Film Camera

>>2744107
Canon AE-1 with HP5+ or Kentmere 400.

I don't have mine yet, but hopefully in a week or two It'll be a Mamiya m645 with Rollei Retro 400s

>implying film bodies matter

Kill yourselves

>>2744107
Anyone noticed a real difference between Tri-X and HP5+? I haven't yet, although I haven't done any tests. If there isn't any, then Tri-X doesn't really need to stick around for most of us, does it?

bessa + 35mm + tri-x

>>2744119
I prefer tri-x as it gives me a better tonality for daytime shots. At least the way I develop it.

Pentax 67 + Ektachrome EPP100

>>2744119
I find HP5 to be finer grained, faster, give better skin tones, respond better to orange and red filters, cost less, and be much easier to scan.
>but hey, that's just me.

Newbie film photog here. I bought some Kodak TMax400. I didn't do any research befor buying it. The problem is I read it can't be developed on your own. Is this true? Or harder to develop than the tri-x.

nikon fm2 + rollei 80s or mamiya rz67 + hp5+

>>2744222
check'd
It is considerably more sensitive to development than tri-x. The effects of a deviation of 1~2ºC during development is similar to what one would expect from 3~5ºC on regular films. That said, it can be developed at home, just be careful. Have your thermometer with you all the time, and sit the developing tank into a larger tank filled with water during development and keep track of the temperature. T-max 400 surely is one the best films available.

RZ67 and hp5 or 4x5 with 100 speed arista

Kiev-60 and fomapan.

>>2744489
Though I did buy batch of delta 3200 and shanghai gp2 some time ago and have been burning through those.

>>2744107
Minolta X-700 with fujicolor 100/superia 200/ultramax
>>2744118
What?

>>2744533

The body is just a shutter housing and a lens mount. It has no bearing on the final image at all.

m2 with trix and sometimes hp5

>>2744554
No but different features mean a lot to certain people. There's a lot of differences between a Leica M3 and an EOS1v, for instance.

m6 with apx or silvermax.

>>2744554
It has a bearing on:
available shutter times
available lenses
shot framing method
portability
potentially metering method

These are all essential to properly casting light on the focal plane of the film of choice, anon, arguing otherwise is a /p/ thing to do.

>>2744585

some day they'll find a cure for your crippling autism

>>2744585

I would be right there with you if people were listing exotic cameras in this thread (or even on this board), but we both know that people are only going to list middle-of-the-road consumer cameras that all do all of the things you listed equally well.

>>2744574
i use either a summaron or a 35 skopar. i prefer trix due to more tones and more everything. hp5 gets all contrasty on me instantly where i have to work for crushed blacks on trix

>>2744619
That's sorta presumptuous of you. Also, dependant on your definition of exotic. So far I've worked on three different SLRs, two very different rangefinders, a lomo-barebones viewfinder and a TLR and each type if not even model of camera forced me to adapt a different, sometimes highly specific, workflow and choice of subjects and motives. So arguing that naming your cam body is irrelevant, from my experience and perspective, at least, is just wrong.
I can post pic examples and arguments to back this up if needed but that seems very self-gratuitous and redundant (I doubt anyone gives a fuck about my gearfagging).

Ricoh gr1v and the roll in it currently is prove 100f

>>2744574
see
>>2744210
>>2744218

>>2744633
>three different SLRs, two very different rangefinders, a lomo-barebones viewfinder and a TLR
>gearfagging

That's not a lot of cameras at all...

>>2744647
It's enough to prove his point though.
Obviously camera bodies matter, other bloke was just gentle trolling.

>>2744649

not that he was a gear fag

>>2744649

Also, it wasn't trolling, but clearly hyperbole.

Clearly your film (and developer) choice is going to have an overwhelming effect on the image compared to the body. It's not like you switch to another film body and all of a sudden your images will be in color.

