[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Whats your opinions on polaroid camera /p/?
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography

Thread replies: 157
Thread images: 36
File: afqw4245.jpg (6 KB, 260x194) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
afqw4245.jpg
6 KB, 260x194
>>
>>2707493
fun to shoot with sometimes, film that isn't made anymore (only made by impossible project) is way too expensive. Find one that uses Fujifilm FP-100C and it's not too bad
>>
Polaroid Cameras!
They are fun and worth it if you do your research.
I stick with B&W 2.0 from the impossible project. Their color film is not quite perfected but they upgraded thier color stocks.
Best results with proper lighting. I wouldn't waste your film indoors.
If you want something super reliable and cheaper gow ith FUJIFILM INSTAX WIDE. Also, lomogrpahy has their version coming out soon
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (353 KB, 1027x1258) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Untitled.jpg
353 KB, 1027x1258
Also, don't waste your film at night.
Make sure to clean your rollers or else they will distort your shots.After loading film, don't bother taking cartridge out. Your polaroid will auto eject(and waste your film).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
File: polaroid_a_shit.jpg (926 KB, 816x1000) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
polaroid_a_shit.jpg
926 KB, 816x1000
>>2707919
if you're gonna post a shit photo at least edit it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:11:22 21:04:30
>>
NAH. I think not. = ]
>>
>>2707946
The original is way better
>>
>>2707977
Which isn't saying much considering the original is garbage
>>
>>2707978
Your edit sucks bro, learn to deal
>>
>>2707981
lel I'm not even the same dude who posted the instagram-tier edit

The original is just not a good photograph. It's limited by the medium, and also just terribly composed. I'm assuming it's just a test shot though
>>
Meme camera
>>
File: DSCF4549.jpg (182 KB, 1000x667) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
DSCF4549.jpg
182 KB, 1000x667
>>2707493

I like to shoot some Polaroids too. This one's been modded so it's a bit hard to get the focus just right, but the colors and contrast are so much better than the original triplet.

Someday I want to mod a Pathfinder to use Instax wide film (Lomo Belair back?)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-Pro1
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:11:23 00:59:22
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Brightness-2.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height667
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
SharpnessNormal
White BalanceAuto
Chroma SaturationNormal
Flash ModeOff
Macro ModeOff
Focus ModeAuto
Slow Synchro ModeOff
Picture ModeManual Exposure
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOff
Blur StatusOK
Focus StatusOK
Auto Exposure StatusOK
>>
Does anyone know why Impossible project film takes 30 goddamn minutes to develop?
it's hardly "instant," but it's still more convenient than developing film and scanning it I guess. If they bought the old machines off of polaroid, why can't they make the film work in the same way?
>>
>>2708923

It has something to to with the chemical process that the don't have down yet, They have Polaroid's tooling but they don't have the formulas. It might also be a a problem with sourcing the raw materials
>>
>>2708923
as >>2709106 said, it's the fact their formula is not the same. They can make the actual film packs in the same way with polaroid's machines, but they do not have the same formula for the film, for various reasons. Copyright is one, but resource procurement is another. a lot of the elements that were in Polaroid process are unavailable, mostly due to the fact that those chemicals or compounds can't be produced for environmental reasons, I believe.
>>
File: Untitled.png (603 KB, 514x620) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Untitled.png
603 KB, 514x620
I don't believe in editing photos. I'm not gonna buy a 600$ camera so I can become an edit-bro. Anyways, Yeah i'm not that great. Still learning. The B&W2.0 from impossible is basically instant. If i'm not mistaken, impossible is actually just leasing the factory. But yes, the chemical formula isn't down yet for color. Like I said, if you can't wait, FUGIFILM INTAX WIDE.
>>
>>2709153
...FUJIFILM INSTAX WIDE**
>>
File: slr670m-main.jpg (28 KB, 451x476) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
slr670m-main.jpg
28 KB, 451x476
I'm going to take the plunge!
https://mint-camera.com/SLR670/SLR670m
>>
>>2709153
>I don't believe in editing fotos
>i don't believe in assigned genders
similarity spotted
>>
>>2709153
>I don't believe in edited photos
>Lightroom is too expensive/I'm technologically illiterate
FTFY
>>
>>2709153
>I don't believe in editing photos
Posts a photo that would take tons of editing to achieve the same level of "different from reality" look.
>>
>>2707493
They are a load of fun to shoot with, but as the first reply stated, the film is just way too expensive.

