Ilford Harman Direct Positive Fiber Based (FB) Paper

>>2750564

looks pretty. so one just goes and shoot and then voila theres a photo in it, or you have to develop it and such procedures.

also price?

>>2750568
You develop it like normal photo paper (dev, stop, fix, wash).

About $17 for 25 sheets.

>>2750564
It's a lot of trouble for such a low ISO and no possibility of enlargement at all, ever.

>>2750617
Cheaper, easier to load, easier to process, immediate results. Enlargement is easy, just scan & print a contact negative.

Looks good OP

can we see a shot of a person?

File: img001 copy.jpg (767KB, 4000x3182px) Image search: [Google]

767KB, 4000x3182px

>>2751055
Perhaps a little underexposed. 1/2 sec @ f/4.5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6435
Image Height	5169
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:19 12:50:14
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3182

>>2751149
well thats disappointing. This is a 4x5 camera?

>>2751170
Yea, 4x5. Schneider Xenar 150mm f/4.5 on a monorail Calumet.

I haven't really dialed in the exposure & development of the paper which is why I asked if anyone had experimented with it.

>>2750564
>>2751149
OP, are you pre-flashing your paper for the extra tonal range/softer contrast?

>>2751189
These are not pre-flashed. These are from my first batch of tests. Next time I get chemistry mixed up I will do some pre-flash tests strips.