Anonymous
Any good rangefinders (film or digital)? 2017-06-23 11:43:50 Post No.3100435
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Any good rangefinders (film or digital)? 2017-06-23 11:43:50 Post No.3100435
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: D3S_9991-1200.jpg (245KB, 1200x829px) Image search:
[Google]
245KB, 1200x829px
Any good rangefinders (film or digital)?
Anonymous
2017-06-23 11:43:50
Post No. 3100435
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hey anon,
I'm thinking of getting a decent rangefinder but I'm having trouble deciding between film/digital. I'll be using it mainly for street/ everyday photography and maybe some portrait too. I do not mind manual focusing or shooting film, but what am I not sure is which system is better at being discreet and unobtrusive while shooting. From the analog side, I'm thinking of Olympus SP 35 or Canonet QL17. I might consider the newer Fuji X-Pro/X100T as they seem to be pretty cheap for digital. I would prefer to have manual control over the camera in addition to auto modes (so that leaves several rangefinders out, e.g. Yashica Electro). Let me know if there's any other models you would recommend.
INB4 Get a Leica, too overpriced desu
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
61 Posts / 14 Images
View this topic
>>
File: ibpcgx12076.jpg (133KB, 550x436px) Image search:
[Google]
133KB, 550x436px
For street photography there's nothing better than this bad boy, professionals' choice, classic.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-H50 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3 dpi Vertical Resolution 3 dpi Image Created 2012:09:07 15:22:36 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 19.60 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1513 Image Height 1201 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
Konica hexar rf or zeiss ikon zm
>>
File: Canon_P.jpg (509KB, 1800x1350px) Image search:
[Google]
509KB, 1800x1350px
>>3100435
No film or digital camera is really invisible, unless it's a tiny spy camera. Best you can do is to carry something that looks quaint and nonthreatening. SP35 or QL17 should be fine, given their 35mm FL, as long as the camera is in good working order. But those were consumer cameras, so don't expect them to hold up to abuse.
Check out the Canon P/Canon 7. They're affordable, solid, and should be easy to find in good working order. Get a Canon or Voigtlander 35mm LTM lens to go with it. The 35mm framelines are hard to see on the P if you wear glasses, though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot G7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2008:08:19 16:49:00 Exposure Time 1/10 sec F-Number f/3.2 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 14.78 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1800 Image Height 1350 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
File: ghost-world-7-232387.jpg (124KB, 1200x795px) Image search:
[Google]
124KB, 1200x795px
So I'm about to launch my website in getting serious about photography
But I play to do all my work under a fictitious pen name based off a famous character.
I'm doing this becuase of my own personal experiences and anxiety also I feel my birth name isn't marketable brandwise.
So if I use a famous fictitious character as my name for my body of work do i have a chance of getting sued, also will it come across a still if I do this.
I also plan to release music under this moniker but photography will be my prime gig
Sorry if this seems silly to ask
54 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3099084
use a character that already is free of rights. like sherlock holmes or something. or maybe youre going to get sued by the owners of that gay tv show?
call yourself either something greek or latin. or a mispelled name of a famous photog/character.
>>
by the way, you dont want to look what 2017 thora birch looks like.
>>
Do you need the confidence of that fake name being a character? I would choose something simple but rememberable for a name and just go by that. Like ken or maybe jason.
File: Screenshot_20170620-101818.jpg (343KB, 1440x1398px) Image search:
[Google]
343KB, 1440x1398px
are you lads fans of Sasha greys photography. she's better than 95% of you lmao.
38 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
File: Screenshot_20170620-101740.jpg (598KB, 1220x1620px) Image search:
[Google]
598KB, 1220x1620px
>>3098717
>>
File: Screenshot_20170620-101634.jpg (1MB, 1240x1594px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1240x1594px
>>3098718
>>
File: sasha grey.jpg (29KB, 245x330px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 245x330px
File: @licht_affen.png (590KB, 800x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
590KB, 800x1280px
>Another Instagram thread?
