Hey there. I've started trying film fotography a few weeks

Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-02-03 23:54:19 Post No. 2759912
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: digitalizar0012.jpg (222KB, 1171x794px) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-02-03 23:54:19 Post No. 2759912 [Report]

Hey there.

I've started trying film fotography a few weeks ago, and this is one from my first color roll. It was a Kodak Gold 200, shot with a Nikon F60. Can someone explain to me what those stripes are? I'm not sure if the problem was in the shooting or if it was the lab.

Anyway, i'm not a pro, i just take photos as a hobby, so don't judge too harshly please

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model HP Scanjet djf2200
Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution 200 dpi
Vertical Resolution 200 dpi
Image Created 2016:01:24 00:53:48
Color Space Information sRGB
Image Width 1171
Image Height 794
Saturation Low
Sharpness Soft

Anonymous 2016-02-04 00:16:42 Post No.2759926
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 00:16:42 Post No.2759926 [Report]

It could be the lab using a dirty machine to process your photos. Tell them to clean their equipment and see if they'll give you a refund/newfilm/process etc.

Anonymous 2016-02-05 22:50:37 Post No.2761587
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-05 22:50:37 Post No.2761587 [Report]

>>2759912
>digitalizar
>fotography
>kodak gold 200
you BR senpai? I suggest quitting film unless you're loaded
it's a niche market in a severely under-demanding market
that means no fair price on new products i.e. film and paraphernalia, due to no production and little to no importation
also no maintenance on equipment since they're getting discontinued and not being replaced due to no demand whatsoever, which is what you're seeing that's happened to your picture

Anonymous 2016-02-06 07:19:42 Post No.2761890
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-06 07:19:42 Post No.2761890 [Report]

>>2759912
Looks like a bad scan to me. I'd try to get a better scan of this picture if possible

and ignore this faggot>>2761587

Anonymous 2016-02-06 19:22:55 Post No.2762212
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-06 19:22:55 Post No.2762212 [Report]

>>2761890
I'm speaking out of experience though
it's just not viable

Camera-Specific Properties:

Camera Model	HP Scanjet djf2200
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385

Image-Specific Properties:

Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	200 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:24 00:53:48
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1171
Image Height	794
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Soft

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/