I do love the physical nature of the it though. The instant gratification of holding the memory/art in your hand.

If it were not so expensive, I could easily see myself shooting with it a whole lot more.
>>
>>2711643
It is expensive, I typically try to buy in bulk.
It has forced me to learn to better compose my shots. Also, found an Impulse today for 5$. Wish I would find an auto-focus one already.
>>
File: Impulse.jpg (269 KB, 1024x681) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Impulse.jpg
269 KB, 1024x681
Thinking about dismantling one and custom repainting considering i have 3 of these babies now.
>>
If anyone is interested in pola, i suggest getting the taschen Polaroid book. i have it. its pretty good, all formats, experimental shit and all. also cheap.
>>
File: polaroidsnap04.jpg (42 KB, 844x546) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
polaroidsnap04.jpg
42 KB, 844x546
This is probably the best place to ask so I don't muck up the board;
Does anyone know if the polaroid snap will take any 2x3 zink paper or is there a specific type I need? I just bought my wife one yesterday for funzies, and I wanted to order more paper.

Also, as a modern take on a polaroid, it is pretty damn fun to use, although nothing beats waving that picture around like a Chinese fan.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4500
Image Height2911
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Data ArrangementPlanar Format
Image Created2015:09:01 15:13:21
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4500
Image Height2911
>>
>>2712215
Z-ink paper is z-ink paper regardless of size, it's one unified standardised technology.
>>
>>2712219
Word, thanks a bunch
>>
Just curious but Cyber Monday is here and I was wondering if you guys would consider this a good deal.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00M1XIPKG?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=ox_sc_act_title_1&smid=A1RUOWZ2794IXS
>>
Installed mini film typically is 20 bucks for 20 shots. The neo classic usually runs in the 150$. It has double exposure mode. I would say it's good for the price. Only downer for me is smaller pictures. I would prefer the WIDE 300 but that baby is huge.
>>
That Polaroid snap has some cool features but picture size is too small for me. Also, the only instant film you're suppose to shake "like a polaroid" was for the original peel apart film = P. All other shaking disturbs the process!
>>
File: mint-lens-set-new2.jpg (127 KB, 590x403) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
mint-lens-set-new2.jpg
127 KB, 590x403
Mine just came in today!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3200
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern970
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width6016
Image Height4000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2013:10:31 19:45:19
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width590
Image Height403
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: images.jpg (11 KB, 275x183) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
images.jpg
11 KB, 275x183
Who /FP-100C/ here?

They've got this guide up on instructables to
get an old polaroid land camera to take normal batteries (since you can still use these types of cameras with FP-100c). Although not as instant as some of the cameras in this thread (1-2 minutes vs 30 seconds), the pictures do come out pretty nice. Its also cheaper in the long run.

Heres the guide if you guys want to check it out:
http://www.instructables.com/id/Resurrect-a-Polaroid-Land-Camera/
>>
>>2714148
I wanted to get into those, still do. It's just I havent encountered any Pola Land Cameras like that in the wild. I got intot his stuff too late and kinda sad Fuji stopped B&W FPorb? 3000.
>>
I want to get into instant film, but haven't yet.

I'm really leaning on going the Land Camera and using FP-100c route.

Instax would be the next choice just because of its ease and availability.

I sometimes think about rebuying my childhood camera, a polaroid spectra procam. I don't though since going Impossible Project is the worst option of these 3.
>>
File: img002.jpg (153 KB, 1200x966) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
img002.jpg
153 KB, 1200x966
>>2714148
yo I have a color pack II

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2015:07:17 21:07:04
>>
>>2714237
III*
>>
>>2714225
I have an Instax Wide 300. I love it, but I lean more towards Polaroid cameras. I imagine if FUJI made b&W instax i'd probably switch in heartbeat.I just enjoy the different frame borders via TIP. I can't wait until they release Color 2.0. There's a video where Steven herchen says TIP is devloping a camera 2016, unless I heard wrong...
>>
>>2714148
I believe MiNT sells special upgraded versions of these.
>>2714237
Ghostly.
>>
File: img061 copy.jpg (192 KB, 1000x760) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
img061 copy.jpg
192 KB, 1000x760
>>2714148
Man I haven't taken my 240 out in ages.
I still wish they made FP3000b. I LOVED how that stuff looked.

