Seize the Means of Production
>Seize the Means of Production
Seize the Means of Production
>Seize the Means of Production
Seize the Means of Production
>Seize the Means of Production
the communist idea should be outlawed everyone who's doing communist propaganda, even as a joke, should suffer a severe punishment, this ideology was the worst thing that happened to humankind
Friendly remainder that there is no anarcho-capitalism or anarcho-communism, only anarchy.
Today I made a young liberal woman question her beliefs and become curious about why I'm right wing. What did you do today?
>>131196128
/Pol/ is all talk, no action
Do you have any cases of extreme irony?
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/embedded?v=7.2.26.21.arm&hl=en-GB#vgi=4765289160264223955&=https%253A%252F%252Famp.theguardian.com%252Fuk-news%252F2016%252Fjul%252F11%252Frevealed-alice-gross-argued-against-banning-foreign-criminals-before-her&idx=0
So, did it happen yet?
>>131196076
PRAISE KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK
KEKEKEKKEKEKE
>>131196270
Hi ShariaBlue
>>131196076
hope so
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8tPjpKBgcc
>please
America 2.o when?
How will WW3 start?
Who will start it?
Who will win?
17th century Europeans venturing in the
Americas faced a harse struggle- settlers
who survived the harsh environment had to
contend with political resentment from Indians- especially regarding land use/ownership.
For a while, Europeans and Indians shared the land, each benefitting from the land in a different way with minimal interferance. Whites grew crops while Indians hunted. Only when Europeans tried to also claim hunting rights did the Indians become violent.
Today, Indians still cause problems- turns out that exclusion did not work.
We face a similar resource problem today, but with women instead of land. The difference is that while land can't choose who owns it, women can.
The problem is the sole claim of ownership towards women- just as in the 1700s, a peaceful existence only existed while resources were used by Europeans/Indians simutaneously. Problems were few, asides from occasional disease transmission.
Considering White/Black mental/physical disparities, either Whites/Blacks may be preferable to women, and at different times, even for different purposes. Considering White/Black disparities, a woman may want a White man for certain purposes, and a Black man for other reasons. And considering women's differing ability to accomdate White/Black performance in different roles, both White/Black have roles to play for women. A peaceful existance is possible so long as resources are used for multiple roles.
>The Falkland Islands are a homogeneous society, with the majority of inhabitants descended from Scottish and Welsh immigrants who settled the territory in 1833.
Remind me again why are we not emigrating en masse to this place in order to save the white race?
>>131195771
Why should we limit ourselves to one small little island?
>>131196940
>inb4 two islands
That actual sounds quite good
I'd love to go there, perhaps not to live but at least spend some months there
Thanks for reminding me this place exists
But since all races are equal I retract my previous statement.
and this is coming from an ancap
so fuck the haters
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/fuck-the-south/Content?oid=19816
I will leave for japan, on foot if I have too
>>131195381
Fucking your wife
Is it worth trying to join the Free Masons in 2017? What is their political views?
>>131195340
just become a jew it's no different other than the potential to go places as a jew.
As a mason you'll just be thrown at the button and left to rot there so you won't learn any "Matrix tier" occult knowledge since you don't have any connection to the royal bloodlines around the world to actually know and run shit as a mason but as a jew you can pretty much do anything.
bonus for jew being the same faith only more open
>>131195627
fpbp
They tell the profane that they don't have a unified religion or political ideology, but their entire repertoire of symbolism points to a common religious and political goal: the construction of a world order in which all forms of religious fundamentalism have been done away with and absolute relativism abounds.
They are building a "spiritual Solomon's Temple" at which people of all faiths can unify and worship a non-specific deity for the purpose of apotheosis. This is the "Great Work" they talk about. If you hold to any religious beliefs that oppose this goal; that is: if you believe the true means of salvation has already been revealed (fundamentalism) you are their enemy and they will stop at nothing to ensure your beliefs do not influence the majority. They want their Jewish-based mysticism to reign supreme.
They have adapted every prominent religion to their spiritual ideals, offering an extremely loose version of each that points towards their religious conceptions. A sort of mystic super-religion in which every person can attain virtual godhood by working really hard to iron-out their moral flaws and to understand the "true unity".
It's all a ruse meant to keep people away from any conception of objectivity. To turn men of good faith into relativist losers or pawns for the NWO.
No, you will never get to the top anyway.
Question: why do immigrants have such a personal vendetta against the west? They feel the need to spite you whenever you deal with them.