Yes, post your Instagram and tell others which pic you liked the most. And what would you change about their pics
i'll start
> @licht_affen
119 Posts / 68 Images
View this topic
>>
do these threads have any use?
all i see are people posting their IGs but no replies or anything, just a string of dull IGs.
>>
>>3056656
sometimes you get the replies on DM directly on Instagram and no replies in the thread
>>
File: Screenshot_20170508-223146~01.png (3MB, 1440x1440px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 1440x1440px
Isn't there already one up?
https://www.instagram.com/ruijie.shao/
I feel like my posts are too inconsistent but idk how to fix that
File: 41CAC48F00000578-4642360-image-a-85_1498544320256.jpg (38KB, 634x357px) Image search:
[Google]
38KB, 634x357px
Why can I only take good creative pictures when I'm high on marijuana?
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3104108
drugs affect different people different ways.
Some people are more creative when high on cannabis.
Also the amount you use and the frequency of usage are factors; getting too high can be a obstacle when trying to focus on creative endeavors
>>
>>3104108
Delete this. Based Tay Tay would never do weed
>>
>>3104124
She fucks niggers though. Remember this post. She will get a black bf and totally change her sound. Screencap this.
File: Karl_schwarzschild.portrait.jpg (139KB, 432x600px) Image search:
[Google]
139KB, 432x600px
Hi,
Im on my way to taking nightphotography and longtime exposures. Now there's my problem with the >Schwarzschild effect<. I have 2 time compensation, one for ilford and one for kodak portra.
Ilford:
1 s - 2 s
2 s - 5 s
4 s - 10 s
8 s - 30 s
15 s - 60 s
30 s - 3 m
45 s - 5 m
60 s - 10 m
???
5 m - 3 h
Kodak Portra:
1 s - 2 s
2 s - 4 s
4 s - 8 s
8 s - 20 s
15 s - 40 s
30 s - 90 s
45 s - 180 s
60 s - 240 s
Can someone pursue and/or give me other tables for other films like fuji?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2015:11:30 00:38:13
7 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3103919
what the fuck.
just leave the shutter open until it feels right to close it duh.
>>
File: 8TGbAgbEc.jpg (76KB, 327x327px) Image search:
[Google]
76KB, 327x327px
>>3103920
Serious?
>>
>>3103921
works everytime. always get TOP images.
Anonymous
Perspective transformation 2017-06-28 01:09:51 Post No.3103870
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Perspective transformation 2017-06-28 01:09:51 Post No.3103870
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: P1020914.jpg (596KB, 1000x669px) Image search:
[Google]
596KB, 1000x669px
Perspective transformation
Anonymous
2017-06-28 01:09:51
Post No. 3103870
[Report]
[View this topic]
Is the perspective edit in this picture an improvement?
Why, or why not?
(original in next post)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-LX100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 67 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:06:28 15:01:42 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Fine Weather Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 30.40 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
7 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
File: P1020914-2.jpg (601KB, 1000x669px) Image search:
[Google]
601KB, 1000x669px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-LX100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 67 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:06:28 15:02:24 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Fine Weather Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 30.40 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
File: P1010253.jpg (156KB, 1044x764px) Image search:
[Google]
156KB, 1044x764px
>>3103874
Would you say it's an improvement in every scenario?
I want to start a discussion on this "rule" that seems to be set in stone (at least on /p/).
When looking at perfect or near-perfect photos of this style (pic related) i find myself focusing almost solely on following the lines and trying to find imperfections.
Does not the focus on geometry and straight lines take away focus from other elements of the picture?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-LX100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 40 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:03:09 20:58:47 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 17.90 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
>>3103870
I see no difference
File: zeiss-otus-lenses-feature-high-quality-workmanship.jpg (199KB, 980x796px) Image search:
[Google]
199KB, 980x796px
No one ever looked at an Henri Cartier-Bresson print and said "Look how sharp it is!"
36 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
Composition and subject matter is a stupid normie meme.
All that matters is the detail and quality of a photo
If I see a model, and you can't discern individual Poor's and ultra fine details, it's shit, no questions. The whole point of photography is the raw capability of the lens and Canon body working in unison to make a fantastically detailed picture, and that's all that matters
Fuck Sony and Fuji, Nikon is ok if your poor.