As for how I feel about Polaroids? They fun. That's about it.
The quality is garbage, the film is expensive, and it can be temperamental (especially expired Polaroid and the older Impossible Project stuff; haven't had a chance to try the new formulation but I plan to one of these days). They're great fun to experience, and are good conversation starters.

If you want instant film, spring for a peel-apart camera like the Polaroid 250; or go for one of the newer Fujifilm Instax cameras. The quality is better (especially if you get one of the Polaroids with glass lens elements), film is somewhat cheaper, and the film is more stable.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2013:02:25 18:32:24
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height760
>>
>>2714876
I feel the same way except I am in love with the B&W2.0.
I don't know of any Instax Cameras with glass lens. Unless mayber the Older AF model? I even think the Lomo Instant Wide is plastic lens.
>>
Now I want this one too... Macro 5 SLR
https://shop.the-impossible-project.com/shop/polaroid-image-spectra-camera-macro-5
>>
>>2715427
I meant Polaroids when I said glass elements. Do those new "high end" Instaxes also have plastic elements?

As for IP's B&W 2.0, haven't tried it yet. I got some deadstock B&W some time around last year for like $10 and it was eight shots of under exposed, sepia toned disappointment.
>>
>>2715483
Plastic lens indeed to my knowledge for the 210/300. It's the main reason I'm pushing for a folding SX-70... Specifically MiNt's SLR670M.
My only recourse is people modifying the Wide 300 to accomodate high end manual lenses by removing the existing lens.
I find the B&2 2.0 gorgeous. Supwer instant too in comparison to to the color stocks. But then again I'm a newb.
>>
File: customwide.png (531 KB, 934x437) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
customwide.png
531 KB, 934x437
>>2715522
>>
>>2715483
This is 2.0 B&W
Unfournately I shot this at night(which i read is a bad idea), over exposed on an 0ne600pro.
>>2709153
I currently don't have my better examples scanned.
>>
Generally, polaroids are not good enough, but they're fun af.
>>
File: 20151205_193328.jpg (2 MB, 4128x2322) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
20151205_193328.jpg
2 MB, 4128x2322
In too deep.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSPH-L720T
Camera SoftwareL720TVPUCOD2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4128
Image Height2322
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:12:05 19:33:27
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4128
Image Height2322
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeNight Scene
>>
>>2715875
>he bought a Mint Polaroid
>>
thinking about hacking up a diana instax back and gaffer tapping it to my mamiya 645 super

anyone have any experience with this?
>>
>>2715931
Apparently you can't read. It's a brand of accessories "MiNT". I don't see any Polaroid cameras.
>>
What are your thoughts on the 600se/Mamiya Press?
>>
>>2716141
Fucking xbox hueg, but they make great portrait cameras since you can get 120/220 backs for them.
>>
>>2716149
As well there's adapters so that you can use the rb67 backs, though at that point you would be better off getting one of those Koni Omega cameras
>>
http://shop.lomography.com/en/cameras/lomo-instant-wide/lomo-instant-wide-portobello-road
>>
>>2712017
How do you like the impulse, my brother's gf recently just gave me hers because she never used it. I've only actually taken pics with a color pack III
>>
>>2718181
Is this worth getting over a Fuji Instax Wide?
>>
>>2714237
>>2714876
How do you get the photos so big? You scan them?
>>
>>2718567
Yeah just have a cheapo USB scanner that does the magic
>>
>>2718644
USB Scanner?
>>
>>2718648
Scanner that plugs in via usb
>>
>>2718255
It's the first 600 I've owned. Swore by it until roller issues. I like the compact body/the off grey green. Keep it mind it's not an slr so you don't always crop out what you want via viewfinder. There's a lighten,darken switch, and a close up option. To be honest I never use it because I can't tell the difference. There are sonar models but I haven't tried those out. It's basically box 600.
>>
>>2718445
Not sure because I don't own one yet.
But, it has a grid to frame your shots. Extra plastic lens to attach. Gel filters for flash. Double exposure/timer options. Definitely has more to offer than Wide.
Wish fuji would make a real camera already...
>>
>>2718675
the 500AF was their last good instant camera
>>
Wish I could have a instant camera that can.
Save images via sd card?
OR VIEW IMAGE BEFORE FILM PRINT
SLR
AUTOFUCKING FOCUS?
MANUAL FOCUS?
Manual LENS?
GLASS LENS?
LIGHTEN DARKEN
FLASH OVERIDE
TRIPOD SOCKET
GEL FILTERS?
ATTACHABLE LENS?
Wish I could cobine Folding SX-70 with polaroid snap with those modified Wide 300's floating around from Asia.
>>
>>2719866
X-E2 with and an SP1 gives you exactly all of that.
>>
>>2719866
Cheap DSLR + this bluetoothed to it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Width958
Image Height399
>>
>>2719872
>X-E2 with and an SP1
Awesome,, but where's my instant film?
>>
>>2719875
Not a fan of Zink paper.
Looks too msall and blurry.
I had selphy printer which was bad ass, but lol, fucking shit if you edit your photos, won't allow to print.
>>
>>2719892
The SP1 uses instax.
>>
>>2707918
>cheaper
>Fuji instax

I'd go with their pack film, FP-100c or (if you can find it) b&w 3000. But of course you need a Land camera or one of their portrait cameras for that.
>>
>>2719911
If they make a wide printer I'd be sold?
>>
File: IMG_0130.jpg (2 MB, 4032x3024) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_0130.jpg
2 MB, 4032x3024
growing collection

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 6s
Camera Software9.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:12:12 12:11:20
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating80
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness3.4 EV
Exposure Bias0.4 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.15 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2720431
More like growing erection, gearfaggot
>>
>>2719900
>>2719875
>>2719866

Just picked up a Polaroid Snap the other day. First impressions are mixed, but I haven't had the chance to shoot in daylight yet, so bear that in mind.

The prints (Zink) are pretty small and may suffer from slight banding issues. The dynamic range isn't great, and colours aren't all that good. The flash definitely needs a gel taped over it too as it's obviously got a strong cool cast to it.

On the plus side, the camera is a decent mix of small and holdable. Cute colours, nice contours and the choice of colour modes, borders and the ability to print film and save digital are winning factors for me.

The daylight examples I've seen are pretty neat, much better colours. But again, yet to test it.

>tl;dr
>Shit dynamic range, may suffer from banding issues
>Sticky back, cute size make it great for non-serious pics
>>
>>2720431


that's like three hundred dollars of terrible film
>>
>>2720431
Awesome dude.
I'm saving my yellow and black for a radiation themed shoot.
Jealous of sx70.
>>
>>2720431
Is that an sx70 or slr680/90?>>2720442
It amazes me on the hate. Who references male erections then proclaims the other to be a gear faggot. Lol. So intellect to brand a hobbyist so you copy every other as hole and their lingo.
>>
>>2720449
I was gonna jump on the snap but I had a feeling the zink paper was eh eh. Great to have Hechern developing film though at impossible.
>>
>>2720498
Sauce? Looks like 200 less than your figure.
>>
>>2720431
Share your results with the new upgraded color! 600 film won't be good on that sx70. Different is unless you have ND filter!
>>
Gearfaggot: Camera,lens,primes. Photoshop,lightroom, gimp.kekekke.
All Dat money so you can faggotgear broedit your pictures
>>
>>2720525
It's an SLR 680
>>
>>2720727
I'm seriously considering the Slr670m from MiNT.
>>
>>2707493
The film is expensive and not the same quality as original Polaroid film. That's honestly the worst part of it all. if you can find the camera in a antique shop it'll make the hobby worth it since you can score it cheap. I got mine for 10 dollars with the original tote bag. you can try to shoot with the original roller but you'll almost never get a good shot outdoors or in intense lighting. Makes beautiful pictures in low to complete darkness.Depending on the camera, the flash sensor isn't sophisticated enough to know when not to flash and you'll still get the flash sometimes outdoors. If you want a low risk, instant gratification camera then go with a instax or for a more physically pleasing and advanced camera go with the lomography version
>>
>>2720431
Hows the close up?
I have the flash version
>>
The film has come a long way and it will get better.
>>
File: pola.jpg (5 MB, 4493x2995) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
pola.jpg
5 MB, 4493x2995
I've played with everything short of Instax, Kodak's patent-infringing stuff, Polaroid's 180/195, and any of the special cameras for dentistry/passports, etc. Ask away.

Impossible's new B&W is the shit, up there with FP-3000B in contrast. Highly recommend. That yellow film is great, too - same chemistry.

Impossible's older-gen color stuff was OK and develops faster with heat. Haven't shot color in awhile but I have a few packs of their newest SX-70 on standby.

>>2714148
AAA-mod is pretty easy to do. Thank fuck my nearest RadioShack survived the cut, I get the battery holders from them.

>>2719866
SLR-680/690 with Mint lens set is as close as you're gonna get. Or there's that Instant Lab if you just want to print digital flicks on instant film.

>>2721374
Except for the 660 which had the sonar AF, literally all the plastic cameras take the same-quality pictures. I rarely shoot with any of the plastic cams (I usually flip the ones I find at Goodwill, the ones i still have were gifts or family-owned) but have a soft spot for the 660.
>>
>>2721480
I have all the acessories for the sx-70 but no camera. Gonna order the SLR670M from mint next paycheck. Only thing I'm worried about is Impossible is making their own camera. But then again, I doubt it will be high end. Also, all I shoot is bw2.0. I've read rumors of Gen 3.0 when "I-1 camera is released".
>>
>>2721480
Super jealous of your blue Impulse. Even though I'm done with 600 series, unless I find a sonar impulse. I have 2 of the green grey I wanna get rid of. Don't care much for the 600one step either. My favorite 2 is my 600sunlms and One600. Is that film on your shelf empty or?
>>
>>>2721506
I'd bite the bullet and just go with the 670m... unless Impossible comes up with something completely out of left field, the I-1 should be just a box-type camera (like a OneStep) with a manual shutter. Before Florian Kaps left the company, they were planning a pinhole camera based on the Film Processing Unit that makes up the base for the Instant Lab, along with a manual lens camera like aforementioned. Kaps got his pinhole camera when he founded Supersense.

Also wait and find a donor SX-70 before getting the 670m, Mint was running an upgrade program earlier this year if you send in your own camera for conversion. Contact them first and see if they still do it - if so, and if I read everything correctly, it'll save you about $250.

>>2721509
I believe they made the Impulse in grey, maroon, yellow, blue, and green. The Impossible stuff is fresh, the 600 is from early-2009 and turning crappy - I can't use it in my 680 due to low battery voltage, the 779 stock is completely dry (it was free), and the Image (Spectra) is still usable despite being a decade old.
>>
>>2720527

it was hyperbole, friend
>>
>>2721480

those fucking dentistry polaroids are crazy

i worked at goodwill and one time we got one in with about a dozen boxes of expired film

also, the cop ones are weird
>>
>>2721615
In the bag on the lower far-right is one of the cop Spectra kits, got it from the Mundelien, IL PD. The 1:1 copy stand is really nice but the close-up attachment lens has so-far proven to be pretty worthless, I'm yet to get a sharp image with it.
>>
File: 12537_56.jpg (180 KB, 1536x1152) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
12537_56.jpg
180 KB, 1536x1152
>>2721615
The Miniportrait is pretty cool too.
>>
>>2721560
I wanted to go this route buy I can't find any in the wild at all. (Southeast USA) There's a few on Craigslist asking typically 125ish territory.
>>
File: img007.jpg (152 KB, 996x1206) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
img007.jpg
152 KB, 996x1206
I'm having fun with mine.
>>
File: image.jpg (76 KB, 1136x640) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
76 KB, 1136x640
>>2721480
>That Andy Warhol type in the corner

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1136
Image Height640
>>
>>2721853

I got the feeling, as they never really sold for that much. We had a 185 land that sold for quite a bit, in contrast.
>>
File: 2015-12-15_07-19-33.jpg (998 KB, 1642x2048) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
2015-12-15_07-19-33.jpg
998 KB, 1642x2048
>>2722725
Not the most practical camera out there but a ball to shoot with and turns out decent shit for being cheap and all-plastic. Pic related.

