Ive been thinking about how we can stop antifa, or at least troll them...
1) Infiltration
We need some anons to infiltrate antifa's Reddit and twitter accounts, someone who can fool them into thinking that they are one of them. This will help us get an idea of how they plan there protest and how we can counter them.
2) Troll them
Steal there flags and shit and unmask them at protest/riots
3) Get them all arrested and so on.
Any other good ideas will be appreciated.
brilliant
why hasn't anyone thought of that before?
>>130957812
we should be paying antifa, their violence scares the shit out of normies and drives them to ourside
>>130959123
true but there still be violent and they may attract more left leaning normies to there side
http://shetterly.blogspot.com/2017/06/why-theory-of-cultural-appropriation-is.html?spref=tw&m=1
is twitter guy the smartest numale on earth? he controls trump.
We're winning bigly today lads.
Is this real?
>>131827339
based judge.
>DON'T JEW ON ME!
>>131827339
How does this affect NY which essentially has the same law?
Oh boy here we go.
These lawyers are so excited for some somali terrorist animal to be their new client....WTF is wrong with them?
I would never want a lawyer that works for free to represent me
What happens when you realize that Obama was able to ban more Muslims than Trump, because Obama wasn't a bumbling dumb fuck, in way over his head.
Our enemies are really shaking in their boots when they see this obese elderly man who acts like he is permanently sun-downing.
>muh Hillary would've started WW3
Trump is starting it as we speak, retard.
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4629922/Tim-Kaine-says-strikes-Syria-targets-illegal.html
>>130957604
>implying the fear mongers and saber rattlers aren't going to start it
>Tim Kaine says
>>130957604
>president making war is illegal
lolno.
International law is meaningless.
We are a sovereign nation meaning we answer to no one but ourselves.
>the earth is a ball
There are people on pol who are unironically this blue pilled
Thoughts on this new NRA ad that the MSM and leftists are calling white supremacist, racist, and downright evil?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrnIVVWtAag
>>131827048
Dana Loesch got fake tits like six months ago and she's 10x hotter now
Would throat fuck/10
>>131827048
Very fashy! I like it!
Baller.
I mean it doesn't mean I suddenly forgot that the NRA only looks after the interest of US gun makers, but what can I say it's a good ad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDTaO5F8JC4&feature=youtu.be
How does this have 3k likes??? Something must be done
>>130957487
>MOLDYLOX
what is it?
>>130958611
gtfo newfag
Jewtube is at it again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lxbdvo2vFwc
Requesting troops in the holy dislike war.
Deus Vult
Is Pirate still a viable career path?
>>131826639
technically yes but in practicality no. Some states/countries have not criminalized piracy in the form of letters of marquee. you have to obtain one however.
>>131826639
Definitely, the Somalis are taking apprentices you should go ask
>>131826868
but they're a bunch of smelly niggers
Furniture-buying, non-pussy getting cheeto fuck ain't got no tapes. Weak sauce boi.
So what, you just sit in an empty room inside your house?
What do ya think of that?
Wouldnt liberals want people "safe"?
Why did 166 democrats vote NO to laws that protect CRIMINAL illegal aliens?
Pic related from todays vote
Will the senate democrats all vote to protect criminal illegal aliens too?
>>131826584
IDK but if any are up for re-election then the opponent has a card to play especially if a illegal immigrant commits a crime.
>>131826584
>Why did 166 democrats vote NO to laws that protect CRIMINAL illegal aliens?
Because that's where they get their votes...
>>131826584
Who is the republican traitor? I wanna know
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of race and color, as well as national origin, sex, and religion.
In time, this act provides protection of womanly acts like pregnancy and abortion even though neither is necessary.
Simply put, why are men only disallowed from being fired if it's based on the fact that they're men but women get that same protection as well as protections towards women-specific acts? Are there any male equivalents?