ITT: Cine film Anyone uses Cinestill, or Vision 2/3? Anyone

>>2759453
from http://filmphotographyproject.com/store/135-cinema-film-fpp-kodak-vision-250d-1-roll

>1. When pouring your chemistry back into your containers, please use a coffee filter in your funnel to capture any "rem jet" waste. This will keep your chemistry clean for re-use!

>2. After your Blix, rinse your film in a half bucket of hot water (80 - 102 degrees F) with a few table spoons of Baking Soda. With your thumb, gently rub the non-emulsion side of your film as you remove it from your film reel. Careful not to scratch the emulsion of your film. Final rinse under running water before submerging your film into the two-minute Stabilizer. You will see the black rem jet in your water as you rinse.

that or just shoot cinestill, not that much more expensive. or just be a normal person and shoot ektar or portra, they use vision 3 technology so don't vary much apart from color balance/speed

>>2759456
>or just be a normal person and shoot ektar or portra

i dont wanna be normal. i have a brand new 400ft metal canister full of V2 200T waiting to be shot.

>>2759453
I use Cinestill 50D. It's currently my favorite general-purpose color neg film, but the slow speed is a bitch when I'm not outside. I wish they spooled 250D into canisters too, I would buy that in a heartbeat. 800T has horrible, ugly grain that I can't get into.

I would never even consider removing the rem-jet layer myself.

OP, have you ever shot any Vision 2383? It's really slow but it doesn't have a remjet layer. Seems like it would be interesting.

>>2759749
>Vision 2383

nope. never heard of it before.

>https://shotonwhat.com/film-print-stock/kodak-vision-color-23833383

theres a bunch of well known memes filmed with it.

will shoot a test roll i have (200T) as fast as i can and will dump here whatever the results are.

>>2759487
bulk loading color film isn't a great idea, the emulsion gets easily scratched when you're spooling it into the cartridge

>>2759756
>https://shotonwhat.com/film-print-stock/kodak-vision-color-23833383

None of these were filmed with 2383. 2383 is an exhibition stock for theaters, or it was until they all went digital. I remember seeing some films projected with it and they looked really great.

File: trash_small.jpg (397KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1000x667px

I've only shot one roll but, well, it was garbage.
washed after, I don't see how you'd do it before when you have to rub it until it's clean

>>2760310
There are places you can send cine film for real ECN-II processing, like Seattle Filmworks. You'll probably have more favorable results doing it that way, but it's more expensive than cross-processing with C-41. I also hope you're shooting it with an 85C filter to undo the Tungsten blue shift.

File: CANUTO.jpg (745KB, 797x1200px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 797x1200px

>will dump here whatever the results are

OP here. fucked up while charging the roll, so when i was taking it out, it was like i only rewinded 10 cms of film. fuck. the guy that washes the rolls said it came out blank. then he said "but there are 3 frames, superimposed".

so long story short: here is the result, 3 shots with lots of shit going on because of unintended multiple exposures. i like them.

1/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:08 00:26:30
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	797
Image Height	1200

File: LUIS.jpg (340KB, 1200x809px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1200x809px

2/3

this one is my fave.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:08 00:25:39
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	809

File: TOMATES.jpg (726KB, 1200x806px) Image search: [Google]

726KB, 1200x806px

3/3

a heap of tasty looking tomatoes. and a bunch of assorted shit.

*veredict: this 200T works pretty alright. there is some shitty stuff in the shadows, maybe from pulling, maybe because it was scanned with a piece of shit from the stone age (some minolta thing that resembles a macintosh). i dig the colors a fuck ton and already looking to shoot night sceneries with it -with a properly loaded camera ofc-.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:08 00:27:52
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	806