>>2722818
The original Spectra was actually a fairly high-end consumer instant camera for its time; image quality was usually better than the OneStep-type cameras. At one point Minolta had a rebadged version with a glass lens, too. They sold like hotcakes, which is why you can find them so cheap. The 180/195 was a legit, professional camera produced in a really limited run, and I believe they were even assembled by-hand.
>>
>>2722832

What did you use for the flash? A cube?
>>
Used the Spectra System today, BW2.0, beautiful results. No more 600 for me.
>>
>>2722835
I actually scored a flash unit that fits the x-cube socket at a thrift store. Nissin PF26 is the model. They show up on eBay once in awhile, usually for an atrocious price.
>>
>>2722304
Patience, man... stalk Craigslist, eBay, local flea markets, antique stores, and estate sales for awhile and you'll find a deal. I've owned a total of eight SX-70's and never paid more than $40 for one; I just got another Alpha off Chicago Clist for $35 shipped
>>
File: BwfCCpz (1).jpg (257 KB, 1235x1500) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
BwfCCpz (1).jpg
257 KB, 1235x1500
>>2722832
instacat bro!
>>
File: Instax001.jpg (573 KB, 1592x1000) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Instax001.jpg
573 KB, 1592x1000
I'd love to see what happens when you load Instax into a medium format camera. I'm not sure if the blurriness is entirely down to the crap lens or if the emulsion being squeezed as it's developed also plays a role.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePaint.NET v3.5.11
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width9191
Image Height5774
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Horizontal Resolution2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution2400 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2013:01:18 15:09:16
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1592
Image Height1000
>>
>>2723032
Despite crappie 300 camera, instax film shows some pretty fine detail.
>>2722989
Hate. Mint tells me depending on model different discount. Most I'm seeing is a lot of Sonar One steps for under 100$. Which I don't mind because it has the tripod hole which is neglible because I have the tripod mount/pola accessory kit.
It also has the tabs for the neck strap.
>>
>>2722989
Nicely framed. Could have had a good illusion going if not for the random Santa hat, though.
>>
>>2723032
Option8 is doing full-frame Instax backs for Polaroid's old roll film cameras, and the Mamiya Universal/Polaroid 600SE. Image quality I've seen from the 600SE is decent.
>>
>>2723737
Interestingggg
>>
File: instax1.1.jpg (136 KB, 640x591) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
instax1.1.jpg
136 KB, 640x591
>>2723737

>option8

Yep, they just graft a lomo belair instax back to the old roll film cameras. I will attempt to do this myself when the back gets here. I will post results if I dont fuck it up
>>
Found Instax Wide for 16.25$ Buying 150$ worthhhh.
>>
Sx70 or Spectra?
>>
>>2726124
SX-70 Alpha 1. More expensive and fragile; but better optics, easier to carry (fits in a large pocket), more film versatility (ND4 filters let you use 600 films), gets in close at 10.5" compared to about 1-2' with the Spectra, and a little wider aperture at f/8 compared to f/10. SLR670m conversion option is also nice.

You can adapt the Spectra's radio-based cable release to work with the SX-70 by changing the plugs, or build your own cable release for dirt cheap. The Spectra is otherwise a fancy 600-type camera with AF that shoots wider film - it's nice but not really anything special unless you find an Onyx or Image 1200 (one's just got fancy cosmetics, the other was a 2000s-modern version with a digital viewfinder).
>>
>>2727421
Well I ordered a sonar one step so we shall see. Was considering a Minolta branded spectra as it has glass lens?
>>
Impossible's based in my home town. Their film is subpar because they've bought Polaroid's machinery but did not get their formula so they've been developing their own from scratch.

Was told they're planning on releasing their own camera in 2016 when I was in their outlet buying some cheap(er) B-stock. They didn't have any details to share yet.
>>
>>2728051
The folding-type or the Pronto? If it's the folding type remember to always keep the camera closed when not in use, for some reason the sonar-equipped SLR's will always meter light when open and drain the battery after a few days. I've had other electrical gremlins with the few I owned.

