These are the two shots I think were the best from my recent

File: #6 (1).jpg (206KB, 934x623px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 934x623px

(2/2)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T3i
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:30 14:40:52
Exposure Time	0.6 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2759094
>>2759098

lol

>>2759102
For context I needed to take a picture using blur and one using a lot of color, anon.

>>2759104
The first one is over exposed and looks like it took no effort. I don't know what you were thinking.

>>2759098
Looks interesting but there is no harmony between the colours. It would look better in black and white as a study of shape and form. Color, not so much.

>>2759106
Thanks anon, that's really helpful. I apologize for the first one, the more I look at it the less potential I see.

>>2759104
first anon here,
basically i agree with >>2759106
I might be wrong but I assume that the point of the project is to make you try a maximum of things by yourself, and discover the range of possibilities in photography. so go ahead and try anything that comes to your mind. the crazier the better. and you can probably do crazier than a close up of a plant.
and don't apologize! no need here!
cheers

>>2759098
>>2759094
I'm curious to know what the shitty ones looked like...

Anyway, if you're trying to do something with blur, maybe find something moving instead of having a spaz attack in front of your mom's petunias.
The second one isn't very colorful for a photo that's supposed to emphasize color. The flowers would probably be a much better choice for that, actually.

Really what you need to do though, is leave your goddamn house to find something to take photos of.

7th grade homework done badly / 10

>>2759581
>maybe find something moving instead of having a spaz attack in front of your mom's petunias.
kek

File: #2.jpg (273KB, 784x1045px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 784x1045px

>>2759581
>>2759621
>>2759721
>>2759142
Here are some of the others I took
(1/3)

File: #3.jpg (244KB, 784x1045px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 784x1045px

>>2759924

File: #7.jpg (282KB, 980x735px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 980x735px

>>2759925
(3/3)

I'm not sure I like the color in this one.

File: IMG_3725forp.jpg (171KB, 1528x1019px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1528x1019px

>>2759925
>>2759927
Taking pictures of the beach and is cliche m9
I find that the best way to deal with cliche topics if you must photograph them is to at least innovate in your framing and portrayal of the scene so try to do something different I personally really like putting my camera on the ground on walls or roofs of caves and find that it gives a really interesting perspective. I'm by no means a decent photographer but if you're in a class try to innovate in ways that are accessible to your artistic mind.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:

>>2759934
Of course, I'll try that next time I'm up in Vermont.
What are your thoughts on the this one >>2759924 ?

File: IMG_3615.jpg (2MB, 4272x2848px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4272x2848px

>>2759924
>>2759936
The two sided perspective of the building is interesting but the highway below is distracting though a crop isn't really feasible I don't know if the picture would actually better from the side of the highway closer to the rail but if you took it from your car it's really the best you could do I recommend you look into perspective in the context of renaissance artists to get a good idea of how to interestingly use it. keep shooting m9 :)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi
Camera Software	Picasa
Lens Size	10.00 - 18.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.4
Serial Number	0570104036
Lens Name	EF-S10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:06:26 21:22:13
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/4.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	10.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4272
Image Height	2848
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	5d25b11d0841f4ed0000000000000000
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Full Auto
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	AI Focus
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	External Flash
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	224
Color Matrix	129

>>2759940
Thanks anon!

What is the story behind this NEET cavern??

>>2759940 What is the story behind this NEET cavern??

File: _MG_5811forp.jpg (187KB, 1463x976px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1463x976px

>>2759984
It's an abandoned mine in Southern California. I've visited a few times and photographed it all the way through twice. It's not as spooky as you would imagine because nothing is actually in there that's alive just the remnants of the miners occupation. They were mining Tourmaline down there.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties: