Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 11437. page

File: IMG_6362.jpg (124KB, 640x479px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 640x479px

Pogressive politics are the way of the future and show true intellect and maturity.


When will your politics grow up?

File: Bernardino_Mei_(Italian_(Sienese)_-_Christ_Cleansing_the_Temple_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg (3MB, 4160x3050px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3050px

Post any pre-expressionist art.

File: images.jpg (7KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 225x225px

Fuck the Normies, Sandnigger, SJW'S, Cucks, etc.

File: uber.png (17KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x300px

So leftist trash have managed to force out the CEO of Uber, who built that company due to random accusations of 'sexism' (which was actually a woman engineer complaining about her FEMALE boss).

Is there a ride sharing app that doesn't bow down to leftist trash?

File: 1L88vUWedmf7ioUHKXzy9_PPY3QD5cJQHBLShdldL5w.jpg (271KB, 1021x768px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1021x768px

>vote democrat they said

What does /pol/ think will happen when the benefits stop flowing? Will it be worse than the LA Riots?

File: Fotolia_137277345_Subscription_XL.jpg (620KB, 1700x1037px) Image search: [Google]

620KB, 1700x1037px

So I am planning to move into the historical and ethnically whitest part of my city. But my autistic brain isn't able to combine the beautiful old
facade with modern furniture inside. It is just a contradiction. How would you guys live in there?

File: download (5).jpg (10KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 259x194px

>Why do atheists insist on believing that everything was created due to a reaction between atoms and particles but not God?

>If there was no God, then "who" was behind all of those gigantic celestial which cover our universe?

>Why do all atheists believe that Religious people (specifically attacking Christian) are dumb when it's actually the opposite?

Pic related

File: 2eb.png (24KB, 432x239px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 432x239px

Come on, smart anons. I want to learn something. Poke a hole in my argument.

The Second Amendment (Hereafter simply "2A") States: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

"Well Regulated", as a phrase, meant at the time something more like "properly self-functioning" than "ordained in legislature." Per http://www.constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm, " Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected." Further, http://www.lectlaw.com/files/gun01.htm presents an excellent, in-depth discussion on the phrase.

Gun Control is not only counter-intuitive to creating a well-regulated militia, by the above definition, but is a clear form of infringement on the ABILITY of the people to keep and bear arms. Regardless of whether or not the RIGHT to bear such arms is extended to individual citizens ("the people") or only those involved in a state- or federal-government-sanctioned Militia (which is unlikely, I think), the very concept of these laws is a limiting factor in the goal of keeping and bearing arms. This is by definition; Gun Control is meant to decrease a set group or groups' ability to buy, keep, and bear firearms.

The Militia Act of 1792 and related legislation carry the definition of Unorganized Militia to modern law. The most recent Act I've encountered in my short research would be the National Defense Act of 1920, which reinforced (as opposed to repealing) the definition of an Unorganized Militia indicating that all male citizens of the prescribed ages (18 to 45) are members of the unorganized militia as a federally-recognized concept and are, thereby, undeniably protected by the 2nd Amendment's definition.

Conclusion. Whether 2A applies to Militias or to Individuals, IE "The People," is irrelevant for Male Citizens. Their rights cannot legally be infringed in the form of Gun Control legislation without disregarding 2A.

File: fags.jpg (192KB, 1012x803px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1012x803px

Can someone tell me about 'anonymous'. what board did they come from? why do they seem like the complete opposite of people who visit 4chan?

File: vectkTi.jpg (483KB, 1500x837px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1500x837px

End of Ramadan 2017 in Moscow, Russia.

File: 652983.jpg (251KB, 1348x1344px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1348x1344px

Tulsi Gabbard is a CIA asset, controlled by the Council of Foreign Relations and the cult, Science of Identity run by (((Chris Butler))). Her father, ex-husband, current husband are all members of the cult. She will be pushed as an anti-war progressive candidate to win over millennials. In reality she will be pushing for more military intervention and promoting the ideology of her violent cult.
http://archive.is/SKofn
http://archive.is/TFu8I
http://archive.is/0hnFz

File: 905f5dae75f54228afabec99bd0192c1.jpg (82KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 720x960px

I'm not talking about hysterical SJWs who scream about how much they hate white people because yeah they are a bunch of cunts and as a white person what they say about whites doesn't apply to me.

But why is choosing not to judge a black person because they're black such a bad thing? It doesn't make me a cuck, it just makes me someone who doesn't engage in silly identity politics.

You can't bitch and moan and feel oppressed about others talking shit about white people, while talking shit about other races in the exact same manner.

File: bba.jpg (154KB, 3456x2304px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 3456x2304px

When did you realised that anime is reddit tier jewish garbage created to emasculine the White man

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-25 at 11.39.18 pm.png (436KB, 581x510px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 581x510px

Since when did this soccer mom become a white supremacist?

I remember seeing someone post her on here almost two years ago. WTF did you do to her? LMAO.