Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 52. page

File: _DSF8934.jpg (429KB, 664x1000px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 664x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _DSF8946.jpg (457KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 1000x664px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _DSF8947.jpg (386KB, 664x1000px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 664x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

What body you using?

>>3122124
Minolta XD-7 for films and a Nex 7 with an adapter for digital.

>>3122123
Can't find a direct comparison but you can see the Olympus measurements here http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=section&id=10&Itemid=97
And compare to some other Minoltas like the 58 1.2 mc

>>3121981
to preview the dof

To preview your DoF you dingus.

>>3121981
I'm willing to bet OP puts the paerture at its widest to test the DoF preview.

Just get a nikon 1 or a BMPCC and stop being such a hipster. Unless you're literally Pablo Larrain there is absolutely no reason to shoot such small format film.

>>3121862
a few c mount lenses cover APS-C with minimal vignetting

>>3121924
>BMPCC
I hadn't heard of this one. I've been looking for something smartphone sized but high quality.

>>3121453
Kill your self. Wtf post processing did you do? Looks terrible. Oh vsco. Yeah kys.

>Equipment Make: Apple
>Camera Model: iPhone
>Camera Software: VSCO

>>3121453
What's the story you're trying to tell? What's the subject of this photograph?

>compactness
>overheating
>battery issues
>would need better internals to compensate for larger sensor
>niche market
>the average user can't tell how bad image quality is on phone cameras anyway

>>3121322
Yes, please put a 135 sized sensor on my phone so I now have a 6" 2 lbs 20mm lens hanging off of it.

People flip out about camera bumps as is, I doubt they're going to get bigger.

Probably 1-5 bucks

Not worth anything d e s u

File: 20170713_201325.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

>>3121038
Oh you would be surprised lmao. Just sold this Fuji dl200 for $50.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G920W8
Camera Software	G920W8VLU5DQD4
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5312
Image Height	2988
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:13 20:13:25
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/1.9
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Brightness	-0.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5312
Image Height	2988
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	A16LSIA00VM A16LSJL02SM_

>>3121043

ReeeeeEeeeeee dont make money off hipsters theyre richer and better than you reeeeeeeee!!!!!

>>3120829
lol shitty photos

I find that some of the photos on r/analog are amazing. But often I find that bad photos get 100s of upvotes rising to the top. Then when I constructively criticise these bad photos everyone gets butthurt.

>>3120830
>>3120838
Literally this. All of the good photos are on page 3 with like 5 updicks. Or maybe I just have shit taste.

>>3120071
Well first of all, do you even have bears where you live?

Second of all, they probably wouldn't go where you are if they could smell you. Humans are the worst and pretty much every animal around agrees.

>>3120074
yeah i have bears, deer, racoons, i saw a bobcat the other day. I just want to see what comes out because there is a lot on the mountain i didn't think was there.

>>3120071
>thinking of setting up some sort of bait
>Am I in any danger?

you bet!
this is highly illegal in many places and frowned upon in most others. if a game warden comes by expect a heavy fine, they don't care if you are shooting animals with a camera or a rifle when it comes to baiting and you could even face a poaching charge. what could be even worse is a die hard naturalist catches you baiting and boot fucks you in the woods.

by all means hang out in a blind and wait, time is the biggest price of hunting / nature photography. putting the time in will also earn you the respect of other nature guys / hunters, IE the only people other than you that will care about your photos.

File: bike.jpg (665KB, 2878x1921px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 2878x1921px

>>3119892
These are shot on a variety of films, but most photos were shot on Kodak 200, with an Olympus or a contax.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:23 22:41:44
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: mohawk.jpg (782KB, 2606x1740px) Image search: [Google]

782KB, 2606x1740px

>>3119892

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:23 22:44:10
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3119892
bump

>falling for the smartphone meme

>>3118965
What kind of phone do you use? A Razer?

File: DMC-CM1.jpg (876KB, 1600x1268px) Image search: [Google]

876KB, 1600x1268px

Checkmate.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5616
Image Height	3744
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015:01:12 17:00:02
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/22.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	84.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1268
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 0e0db8c3a94ff119bf199cc05e11e6c6.png (364KB, 596x446px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 596x446px

I am a shitty photographer, but here ya go

File: 32466314755_4a1059f0a4_b.jpg (424KB, 1024x670px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 1024x670px

i have way too many shots of trees

File: 32344923351_acfba58bfd_b.jpg (424KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 1024x680px

>>3119958
so im gonna dump them i guess

Street photography is a shitty meme and I would advise you to avoid it.

I'm not USA but I assume it's similar law wise in that you have no right to privacy in a public place, including photographs. Once you get in a private mall or something things change a little.

If you're worried about peoples reactions start by focusing on architecture, graffiti, traffic lights etc and work your way down until you feel comfortable a little invisible in your area.

Not sure but I assume NYC would have a few tough guys who'd confront you if you shot their photo. It's legal but not really "ok" as in just not cricket in a lot of places to just walk up to someone and tsk tsk tsk in their face. If you're subtle and not too close and not a fucking creep talking upskirts you should be fine most of the time.

That being said some people do enjoy the small interactions (from what I've heard), so trying to start a small chat and ask if you can take a few snaps is ok if the feel is right, but you're no longer shooting street photography at this point its just a portrait and probably a shitty one.

I can't recommend any reading or people to follow because street photography is a shitty meme and you should stick to getting your other shoots instead if you want to get better at photography. Practise composure exposure etc on an inanimate object until you've got it down so you have less to worry about with a model. From there the best advice I can give is have something in mind, if it's just a few certain shots for the area your in, or a certain feel. Something that's fun is to get some bonding in with your model before actually shooting. Take a few more candid shots of them flipping you off and making a stupid face, ask them if they can do a handstand or something. Will lighten the mode and relax both of you. Will keep the camera in their mind, but make them less afraid of it.

>>3118164
I might add a good place to start to feel more at home shooting around people is taking your shit to a place where photography is something everyone does and start there before you move into just the street. So like, fucking I dunno, fairs, festivals, the zoo etc.

File: DSC_0295.jpg (141KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1000x667px

>>3118164
>ask if you can take a few snaps
Nah, that would ruin the point. Then they're just a model, and like you said, probably a shitty one.

The point is to capture people acting normal, not mugging for the camera. Perfect example is this pic; I felt bad for taking it and so bought some food for the couple and asked to take more. The shots I took after were fucking atrocious.

As for >>3118172 you're right, a good chunk of my library is from parades, but I'm talking more candid stuff like pic related.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3400
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows)
Photographer	TB Johnson (@tbjson)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	800
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	150 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:21 02:48:58
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/4.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Exposure Bias	2.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

it was a different time.

His entire body of work is the same unflattering, blurred, candid portrait over and over again.
There is no variation in his work, and his style got old for me fast.
>I don't care about the photo looking nice
>muh capturing the chaos
>muh capturing all the LIFE around me
>muh characters! I find characters!
It's not deep.
It's not meaningful.
It's just being a nuisance.

I feel like good street photographers are so rare. Most fall into the abundant clichés of the genre like homeless peoples' wrinkly faces.
And almost all have some sense of unwarranted self-importance.

>>3117741
i agree with you, lots of street togs end up replicating the same style thats been done before which is not
entirely bad, but it also hinders your creative ability to shoot with your own style and instead keep replicating the same shots over and over again.

does anyone know of any good street photographer to study up on?