>>2744670
Ah, I see now, we're having two different conversations here - I'm talking about the brushes and canvas and you're talking about pigments, paints and varnishes. The same roll of film/dev process will yield identical results dynamic range-wise, in terms of contrast/colour regardless of used gear, but if your camera doesnt have the right shutter speeds to nail the exposure or means of framing the shot you envision, the content of the film frame will physically differ. There really are subjects, situations or lighting conditions in which some types of cameras or combinations of available settings are impossible or very troublesome to use. I know b/c I've been in them purposefully.
Film/process is crucial for resulting image.
Camera is crucial to obtain said image properly.
(•_•)7 let there be peace between the warring autist nations

Ae-1p + hp5

>>2745598
New F-1 + HP5

Right now its a Rollei 35 with Portra 160.

Usually though, I just use Fuji Superia because I'm poor.

>>2745909
Superia is actually not bad. I like the reds and greens.

$20 F-301 and HP5

FM2 or F5 with Tri-X 400, Ilford 3200, Ektar 100, Portra 400, sometimes Superia 800.

I don't have have a "Usual" combo. Just whatever film or speed is needed for the shoot.

>>2745909
Same. I just got a roll of Portra 800 (inb4 shitty grain joke) but I usually shoot Superia too because it's easily accessible and weilds good results.

File: IMG_9719.jpg (986KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

986KB, 1600x1067px

New F1 + Kodak Portra 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Windows)
Photographer	David Yuan
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2014:01:25 15:57:44
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

F100 with a nifty fifty + Portra 400

and a GR on my pocket, and that's all I'll ever need.

Nikon F2 with Kentmere 400

Using probly a 35mm f/2 lens

File: cam.jpg (238KB, 720x900px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 720x900px

>>2744210
>bessa + 35mm + tri-x

Ma nigga~

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	COOLPIX P340
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	734
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015:02:23 22:53:52
Exposure Time	1/5 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	10.70 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSCF8803_v1.jpg (133KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1000x664px

RB67 with Velvia 50

File: DSCF9805.jpg (193KB, 1000x771px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1000x771px

t90 & portra 400 or tmax 100

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X100S
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3456
Image Height	2304
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:17 20:59:36
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	3.7 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	771
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2746663
Is that a huge fucking thumbprint on that lense?
Where did you even find a working T90?

>>2746675

Found mine for 30 bucks in an electronics surplus warehouse

LCD is good too

>>2746716
>but sugar, if your cameras worked wouldn't you post photos from them?

>>2746717

DON'T ASK HIM TO POST PHOTOS

File: 1137-400219.jpg (612KB, 1000x648px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 1000x648px

>>2746717

Me? Post BW photos taken with a T90? Never. Please everyone knows those things don't work you were just being trolled. Finding a working T90 without shutter issues or LCD failures is like finding all 7 Dragonballs.

>>2746744

If you weren't so busy shitposting you would have seen the Sugar Thread I posted on Christmas Day. Lurk the RPT too I post in there from time to time.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2746756
>if you weren't lurking /p/ on Christmas day like an assburger hikikomori you wouldn't have seen the thread, because it sank like a fucking stone and fell off the board in a few hours
Not only is that picture a fucking repost, it's out of focus. Now last I checked rolls of film had 36 shots on them, what the hell were the rest of?

>>2746762

>repost

2/10

>fell off the board in a few hours

It was trolled for a good week or so and fell off.

Guess you were too busy exploring outside of your basement for once to notice.

File: GR003431.jpg (772KB, 1000x598px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 1000x598px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	GR II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	21 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	500 dpi
Vertical Resolution	500 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:18 16:20:04
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	8.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	13.70 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>2746798
how do u like your t3 so far? is the autofocus good? if you could tell me your experience with it I would be very grateful.

>>2746849
its not to bad its a point and shoot but it performs well enough, focus is loud as fuck but quick. fits in your pocket and the lens is great, is it worth the price well probably not. its solid as fuck and the construction is top notch. it does the job but so can other cameras for cheaper. I prefer the T2.

>>2746798
How much did you pay for yours? I see tons on ebay for 800+

Is there a CLA guide for Canon cameras? I have a couple AE-1s and an FT that I figure are better off cleaned.

What are your favourite 120 films?

