I accidentally touched my cameras sensor with my finger and now

>>2758248
apply brasso and clean it gently with a piece of wool.

File: 1454282342166.png (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1000px

>>2758249
wow so randum xD

>>2758248
Buy sensor cleaning swabs and some 99,9% isopropyl alcohol.

>>2758248

ask ur mom OP

>>>>>mirrorless

>>2758316
>Implying mirrorless isn't an inherently better design.
>Implying the mirror isn't there because of the limitations of film.

File: 1447297432557.png (293KB, 413x417px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 413x417px

>>2758331

what

>>2758347
What's confusing there?

>>2758331

mirrorshill pls go.

>>2758348

There are a fuckton of mirrorless film cameras.

>>2758331
>Implying the mirror isn't there because of the limitations of film.

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

LOOK AT HIM AND LAUGH

>inb4 i was only pretending

>>2758351
How many of them are TTL?

He didn't say the film is there because of the mirror, he said the mirror is there because of the film. Don't pretend to be stupid to win an argument. It just makes you look stupid (go figure)

>>2758351
You can either have a second lens, randfinder/sight or a mirror to redirect the light that would otherwise hit the film/sensor.

But if you're using a digital sensor, you can see the image that is hitting the sensor. There is no need to redirect that light for monitoring purposes.

There can still be advantages to DSLRs, number of lenses for example, but the inclusion of a mirror is because of a limitation that no longer exists.

>>2758360
>>2758366

top grade clowns right there, folks.

>>2758371
I love these comebacks. In fact I love the whole this gear vs that gear tribalism. Different camera designs have strengths and weaknesses. Mirrorless makes more sense for digital sensors.

>>2758377
>Different camera designs have strengths and weaknesses

yeah, digital works great and is indeed a need in pro fashion, pro sports and journalism. tell me how many /p/ guys work on any of these fields. oh i thought so.

X - Told
O - Not Told

>>2758248
buy some pre-moistened sensor swabs that are the right width for your sensor. it's not hard to clean the sensor.

File: 1425919536617.png (4KB, 128x128px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 128x128px

>>2758360
ya ever heard of a leica, champ?

if not I doubt you know what a rangefinder is either