>>
>>3103655
no one ever has said the same about you either.
>>
>>3103660
Wait, do you mean no one has said that my prints are sharp or that no one has ever said about me that it(referring to me) looks sharp?
File: nikon logo.png (126KB, 952x952px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 952x952px
Hi /p/ !
I'm more a Canon guy, but would like to know the logic behind the nikons...
I know that on EOS, the smallest, the better.
EOS 1, better than EOS 5, better than EOS 50, better than EOS 500, better than EOS 1000 , one friend told me the logic behind Nikon but I forgot. Can anyone tell me which SLR model is best/good/bad ? (Not DSLR)
Thanks !
7 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
less digits = better tier, just like canon, but within the lower digits, highest number = better camera
eg d3xxx < d5xxx < d7xxx
d6xx < d7xx < d8xx
d3 < d4 < d5
ashe thing with film
>>
>>3102769
Super ! Thanks !
>>
File: Rfbpjfy.jpg (966KB, 3280x2638px) Image search:
[Google]
966KB, 3280x2638px
Where do you draw the line in street photography?
At least legally in the US, if a person has no reasonable expectation that any part of themselves won't be seen in public, then everything is fair game (this definition bars upskirts, since people do have a reasonable expectation of not being viewed up their skirt).
It's okay for me to see you and everything you do in public with my eyes, but the moment it's recorded it suddenly becomes abhorrent? Perhaps it does, perhaps it doesn't, I'm curious what you guys think about this subject as photographers.
6 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3102350
Where I live a person in public has no right to privacy. A bar, restaurant or store is not considered a public place. But the streets are. Also anyplace that can be seen from the street ( front yard and so forth) is considered to be in public.
>>
I draw the line right at the very beginning of street photography, since it's a played-out genre with nothing new to say. It's just a sad, dead genre that is literally just a soulless, rote imitation of the habits, rituals and ideas of great artists from long ago.
It's kind of like wearing a studded leather jacket and trying to be the most punk all the way up here in 2017. Those poor kids don't even know why they do it, but they feel like they ought to.
>>
>>3102350
>It's okay for me to see you and everything you do in public with my eyes, but the moment it's recorded it suddenly becomes abhorrent?
This should be obvious but the difference is that if you see something it's a private moment. Only the people present at that time see what you do in public, they can then only tell others about it who can choose to believe you or not and if it's nothing significant you will probably forget about it. But if it's recorded everyone, even the people who were not present at that time, can see it.
File: GR006263.jpg (1MB, 1100x850px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1100x850px
Australian Facades: The Remix.
New and Old.
As always the unholy Trinity: Rich GR / VSCO / White Borders.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1000 Image Height 750 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:06:23 16:15:55 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness 8.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1100 Image Height 850 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
32 Posts / 26 Images
View this topic
>>
File: GR003341-2.jpg (543KB, 1100x748px) Image search:
[Google]
543KB, 1100x748px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 21 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1000 Image Height 648 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:06:23 16:08:31 Exposure Time 1/750 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness 9.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 13.70 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1100 Image Height 748 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>
File: GR003421.jpg (557KB, 1100x724px) Image search:
[Google]
557KB, 1100x724px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 21 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1000 Image Height 624 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi Image Created 2016:01:19 18:58:14 Exposure Time 1/750 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 9.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 13.70 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1100 Image Height 724 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>
File: GR006270.jpg (1MB, 1100x1022px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1100x1022px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1000 Image Height 922 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:06:23 16:16:18 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Brightness 8.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1100 Image Height 1022 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
File: IMG_0129.gif (4MB, 320x240px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 320x240px
>/p/ 2008-2014
>always more than 5 photo threads
>quality shitposts
>meet ups
>non summerfaggotry
>anon is a photographer
>/p/ now
>4 photographers' threads 3 of which are tripfags
>catsby has 3 threads in attempt to kill the newfag tier gearfaggotry shitposts
>isi threads are dying from the shit tastes of new anons
>sugar is still alive
>anon has 1 photo thread
>everyone else is on youtube drama
>"""""""""""what should i buy now that this brand is dead"""""""""""
>"""""""""""how is this ONE shot /p/"""""""""""
>"""""""""""MUH IMAGE QUALITY"""""""""""
>even burke is gone
this is a sign, someone make a new /p/
75 Posts / 12 Images
View this topic
>>
Maybe you should post in my photo thread instead of trying to bump it off page 10 with yet another shit thread
>>
>>3100180
link
>>
new /p/ here AMA
File: Screenshot_20170623-162345.jpg (734KB, 1440x1856px) Image search:
[Google]
734KB, 1440x1856px
What do you call this kind of photo?
