever happened to her?

File: sad.jpg (103KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 600x338px

>Because our immigration system is universally regarded as “broken.” If what we’re doing doesn’t work, why not try something different?
>Because it’s what we used to do.
>Because rich people already live an open-borders life. People from wealthy families cross borders with ease. So why put such harsh restrictions on people who immigrate to work for paychecks?
>Because if capital and goods can flow across borders, why not labor?
>Because undocumented immigrants are the victims of legislation that is, frankly, dumb.
>Because immigration improves the economy.
>Because Europe opened many of its borders, and the sky didn’t fall. Everything is fine.
>Because the U.S. is responsible for creating the conditions that cause illegal immigration.
>Because it allows people to go back. Let's stop breaking up families.
>Because fewer people will die crossing the border.
>Because border spending is out of control. Let's use our money for more important humanitarian things.
>Because border enforcement punishes the wrong people.
>Because American employers want the labor. It helps small businesses grow.
>Because our enforcement system is a piggy bank for the private prison industry. Jailing people for migrating isn’t just morally questionable, it’s expensive. The clearest beneficiary from this system is the private-prison industry, which receives millions of dollars to jail immigrants on behalf of the federal government.
>Because it's the right thing to do /pol/ :)

File: EHrJGCb[1].jpg (628KB, 3774x1893px) Image search: [Google]

628KB, 3774x1893px

terror attacks since 2001

File: 1495172636020.jpg (67KB, 960x507px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 960x507px

is Trump making a good move by constructing more of the fence that was built after the secure fence act of 2006?
liberals in congress are delaying budget funding for Trump's concrete wall, so he's using funds appropriated for border security to build more of the old fence. Trump just completed the Naco Arizona fence in May.
Trump is building more of this fence because the budget bill that obama signed last year has funds reserved for border fencing and security, and Trump's current budget bill got more money for border security.

File: PolishSoccerFansRefugees.jpg (68KB, 721x291px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 721x291px

Would you be willing to move to a poorer country than the one you live in now if it was a whiter, more homogeneous, more traditionalist conservative society, like Poland or Hungary?