Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 11296. page

File: TRUNEWS.com.jpg (37KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 600x338px

Rick Wiles: Is This the Beginning of the Revolution?

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1ynJOjOqYBlGR

A U.S. Congressman shot and four others wounded while practicing for a charity baseball game by a man who hated Trump and Republicans. Has the vicious rhetoric spewed by Marxist-Socialist Democrats spawned the next revolution? Do Republicans need to sound the alarm? Rick Wiles dares to ask the question, "Should the Democrat Party be banned?"

File: comment_vk9J5lclBcwat7pAFT4Ik5EpL6QPYyMe.jpg (794KB, 1600x1286px) Image search: [Google]

794KB, 1600x1286px

How is the situation in your countries, anons?

File: julius-holgate.jpg (21KB, 361x271px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 361x271px

>be bong.

>go to get tested for disability.

>can "crawl up stairs on hands" so get denied money.

what a pathetic shithole this island is.

"A double-amputee who was told by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) that he was fit to work because he could “climb stairs with his arms”, has won his appeal against the decision and will receive his missing benefits payments.

Julius Holgate, from Hackney, north London, fell into debt and resorted to selling his jewellery and other belongings to survive after he received zero points during his Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) assessment in January.

The DWP said Julius was able to climb stairs using his arms and therefore had “mobility” so he could work."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/disability-benefits-man-julius-holgate-no-legs-cut-government-pip-climb-stairs-with-arms-dwp-a7606416.html#commentsDiv

File: artworks-000074516079-hef67e-t500x500.jpg (13KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 500x500px

What the hell is wrong wit y'all white kids?

There's a new craze going around where they inhale fermented shit and piss left to rot in the sun for 24 hours.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIAqUx79PFI

File: pt.jpg (192KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1500x1000px

http://123hulu.com/watch/xRlO8bod-the-putin-interviews-season-1/episode-1.html

File: download.jpg (11KB, 179x281px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 179x281px

'murica fuck yeah

File: selfie 0145.jpg (11KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 480x360px

In your opinion, what is the difference between racism and prejudice? Are they synonymous? Can you be racist, but not prejudiced (a la ALL WHITE PPL R RAYSIST)? Can you be prejudiced and NOT racist (a la ONLY WHITE PPL CAN B RAYSIST)?

What lies in the future of these words? How will these affect politics domestically and internationally? This is certainly an interesting subject IMO, and I think it needs to be addressed before it spirals out of control.

I would assume most of you believe the two to be synonymous, but I'd love to hear from anyone else who disagrees or has a different point of view.

Is prejudice really just one part of the idea that is racism (prejudice + power etc)?

Can you really argue that ALL white people are racist EVERYWHERE under this system? What about North Korea where white people hold absolutely NO power?

The modern world was undoubtedly shaped by colonialism and the sins of our ancestors (whatever their race/ethnicity), but does that mean we are obliged to atone for them?

File: image.png (409KB, 1576x1180px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 1576x1180px

OK, we all know these political tests are quite inaccurate, and don't necessarily reflect one's beliefs, but post your results anyway

File: IMG_8625.png (62KB, 511x512px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 511x512px

They want war?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-14/one-down-216-go-ny-rep-received-threatening-email-after-virginia-shooting


I mean... if they really really want it...

File: IMG_2103.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

Muslim here, why the hatred?

File: colorful-buildings-Old-San-Juan-Puerto-Rico-7399.jpg (731KB, 1680x1120px) Image search: [Google]

731KB, 1680x1120px

The 51st state

File: breitbart-jerusalem-logo-640x480.png (75KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 640x480px

https://digiday.com/media/breitbart-ads-plummet-nearly-90-percent-three-months-trumps-troubles-mount/

File: Capture.png (905KB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]

905KB, 1920x1040px

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/14/politics/southern-baptist-convention-alt-right/index.html

File: Screenshot (24).png (617KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 1920x1080px

>https://www.conventionofstates.com/

>The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
>- Article V, U.S. Constitution

>The Founders knew the federal government might one day become drunk with the abuses of power. The most important check to this power is Article V. Article V gives states the power to call a convention for the purpose of proposing amendments to the Constitution.

>By calling a convention of the states, we can stop the federal spending and debt spree, the power grabs of the federal courts, and other misuses of federal power. The current situation is precisely what the Founders feared, and they gave us a solution we have a duty to use.

>After the states propose, debate, and vote upon the proposed amendments, they will be sent to the 50 states for ratification. Three-quarters of the states must agree for any of the proposed amendments to be ratified.

>Congress has no authority to stop such a process. The Founders made sure of that.

>What Sorts of Amendments Could be Passed?
>Imposing term limits on Congress and the Supreme Court
>Placing an upper limit on federal taxation
>Imposing term limits on Congress and the Supreme Court