File: IMGP0152.jpg (396KB, 866x1154px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 866x1154px

Pentax ES
and ilford HP5+

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-01
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	42 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	240 dpcm
Image Created	2016:01:18 20:15:39
Exposure Time	1/4 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>2748444
All of them, provided you're using patrician 6x9.
With that much film real estate, any film will give you great sharpness and tonal range at normal viewing sizes.
If you're shooting 645, or cropping from square format, then slower and sharper is better.

yashicamat 124g with fomapan 100

Minolta SRT 101 and Fuji

>tfw fuji price increase

gonna have to stockpile that bitch it seems

>>2748850
>patrician 6x9
indeed you are quite noble but the true format of kings is 6x7

>>2746855
can you expand a little on why you prefer the t2? it is basically between these two for me and the t2 is significantly more accessible.

File: IMG_1636.jpg (861KB, 1588x1010px) Image search: [Google]

861KB, 1588x1010px

tri-x in one portra in the other

ive bought -and subsequently sold- many "nicer" lenses, point and shoots, a dslr, et cetera, but this is the only setup that i've ever enjoyed enough to keep using...

oly mju II + ektar/portra/superia wtv color film

File: 20160127_190913.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

>>2744222
Just developed mine myself today. Seems just slightly purple tinted but i shouldve just fixed it longer

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G925W8
Camera Software	G925W8VLU3BOK1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5312
Image Height	2988
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:27 19:09:13
Exposure Time	1/248 sec
F-Number	f/1.9
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	40
Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Brightness	6.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5312
Image Height	2988
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	A16LLIC08SM A16LLIG02GM_

Mamiya RB67

Ilford 400 in one back, Portra 400 in the other

I'd say gw690 + velvia but sadly that camera is kill

>>2754863
Kodak film base is purple, m8, there's no problem.
Film that isn't fixed properly will show a yellowy stain towards the middle of the neg, or overall cloudiness, or sometimes streaking around the sprocket holes.
You do seem to have quite a few underexposed negs though, I'd work on that.

>>2754955
phone rings, it is my friend pjiotr
>that camera is kill
no

But how was kill?

Konica IIIa
Ilford Pan 400 or Foma Retropan 320.

>>2744113
>>2745598
>>2745603

My niggas.

>>2755239
noicce, post shots

Pentax K1000 with the Smc 50/f2
Nikkormat ft(n?) with a Nikon 28/f3.5
Olympus 35RC 42/2.8
Olympus Mju

Only bought the K1000, the rest were gifts.

>>2755252
Should probably add to that, all I can get my hands on right now are kodak gold and hp5+

>>2755022
I have under and over exposed images. I bracketed my shots is all

>Scanning film for first time
>4800dpi
>Scan resolution is 72 megapixels

File: img001-2.jpg (962KB, 1920x1405px) Image search: [Google]

962KB, 1920x1405px

Here's the first shot I took with my Mamiya m645 and Retro 80s, I pushed it a little to 100, a little curves and high pass were added in PS

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	9967
Image Height	7295
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	530 dpi
Vertical Resolution	530 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:28 17:03:42
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1405

>>2755434
It's an out of focus, contrast-raped snapshit of nothing at all.
0/10

>>2755448
>out of focus
>only part that's even slightly blurry is the tree in the foreground

>>2755459
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept

>>2755434
what the fuck

looks fucking horrendous, don't sharpen that much

>>2744118
buttmad poorfag?

File: img005-2.jpg (665KB, 1399x1920px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 1399x1920px

>>2755590
:^)

FED 3 w/Industar 61 and tri x

>>2755434
so sharp i cut my eyes, senpai

File: waste of film.jpg (441KB, 1000x1039px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 1000x1039px

>>2755594
Oh hey it's like we're horrendously shit min focus distance MF dead winter plantlife buddies!

>>2755741
What lens and body combo are you using, mang? Mine's a Mamiya m645 with the Sekor C 70mm f2.8

OM2 + Carl Zeiss Jena 28mm MC

HP5 or Tmax (when it's available)

>>2755813
This is an extremely unevenly exposed (5 ev between the thristle plant and the background) min focus dist f/5.6 shot from a 50yo polish TLR with a 75mm triplet, shot on Ilford XP2, scanned on a 12yo flatbed with improvised backlignting, aka you hoped for a civilised known body/lens combo and got outlandish gibberish from the tripfag.

I underestimated how shallow the dof is on these things, there's an apartment building and McDonalds' sign in the background, smudged into oblivion making this look like a wildlife shot. Talk about isolating the subject.