Is this A+ quality?

>>2742605
1. Read the sticky
2. Not even remotely good.
3. Throw away that point and shit and get a decent camera.

File: Mandy4k.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	988
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4608
Image Height	3072
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2014:11:12 10:37:46
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4608
Image Height	3072
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2742614
>mad that a p&s camera takes better photos than your "pro" dslr or "enthusiast" mirrorless

>>2742646
how can you think that this post will have any weight at all when paired with op

come on man you need something to back you up with these claims

>>2742605
sage

>>2742634
deep, man. deep

>>2742646
>claims his 5 year old point and shoot takes better pictures than pro cameras

>cant even provide a good photo with their "p&s camera that takes better photos than your "pro" dslr or "enthusiast" mirrorless"

kek'd, learn to take criticism, isnt our fault that your photos are shit

>>2742634
>meditation on cheeseburgers

>>2742605
Good idea but shit camera and angle

>>2742605
A+? No.
Its not a great photo desu

Firstly, being in portrait means that the photo is awkward to look at with so much going on- typically with portrait photos its immediately apparent why you took it to anybody looking.... I honestly can't tell here other than maybe the pigeon being in the water?

Angle isn't great, there's a row of trees I can spot so maybe wide wouldn't have worked... should have been flat on and close enough so the width of the fountain took up the frame.

In this case your camera was up to it but you weren't. Looking at the camera specs its actually not bad if you flick it to manual. Obviously a proper IL (Interchangeable Lens) camera would be better but with 24-120mm and F2.0-8.0 you can handle most styles. Even long exposure (no bulb but up to 15s is good)... in other words don't even think about upgrading that camera until your skill improves.

Also it looks like you edited this... take a good long look at the original and see if you really did improve it.