I am incapable, please help me out.
I was trying to take star pictures but failed miserably and only noticed once I got back. I only have a kit 18-55mm lens.
But I'm not sure what my mistakes were: I used around 2000 ISO, lowest focal, and about 20s shutter. But they turned out complete crap.
Please tell me everything I did wrong.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 738 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:07:22 19:43:29 Exposure Time 25 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 6400 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>3119033
Your EXIF says the ISO was 6400 which explains your problem. Turn down your ISO a bit, stop down a bit so that stars will be in focus and not just the clouds (you only need to stop down so far on a wide-angle before the focus becomes infinity), and up the shutter speed so it's all exposed properly.
You'll probably need a tripod if you have to slow the shutter speed that much. If you don't, keep the ISO high up and just stop down until the pic isn't over-exposed.
And once you're bored of working your ass off to take some dull shot of the star pic a real subject. And don't be afraid to use the programed modes, the mark of the newbie is using full manual for no good reason
>>3119033
Go research astrophotography.
>>3119033
Use the 500 rule for maximum exposure time without star trails. That means divide 500 by the focal length of your lens so if you're using a 12mm, 500/12= 41s max exposure.
Now with that kind of exposure time you can probably get away with 1600iso or maybe even 1200.
Shoot in raw and turn off noise reduction.
Open your RAW in darktable or even perhaps ACR. If you're in ACR goto sharpening and under noise reduction increase Luminance to about 25 and luminance detail to about 35. That should help smooth out some of the noise while preserving detail.
Another thing is you can't just point it at the sky and expect great results. The sky needs to be clear, also find out what time galactic center rises (if you use an iphone you can ask siri) or get the photo pills app and it will show you an augmented reality overlay of when and where the milky way will be when you're shooting.
Put those things together and you'll make a more interesting photo.
I got these two large camera lenses at a yardsale /p/. One of them was a made in japan kowa 1:1.2/81mm. This other lens looks to be about 81mm as well give or take a bit but it has no labels or manufacturer marks of any kind. It also has a 4 hole flange like the Kowa. I'll post a bunch of pics of the unknown lens hopefully someone will know what it is haha.
ITT: best photo you have ever seen
I'll start
>>3118637
Still waiting OP...
>>3118644
Where's yours?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Unknown Image Width 1600 Image Height 1087
Would you buy a Nikon version of Sony RX1 with smaller/sharper lens and better sensor processing?
>>3118631
I have a feeling that Sony will be the first to make a version of Sony RX1 with smaller/sharper lens and better sensor processing
>>3118632
I have a feeling this Nikon patent is more vaporwave than the DL line.
>>3118631
IT'S-A RISKY-A GAMBURU!
How can I take a photo with this exact same kind of lighting and colors?
>>3118418
Don't, that looks shitty
i can't believe vanity fair even bothered putting a mark on that
>>3118418
shoot 2 stops underexposed surrounded by white marble so that the little light you have is bouncing everywhere. spritz down your model for the extra glow
Do I lack creative skill in my photography? Regarding angles-light?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS Rebel T6 Camera Software VSCO Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:02:11 09:05:47 Exposure Time 1/4000 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/4.6 Exposure Bias -2.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 33.00 mm Comment Processed with VSCO with 4 preset Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1280 Image Height 1920 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3118227
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS Rebel T6 Camera Software VSCO Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:07:03 09:38:03 Exposure Time 1/2000 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.6 Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Comment Processed with VSCO with tk preset Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1280 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3118228
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS Rebel T6 Camera Software VSCO Maximum Lens Aperture f/7.1 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:07:10 20:32:00 Exposure Time 1/3200 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias -2 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 250.00 mm Comment Processed with VSCO with q2 preset Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1280 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3118229
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS Rebel T6 Camera Software VSCO Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:07:03 05:34:52 Exposure Time 1/20 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/4.6 Exposure Bias -2.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Comment Processed with VSCO with 4 preset Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1280 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
B&H general discussion
do you shop there?
no doubt B&H is killing the local camera store but it is hard to not order from them when they are cheaper, have everything in stock, and it gets to your door faster than you can order the item from the local guys.