19 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
shit
>>
>>3100721
The photographer saw SOMETHING. Inside of every bad or mediocre shot is the potential for a good shot. Something motivated the shooter to snap it, but in this case I'd say they didn't quite capture the essence they were hoping to.
>>
File: img037.jpg (481KB, 1000x714px) Image search:
[Google]
481KB, 1000x714px
>>3100721
I don't even know, and that's like half of the shots I enjoy taking. It's kinda landscapes with a little bit of still life thrown in? But this particular shot you could call almost okay, kinda boring, kinda decent colors, kinda awkward shadow.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6645 Image Height 4853 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Created 2017:01:15 18:26:04 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 714
Anonymous
/rpt/ - Recent photo thread 2017-06-23 08:04:38 Post No.3100701
[Report] Image search: [Google]
/rpt/ - Recent photo thread 2017-06-23 08:04:38 Post No.3100701
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: P1040408 TWO.jpg (703KB, 1618x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
703KB, 1618x1000px
/rpt/ - Recent photo thread
Anonymous
2017-06-23 08:04:38
Post No. 3100701
[Report]
[View this topic]
New thread, old one: >>3098013
Post recent or not-so-recent photos, give criticism and try to not be a cockhead about either.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-G7 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2017:06:12 00:35:48 Exposure Time 1/3200 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1618 Image Height 1000 Exposure Mode Auto Image Quality Unknown White Balance Auto Focus Mode Manual Spot Mode Unknown Image Stabilizer Off Macro Mode Normal Shooting Mode Aperture Priority Audio No Flash Bias 0.00 EV
270 Posts / 151 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMG_20170208_195425-01.jpg (210KB, 679x1239px) Image search:
[Google]
210KB, 679x1239px
Forgot I had this one on my phone. Why not.
>>
File: tuxpi.com.1497521237.jpg (447KB, 813x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
447KB, 813x1200px
>>3100701
From last week. Got up at 400 am for it, worth it. Haven't shot too much lately, due to work, but that's all over now.
>>
File: T0TCGnF.jpg (471KB, 1000x669px) Image search:
[Google]
471KB, 1000x669px
a hopeless sigishit until I get all my film scanned.
Anonymous
Best process for skin retouching many photos fast 2017-06-22 12:53:30 Post No.3099921
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Best process for skin retouching many photos fast 2017-06-22 12:53:30 Post No.3099921
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: unnamed.png (454KB, 660x439px) Image search:
[Google]
454KB, 660x439px
Best process for skin retouching many photos fast
Anonymous
2017-06-22 12:53:30
Post No. 3099921
[Report]
[View this topic]
Is there a tool where I can just select the area of the photo and soften all colours that are in the range of human skin? I want to be able to quickly soften skin on, say, 100 images. When I use Lightroom's skin softening brush, it takes minimum a couple minutes per face, per photo, and if it's a complicated one can take up to 10-15 minutes.
What is a better way to do this with either Lightroom or Photoshop? A youtube tutorial would be very much appreciated.
24 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3099921
automatic skin 'softening' always looks like ass
take your time to dodge and burn
100 pictures are roughly 50 hours if you want to do it right, that's just the way it is. that's why 100 pictures is not an amount you want to hand over for any kind of shoot that involves edited skin
>>
You can use layers in photoshop.
>>
Portraiture plugin for Photoshop.
>>3099922
>automatic skin 'softening' always looks like ass
Sure if you're a retard who don't use layers and eraser.