Never played with the MIP so I can't compare; I imagine it's a bit sharper than the plastic lens, though.
>>
>>2724400

Attempted. I'm not sure how they get infinity focus as everything beyond about 12 feet is out of focus. Yes I tried moving the infinity stop all the way back and it's no good.

shit
>>
>>2729105
I have the folding Sonar Onestep.
The baby works, orignally bought it to trade into MiNt. However, the 80 I spent + the hong kong shipping fee doesn't merit the discount estimate. If I acquire a Minoltra pro I will discard one spectra System. I have about 6, 600Cameras I won't to clear out too. One Pronto that doesn't work. I really want the SLR670 but instax film is so much cheaper and I am, cosnidering the lomo instant wide. I'm really not holding out for for impossible's new camera because I'm certain it will be shit tier 600 model...
>>
>>2729102
I reccomend the BW2.0.
Wait for gen3.0 for BW.
I'm not buying color until the upgrade oficially matches BW2.0.
>>
>>2730277
I don't think Mint converts Sonars, anyway; only Model 1's and Alphas.
>>
>>2730638
They still take your trade in apparently, after all, they do sell other folding sx-70s
>>
>>2731041
Good to know. Maybe I can stock up a few for cheap and exchange them all for a 670m without putting much money down.
>>
>>2732270
i was thinking the same, however, my little research has led me to believe shipping to Hong Kong is expensive. I think some website said in the region of 70$.. Haven't bothered to research further.
>>
My BW2.0 film,.some of it shows signs of turning sepia = /
I dunno if this is emulsion problem,roller, or the film.
>>
>>2734376
It will develop a faint sepia tone over time - it's a film issue.
>>
File: 41.jpg (618 KB, 990x1272) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
41.jpg
618 KB, 990x1272
Polaroid film is fun.The fuji stuff is fantastic for the price. This is taken with a custom modded Pathfinder with an Packfilm back. Modding is really the best way to get good photos from most of these cameras.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2550
Image Height3507
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:07:06 19:58:48
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width990
Image Height1272
>>
File: img012.jpg (84 KB, 810x1205) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
img012.jpg
84 KB, 810x1205
got an instax 90 a few days ago. having a blast so far.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
>>
>tfw I started a polaroid collection in the mid 2000's before all the hipsters caught on
>now when people come into my house and see my (non-fixie) bicycles and massive collection of polaroids they just assume I'm one of those faggots
>>
>>2736156
your lifestyle got appropriated

how does it feel
>>
File: 4457.jpg (21 KB, 630x315) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
4457.jpg
21 KB, 630x315
I had one in the 90's as my only camera that I fucking loved. It wasn't a good one though. Bummed as shit when they stopped making film.

>>2736156
P.S. The hipsters had already caught on.
>>
>>2736156
I give the hipsters credit for keeping the format alive (money is money to Impossible and Fuji), but as far as it being against the social norm or whatever it just comes down to how you use and present it. There's a difference between being a Brooklyn trustfund fuck, who bought an overpriced "refurbished" OneStep as a fedora accessory to be the life of some hipster parties, and being a legit photog who shoots the format as a fun diversion. I dunno.
>>
got a sun 660 se at goodwill for like two dollars in immaculate condition

best film to throw in there and take some fun shots?
>>
>>2737803
https://shop.the-impossible-project.com/shop/film

all the colour films are the same, all the black and white films are the same, the only differences are the borders. get the cheapest borders imo

the black and white 2.0 film looks really impressive compared to their older attempts https://www.flickr.com/photos/patrickjclarke/16851134136
>>
>>2737812
Rad thanks for the info

How long does film like this last if on a shelf?
>>
>>2737818
there's a best if used by date on the boxes now, but years ago they recommended using it within a year of the manufacture date (which is no longer on the box, in favour of the best if used by date)

dan finnen said that he experienced defects after about 6 months of storage

keep it refrigerated, don't freeze it, and give it an hour after taking it out of the fridge
>>
>>2737861
Rad thanks for even more info

Gonna grab a pack to test this camera out with
>>
>>2737818
SX-70 film tends to last longer - I'm currently shooting 2014-made stock with excellent results.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 4.0 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution1200 dpi
Image Created2016:01:01 23:43:10
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3756
Image Height3824
>>
I'm still mad that bw2.0 turns sepia at top. I'm told it's some sort of felt that absorbs left over developer.
>>
Is there really no modern replicas with cheap film?
>>
>>2742075
I don't see what that would have to do with the sepia tones coming out later - if it's like their older stuff, there's probably still a chemical reaction going on long after the initial image has developed.