>caring about the local guys
Its their fault for being to stupid to sell things cheaper
>>3118090
>do you shop there?
No
Hey, /p/ can you tell me where did I fuck up this image, I feel something's off
its very cluttered. idk, kinda boring too. just a big clock tower and some houses.
>>3117713
Law of thirds, tower should be more to the right, and you should have had a lower angle on it, to include more sky for the top third.
>>3117771
Thank you
Why don't I see Canon get mentioned more when it comes to mirrorless discussions?
>more ergonomic Sony with better lens line-up for those who don't wanna roll with Fuji
>larger sensor than M43 if that matters to you
>decent pricing
>>3117629
hm, don't know. looks pretty cute, though.
didn't even realize Canon had a mirrorless kek. their marketing department needs to hire some shills or something
>>3117629
>more ergonomic sony
Not really, roughly the same.
>more lenses than Fuji
Not even close, there is one good EF-M lens.
Would you recommend them?
No. Expensive. Small sensor size, poor image quality. Might as well buy a cheap dslr for same price.
Unless you want that 100x zoom for god knows what.
>>3117610
I just sold my Coolpix b700 and got a Canon 70d, to be fair the camera is not bad for beginners but it sucks on manual and the sensor is too small to zoom in the pictures
The superzoom Nikon bridge camera can see Saturn without some expensive gross oversized tele
Tbh it's better than most dslr cameras
Developed a few rolls. Critique and comment please :3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Zoran Corporation Camera Model COACH Camera Software GIMP 2.8.22 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4064 dpi Vertical Resolution 4064 dpi Image Created 2017:07:15 17:04:25 Exposure Time 1481089/16777216 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 0 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Exposure Index 1
>>3116400
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Zoran Corporation Camera Model COACH Camera Software GIMP 2.8.22 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4064 dpi Vertical Resolution 4064 dpi Image Created 2017:07:15 17:03:23 Exposure Time 1481089/16777216 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 0 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Exposure Index 1
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Zoran Corporation Camera Model COACH Camera Software GIMP 2.8.22 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4064 dpi Vertical Resolution 4064 dpi Image Created 2017:07:15 17:54:37 Exposure Time 1481089/16777216 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 0 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Exposure Index 1
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Zoran Corporation Camera Model COACH Camera Software GIMP 2.8.22 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4064 dpi Vertical Resolution 4064 dpi Image Created 2017:07:15 17:49:06 Exposure Time 1481089/16777216 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 0 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Exposure Index 1
How good of a picture can I expect to take with this? I'm looking to get into film.
Its an instant snapshit printer!
>>3116303
Use 35mm if you're actually being serious
>>3116310
>if you're actually being serious
>Seriously thinking there is a chance of OP being serious
Why get digital camera when you can just use your phone. Film camera plus phone is best combo.
>>3116028
Why would you even use film? My grandpa even knows it's fucking garbage
>>3116034
Because it looks infinitely better than digital. I use my phone to snap a few shots before I take the serious picture with my film camera.
>>3116042
>Because it looks infinitely better than digital.
Fucking HILARIOUS
NYC /p/ field trip when?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T1i Camera Software Digital Photo Professional Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2011:11:03 15:17:17 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/3.5 ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4752 Image Height 3168 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
As much fun as it sounds to meet 4chan weirdos irl, I'm sure most of you are just socially awkward losers who'll keep your eyes on your viewfinders and refuse to talk to anyone the whole time
I go there every once in a while from my home in TN...IDGAF who hangs out with me.
>>3115430
wrong again idiot
How to photograph big blubberry fat girls?
>>3114751
There's actually quite a few guides for this on youtube,
A...
growing market
ifyouwill
With this lens.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Digital Camera X-T1 Ver4.30 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 90 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016-06-27T15:47:30-04:00 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/10.0 Brightness -4.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 60.00 mm Image Width 1200 Image Height 893 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>3114751
> How to photoshop big blueberry fat girls?