[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Ilford Harman Direct Positive Fiber Based...
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography

Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2
Anyone, experimenting with the Ilford direct positive paper? Photo related, one of my shots on direct positive paper in my 4x5. (1/2 sec @ f/4.5. Rated the paper at ISO1.5)
>>
>>2750564

looks pretty. so one just goes and shoot and then voila theres a photo in it, or you have to develop it and such procedures.

also price?
>>
>>2750568
You develop it like normal photo paper (dev, stop, fix, wash).

About $17 for 25 sheets.
>>
>>2750564
It's a lot of trouble for such a low ISO and no possibility of enlargement at all, ever.
>>
>>2750617
Cheaper, easier to load, easier to process, immediate results. Enlargement is easy, just scan & print a contact negative.
>>
Looks good OP

can we see a shot of a person?
>>
File: img001 copy.jpg (767 KB, 4000x3182) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
img001 copy.jpg
767 KB, 4000x3182
>>2751055
Perhaps a little underexposed. 1/2 sec @ f/4.5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width6435
Image Height5169
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionUnknown
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution1200 dpi
Image Created2016:01:19 12:50:14
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4000
Image Height3182
>>
>>2751149
well thats disappointing. This is a 4x5 camera?
>>
>>2751170
Yea, 4x5. Schneider Xenar 150mm f/4.5 on a monorail Calumet.

I haven't really dialed in the exposure & development of the paper which is why I asked if anyone had experimented with it.
>>
>>2750564
>>2751149
OP, are you pre-flashing your paper for the extra tonal range/softer contrast?
>>
>>2751189
These are not pre-flashed. These are from my first batch of tests. Next time I get chemistry mixed up I will do some pre-flash tests strips.
Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2
Thread DB ID: 470865



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.