>>2742093
Instax Mini is about as close as it gets right now - packfilm compatibility with old Land Cameras is merely a fortunate coincidence, and Impossible is a niche brand.
>>
File: 600.jpg (53 KB, 720x720) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
600.jpg
53 KB, 720x720
>be me bored as hell
>dig into some old stuff in home
>found polaroid 600 that i had when i was kid
>feel nostalgic and happy at the same time
>time to take pics
>there is no film in it
>get suicidal
so any /film photographers/ here?
where can i get cheap ass films for polaroid?
also any advices with this kind of camera, tutorials, howtos are appreciated
>>
>>2742732
Film wouldn't have been good, anyway - either the battery would be dead or the developer pods dried-up.

Cheap-ass film doesn't exist, unfortunately. Impossible's stock runs you about $30 for a pack of 8 after shipping - however if you know where to look you can usually get free shipping which cuts it down to $24. Impossible has expired bags which have three random films for $40 which might help some. Expired Polaroid stock is garbage, these days.

OneSteps are pretty idiot-proof; stick film pack in, point, shoot, shade your color film while it develops (b/w you can watch develop like back in the day). Too dark, move slider left; too bright, move slider right. Don't bother with the sliding close-up lens, it just distorts your images.
>>
>>2708923
A beta of Color 600 just went out to Pioneers and members, they're calling it Color 3.0. Supposedly it develops in half the time.
>>
>>2718445
>Is this worth getting
>lomo
no
>>
Just ordered a Snap.

It looks like there's 2 levels of quality for the paper, at 50 cents a picture and 31 cents a picture. I got both to see what the difference is. Not a bad price for an instant photo, though I wish they were a bit bigger than 2x3.
>>
I recently acquired a Polaroid Snap, but I'm having trouble framing pictures with the viewfinder. Is this just an issue of the camera design itself?

I guess it's more of a point and hope toy camera than a point and shoot instant camera.
>>
I use a polaroid 350 rangefinder camera and would recommend it. you can't obtain the batteries which you need for the electronic meter and shutter but it's simple enough just to rewire a 9v battery socket into its place. You can then use fp-100c which is quite cheap considering its a negative positive colour film.
>>
File: 20160119_223534.jpg (4 MB, 5312x2988) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
20160119_223534.jpg
4 MB, 5312x2988
Copped at a thrift store for like 5 bucks out of impulse, I'm a newfag here w2c film for it?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-G900V
Camera SoftwareG900VVRU2BOK3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width5312
Image Height2988
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:01:19 22:35:33
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness-1.9 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length4.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5312
Image Height2988
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image IDF16QLHF01SB
>>
File: 120911-px600SAUTER.jpg (2 MB, 1890x1926) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
120911-px600SAUTER.jpg
2 MB, 1890x1926
>>2748420
Those still ran 4.5v cells, I think. I forget when and which models went to just 3v. You can still get the battery brand-new, but not easily or for a resonable cost. I take the 4x-AAA holder Radio Shack sells, jump a terminal to make 4.5v, remove some plastic from the battery compartment, and solder that in.

>>2748438
Impossible Project. The Sonar 660s were probably the best box-type 600 cameras Polaroid made. Pic-related was taken with one on older TIP stock.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 4.0 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution600 dpi
Vertical Resolution600 dpi
Image Created2011:12:09 15:56:02
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1890
Image Height1926
>>
File: inxtax_sp1_paris_02.jpg (289 KB, 2000x1333) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
inxtax_sp1_paris_02.jpg
289 KB, 2000x1333
I have pic related. The latest fuji cameras have Wifi and can wirelessly send pics to the printer, which fits perfectly in my back pocket. Great for parties and events where you can give copies of photos to qts.

Film is pretty expensive though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2000
Image Height1333
>>
>>2748903
can you print directly from the x100 to the instax without going through phone bullshit? that sounds pretty rad.
>>
>>2748903
Trying to decide between that or the Polaroid ZIP for on the fly prints from my a7ii.
>>
Meme camera
>>
>>2749229
yeah, from any fuji camera with wifi
>>
>>2749251

zink (zip) is cheaper and slightly larger size. Prints don't look as good and quickly deteriorate though

Instax is more expensive per film and but looks better. Since you don't have a fuji you don't get the direct to camera printing so it's a toss up IMO
>>
>>2749378
Neat. If I had friends or any sort of interaction with the opposite sex I'd probably get one.
Thread replies: 157
Thread images: 36
Thread DB ID: 461295



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.